I am growing animal territories. Animal territories may cleave parts of other animal territories during the process of expand. So instead of being one contiguous territory, the territory may include more than one cluster (i.e., unattached clusters). This is what happens in the model below. I'd like to have the territory recognize this and release whichever cluster of cells (or a single unattached cell) is smallest so that the territory remains one contiguous cluster. I'm not sure where to start with this. Any help would be great.
breed [animals animal]
breed [homeranges homerange]
animals-own
[
Name
orig
territory
food
status
]
patches-own
[
owner
prey
]
to setup
clear-all
random-seed 2234
ask patches
[
set owner nobody
set prey 2
set pcolor scale-color (black) prey 1 4
]
let $colors [brown orange violet sky lime]
let $Name ["t6" "t7" "t8" "t9" "t10"]
let $status [0 0 0 0 5]
ask n-of 5 patches
[
sprout-animals 1
[
set shape "circle"
set orig patch-here
set territory patch-set orig
set status item who $status
set size 0.3 + 0.1 * status
set color item who $colors
set pcolor color
set Name item who $Name
set owner self
]
]
reset-ticks
end
to go
if all? animals [food >= 350] [ stop ]
if ticks = 70 [ stop ]
expand
tick
end
to expand ; animals procedure
repeat 10
[
ask animals
[
let vacant no-patches
let subord no-patches
let target nobody
let new-patches no-patches
let status-of-calling-tiger status ;
let calling-tiger self ;
; If territory not yet good enough:
if food < 500
[
ask territory
[
; Add unoccupied neighbor patches as potential targets:
set vacant (patch-set vacant neighbors with [owner = nobody])
; Add occupied neighbor patches as potential targets if their tiger has a lower status than me:
set subord (patch-set subord neighbors with [owner != nobody and [status] of owner < status-of-calling-tiger])
]
ask subord [ set pcolor red ]
; Set of all potential targets:
set new-patches (patch-set new-patches vacant subord)
; Choose as target the one potential target with highest prey:
if any? new-patches
[
ask new-patches
[ifelse any? vacant
[ifelse any? subord
[ifelse [prey] of max-one-of vacant [prey] = [prey] of max-one-of subord [prey]
[set target max-one-of vacant [prey]]
[set target max-one-of new-patches [prey]]
]
[set target max-one-of vacant [prey]]
]
[set target max-one-of subord [prey]]
]
move-to target
if-else member? target subord
[ set shape "triangle" ] ; so you can see that the target patch was from "subord"
[ set shape "circle" ] ; or from "vacant"
]
;ifelse any? target with [owner != nobody]
if target != nobody
[
; Add target patch to territory of the current animal:
set territory (patch-set territory target) ; this is the territory of the calling tiger
let old-owner [owner] of target; this needs to be memorized
; Tell target patch that is has new owner:
ask target [ set owner calling-tiger ]
; Tell the original owner of the target patch to remove the target patch from its territory:
if old-owner != nobody ;
[
ask old-owner
[
set territory territory with [ owner != calling-tiger ]
]
]
]
set food sum [prey] of territory
]
]
]
ask animals
[
ask territory
[
set pcolor [color] of myself
set plabel (word [status] of owner [status] of myself)
]
if food < 10 [die]
]
end
Patch Clusters Example, in the Code Examples section of NetLogo's Models Library, has code for identifying a contiguous cluster of patches. The core code is as follows:
patches-own [cluster]
to setup
...
ask patches [ set cluster nobody ]
...
end
to grow-cluster ;; patch procedure
ask neighbors4 with [(cluster = nobody) and
(pcolor = [pcolor] of myself)]
[ set cluster [cluster] of myself
grow-cluster ]
end
But see the rest of the example as well.
In your use case, instead of placing the "seeds" randomly for growing the clusters, you'll start growing the clusters in the patches where the animals are standing.
