In JOGL, there are lots of native jars for different OS x arch combinations. JOGL has several of its own mechanisms to load the right ones if you aren't using java.library.path, and supports a kind of "fat jar" layout.
In a fat jar layout, any native libraries need to be in a subdirectory ./natives/os.and.arch/. However, since the native jars themselves don't have any internal layout, similarly named so/dylib/dll files collide the flat hierarchy in the final jar.
From what I can tell, I don't think I want to de-duplicate with any of the given MergeStrategy because it's only invoked if there is a collision. The layout is mandatory per JOGL's native library loaders - I want to invoke it every time. Is there a mechanism that can allow me to map certain jar -> prefix/with/path in sbt-assembly?
Example
jogl-all-2.1.3-natives-android-armv6.jar is pulled in through a dependency.
$ jar -tf jogl-all-2.1.3-natives-linux-amd64.jar
META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
libjogl_mobile.so
libnewt.so
I'd like this to go here in the final jar:
./natives/
./natives/linux.and.amd64/
./natives/linux.and.amd64/libnewt.so
./natives/linux.and.amd64/libjogl_mobile.so
From what I can tell, I don't think I want to de-duplicate with any of the given MergeStrategy because it's only invoked if there is a collision. The layout is mandatory per JOGL's native library loaders - I want to invoke it every time.
All merge strategies are invoked every time. MergeStrategy.deduplicate, which is the default strategy for most files, just happens to take effect only if there's a collision.
MergeStrategy.rename, applied for README and license files by default for example, will rename the file every time by appending the jar name.
Is there a mechanism that can allow me to map certain jar -> prefix/with/path in sbt-assembly?
There's no strategy out of the box that does exactly that, but you can define a custom strategy similar to MergeStrategy.rename.
Just follow this rule as Xerxes explained here. There is then no longer any risk of collision. The official JogAmp forum is a better place to ask questions about all JogAmp APIs. If you don't follow my advice, GlueGen will be unable to extract and load the correct native libraries. In your case, natives/linux-amd64 is correct whereas natives/linux.and.amd64 isn't.
Related
There is information on the web as well as here on the topic related to the using external file resources in CDT Eclipse: C/C++ and H files located somewhere else in the files system. All the described methods run along two methods:
creation within the project space the virtual linked files which point to
the locations of the actual files without copying them
adding the location of the external referenced resource in the
Project->Properties->C/C++ general->Paths and Symbols and related
Project->Properties-> C/C++ Build (link folders and includes)
I am not sure if the 1st method is always enough without adding the 2nd, but seems the 2nd builds well without the 1st.
My question is about a comparison of the two. Are those methods intended to be used similarly or each one is preferred in some cases?
Is each method self sufficient without applying the other?
This forum thread
https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/t/1087314/ suggests that for the include files the 1st method might not even be sufficient as the Build Settings should still be updated (2nd method) to include the linked H files...then may be the 1st method is irrelevant?
You would typically use the first method if you want to edit the externally-located files as part of your work on the project, and the second method if they're just dependencies that you use without modifying.
On a technical level, the difference is that with the first method the files will be part of the project model, and so will e.g. show up as candidates in Open Resource, while with the second method they wouldn't. Another difference is that with the first method, the files are indexed independently, while with the second method the files are only indexed by virtue of being included by files in your project (so e.g. .cpp files in those directories typically wouldn't be indexed with the second method at all).
Update: answers to questions from the comment
Is the 1st method sufficient enough in all cases without updating Paths and Symbols Property ?
No, if there are header files located in the linked directory that are included by files in your project using include paths that are not relative to the current directory (so not just #include "foo.h" in the same directory, #include "../foo.h" in a child directory, etc., but #include <bar/foo.h> in some other directory), you still want to specify those include paths in Paths and Symbols.
CDT's indexer does have an "Allow heuristic resolution of includes" option (specified in Preferences -> C/C++ -> Indexer) that may allow you to avoid adding the paths to Paths and Symbols, but note that (1) this affects the indexer only, not the build (which may be fine if you're using your own makefiles for the build), and (2) as it's heuristic, it's not perfect, e.g. if you have headers with the same name in different directories it can get confused. For best accurracy, I recommend unchecking "Allow heuristic resolution of includes", and always specifying include paths explicitly.
Also can the 2nd method be sufficient in itself if referenced files to be used AS IS without modification?
I don't see why not.
