hey i'm looking for way to search for text pattern (in jpa) and to sort the result, first all the result starting with this string and then all other result.
i have found Mysql order by using search string to get the answer for mysql
most of the answers use union(which does not exist in jpa) and force to query the db or open a view for that. (ordering from code is not that good solution since we use paging to get part of the result as the result size can be really big)
One solution i like from the link above is :
select * from employee where name like '%ani%' order by locate('ani', name) asc, name asc
source
This seems to me very clear but i'm not sure how to convert it to jpa. seems like Order object is not able to get locate output
any ideas will be welcome
Thanks!
Alon
EDIT:
thanks for reply. i'm tring to achive the same with jpa critiera
Iterator<Order> sortingIter = page.getSort().iterator();
ArrayList<javax.persistence.criteria.Order> order = new ArrayList<javax.persistence.criteria.Order>();
String fieldName;
while (sortingIter.hasNext()) {
Order sort = sortingIter.next();
fieldName = sort.getProperty();
order.add(sort.getDirection() == Sort.Direction.ASC ? cb
.asc(keyword.get(fieldName)) : cb.desc(keyword
.get(fieldName)));
}
while the above works well. i cannot add the following line to the code. seems like Order object doesnt like them
Expression<String> fieldValue = keyword.get(fieldName);
order.add(cb.locate(fieldValue,key));
EDIT 2:
tried
order.add(new javax.persistence.criteria.Order() {
#Override
public javax.persistence.criteria.Order reverse() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return null;
}
#Override
public boolean isAscending() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return true;
}
#Override
public Expression<?> getExpression() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return cb.locate(fieldValue,key);
}
});
jpa doesn't complain but the query does not get the right order
EDIT 3:
Found my mistake!
The key value i was passing above already contained "%" and both sides... so locate did not work properly.
now i'm getting some weird behavior on some special chars:if - for example - i have the word Ghurabā the query like %ba% will find it. but, it seems that locate(Ghurabā,ba) will return 0 - meaning as pattern was not found in string any idea how to overcome this issue?
seems like this is not only jpa but also mysql behavior.
SELECT *
FROM `keywords`
WHERE name LIKE '%ba%'
ORDER BY LOCATE( 'ba', name ) , name
LIMIT 0 , 30
will return the next result
Ghurabā'
Khuṭabā'
qabā\
Ribāṭ
ba'urchi (cook)
Baghdad
...
note that it does work for "regular english characters" but there is a mismatch between the like and the locate function
Using Collcation: utf8_general_ci (got the same result with utf_unicode_ci)
This does not makes any complain.
String jpql = "select e from Employee e where e.name like '%ani%' order by locate('ani', e.name) asc, e.name asc";
TypedQuery<Employee> query2 = em.createQuery(jpql ,Employee.class);
And this is the translation that hibernate does.
Hibernate: select employee0_.id as id1_2_, employee0_.address_id as
address5_2_, employee0_.DEPT_ID as DEPT6_2_, employee0_.manager_id as
manager7_2_, employee0_.name as name2_2_, employee0_.salary as
salary3_2_, employee0_.startDate as startDat4_2_ from Employee
employee0_ where employee0_.name like '%ani%' order by locate('ani',
employee0_.name) asc, employee0_.name asc
Using some data as the link you mention.
Employee 10: name: anil, salary: 59000,
Employee 1: name: anirudha, salary: 55000,
Employee 5: name: rani,
Employee 7: name: Stephanie, salary: 54000,
{anil,anirudha,rani, ...}
Same problem using CriteriQuery solution
Ok, you own me some points for this =)
Hibernate: select employee0_.id as id1_2_, employee0_.address_id as address5_2_, employee0_.DEPT_ID as DEPT6_2_, employee0_.manager_id as manager7_2_, employee0_.name as name2_2_, employee0_.salary as salary3_2_, employee0_.startDate as startDat4_2_ from Employee employee0_ where employee0_.name like ? order by locate(?, employee0_.name) asc, employee0_.name asc
CriteriaBuilder cb = em.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery<Employee> cq = cb.createQuery(Employee.class);
Root<Employee> root = cq.from(Employee.class);
cq.where(cb.like(root.<String>get("name"), "%ani%"));
cq.orderBy(cb.asc(cb.locate(root.<String>get("name"), "ani")), cb.asc(root.get("name")));
TypedQuery<Employee> query2 = em.createQuery(cq);
printList(query2.getResultList());
Try the above it should work.