Related
I have turtles (patients), and they can only use only one bed each (white patch). Since patients are randomly generated in a waiting room (green patches), sometimes two or more of them get at the same distance and therefore they find the same patch as its target. I tried to add an attribute to the patch with the purpose of assigning that particular bed to a specific patient. The idea is something like this (please indulge on the ugly code, I'm learning :P):
globals [
waitxmax
waitxmin
waitymax
waitymin
box
]
breed [ patients patient ]
patients-own [ target ]
patches-own [ assigned ]
to setup-wait-room
set waitxmax -15
set waitxmin 15
set waitymax 11
set waitymin 15
ask patches with [
pxcor >= waitxmax and
pxcor <= waitxmin and
pycor >= waitymax and
pycor <= waitymin
] [ set pcolor green ]
end
to setup-beds
let cmy 7
let cmx 15
let dst 3
let nbox 7
ask patch cmx cmy [ set pcolor white ]
let i 1
while [ i < nbox ] [
ask patch (cmx - dst) cmy [ set pcolor white ]
set i i + 1
set cmx cmx - dst
]
ask patches with [ pcolor = white ] [ set assigned false ]
set box patches with [ pcolor = white ]
end
to setup-patients
create-patients start-patients [
set shape "person"
set target nobody
move-to one-of patches with [ pcolor = green ] ]
end
to setup [
clear-all
setup-wait-room
setup-beds
reset-ticks
]
to go
ask patients [ go-to-bed ]
tick
end
to go-to-bed
let _p box with [ self != [ patch-here ] of myself ]
if target = nobody [
set target min-one-of _p [ distance myself ]
ask target [ set assigned myself ]
]
;;; FIXME
if ([ assigned ] of target) != self [ show "not true" ]
if target != nobody [
face target
fd 1
]
end
When I print the two sides of the comparison below FIXME, from the command center I actually get the expected result. For example: both patient 0 and patient 1 have the same target (patch -3 7), but that patch is assigned to (patient 0). I would have expected that comparison to force patient 1 to get a new target since the bed doesn't have his name (I haven't written that code yet), but it always evaluates to true. This is more notorious as more patients I add over available beds (if no beds available, they should wait as soon as one gets free).
When inspecting trough the interface I also see that the patch -3 7 says (patient 0), so I don't know what's happening. Command center example:
observer> show [ assigned ] of patch -3 7
observer: (patient 0)
observer> if ([ assigned ] of patch -3 7) = [self] of patient 0 [ show "true" ]
observer: "true"
observer> if ([ assigned ] of patch -3 7) = [self] of patient 1 [ show "true" ]
;;;; SETUP AND GO
(patient 0): (patch -3 7)
(patient 0): (patient 0)
(patient 0): "true"
(patient 2): (patch 12 7)
(patient 2): (patient 2)
(patient 2): "true"
(patient 1): (patch -3 7)
(patient 1): (patient 1)
(patient 1): "true"
Maybe I'm just overthinking this and there are is a simpler way to assign a bed to a patient and vice versa?
There seems to be a chunk or two missing from your code above (I can't copy-paste and run it), so please have a look at the option below.
This version works by having a single place to store the 'claimed' beds- in the turtle variable. Since the turtle variables can be queried as a list using of, a bed-less turtle can check if there are any beds that are not already present in that list and, if so, claim one.
turtles-own [ owned-bed ]
to setup
ca
ask n-of 5 patches [
set pcolor green
]
crt 10 [
set owned-bed nobody
claim-unclaimed-bed
if owned-bed != nobody [
print word "I own the bed " owned-bed
]
]
reset-ticks
end
to claim-unclaimed-bed
; If I have no bed
if owned-bed = nobody [
; Pull the current owned beds for comparison
let all-owned-beds [owned-bed] of turtles
; Pull those beds that are green AND are not found in 'all-owned-beds'
let available-beds patches with [
pcolor = green and not member? self all-owned-beds
]
; If there are any beds available, claim one
ifelse any? available-beds [
set owned-bed one-of available-beds
] [
; If there are none available, print so
print "There are no available beds."