I've been given the task of researching whether one can use Powershell to automate the managing of References in VB6 application and then compile it's projects afterwards.
There are 3 projects. I requirement is to remove a specific reference in each project. Then, compile projects from bottom up (server > client > interface) and add reference back in along the way. (remove references, compile server.dll >add client reference to server.dll, compile client.dll > add interface reference to client.dll, compile interface.exe)
I'm thinking no, but I was still given the task of finding out for sure. Of course, where does one go to find this out? Why here of course, StackOverflow.
References are stored in the project .VBP files which are just text files. A given reference takes up exactly one line of the file.
For example, here is a reference to DAO database components:
Reference=*\G{00025E01-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}#5.0#0#C:\WINDOWS\SysWow64\dao360.dll#Microsoft DAO 3.6 Object Library
The most important info is everything to the left of the path which contains the GUID (i.e., the unique identifier of the library, more or less). The filespec and description text are unimportant as VB6 will update that to whatever it finds in the registry for the referenced DLL.
An alternate form of reference is for GUI controls, such as:
Object={BDC217C8-ED16-11CD-956C-0000C04E4C0A}#1.1#0; tabctl32.ocx
which for whatever reason never seem to have a path anyway. Most likely you will not need to modify this type of reference, because it would almost certainly break forms in the project which rely on them.
So in your Powershell script, the key task would be to either add or remove the individual reference lines mentioned in the question. Unless you are using no form of binary compatibility, the GUID will remain stable. Therefore, you could essentially hardcode the strings you need to add/remove.
Aside from all that, its worth thinking through why you need to take this approach at all. Normally to build a VB6 solution it is totally unnecessary to add/remove references along the way. Also depending on your choice of deployment techniques, you are probably using either project or binary compatibility which tends to keep the references stable.
Lastly, I'll mention that there are existing tools such as Kinook's Visual Build Pro which already know how to build groups of VB6 projects and if using a 3rd party tool like that is an option, could save you a lot of work.
How can I get GWT to provide the same dependency insights as mvn dependency:analyze?
Maven can report about dependencies (Used undeclared dependencies and Unused declared dependencies). I'd like to get GWT to do the same because determining missing inherits in my gwt.xml proves difficult.
Is there a good way for the system to analyze dependency state?
Thanks
Peter
I'm not aware of any such tool, and while I think a utility to analyze and report on GWT dependencies could be interesting, I also think it would be difficult to define well.
Used, undeclared dependencies
Before trying to solve this, what is the problem? In maven, this category means that a Class is loaded from a dependency that isn't directly depended on, but instead is transitively loaded. This starts to get into the whole issue of transitive dependencies (which exist in GWT) and scopes (which don't). If A uses a class in C, but only depends on B, which depends on C, this will be listed in the 'used, undeclared dependencies' list.
In GWT however, we very rarely list every single dependency we use directly. Instead, we assume that transitive dependencies will stay transitive - we dont bother to inherit com.google.gwt.user.RemoteService for RPC as long as we already have com.google.gwt.user.User listed.
So how could we tell if we are using an undeclared dependency, the kind that warns when we do a gwt:compile? Perhaps such a tool could find every .gwt.xml file on the classpath, and read through its <source> and <super-source> rules to look for somewhere that a class we are using is declared? Or in the case of invoking GWT.create on something and getting back a non-concrete type, it could look for <replace-with> and <generate-with> rules. As long as your code already compiles in Java, the classes are on the classpath, but you still run the risk that while the class is there, the .java or .gwt.xml files might not be.
Unused, declared dependencies
This seems like an easier problem - analyze the modules we are inheriting, and look through them for any module that could be pruned out. Unfortunately, as the above discussion notes, we can't just look for the classes and which package they are in, which <source> and <super-source> elements are unused - we also would need to look for <replace-with> and <generate-with> rules - consider something like com.google.gwt.user.RemoteService, which only adds a rule and some configuration details, or even com.google.gwt.user.RemoteServiceObfuscateTypeNames, which modifies only a single setting of the RemoteService module. If RemoteServiceObfuscateTypeNames were removed, everything would still compile, but now there might be information about your RPC classes compiled into your app that you don't expect to be there.
With these in mind, perhaps such a tool could watch all possible rebind rules in the current build, and all configuration settings, properties, etc, and see if any of those rules were not using during a gwt:compile process. Then, indicate which modules had unused parts, and if any module (and all of its inherited modules) were unused, it could shown to the user as able to be removed.
