Person = (name, age, job) ->
#name = name
#age = age
#job = job
#sayName = ->
console.log(#name)
kim = new Person("Kimothy Lozado", 37, "Skip Tracer")
console.log kim.sayName()
Returned Error
TypeError: Object function () {
return console.log(this.name);
} has no method 'sayName'
at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/aero/Downloads/m.coffee:11:17)
at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/aero/Downloads/m.coffee:1:1)
at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
Your not quite defining classes properly. Namely you need a constructor and need to use :s instead of =s unlike regular js.
Do this instead:
class Person
constructor: (#name, #age, #job) ->
sayName: ->
console.log(#name)
kim = new Person("Kimothy Lozado", 37, "Skip Tracer")
console.log kim.sayName()
Demo in a fiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/4e8xZ/
Here's a great article on CoffeeScript class from the little book of CoffeeScript for your reference.
I recommend agconti answer for creating classes, but here I want to answer to why this error occurs.
When you write a constructor in javascript:
function Person(name) {
this.name = name;
}
var someone = new Person('someone');
The variable someone is assigned to the returned object of the new keyword.
But if the constructor returns a function:
function Person(name) {
this.name = name;
return function(){};
}
var someone = new Person('someone');
Unfortunately, instead of getting the new created object, someone is assigned to the function returned by the constructor.
If we look at the compiled code of your coffee:
Person = function(name, age, job) {
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
this.job = job;
return this.sayName = function() {
return console.log(this.name);
};
};
We see that the constructor returns a function. this happens because coffescript always returns the last expression of a function.
You can fix it by returning nothing:
Person = (name, age, job) ->
#name = name
#age = age
#job = job
#sayName = ->
console.log(#name)
return
Related
OK, first of all, I'm a rookie with Caché, so the code will probably be poor, but...
I need to be able to query the Caché database in Java in order to rebuild source files out of the Studio.
I can dump methods etc without trouble, however there is one thing which escapes me... For some reason, I cannot dump the properties of parameter EXTENTQUERYSPEC from class Samples.Person (namespace: SAMPLES).
The class reads like this in Studio:
Class Sample.Person Extends (%Persistent, %Populate, %XML.Adaptor)
{
Parameter EXTENTQUERYSPEC = "Name,SSN,Home.City,Home.State";
// etc etc
}
Here is the code of the procedure:
CREATE PROCEDURE CacheQc.getParamDesc(
IN className VARCHAR(50),
IN methodName VARCHAR(50),
OUT description VARCHAR(8192),
OUT type VARCHAR(50),
OUT defaultValue VARCHAR(1024)
) RETURNS NUMBER LANGUAGE COS {
set ref = className _ "||" _ methodName
set row = ##class(%Dictionary.ParameterDefinition).%OpenId(ref)
if (row = "") {
quit 1
}
set description = row.Description
set type = row.Type
set defaultValue = row.Default
quit 0
}
And the Java code:
private void getParamDetail(final String className, final String paramName)
throws SQLException
{
final String call
= "{ ? = call CacheQc.getParamDesc(?, ?, ?, ?, ?) }";
try (
final CallableStatement statement = connection.prepareCall(call);
) {
statement.registerOutParameter(1, Types.INTEGER);
statement.setString(2, className);
statement.setString(3, paramName);
statement.registerOutParameter(4, Types.VARCHAR);
statement.registerOutParameter(5, Types.VARCHAR);
statement.registerOutParameter(6, Types.VARCHAR);
statement.executeUpdate();
final int ret = statement.getInt(1);
// HERE
if (ret != 0)
throw new SQLException("failed to read parameter");
System.out.println(" description: " + statement.getString(4));
System.out.println(" type : " + statement.getString(5));
System.out.println(" default : " + statement.getString(6));
}
}
Now, for the aforementioned class/parameter pair the condition marked // HERE is always triggered and therefore the exception thrown... If I comment the whole line then I see that all three of OUT parameters are null, even defaultValue!
I'd have expected the latter to have the value mentioned in Studio...
So, why does this happen? Is my procedure broken somewhat?