]
]
end
Edit: Forgot the actual question title- to actually move to their owned-bed (if they have one) in the example above, they simply face it and move how you like- for example:
to go
ask turtles with [ owned-bed != nobody ] [
ifelse distance owned-bed > 1 [
face owned-bed
fd 1
] [
move-to owned-bed
]
]
tick
end
Edit: added complexity
Ok, for an added element of severity, you will likely want to avoid using multiple with [ ... = x statements, and instead to use a primitive called min-one-of which returns the agent with the minimum value of some reporter. Then, you want to tell NetLogo to keep asking the next most severe and the next most severe, etc. One way to do this is with a while loop, which basically says "While this condition is met, continue evaluating the following code." Be careful with while loops- if you forget to write your code such that eventually the condition is no longer true, the while loop will just continue running until you will eventually Tools > Halt your model (or, as has happened to me with a large model, NetLogo crashes).
I've reworked the code (much of what was above is unchanged) to include such a while loop. Note as well that, since the model needs to check which beds are available multiple times, I've made that code into a to-report chunk to condense / simplify.
turtles-own [ owned-bed severity ]
to setup
ca
ask n-of 5 patches [
set pcolor green
]
crt 10 [
set owned-bed nobody
set severity random-float 10
]
let current-available-beds report-available-beds
while [any? current-available-beds] [
; From the turtles with no bed, ask the one with the lowest severity number to
; claim an unclaimed bed. Then, reset the current-available-beds
ask min-one-of ( turtles with [owned-bed = nobody] ) [ severity ] [
claim-unclaimed-bed
if owned-bed != nobody [
show ( word "I have a severity of " severity " so I am claiming the bed " owned-bed )
]
]
set current-available-beds report-available-beds
]
reset-ticks
end
to-report report-available-beds
let all-owned-beds [owned-bed] of turtles
report patches with [
pcolor = green and not member? self all-owned-beds
]
end
to claim-unclaimed-bed
; If I have no bed
if owned-bed = nobody [
let available-beds report-available-beds
; If there are any beds available, claim one
ifelse any? available-beds [
set owned-bed one-of available-beds
] [
; If there are none available, print so
print "There are no available beds."
]
]
end
I am writing a NetLogo model of a housing market and its political ramifications. There are two breeds in the model: households and houses. An early step in my development with which I am having difficulty is having households match to houses via one of two types of links, own or rent, defined by nested conditional statements. This has resulted in two difficulties I haven't been able to overcome as of yet.
Within the command setup-market command, I'm trying to define a set of possible houses to purchase for each household which, if they meet a set of conditions, the household then buys (and creates a link). If it cannot afford to buy, then it will try to rent. If it cannot afford to rent the household will die.
My code continually results in the following error:
IFELSE expected input to be a TRUE/FALSE but got the turtle (house XXX) instead.
There is a further issue I'm having as well later in the code (in the two lines commented out with ";") where I attempt to set the variables owner-occupied and renter to 1 based on the presence of the appropriate link (they should remain 0 and the household should die if it remains unlinked).
The full code is below. The line with ";; This is the line giving me trouble" denotes where the error seems to be occurring.
UPDATE:
Code has been updated with JenB's solution. Resulting error is now:
CREATE-LINK-WITH expected input to be a turtle but got NOBODY instead. which occurs at the line: create-link-with one-of potentialHomes [ set color red
undirected-link-breed [own-links own-link]
undirected-link-breed [rent-links rent-link]
breed [city-centers city-center]
breed [households household]
households-own
[
age
money
income
monthly-income
consumption
monthly-consumption
hh-size race
preference
net-income
net-monthly-income
myHouse
]
breed [houses house]
houses-own
[
cost
down-payment
mortgage-payment
rent
rent-premium
rooms
onMarket
owner-occupied
rental
onMarket?
