As per the sonar logs, I see that sonar first runs the sensors, then the decorators and then stores the analysis results to the database. Is is possible to access analysis results in a sonar plugin?
Thanks
The Sonar web application is available at localhost:9000 (or wherever it's installed).
There is also a plugin for Eclipse to view issues:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/SonarQube+in+Eclipse
I finally found a solution to my problem here.
http://sonarqube.15.x6.nabble.com/sonar-dev-Where-can-I-find-new-issue-information-on-sonar-db-td5021022.html
// this annotation is important to be sure that relevant data on issues are up-to-date.
#DependsUpon(DecoratorBarriers.ISSUES_TRACKED)
public final class MyDecorator implements Decorator {
private final ResourcePerspectives perspectives;
public TechnicalDebtDecorator(ResourcePerspectives perspectives) {
this.perspectives = perspectives;
}
public void decorate(Resource resource, DecoratorContext context) {
Issuable issuable = perspectives.as(Issuable.class, resource);
if (issuable != null) {
List<Issue> issues = issuable.issues();
// Issue has method isNew()
}
}
}
Related
The thing is on production servers we got mapping for Elasticsearch with dynamic set to strict. Currently, we use a rest level client to communicate with Elastisearch, however, we would like to migrate to spring-data-elasticsearch.
Unfortunately, it seems spring data force to use either _class or #TypeAlias which also interfere with the mapping itself. Is any way to use spring-data without _class or #TypeAlias?
Ok I have found a workaround for it.
Be aware of using it when your elasticsearch model uses inheritance.
To solve this problem create class like this:
public class CustomMappingEsConverter extends MappingElasticsearchConverter {
public CustomMappingEsConverter(MappingContext<? extends ElasticsearchPersistentEntity<?>, ElasticsearchPersistentProperty> mappingContext, GenericConversionService conversionService) {
super(mappingContext, conversionService);
}
#Override
public Document mapObject(#Nullable Object source) {
Document target = Document.create();
if (source != null) {
this.write(source, target);
}
target.remove("_class"); // << workaround to remove those _class field in elasticsearch
return target;
}
}
And register the bean:
#Configuration
public class MappingEsConfiguration {
#Bean
#Primary
public CustomMappingEsConverter CustomMappingElasticsearchConverter(MappingContext<? extends ElasticsearchPersistentEntity<?>, ElasticsearchPersistentProperty> mappingContext,
GenericConversionService genericConversionService) {
return new CustomMappingEsConverter(mappingContext, genericConversionService);
}
}
After this changes I was able to use spring data without additional field _class.
Currently this is not possible. There is an open issue for that.
Edit 25.04.2021:
this feature will be available from the next version (4.3) on.
I'm using mvvmcross version 6.4.1 to develop an app for IOS, Android, and WPF.
I've searched all over for my to use plugins. There seems to be no code examples. The documentation said to install the nuget in both my core and ui application projects. Which I did. Is there any special IOC registration/setup/or loading that needs to be done before I can use the plugin and how do I go about using the plugin? Do they get injected in the constructor or Do I have to manually pull them from the IOC container or new () them up.
I've installed nuget for the File plugin into my WPF UI and Core project. I added the IMvxFileStore to one of my core project's service constructor thinking it automagically gets added to the DI container, but it doesn't seem to get injected.
namespace My.Core.Project.Services
{
public class SomeService : ISomeService
{
private IMvxFileStore mvxFileStore;
public SomeService(IMvxFileStore mvxFileStore)
{
this.mvxFileStore = mvxFileStore;
}
public string SomeMethod(string somePath)
{
mvxFileStore.TryReadTextFile(somePath, out string content);
return content;
}
}
}
App.xaml.cs
using MvvmCross.Core;
using MvvmCross.Platforms.Wpf.Views;
...
public partial class App : MvxApplicatin
{
protected override void RegisterSetup()
{
this.RegisterSetupType<Setup<Core.App>>();
}
}
App.cs
using MvvmCross;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Core.Project.Services;
public class App: MvxApplication
{
public override void Initialize()
{
Mvx.IocProvider.RegisterType<ISomeService, SomeService>();
RegisterCustomAppStart<AppStart>();
}
}
AppStart.cs
using MvvmCross.Exceptions;
using MvvmCross.Navigation;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Core.Project.ViewModels;
using System;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
....
public class AppStart : MvxAppStart
{
public AppStart(IMvxApplication application, IMvxNavigationService navigationService) : base(application, navigationService)
{}
public override Task NavigateToFirstViewModel(object hint = null)
{
try {
return NavigationService.Navigate<FirstPageViewModel>();
} catch {
throw e.MvxWrap("Some error message {0}", typeof(FirstPageViewModel).Name);
}
}
}
Setup.cs in WPF project
using MvvmCross;
using MvvmCross.Base;
using MvvmCross.Platforms.Wpf.Core;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.File;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.Json;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Wpf.Project.Services;
...
public class Setup<T> : MvxWpfSetup
{
public Setup() : base() {}
protected override IMvxApplication CreateApp()
{
return new Core.App();
}
protected override void InitializeFirstChange()
{
base.InitializeFirstChange();
Mvx.IocProvider.RegisterType<ISomeWpfSpecificService>(() => new SomeWpfSpecificService());
}
protected override void InitializeLastChange()
{
base.InitializeLastChange();
}
}
I'm expecting my service to load but instead, I get the error message
MvxIoCResolveException: Failed to resolve parameter for parameter mvxJsonConverter of type IMvxJsonConverter
NOTE: I get the same error message for both File and Json plugin, The plugin that gets listed first in the constructor gets the error message when the app trys to load.
