Am following the "Streaming HTTP Response" documentation of Play2! framework which describes how a file or stream could be sent as chunked responses. The http-action code I wrote after reading this is very simple -
Ok.chunked(
Enumerator.fromStream(istream).andThen(Enumerator.eof)
)
With this code everytime I refresh the URL the data in the stream gets downloaded as a file by the browser. Instead of downloading as a file I want the stream content to shown inline in the browser as text. The File example on the documentation page describes how one could do this with files... but looking at the APIs I dont see an inline option with streams. So is it possible to show stream data inline with chunked responses everytime I refresh the browser? If my expectation is invalid then a little explanation of why-so will be very welcome.
From my comment: You should set a content-type supported by your browser (like text/plain or text/xml) when sending the response, otherwise you're just sending bytes and the browser doesn't "know" it can display it.
Update: adding the exact code that solved the issue:
Ok.chunked( Enumerator.fromStream(istream).andThen(Enumerator.eof) ).as("text/html")
Related
I'm very new to API testing.
I'm trying to make use of Google Chrome's developer tools to understand and explore this subject.
Question 1:
Is it possible to get the response (possibly in JSON format) of a simple GET request using chrome developer tools?
What I'm currently doing is:
Open chrome developer tools
Go to Network tab
Clear existing logs
Send a post request simply by hitting a URL. e.g. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/ask
Check the corresponding docs loaded
Question 2:
What are the relevance "Reponse Headers" shown on the image above? I mean, am I correct to think that this is the response I am getting after doing the GET request?
Any help or references you can give are much appreciated!
If you want to test a rest api I sugest you get postman which is meant for that purpose.
Going to your questions:
Question 1: Is it possible to get the response (possibly in JSON
format) of a simple GET request using chrome developer tools?
The first point to make clear is that it is the server who will or will not send a json response to the browser. Not the browser who can choose to see any response as json.
If you send a GET request that the server responds with a json object or json array and the Content-type header is set to application/json, you will see that response already formated in the main window of the browser.
If the Content-type is set to text/html, for example, then you will still get the a json text as response in the main window but it won't be nicely formated. Depending on how the response was sent, sometimes you can see it nicely formatted by left clicking the browser window and selecting view source page.
For this you don't need developer's tools unless you want to see how long did it take to receive the response, or check the headers for some specific value, etc, but nothing to do with receiving the response or rendering it on screen.
Developer's tools is more usefull if you are working with javascript/jquery and/or if you are sending ajax requests (GET or POST). In these cases you can debug the function and also see the ajax request to check what actually went out from your browser and what was received as a response.
Question 2: What are the relevance "Reponse Headers" shown on the
image above? I mean, am I correct to think that this is the response I
am getting after doing the GET request?
In the response you get the two things, the headers, and the content. The json objects you see are part of the content not the headers.
The headers will tell the browser, for example, that the body is json (vs. an html documenet or something different), besides of other information like cache-control, or how long the body is.
Search for http headers for more information on which are teh standard headers.
To answer your questions narrowly:
Is it possible to get the response (possibly in JSON format) of a simple GET request using chrome developer tools?
Yes! Just click the Response tab, which is to the right of the Headers tab that's open in your screenshot.
What are the relevance "Reponse Headers" shown on the image above? I mean, am I correct to think that this is the response I am getting after doing the GET request?
Yes, these are the HTTP headers that were sent with the response to your request.
The broader question here is "how do I test a REST API?" DevTools is good for manual testing, but there are automated tools that can make it more efficient. I'll leave that up to you to learn more about that broad topic.
I got this problem, I have built a rest api and I don't know how to deal with this:
When the javascript client (Marionette.js) is in charge of making the views, I don't have problems, because as it is known, it just requests an url (e.g. example.com/user/37), the server retrieves a json with {id:'37', name:'Peter', age:'24'} (there is one controller class named User) and Marionette shows that data in the view. But if the user enter to example.com/user/37 by the browser it will show just {id:'37', name:'Peter', age:'24'} without any view. What can I do if I want to see the same view in both cases?
If you're trying to serve up HTML or JSON from the same endpoint then your server should be making that decision based on the request's Accept header. If the request's Accept header is application/json then your server should return just the JSON ortherwise return the HTML.
You can see that SoundCloud uses the same technique for returning XML or JSON from their API:
Resources are returned as XML by default, or JSON if a .json extension is appended to the resource URI. We encourage you to use JSON. You can also send an appropriate Accept header specifying the format you would like. For example, a request with the header Accept: application/json will return resources represented as a JSON document.
What you are trying to do is pratically impossible.
why ?
When your first enter the url example.com it's the server that responds with all the artifacts that compose your application (html, js, css ...) and the browser display it.