]
patches-own [
seed? ;;district seed
district ;;district number
full? ;;is the district at capacity?
quadrant
]
to setup
clear-all
reset-ticks
setup-patches
set-default-shape households "person"
create-households num-households [ setxy random-xcor random-ycor ]
set-default-shape houses "house"
create-houses num-houses [ setxy random-xcor random-ycor ]
setup-households
setup-houses
setup-market
generate-cities
end
to generate-cities
let center-x random-xcor / 1.5 ;;keep cities away from edges
let center-y random-ycor / 1.5
end
to setup-patches
ask patches with [pxcor > 0 and pycor > 0] [set quadrant 1 set pcolor 19 ]
ask patches with [pxcor > 0 and pycor < 0] [set quadrant 2 set pcolor 49 ]
ask patches with [pxcor < 0 and pycor < 0] [set quadrant 3 set pcolor 139 ]
ask patches with [pxcor < 0 and pycor > 0] [set quadrant 4 set pcolor 89 ]
end
to setup-households
ask households
[ set age random-poisson 38
set money random-exponential 30600
set income random-exponential 64324
set monthly-income income / 12
set consumption .5 * income
set monthly-consumption consumption / 12
set hh-size random 6 + 1
set net-income income - consumption
set net-monthly-income monthly-income - monthly-consumption
]
end
to setup-houses
ask houses
[ set cost random-normal 300000 50000
set down-payment cost * down-payment-rate
set mortgage-payment (cost - down-payment) / 360
set rooms random-exponential 3
set onMarket 1
set rent mortgage-payment + mortgage-payment * .25
set owner-occupied 0
set rental 0
]
end
to setup-market
ask houses
[ set onMarket? TRUE ]
ask households
[ ifelse any? houses with [ [money] of myself > down-payment and [net-monthly-income] of myself > mortgage-payment ]
[ let potentialHomes houses with [[money] of myself > cost and onMarket? ]
create-link-with one-of potentialHomes [
set color red
]
]
[
ifelse any? houses with [ [net-monthly-income] of myself > rent]
[ let potentialRentals houses with [ [net-monthly-income] of myself > rent and onMarket? ]
create-link-with one-of potentialRentals [ set color blue ]
]
[ die ]
]
]
ask houses
[ if any? link-neighbors [set onMarket FALSE ]
;if any? link-neighbors and color red [ set owner-occupied 1 ]
;if any? link-neighbors and color blue [ set rental 1 ]
]
end
to go
move-households
tick
end
to move-households
ask households [
move-to myHouse
]
end
You don't need to "suspect" where the problem is, NetLogo points to the problem line. Running your code, the problem is actually ifelse one-of houses with [ [net-monthly-income] of myself > rent]. Looking at that line, you pull out a randomly selected house from the pool with rent less than income. But you don't have a condition for the ifelse to test.
In previous constructions you have had != nobody at the end but you forgot that in this line. That will fix the error, but your code would be much less error prone if you used any? instead. You seem to be using one-of .... != nobody to test whether there are any turtles that satisfy the condition. That's what any? is for.
So instead of:
ifelse one-of houses with [ [net-monthly-income] of myself > rent] != nobody
[ let potentialRentals houses with [[money] of myself > rent and onMarket = 1 ]
create-link-with one-of potentialRentals [ set color blue ]
]
[ die ]
you can have:
ifelse any? houses with [ [net-monthly-income] of myself > rent]
[ let potentialRentals houses with [[money] of myself > rent and onMarket = 1 ]
create-link-with one-of potentialRentals [ set color blue ]
]
[ die ]
I should add that there is a potential logic problem here. Say there are houses with rent lower than income, the code goes to the first (true) actions. But there's no guarantee that there are any houses that satisfy the new conditions, which are different.
Also, NetLogo has the concept of true and false so you don't need to use 1 and 0. By convention (but not required), boolean variable names end with a question mark. So you could have set onMarket? true instead of set onMarket 1. Why would you do this? It makes logical operators cleaner and easier to read (which reduces bugs). Your line:
let potentialRentals houses with [[money] of myself > rent and onMarket = 1 ]
would look like:
let potentialRentals houses with [[money] of myself > rent and onMarket? ]
And you can do things like if not onMarket? instead of if onMarket? = false or if onMarket = 0
I want to check if target patches fulfil a condition. If a patch is found that fulfils the condition,
then the turtles should move there. If 'nobody' fulfils this condition, then an error message should be printed.