Am I properly using or loading the plugin?
UPDATE: I manually registered the Plugins in the UI Setup.cs and it is working but I am not sure if this is the proper way to do it.
WPF UI project Setup.cs
using MvvmCross;
using MvvmCross.Base;
using MvvmCross.Platforms.Wpf.Core;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.File;
using MvvmCross.Plugin.Json;
using MvvmCross.ViewModels;
using My.Wpf.Project.Services;
...
public class Setup<T> : MvxWpfSetup
{
public Setup() : base() {}
protected override IMvxApplication CreateApp()
{
return new Core.App();
}
protected override void InitializeFirstChange()
{
base.InitializeFirstChange();
Mvx.IocProvider.RegisterType<ISomeWpfSpecificService>(() => new SomeWpfSpecificService());
Mvx.IoCProvider.RegisterType<IMvxFileStore, MvxFileStoreBase>();
Mvx.IoCProvider.RegisterType<IMvxJsonConverter, MvxJsonConverter>();
}
protected override void InitializeLastChange()
{
base.InitializeLastChange();
}
}
Yes you are using the plugin properly and I think that for now your solution to manually register your plugin is viable.
The root of the problem is located in the MvxSetup class. This class contains the method LoadPlugins which is responsible for loading the MvvmCross plugins which are referenced by your UI project. This is how LoadPlugins determines what plugins to load:
Get all assemblies that have been loaded into the execution context of the application domain.
Find types within these assemblies which contain the MvxPluginAttribute.
Now the problem occurs in step 1. In a .NET framework project, by default, your referenced assemblies won't be loaded into the execution context until you actually use them in your code. So if you don't use something from your MvvmCross.Plugin.File reference in your UI project it won't be loaded into your execution context and it won't be found in step 1 and thus it won't be registered by LoadPlugins. (good read: when does a .NET assembly Dependency get loaded)
One way I have tested this is by doing this:
protected override void InitializeFirstChance()
{
// Because a type of the MvvmCross.Plugin.File.Platforms.Wpf reference is
// used here the assembly will now get loaded in the execution context
var throwaway = typeof(Plugin);
base.InitializeFirstChance();
}
With the above code you don't have to manually register the Plugin.
There has been a pull request to fix this in the MvvmCross framework but this has been reverted later since it caused problems on other platforms.
In other platforms the plugin assemblies will get loaded into the execution context without any tricks so I would say updating the MvvmCross documentation stating you have to register your plugin manually for WPF would be useful for other developers in the future.
My application is a restful api and its integrated with Swagger and OpenAPI.
I have generated all Java stubs using OpenAPI YAML file and everything is working fine.
But when i try o drill down model objects on Swagger then it cannot locate some of objects although there are part of project as project compiles fine.
As shown in below screenshot, drilldown fails to locate COnfiguration object.
Any ideas on how to resolve this.
Edit:
I have a restful webservice and i generate all the java stubs [Data transfer objects] from a YAML file using openapi-generator plugin. This plugin automatically generates a class OpenAPIDocumentationConfig and following are the details of the class. After this setup, models are automatically generated in Swagger UI.
Also want to add that I am using OpenAPI 3.0 but i need to split Object definitions into multiple files. So i am referring to them using definitions as i don't believe component schemas can be split into multiple files.
#Configuration
#EnableSwagger2
public class OpenAPIDocumentationConfig {
ApiInfo apiInfo() {
return new ApiInfoBuilder()
.title("ABC Service")
.description("ABC Service")
.license("")
.licenseUrl("http://unlicense.org")
.termsOfServiceUrl("")
.version("1.0.0")
.contact(new Contact("","", "xyz#abc.com"))
.build();
}
#Bean
public Docket customImplementation(ServletContext servletContext, #Value("${openapi.studioVALService.base-path:}") String basePath) {
return new Docket(DocumentationType.SWAGGER_2)
.select()
.apis(RequestHandlerSelectors.basePackage("com.x.y.z"))
.build()
.pathProvider(new BasePathAwareRelativePathProvider(servletContext, basePath))
.directModelSubstitute(java.time.LocalDate.class, java.sql.Date.class)
.directModelSubstitute(java.time.OffsetDateTime.class, java.util.Date.class)
.apiInfo(apiInfo());
}
class BasePathAwareRelativePathProvider extends RelativePathProvider {
private String basePath;
public BasePathAwareRelativePathProvider(ServletContext servletContext, String basePath) {
super(servletContext);
this.basePath = basePath;
}
#Override
protected String applicationPath() {
return Paths.removeAdjacentForwardSlashes(UriComponentsBuilder.fromPath(super.applicationPath()).path(basePath).build().toString());
}
#Override
public String getOperationPath(String operationPath) {
UriComponentsBuilder uriComponentsBuilder = UriComponentsBuilder.fromPath("/");
return Paths.removeAdjacentForwardSlashes(
uriComponentsBuilder.path(operationPath.replaceFirst("^" + basePath, "")).build().toString());
}
}
}
EDIT 2:
I moved all definitions to components and schemas but they are still split in multiple files and are referring to components across files but still i get the same error.