In first you should check that you send right value for className and paramName, full name and in right case and. Why you choose storage procedures, when you can use select? And you can call your procedure in System Management Portal to see about probable errors.
select description, type,_Default "Default" from %Dictionary.ParameterDefinition where id='Sample.Person||EXTENTQUERYSPEC'
Your example, works well for me.
package javaapplication3;
import com.intersys.jdbc.CacheDataSource;
import java.sql.CallableStatement;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.Types;
public class JavaApplication3 {
/**
* #param args the command line arguments
*/
public static void main(String[] args) throws SQLException {
CacheDataSource ds = new CacheDataSource();
ds.setURL("jdbc:Cache://127.0.0.1:56775/Samples");
ds.setUser("_system");
ds.setPassword("SYS");
Connection dbconnection = ds.getConnection();
String call = "{ ? = call CacheQc.getParamDesc(?, ?, ?, ?, ?)}";
CallableStatement statement = dbconnection.prepareCall(call);
statement.registerOutParameter(1, Types.INTEGER);
statement.setString(2, "Sample.Person");
statement.setString(3, "EXTENTQUERYSPEC");
statement.registerOutParameter(4, Types.VARCHAR);
statement.registerOutParameter(5, Types.VARCHAR);
statement.registerOutParameter(6, Types.VARCHAR);
statement.executeUpdate();
int ret = statement.getInt(1);
System.out.println("ret = " + ret);
System.out.println(" description: " + statement.getString(4));
System.out.println(" type : " + statement.getString(5));
System.out.println(" default : " + statement.getString(6));
}
}
end result
ret = 0
description: null
type : null
default : Name,SSN,Home.City,Home.State
UPD:
try to change code of your procedure and add some debug like here
Class CacheQc.procgetParamDesc Extends %Library.RegisteredObject [ ClassType = "", DdlAllowed, Owner = {UnknownUser}, Not ProcedureBlock ]
{
ClassMethod getParamDesc(className As %Library.String(MAXLEN=50), methodName As %Library.String(MAXLEN=50), Output description As %Library.String(MAXLEN=8192), Output type As %Library.String(MAXLEN=50), Output defaultValue As %Library.String(MAXLEN=1024)) As %Library.Numeric(SCALE=0) [ SqlName = getParamDesc, SqlProc ]
{
set ref = className _ "||" _ methodName
set row = ##class(%Dictionary.ParameterDefinition).%OpenId(ref)
set ^debug($i(^debug))=$lb(ref,row,$system.Status.GetErrorText($g(%objlasterror)))
if (row = "") {
quit 1
}
set description = row.Description
set type = row.Type
set defaultValue = row.Default
quit 0
}
}
and after some test from java, check zw ^debug
SAMPLES>zw ^debug
^debug=4
^debug(3)=$lb("Sample.Person||EXTENTQUERYSPEC","31#%Dictionary.ParameterDefinition","ERROR #00: (no error description)")
Well, uh, I found the problem... Talk about stupid.
It happens that I had the Samples.Person class open in Studio and had made a "modification" to it; and deleted it just afterwards. Therefore the file was "as new"...
But the procedure doesn't seem to agree with this statement.
I closed the Studio where that file was, selected not to modify the "changes", reran the procedure again, and it worked...
Strangely enough, the SQL query worked even with my "fake modification". I guess it's a matter of some cache problem...
Most of the times all I have to do with JavaScript is just add some dynamics to simple HTML. Recently, however, after discovering CoffeeScript, I got interested in *Object Oriented JavaScript". Here is some code in CoffeeScript.
class MyClass
constructor: (title, purpose)->
#title = typeof title is undefined ? "My Class" : title
#purpose = typeof purpose is undefined ? "None" : purpose
#myMethod()
myMethod: ->
_getTitle = #getTitle
_getPurpose = #getPurpose
$(window).click ->
_getTitle()
_getPurpose()
return
return
getTitle: ->
_title = #title
window.console.log "Title of the class this object belongs to is: #{_title}"
return
getPurpose: ->
_purpose = #purpose
window.console.log "Purpose of creating this class is: #{_purpose}"
return
title = ""
purpose = ""
myObject = new MyClass("Testbed", "to test Object Oriented JavaScript")
For those who prefer JavaScript, here is the compiled (?) JavaScript.