The condition is that a patch should have in radius 10 2 turtles of the same breed.
I try to achieve this with ifelse and nobody. However, at the moment I always get the error message, even though the
target variable is not empty (you can check this with the if loop).
breed [ breed1s breed1 ]
breed [ breed2s breed2 ]
globals [target1 target2]
to setup
ca
create-breed1s 1000 [
setxy random-xcor random-ycor
]
create-breed1s 1000 [
setxy random-xcor random-ycor
]
end
to go
ask turtles [
set target1 ( count turtles in-radius 10 with [breed = breed1s] ) >= 2
set target2 ( count turtles in-radius 10 with [breed = breed2s] ) >= 2
new-position
]
end
to new-position
ifelse target1 != nobody
[ if (breed = breed1s) [ move-to one-of patches with [ target1 ] ] ]
[ print "Not enough agents in the neighborhood" ]
ifelse target2 != nobody
[ if (breed = breed2s) [ move-to one-of patches with [ target2 ] ] ]
[ print "Not enough agents in the neighborhood" ]
; if (breed = breed1s)
; [ move-to one-of patches with [ target1 ] ]
end
A remark to the efficiency of the model: as I want to add turtles later in every tick, target has to be reevaluated
in every tick (therefore it is in "go" and not in "setup").
Another question: is there a possibility to do something like [ breed = myself ] instead of [ breed = breed1s ], so
I don't have to type the breed for every breed?
Edit:
the turtles that move to the target patch should have the same breed that is also addressed in the target patch.
The problem is actually how you are creating target1, not the check as to whether it is nobody. You have:
set target1 ( count turtles in-radius 10 with [breed = breed1s] ) >= 2
This line first identifies all the nearby turtles with the appropriate breed and counts them. If the count is 2 or higher, then the variable target1 is set to true and to false if the count is 0 or 1. So you are comparing a boolean true or false to nobody (a special type of agent). That will always be a mismatch and therefore print the error.
Just a note on debugging - when you get this sort of problem, it's always useful to have a print statement for each side of the check just before doing the check. You would have immediately spotted that target1 wasn't what you thought it was.
Since you are asking to move to one-of the patches, you probably really want to store the available patches that are within 10 distance (I think) and have enough of the right type of turtles. So, you need something like:
to go
ask turtles [
set target1 patches in-radius 10 with [count breed1s-here >= 2]
set target2 patches in-radius 10 with [count breed2s-here >= 2]
new-position
]
end
Then your emptiness test is any?
to new-position
ifelse any? target1
[ move-to one-of target1 ]
[ print "Not enough agents in the neighborhood" ]
ifelse any? target2
[ move-to one-of target2 ]
[ print "Not enough agents in the neighborhood" ]
end
Assuming I have correctly interpreted that you want patches within 10 of the asking turtle (as compared to any patch with sufficient turtles within a distance of 10) and all you care about is the number of turtles of its own breed, then:
to go
ask turtles [
let target-breed [breed] of myself
set targets patches in-radius 10 with [count turtles-here with [breed = target-breed] >= 2]
new-position
]
end
to new-position
ifelse any? targets
[ move-to one-of targets ]
[ print "Not enough agents in the neighborhood" ]
end
On the efficiency, it depends on how many turtles you have. If you have quite a lot of turtles, then asking each to count its own neighbourhood will be expensive. Instead, you could have patchsets for each breed. That is, set up target1 as patches with [count breed1s-here >= 2] at the beginning of the go procedures. Then you can just do:
to go
let targets1 patches with [count breed1s-here >= 2]
let targets2 patches with [count breed2s-here >= 2]
ask turtles
[ set targets targets1 in-radius 10
new-position
]
end
However, you can no longer use the breed of the turtle and the myself trick to pick the correct patchset. There are ways to get around this (for example, using a list with two items, breed at first position and the patchset as second position) but that's getting well off track for this answer.