Now, when you enter ther url example.com/user/37 the server only sends the JSON data without any html, js or css, so the browser display the raw data he received.
What you are trying to do is to force the server to give two responses (JSON or html/js/css) depending on the user request.
You can do it, but it would be so complicated that's not worth the efforts.
I have a Node.js server running on a Google Compute Engine virtual instance. The server streams incoming files to Google Cloud Storage GCS. My code is here: Node.js stream upload directly to Google Cloud Storage
I'm passing Content-Type in the XML headers and it's working just fine for image/jpeg MIME-types, but for video/mp4 GCS is writing files as application/octet-stream.
There's not much to this, so I'm totally at a loss for what could be wrong ... any ideas are welcome!
Update/Solution
The problem was due to the fact that the multiparty module was creating content-type: octet-stream headers on the 'part' object that I was passing into the pipe to GCS. This caused GCS to receive two content-types, of which the octet part was last. As a result, GCS was using this for the inbound file.
Ok, looking at your HTTP request and response it seems like content-type is specified in the URL returned as part of the initial HTTP request. The initial HTTP request should return the endpoint which can be used to upload the file. I'm not sure why that is specified there but looking at the documentation (https://developers.google.com/storage/docs/json_api/v1/how-tos/upload - start a resumable session) it says that X-Upload-Content-Type needs to be specified, along some other headers. This doesn't seem to be specified in HTTP requests that were mentioned above. There might be an issue with the library used but the returned endpoint does not look as what is specified in the documentation.
Have a look at https://developers.google.com/storage/docs/json_api/v1/how-tos/upload, "Example: Resumable session initiation request" and see if you still have the same issue if you specify the same headers as suggested there.
Google Cloud Storage is content-type agnostic, i.e., it treats any kind of content in the same way (videos, music, zip files, documents, you name it).
But just to give some idea,
First I believe that the video () you are uploading is more or less size after it being uploded. so , it falls in application/<sub type>. (similar to section 3.3 of RFC 4337)
To make this correct, I believe you need to fight with storing mp4 metadata before and after the file being uploaded.
please let us know of your solution.
A solution that worked for me in a similar situation is below. TLDR: Save video from web app to GCS with content type video/mp4 instead of application/stream.
Here is the situation. You want to record video in the browser and save it to Google Cloud Storage with a content type set to video/mp4 instead of application/octet-stream. User records video and clicks button to send video file to your server for saving. After sending the video file from the client to your server, the server sends the video file to Google Cloud Storage for saving.
You successfully save the video to Google Cloud Storage and by default GCS assigns a content type of application/octet-stream to the video.
To assign a content type video/mp4 instead of application/octet-stream, here is some server-side Python code that works.
storage_client = storage.Client()
bucket = storage_client.bucket(bucket_name)
blob = bucket.blob(destination_blob_name)
blob.upload_from_file(file_obj, rewind=True)
blob.content_type = 'video/mp4'
blob.patch()
Here are some links that might help.
https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/uploading-objects#storage-upload-object-python
https://stackoverflow.com/a/33320634/19829260
https://stackoverflow.com/a/64274097/19829260
NOTE: at the time of this writing, the Google Docs about editing metadata don't work for me because they say to set metadata but metadata seems to be read-only (see SO post https://stackoverflow.com/a/33320634/19829260)
https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/viewing-editing-metadata#edit
I'm using Fiddler to debug some particularly painful AJAX code, and in the POST requests that are being sent across to the server the Request BODY is UrlEncoded. This leads to me having to cut and paste the text into an online app to UrlDecode the text into the JSON object for the request. There has to be a better way to do this.
Does anyone know how I can make fiddler automatically URLDecode the body of the POST Request?
Well, you can simply press CTRL+E to decode locally. But depending on the format, you may also be able to use the WebForms Inspector.
Fiddler can manipulate the HTTP request and response in any way you like:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/23615119/264181
I am posting (HTTP POST) various values to the posterous api. I am successfully able to upload the title, body, and ONE media file, but when I try to add in a second media file I get a server 500.
They do allow media and media[] as parameters.
How do I upload multiple files with the iPhone SDK?
The 500 your getting is probably based on one of two things:
An incorrect request
An error on the server
Now, if its an incorrect, the HTTP server would be more helpful responding back with like a 415 (unsupported media type) or something. A 500 insists that something went wrong on the server and that your request was valid.
You'll have to dig into the server API or code (if you wrote it), or read the docs and figure out what's wrong with your second request ... seems like maybe your not setting the appropriate media type?
EDIT: Ok, so I looked at the API. It appears your posting XML, so your request content-type should be
Content-Type: application/xml
The API doc didn't specifically say, but that would be the correct type.
EDIT: Actually on second glance, are you just POSTing w/URI params? Their API doc isn't clear (I'm also looking rather quickly)