var MyClass, myObject;
MyClass = (function() {
var purpose, title;
function MyClass(title, purpose) {
var _ref, _ref1;
this.title = (_ref = typeof title === void 0) != null ? _ref : {
"My Class": title
};
this.purpose = (_ref1 = typeof purpose === void 0) != null ? _ref1 : {
"None": purpose
};
this.myMethod();
}
MyClass.prototype.myMethod = function() {
var _getPurpose, _getTitle;
_getTitle = this.getTitle;
_getPurpose = this.getPurpose;
$(window).click(function() {
_getTitle();
_getPurpose();
});
};
MyClass.prototype.getTitle = function() {
var _title;
_title = this.title;
window.console.log("Title of the class this object belongs to is: " + _title);
};
MyClass.prototype.getPurpose = function() {
var _purpose;
_purpose = this.purpose;
window.console.log("Purpose of creating this class is: " + _purpose);
};
title = "";
purpose = "";
return MyClass;
})();
myObject = new MyClass("Testbed", "to test Object Oriented JavaScript");
Sorry about the long code. I had to try to keep it interesting. The thing is, this code outputs:
Title of the class this object belongs to is: undefined
Purpose of creating this class is: undefined
whereas I was expecting it to output:
Title of the class this object belongs to is: Testbed
Purpose of creating this class is: to test Object Oriented JavaScript
And I could've sworn this was how it worked when I last tinkered with it (around six months ago). I learnt that in a method that is part of the prototype of an object, this refers to the prototype itself. And this.something would actually point to object.something. Whereas in this example, inside myObject.myMethod(), this behaves as it should and this.getTitle() refers to myObject.getTitle(). Inside myObject.getTitle(), however, this refers to window. Why?
Is it because getTitle() was called inside a $(window).click() handler? But why would that change the context? getTitle() is still a property of myObject.
Also, you see what I am trying to accomplish here. How could I accomplish that?
There are several problems.
1) You never return anything from .getPurpose or .getTitle
2) You should create a reference to this in myMethod. i.e. var me = this and then inside the event listener call me.getTitle() and me.getPurpose(). This is needed because inside the event listener (window onclick), this refers to the window and not the object.
3) It looks like your ternary expressions are always evaluating to false. You need to rethink them.
P.S. I looked at the straight JS version
I'm trying to use repository pattern for my vsto project.
How do I use a repository pattern to execute a stored procedure? I'm using Entity Framework. Any link for code sample would really useful
To your generic repository add
public IEnumerable<T> ExecWithStoreProcedure(string query, params object[] parameters)
{
return _context.Database.SqlQuery<T>(query, parameters);
}
And then you can call it with any unitofwork/repository like
IEnumerable<Products> products =
_unitOfWork.ProductRepository.ExecWithStoreProcedure(
"spGetProducts #bigCategoryId",
new SqlParameter("bigCategoryId", SqlDbType.BigInt) { Value = categoryId }
);
A non generic solution in your repository would be:
private int ExecWithStoreProcedure(string query, params object[] parameters)
{
return _context.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand("EXEC " + query, parameters);
}
And then a few typical examples of use:
var param = new SqlParameter("SomethingToCheck", SqlDbType.NVarChar) { Value = shortCode };
var result = ExecWithStoreProcedure("mySchema.myStoredProc #SomethingToCheck", param);
with multiple parameters:
var param1 = new SqlParameter("SomeCode", SqlDbType.VarChar) { Value = shortCode };
var param2 = new SqlParameter("User", SqlDbType.VarChar) { Value = userName };
var result = ExecWithStoreProcedure("mySchema.myStoredProc #SomeCode, #User", param1, param2 );
this link guided me. [Link]
But when you execute stored procedure you have to put "exec" informant of SP name
Eg: if sp is "sp_aa"
string should be "exec sp_aa"
SO follow this example
example and how make a fake DBContex For test my test using just this work fine
[Test]
public void CiudadIndex()
{
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Ciudad>
{
new Ciudad {CiudadId = 1, EmpresaId =1, Descripcion ="Santa Cruz", FechaProceso = DateTime.Now, MarcaBaja = null, UsuarioId = 1},
new Ciudad {CiudadId = 2, EmpresaId =1, Descripcion ="La Paz", FechaProceso = DateTime.Now, MarcaBaja = null, UsuarioId = 1},
new Ciudad {CiudadId = 3, EmpresaId =1, Descripcion ="Cochabamba", FechaProceso = DateTime.Now, MarcaBaja = null, UsuarioId = 1}
};
//// Create mock unit of work
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
mockData.Setup(m => m.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
// Setup controller
var homeController = new CiudadController(mockData.Object);
// Invoke
var viewResult = homeController.Index();
var ciudades_de_la_vista = (IEnumerable<Ciudad>)viewResult.Model;
// Assert..
