I have a question about network connections among computers.
I've made some applications where messages pass through the Internet (via sockets) to make a connection between two devices. However, a strong condition is that two devices must be connected to the same network.
Can anyone give me a trick how to create a communication using sockets between two computers even if they are connected to different netwkorks?
Thank you in advance.
Here is a great tutorial on how to use sockets and general networking
(in java) http://www.thenewboston.org/watch.php?cat=25&number=38
In order to communicate between two diffrent networks over the internet, you will need to do something called port forwarding. What that does is that when your public IP of your network receives a packet with a spesific port number. The router knows where to send that packet to which local IP.
If you dont port forward and receive some data. The router doesent know where to send the packet. Therefore it discards it, which means others wont be able to connect to you.
You will only need to port forward the network with your server (using the example i linked). How you do that is by logging in to your router, and say that a port which the server uses gets forwarded to the IP of the PC hosting the server.
On the other network (client) you will need to change the IP address of which the client shall connect to. That IP address needs to be your public IP of your server's network. You can find that by connecting to the server's network and go to: http://www.whatsmyip.org/ . Keep in mind that public IP addresses may change over time.
Hope this helped!
-Kad
Related
I am just experimenting with my phone system and I'm wondering how both endpoints know they are on the same LAN, I have both endpoints breaking out to the cloud phone system with two separate public IP addresses, I've segmented them off from each other with a firewall so they can't see each other however every time I attempt a call between the two end points the call is setup as a peer to peer call and attempts to traverse the local LAN via RTP through the firewall, the firewall blocks the RTP communication and the call has no audio.
I am just wondering how both endpoints are realizing they are behind the same firewall/router since they are both registering with the cloud system from different public IP addresses, I wanted the call to be bridged in the cloud and not traverse the local LAN but somehow both endpoints only attempt the call over the LAN every single time and no idea how they're realising they're on the same LAN.
Anyone else encountered this before?
SIP endpoints don't have to know they are on the same LAN. They just make best use of the IP addresses you provide.
Your INVITE request will provide more insight, but from what you write my guess is that you use public IP addresses for your contact/request URI and local IP addresses in your SDP offer. The local IP addresses are probably routable through the firewall.
With ICE and STUN endpoints may select the best IPs for media traffic - but for that to work the RTP/STUN packets should be able to traverse the firewall in your LAN.
Attempts to communicate directly may mean that LAN uses IPs from public ranges or endpoints a SIP proxy were not smart enough to detect NAT in front of your LAN.
I'm working on a simple Swift app where one user can find other machines on a local network which are running an instance of my app and then send data to that machine using TCP sockets.
My question is how to find IP addresses of devices on same network which are running an instance of my app (cross-platform)?
I was thinking about listing all devices on local network and then
checking whether they have opened specific port (the port my app is
using)?
I also found that Apple provides service called Bonjour which could make my process discoverable. I'm not sure if this solution is good for cross-platform communication.
Apart of Mac-related stuff and high-level solutions (I believe keywords "network service discovery" will bring you to them), there are a couple of things that will work for a local network:
I Have a server that clients should report to. Some short hello-like UDP message and a timeout mechanism will be sufficient to keep a list of available clients in the network.
II Use IP or UDP multicast groups to notify others that a client has just connected to the network. Send a message to a multicast group and listen to this group to build a list of clients.
However, broadcasts and multicasts won't be transmitted through a router. So if your network is large enough only neighbouring clients will hear your notification. In order to overcome it,
III DHCP servers can be configured to provide custom data to clients via unassigned DHCP options. Large networks have usually such server. You probably can use it to send out a list of clients, but I'm not sure about this.
I like to connect to a TCP server that run in a machine that is connected to the LAN in my home network. This LAN can be connected to internet via either following methods.
1. Through a router which has a wireless or wired WAN connection
2. Through a router which uses a mobile broadband connection, for example a router that accept a USB modem to connect to internet.
I know in the first case, we can use port forwarding.
In the second case, I believe telcos use PPP protocol and port forwarding does not work.
In addition, even in the first case, if ISP does not give a static IP, then we need to use DNS mapping service to map a fixed URL to the allocated dynamic IP and we need to configure router to go and register the dynamic ip at the start up.
My question is, are there any other better methods that can be used in this situation? I am wondering how chat applications connect to each other? I hope they maintain a TCP connection between two devices, without a central relay server?
For example, when you make an ssh connection, you are connected to port 22. What happens then? On a very high level brief overview, I know that if port 22 is open on the other end and if you can authenticate to it as a certain user, then you get a shell on that machine.