If you are using OpenAPI 3 you should put schemas that you want to reuse inside components. To refeer to it you must use refs like:
$ref: "#/components/schemas/EquityOptionConfigurationDO"
I am testing using Junit4 with eclipse. I want to test the function expandAll
public void expandAll(TreeExpansionModel<TreeData> expansionModel)
{
List<TreeNode<TreeData>> roots = getTreeModel().getRootNodes();
for (TreeNode<TreeData> root : roots)
{
expandAllNode(root, expansionModel);
}
}
private void expandAllNode(TreeNode<TreeData> node, TreeExpansionModel<TreeData> expansionModel)
{
if (node.getHasChildren())
{
expansionModel.markExpanded(node);
for (TreeNode child : node.getChildren())
{
expandAllNode(child, expansionModel); // this is a recursive call
}
}
}
The problem I am having is the expansionModel. In my program(not test), I pass in the expansionModel using tree.
Here is the code fragment from java.
#InjectComponent
private Tree tree;
public void onExpandAll()
{
expansionModel = tree.getExpansionModel();
treeFunction.expandAll(expansionModel);
ajaxResponseRenderer.addRender(treeZone);
}
I have tried in my test using
tree = new Tree();
expansionModel = tree.getExpansionModel();
testing.expandAll(expansionModel);
but the expansionModel I get is null. How do I go about testing with #InjectComponent tree?
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Unit testing of pages that contain components can be difficult, it often requires adding special constructors to your components that are ONLY required for testing. This becomes even harder when the components are from an external source (ie tapestry-core).
Have you considered selenium testing instead? I often find that unit testing pages requires lots of effort for little gain.
If you really want to unit test this page, I suggest that you refactor the code to isolate the Tree dependency:
#InjectComponent
private Tree tree;
public void onExpandAll() {
onExpandAll(tree.getExpansionModel());
}
protected void onExpandAll(TreeExpansionModel expansionModel) {
treeFunction.expandAll(expansionModel);
ajaxResponseRenderer.addRender(treeZone);
}
Then you can unit test the second onExpandAll method without needing a Tree instance using DefaultTreeExpansionModel or similar.
Thanks to uklance.
I just need to use DefaultTreeExpansionModel.
Here is the code fragment in my test
expansionModel = new DefaultTreeExpansionModel();
testing.expandAll(expansionModel);
I'm struggling with Play and JPA in order to be able to use two different javax.persistence.Entity model associated to two different persistence units (needed to be able to connect to different DB - for example an Oracle and a MySQL db).
The problem come from the Transaction which is always bind to the default JPA persitenceUnit (see jpa.default option).
Here is two controller actions which show the solution I found to manually define the persistence :
package controllers;
import models.Company;
import models.User;
import play.db.jpa.JPA;
import play.db.jpa.Transactional;
import play.mvc.Controller;
import play.mvc.Result;
public class Application extends Controller {
//This method run with the otherPersistenceUnit
#Transactional(value="other")
public static Result test1() {
JPA.em().persist(new Company("MyCompany"));
//Transaction is run with the "defaultPersistenceUnit"
JPA.withTransaction(new play.libs.F.Callback0() {
#Override
public void invoke() throws Throwable {
JPA.em().persist(new User("Bobby"));
}
});
return ok();
}
//This action run with the otherPersistenceUnit
#Transactional
public static Result test2() {
JPA.em().persist(new User("Ryan"));
try {
JPA.withTransaction("other", false, new play.libs.F.Function0<Void>() {
public Void apply() throws Throwable {
JPA.em().persist(new Company("YourCompany"));
return null;
}
});
} catch (Throwable throwable) {
throw new RuntimeException(throwable);
}
return ok();
}
}
This solution doesn't seem to be really "clean". I'd like to know if you know a better way to avoid the need to manually modify the transaction used.
For this purpose, I created a repo on git with a working sample application which shows how I configured the project.
https://github.com/cm0s/play2-jpa-multiple-persistenceunit
Thank you for your help
i met the same problem, too. too many advices are about PersistenceUnit annotation or getJPAConfig. but both them seem not work in play framework.
i found out a method which works well in my projects. maybe you can try it.
playframework2 how to open multi-datasource configuration with jpa
gud luk!