}
Iam tryign now to use Autofixture-Moq
to create "ciudades" but I cant. I try this
var fixture = new Fixture();
var ciudades = fixture.Build<FakeDbSet<Ciudad>>().CreateMany<FakeDbSet<Ciudad>>();
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
mockData.Setup(m => m.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
I get this error
Cant convert System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable(FakeDbSet(Ciudad)) to System.Data.Entity.IDbSet(Ciudad)
cant put "<>" so I replace with "()" in the error message
Implementation of IContext and FakeDbSet
public interface IContext
{
IDbSet<Ciudad> Ciudades { get; }
}
public class FakeDbSet<T> : IDbSet<T> where T : class
how can make this to work?
A minor point... In stuff like:
var ciudades_fixture = fixture.Build<Ciudad>().CreateMany<Ciudad>();
The second type arg is unnecessary and should be:
var ciudades_fixture = fixture.Build<Ciudad>().CreateMany();
I really understand why you need a FakeDbSet and the article is a bit TL;DR... In general, I try to avoid faking and mucking with ORM bits and instead dealing with interfaces returning POCOs to the max degree possible.
That aside... The reason the normal syntax for initialising the list works is that there is an Add (and IEnumerable) in DBFixture. AutoFixture doesn't have a story for that pattern directly (after all it is compiler syntactic sugar and not particularly amenable to reflection or in line with any other conventions) but you can use AddManyTo as long as there is an ICollection in play. Luckily, within the impl of FakeDbSet as in the article, the following gives us an in:-
public ObservableCollection<T> Local
{
get { return _data; }
}
As ObservableCollection<T> derives from ICollection<T>, you should be able to:
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Cuidad>();
fixture.AddManyTo(ciudades.Local);
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
mockData.Setup(m => m.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
It's possible to wire up a customization to make this prettier, but at least you have a way to manage it. The other option is to have something implement ICollection (or add a prop with a setter taking IEnumerable<T> and have AF generate the parent object, causing said collection to be filled in.
Long superseded side note: In your initial question, you effectively have:
fixture.Build<FakeDbSet<Ciudad>>().CreateMany()
The problem becomes clearer then - you are asking AF to generate Many FakeDbSet<Ciudad>s, which is not what you want.
I haven't used AutoFixture in a while, but shouldn't it be:
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Ciudad>();
fixture.AddManyTo(ciudades);
for the moment I end doing this, I will keep reading about how use automoq, cause I'm new in this
var fixture = new Fixture();
var ciudades_fixture = fixture.Build<Ciudad>().CreateMany<Ciudad>();
var ciudades = new FakeDbSet<Ciudad>();
foreach (var item in ciudades_fixture)
{
ciudades.Add(item);
}
var mockData = new Mock<IContext>();
fixture.Create<Mock<IContext>>();
mockData.Setup(r => r.Ciudades).Returns(ciudades);
I have found a few articles like this one:
http://devtoolshed.com/using-stored-procedures-entity-framework-scalar-return-values
Yet when I take the step to create a function import for a int32 scalar, this is what gets generated:
public ObjectResult<Nullable<global::System.Int32>> MyStoredProcedure(Nullable<global::System.Int32> orderId)
{
ObjectParameter orderIdParameter;
if (orderId.HasValue)
{
orderIdParameter = new ObjectParameter("OrderId", orderId);
}
else
{
orderIdParameter = new ObjectParameter("OrderId", typeof(global::System.Int32));
}
return base.ExecuteFunction<Nullable<global::System.Int32>>("MyStoredProcedure", orderIdParameter);
}
I am able to call the procedure with this, but am not able to get to the underlying scalar:
ObjectResult<int?> result = myEntities.MyProcedure(orderId);
In the code examples I have seen, I should get context.MyProcedure().SingleOrDefault().
Try this:
int? result = myEntities.MyProcedure(orderId).FirstOrDefault();