Employee 10: name: anil, salary: 59000,
Employee 1: name: anirudha, salary: 55000,
Employee 5: name: rani,
Employee 7: name: Stephanie, salary: 54000,
Check this out if you think ?(question mark) is not correct in the query.
http://webdev.apl.jhu.edu/~jcs/ejava-javaee/coursedocs/605-784-site/docs/content/html/jpa-query-criteria-function.html#jpa-query-criteria-function-string-locate
Related
I have following query which select from employee table where name is "max" and ID not in 123 and 444.
Not in IDs can grow in future. But I am receiving error as
Error
( 8023): [ERROR:flutter/lib/ui/ui_dart_state.cc(148)] Unhandled Exception: DatabaseException(near "?": syntax error (code 1 SQLITE_ERROR): , while compiling:
Query
List<String> a = [];
a.add("123");
a.add("444");
var table = await mydb.rawQuery(
"SELECT value from employee WHERE employeename = ? AND id NOT IN ? ORDER BY timestamp DESC",
["max", a]);
If the LIST is unpredictable, one way is that you can use JOIN to create your select statement with required value of NOT IN. Below is one sample.
void main() {
List<String> a = [];
a.add("123");
a.add("444");
var select =
'SELECT value from employee WHERE employeename = ? AND id NOT IN (\'' +
(a.join('\',\'')).toString() +
'\') ORDER BY timestamp DESC';
var table = await mydb.rawQuery(select, ["max"]);
}
If you print the variable select you will get
SELECT value from employee WHERE employeename = ? AND id NOT IN ('123','444')
ORDER BY timestamp DESC.
Then you can pass the above statement to rawquery and get your result.
P.S:Use your single quote and double quote accordingly.
I'd go for #arun-palanisamy 's solution, see his comment. Props go to him. I just tried the following -- with Groovy/Postgres, but the error seems to be the same, so you might want to give it a try:
String[] a = ['123', '444']
// your code, throws 'ERROR: syntax error at or near "$2"':
// def table = sql.execute("SELECT value from employee WHERE employeename = ? AND id NOT IN ? ORDER BY timestamp DESC", ["max", a])
// code of arun-palanisamy, compiles:
def table = sql.execute("SELECT value from employee WHERE employeename = ? AND id NOT IN (${a.join(', ')}) ORDER BY timestamp DESC", ["max", a])
Side notes:
You might want to try a different type for a, such as Array in my code, or even a HashMap.
There are examples (like here) where the number of ? are generated dynamically.
Update: Go for this answer, we posted simultaneously
But updation works with below code snippet
Department department= departmentRepository.findOne(300L);
department.setName("rajiv");
departmentRepository.saveAndFlush(department);
but then this scenario being onetone mapping it could be a case where i would end up hitting 3 queries which include 2 select queries and one one update query .
To optimize the way i update it i'm trying to use this approach which is not getting updated thought executeUpdate() returns affected row as 1 .
There is a small mistake in your query.
You have used the = operator instead you should have used the like operator
You can also take help of #NamedNativeQueries
Example
DepartmentRepository.java
#Query(nativeQuery = true)
public List<Department> update(Long id);
Department.java
#SqlResultSetMapping(name="updateResult", columns = { #ColumnResult(name = "count")})
#NamedNativeQueries({
#NamedNativeQuery(
name = "Department.update",
query = "UPDATE departmemnt SET name like 'rajiv' WHERE id = ?",
resultSetMapping = "updateResult")
})
NativeQueries works more faster than normal Hibernate Queries
Yeah may this would help , in case of spring data i found a way to make it updatable and since they insist to use #transactional and extend the functionality of jparepository and now it hits only one line of statement
#Modifying(clearAutomatically = true)
#Transactional(readOnly=false)
#Query("update Department d set d.name =:name where d.id=:id")
int update(#Param("name")String name,#Param("id")Long id);
in case if i choose to for nativeQuery
#Modifying(clearAutomatically = true)
#Transactional(readOnly=false)
#Query(value="update Department d set d.name =:name where d.id=:id",nativeQuery=true)
int update(#Param("name")String name,#Param("id")Long id);
I want to rewrite this SQL query in JPA.