One more important piece: order matters, when defining <inherits> statements. If I add a inherits for com.google.gwt.logging.Logging, then follow it with com.google.gwt.logging.LoggingDisabled, logging classes will be on the source path and will compile, but will have no effect. But if those are ordered the other way around, then they will not only be on the source path, but will all be functional. So any analysis of modules used and unused would need to also include transitive inherits statements, and their orders.
I'm using GWT in my stuff, and I would like to make it,
international, so I use GWT constants method.
I have a java file with defaults, and I now need to make properties files.
In a remember, there is a special thing to do (or done automagically) to generate
a kind of template where all constants are generated with empty labels for other langages.
Did I dream this ?
(using eclipse indigo to develop webapp with gwt but not gae)
[edit:]
this was not a dream, it's i18ncreator:
http://code.google.com/intl/fr-FR/webtoolkit/doc/latest/RefCommandLineTools.html#i18nCreator
but I can't make it working on windows :-(
[edit again ]
due to this issue : http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5113
recommended solution is use i18ncreator in gwt 1.7 (!)
you should see the page on locales in GWT
I had the same issue. I was looking all over the place for the answer but could not find an answer; either in the docs or on stackoverflow.
So I asked in the GWT gitter channel and was told to use the compiler argument
-extra <destination-folder-name>
to generate the .properties files from the Interface files.
Steps in eclipse:
Select project you want to compile
[right click] -> Google -> GWT Compile
In the window that opens, open the Advanded options.
Add the following additional compiler argument -extra <destination-folder-name>
Compile
This should generate the *.properties files in the /destination-folder-name.
NOTE: This only generates the .properties files. It does not actually compile the application with all the locales for deploy.
Move the MyInterfaceExtension_*.properties to be right beside the MyInterfaceExtension.java file.
Make copies for each locale i.e. MyInterfaceExtension_fr_CA.properties, MyInterfaceExtension_fr_FR.properties, etc..
Translate them
Then run the compilation process again with out the -extra <destination-folder-name> option. Because it is not needed anymore.
This will compile with all the locales you enabled. You can now deploy the app the usual way.
Quick Tips:
When compiling for the first time in order to generate the .properties file, I commented out the locales in the module definition file so that the compiler will not sit there and compile again and again for every browser and every locale
i.e. supported_browser_count x enabled_locale_count = 5 browsers x 3 locales = 15 compilation Permutations, which is going to increase your compilation time.
Because, all I needed was that one *_en.properties file.
For the second compilation, after you copied and translated the properties files for each locale, you have to enable all the locales you want to support and compile.
Credits:
github #niloc132 : Colin Alworth
github #ibaca : Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres
For helping me with this.
For my project, I used the i18n-Creator
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideI18n.html#DevGuidePropertiesFiles
It kind of does the opposite of what you are asking for. With the i18n-creator, you create the properties files for the various locales and run the script that is generated with the i18n-creator, and it will generate the constants interface.
I haven't heard yet of this feature in Eclipse but IntelliJ IDEA has this feature, you just create the Constants Interface class and the properties file. If you add a method in the class file it will warn you to add the property or the other way around. HTH.
I have a legacy java project that we have been moving to buildr/artifactory from ant/jars in svn.
The primary code is in the default (src/main/java) folder, but we have a few external source paths, for various tests that we can't move into the default folder, but we want to have access with it.
Currently, when adding a new library/regenerating IDE fields, it does not pick up these source paths, and I can't find a succinct discussion in the buildr manual for how to actually add them, rather than re-adding everything manually in eclipse (which just gets wiped out on the next regen).
Any idea how to have multiple source paths get picked up explicitly by buildr so that the idea/eclipse targets generate properly?
There are two ways that I know will work with IDEA. The second one might also work with Eclipse, while the first is specific to the idea task.
The IDEA-specific solution:
define 'proj' do
# ...
iml.main_source_directories << _('src/other')
end
iml also has test_source_directories and excluded_directories arrays you can append to.
The possibly eclipse-compatible solution, with more background than you probably want:
The iml object gets its default values for the main and test source directory arrays from project.compile.sources and project.test.compile.sources (slight simplification; resources are considered also). Buildr defines these .sources project attributes from the layout, so instead of explicitly appending to the iml attributes, you could use a custom layout for your project that includes your special source paths. That might work with the eclipse task, but I haven't tried it.