But I don't understand how ports tie into this model of services and connections to different services from remote machines? Why is there a need for so many specific ports running specific services? And what exactly happens when you try to connect to a port?
I hope this question isn't too confusing due to my naive understanding. Thanks.
Imagine your server as a house with 65536 doors. If you want to visit family "HTTP", you go to door 80. If you were to visit family "SMTP", you would visit door no. 25.
Technically, a port is just one of multiple possible endpoints for outgoing/incomming connections. Many of the port numbers are assigned to certain services by convention.
Opening/establishing a connection means (when the transport protocol is TCP, which are most of the “classical” services like HTTP, SMTP, etc.) that you are performing a TCP handshake. With UDP (used for things like streaming and VoIP), there's no handshake.
Unless you want to understand the deeper voodoo of IP networks, you could just say, that's about it. Nothing overly special.
TCP-IP ports on your machine are essentially a mechanism to get messages to the right endpoints.
Each of the possible 65536 ports (16 total bits) fall under certain categories as designated by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).
But I don't understand how ports tie into this model of services and
connections to different services from remote machines? Why is there a
need for so many specific ports running specific services?
...
And what exactly happens when you try to connect to a port?
Think of it this way: How many applications on your computer communicate with other machines? Web browser, e-mail client, SSH client, online games, etc. Not to mention all of the stuff running under the hood.
Now think: how many physical ports do you have on your machine? Most desktop machines have one. Occasionally two or three. If a single application had to take complete control over your network interface nothing else would be able to use it! So TCP ports are a way of turning 1 connection into 65536 connections.
For example, when you make an ssh connection, you are connected to
port 22. What happens then?
Think of it like sending a package. Your SSH client in front of you needs to send information to a process running on the other machine. So you supply the destination address in the form of "user#[ip or hostname]" (so that it knows which machine on the network to send it to), and "port 22" (so it gets to the right application running on the machine). Your application then packs up a TCP parcel and stamps a destination and a return address and sends it to the network.
The network finds the destination computer and delivers the package. So now it's at the right machine, but it still needs to get to the right application. What do you think would happen if your SSH packet got delivered to an e-mail client? That's what the port number is for. It effectively tells your computer's local TCP mailman where to make the final delivery. Then the application does whatever it needs to with the data (such as verify authentication) and sends a response packet using your machine's return address. The back and forth continues as long as the connection is active.
Hope that helps. :)
The port is meant to allow applications on TCP/IP to exchange data. Each machine on the internet has one single address which is its IP. The port allows different applications on one machine to send and receive data with multiple servers on the network/internet. Common application like ftp and http servers communicate on default ports like 21 and 80 unless network administrators change those default ports for security reasons
I'm writing a C# remote control for my media player. It runs on my Android phone.
I have a client app listening for TCP connections on my computer which, one a connection has been established, processes commands (Volume up, volume down, ...). I've tested that part using telnet 127.0.0.1 on my computer, and it works great.
Things are trickier when it comes to connecting from my phone, since it's not on the same network (I don't have Wi-Fi, only wired connections), so I'm not sure how to proceed. Basically I want to connect to a computer that's behind a router.
Should I rather host the TCP server on my phone, and have the PC connect to it? Take IRC as an example: although I'm behind a router, I can connect to servers outside, without port forwarding.
Or if hosting the server on my computer is fine, how do I connect to it?
I don't understand everything to this yet, so feel free to correct me if I got something wrong.
It would be more logical to keep the PC hosting the server, and configure your router to forward connections to your PC. You have two options:
Establish a DMZ: all incoming connections on the router will be forwarded to one PC only. This is easiest when you only have 1 PC on the network that needs to accept connections.
Configure port forwarding: you can instruct the router to forward connections incoming on port X to the IP Y on port Z. This way, multiple PC's can listing for connections (using different ports on the router). It is also a bit more secure.
How to set these up depends on your router, but most routers just accept connections on their port 80 and offer an easy web-interface. If you give your router brand, we can link you to the manual.
Things are trickier when it comes to connecting from my phone, since
it's not on the same network (I don't have Wi-Fi, only wired
connections), so I'm not sure how to proceed. Basically I want to
connect to a computer that's behind a router.
What you want to achieve is possible, but you need to learn about NAT traversal and hole punching.
Most often, devices behind a NAT/Router have a private IP address only valid on the LAN. Remote devices can't guess it. This private address is translated into a public IP address by the NAT when the device wants to communicate with the WAN.
The easy solution is you can give a public IP address to the device behind the NAT. In this case, remote devices on the WAN will easily be able to reach it, because its address is public.