String hql = "SELECT date(created_at) AS cdate, sum(amount) AS amount, count(id) AS nooftransaction "
+ "FROM payment_transactions WHERE date(created_at)>=date(now()- interval 10 DAY) "
+ "AND date(created_at)<date(now()) GROUP BY date(created_at)";
TypedQuery<Merchants> query = entityManager.createQuery(hql, Merchants.class);
List<Merchants> merchants = query.getResultList();
Is there a way to rewrite the queries into JPA or I should use it as it is?
In situations like these, more often than not the best approach is to write a plain SQL view:
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW payment_transactions_stats AS
SELECT date(created_at) AS cdate, sum(amount) AS amount, count(id) AS nooftransaction
FROM payment_transactions
WHERE date(created_at)>=date(now()- interval 10 DAY)
AND date(created_at)<date(now()) GROUP BY date(created_at);
And map it to an #Immutable entity. This approach works well when:
you have read only data
the view does not need parameters (in this case there are solutions as well which span from hacky to nice)
You provide no details about the classes and entities but it could be something like:
CriteriaBuilder builder = entityManager.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery<Tuple> query = builder.createTupleQuery();
From<PaymentTransaction> tx = query.from(PaymentTransaction.class);
Expression<Long> sumAmount = builder.sum(tx.get("amount"));
Expression<Long> count = builder.count(tx.get("id"));
Expression<Date> createdAt = tx.get("created_at");
query.multiselect(createdAt, sumAmount, count);
query.where(builder.greaterThanOrEqualTo(createdAt, builder.function("DATEADD", "DAY", new Date(), builder.literal(-10))),
builder.lessThan(createdAt, new Date()));
query.groupBy(createdAt);
entityManager.createQuery(query).getResultList().stream()
.map(t -> new Merchants(t.get(0, Date.class), t.get(1, Long.class), t.get(2, Long.class)))
.collect(Collectors.toList());
It is better not to use JPA for complex queries like this. JPA are usually used for simple queries.
Since the question is tagged with spring-data-jpa, you could try using a Spring CRUDRepository on top of your table. In the CRUDRepository, write a custom method with the #Query annotation.
It's hard for me to formulate the entire query because I don't know the members of your Merchants class.
Alternatively you can set the nativeQuery = true for the #Query annotation and use actual DB query to solve your problem.
You can use below code
CriteriaBuilder qb = entityManager.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery cq = qb.createQuery();
Root paymentInstructionsRoot = cq.from(PaymentInstructions.class);
List<Predicate> predicates = new ArrayList<>();
predicates.add(qb.greaterThanOrEqualTo(path, fromDateRange));
predicates.add(qb.lessThanOrEqualTo(path, toDateRange));
Selection cdate = paymentInstructionsRoot.get(PaymentInstructions_.createdAt).alias("cdate");
Selection amount = qb.sum(paymentInstructionsRoot.get(PaymentInstructions_.amount))).alias("amount");
Selection nooftransaction = qb.count(paymentInstructionsRoot.get(PaymentInstructions_.id))).alias("nooftransaction");
Selection[] selectionExpression = {cdate, amount, nooftransaction};
Expression[] groupByExpression = {paymentInstructionsRoot.get(PaymentInstructions_.createdAt)};
cq.multiselect(selectionExpression).where(predicates.toArray(new Predicate[]{})).groupBy(groupByExpression).where(predicates.toArray(new Predicate[]{}));
List<PaymentInstructions> paymentInstructions = entityManager.createQuery(cq).getResultList();
In your Entity class that represents the 'payment_transactions' table, add the following:
#SqlResultSetMapping(
name = "PaymentTransaction.summaryMapping",
classes = {
#ConstructorResult(targetClass = PaymentTransactionSummary.class,
columns = {
#ColumnResult(name = "cdate")
, #ColumnResult(name = "amount")
, #ColumnResult(name = "nooftransaction")
})
}
)
Create a new pojo class named PaymentTransactionSummary (must match the name used above, or whatever name you choose, with member fields cdate, amount, and nooftransaction. Include a constructor that includes those three fields in the order listed above.
Then in your dao class, write this:
Query q = entityManager.createNativeQuery("your query string from above"
, "PaymentTransaction.summaryMapping");
List<PaymentTransactionSummary> results = q.getResultList();
I created a a query to only get 4 items from a row in a table which does not include the column cloth style, so i understand why i get the error, but how can i tell Spring Jpa or JPA it is on purpose. and i just want the id, name and color table ?
this is my code:
#RequestMapping(value = "/query/material",method = RequestMethod.GET)
public String QueryMaterialTable(HttpServletRequest request){
DataTableRequest<Material> dataTableInRQ = new DataTableRequest<Material>(request);
PaginationCriteria pagination = dataTableInRQ.getPaginationRequest();
String baseQuery = "SELECT id as id, time as time, name as name, color as color, price as price, (SELECT COUNT(1) FROM MATERIAL) AS totalrecords FROM MATERIAL";
String paginatedQuery = AppUtil.buildPaginatedQuery(baseQuery, pagination);
System.out.println(paginatedQuery);
Query query = entityManager.createNativeQuery(paginatedQuery, Material.class);
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
List<Material> materialList = query.getResultList();
DataTableResults<Material> dataTableResult = new DataTableResults<Material>();
dataTableResult.setDraw(dataTableInRQ.getDraw());
dataTableResult.setListOfDataObjects(materialList);
if (!AppUtil.isObjectEmpty(materialList)) {
dataTableResult.setRecordsTotal(String.valueOf(materialList.size())
);
if (dataTableInRQ.getPaginationRequest().isFilterByEmpty()) {
dataTableResult.setRecordsFiltered(String.valueOf(materialList.size()));
} else {
dataTableResult.setRecordsFiltered(String.valueOf(materialList.size()));
}
}
return new Gson().toJson(dataTableResult);
}
If I got the question right, your problem is with the following two lines:
Query query = entityManager.createNativeQuery(paginatedQuery, Material.class);
List<Material> materialList = query.getResultList();
You have various options to fix this:
provide a complete column list, i.e. provide the missing column in the SQL statement and just make them NULL;
Don't use Material but a new class that has the matching attributes.
Don't use a native query but JPQL and a constructor expression.
Use a ResultTransformer.
Use Spring Data and a Projection.
Use a Spring JdbcTemplate.
I have the following QueryDSL query:
QCustomer customer = QCustomer.customer;
BooleanBuilder builder = new BooleanBuilder();
builder.or(customer.person.name.containsIgnoreCase(query));
builder.or(customer.company.name.containsIgnoreCase(query));
return builder;
And I expect to get results from Persons that contains the name = query and/or Companies that contains the query parameter. But I get nothing.
This is my Customer class mapping:
#OneToOne(orphanRemoval = false, optional = true, cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
private Company company;
#OneToOne(orphanRemoval = false, optional = true, cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
private Person person;
Did someone knows what I'm missing here?
I expect to get a query like this:
select o
from Customer
where o.person.name like '%:name%' or o.company.name like '%:name%'
This is the generated query:
select
count(customer0_.uid) as col_0_0_
from
Customer customer0_
cross join
Person person1_
cross join
Company company2_
where
customer0_.person_uid=person1_.uid
and customer0_.company_uid = company2_.uid
and (lower(person1_.name) like ? escape '!' or lower(company2_.name) like ? escape '!') limit ?
It uses a count because it's the first query that Spring Data use to paginate the result.
The query looks ok. Most probably you get wrong results because the implicit property based joins make the joins inner joins.
Using left joins you might get the results you need.
QPerson person = QPerson.person;
QCompany company = QCompany.company;
BooleanBuilder builder = new BooleanBuilder();
builder.or(person.name.containsIgnoreCase(str));
builder.or(company.name.containsIgnoreCase(str));
query.from(customer)
.leftJoin(customer.person, person)
.leftJoin(customer.company, company)
.where(builder);