to new-position
ifelse any? targets
[ move-to one-of targets ]
[ print "Not enough agents in the neighborhood" ]
end
Good morning people,
At the moment I have a template in netlogo that allows to visualize routes of deliveries in houses created randomly.
globals[route-vector]
breed [carr car]
breed [spare spares]
breed [hous housess]
breed [spawns spawn]
carr-own [ route route-counter spawn-target target route-complete?]
spare-own[ route route-counter spawn-target target route-complete?]
to setup
clear-all
create-carros
create-casas
path
reset-ticks
end
to create-carros
create-carr 2 [ set color green ]
ask carr [
set size 1.5
setxy random-xcor random-ycor
set route-counter 0
set target nobody
set route []
set route-complete? false
pd
]
end
to create-carspare
create-spare 1 [ set color blue ]
ask spare [
set size 1.5
setxy random-xcor random-ycor
set route-counter 0
set target nobody
set route []
set route-complete? false
pd
]
end
to create-casas
create-hous 5 [ set color red ]
ask hous [
set shape "house"
set size 1.5
setxy random-xcor random-ycor
]
end
to path
set route-vector [4 7 6 3 5 0 1 1 0 1]
let houses sublist route-vector 0 (length route-vector / 2 )
let carlist sublist route-vector (length route-vector / 2 ) (length route-
vector)
(foreach carlist houses
[ [the-car the-house] ->
ask car the-car [
set route lput ( housess the-house ) route
]
]
)
ask carr [
hatch 1 [
set breed spawns
ht
]
set spawn-target one-of other turtles-here with [
xcor = [xcor] of myself
]
]
end
to go
ask carr with [ not route-complete? ] [
if route = [] [
set target spawn-target
]
if target = nobody [
set target item route-counter route
]
face target
ifelse distance target > 1 [
fd 1
] [
move-to target
ifelse target != spawn-target [
set route-counter route-counter + 1
] [
set route-complete? true
]
set target nobody
]
if route-counter > length route - 1 [
set route-counter 0
set target spawn-target
]
]
tick
end
I thought about using a broken or crash switch, and a slider with how many maximum home deliveries per car.
in my go procedure I put:
ask carr with [failure?] [
if ticks = 25 [ask one-of carr [set crash? TRUE]
set target spawn-target
Assuming the maximum deliveries per car are 3 and as one or more houses will not be visited because of the car that stopped, I put a reschedule button:
to reschedule
ask one-of spare with [not route-complete?] ; How do I make the reservation
car take the route of the car that stopped?
[
set target [car route that stopped]
]
set target spawn-target
end
I need some help in my reschedule bottom. if a car stops, and does not finish the route, the reserve car should take over the houses that are missing to visit
Thanks in advance for your understanding, and if you can help, I was grateful.
If I understand what you are asking, you have a car that has crashed and want to pass on the content of one of its variables to the spare car. The car that is crashed has the variable crash? set to TRUE, but I can't see from your code how you define a car to be the spare car. But it's probably something like this.
ask cars
[ <doing whatever they do>
if <conditions for crash>
[ set crash? TRUE
ask one-of cars with [spare?]
[ set spare? FALSE
set target [target] of myself
]
stop
]
]
I've been struggling with this one for the last 24 hours or so I feel like I'm missing something relatively simple here.
to setup-scale-free-network
clear-all
;; Make a circle of turtles
set num-nodes (num-children + num-adults + num-toddlers)
create-children num-children
create-adults num-adults
create-toddlers num-toddlers
layout-circle turtles (max-pxcor - 8)
ask turtles[
create-links-with turtles with [self > myself and random-float 5 < probability]
]
setup
end
to-report find-partner
report [one-of both-ends] of one-of links
end
The above code creates a set number of turtles of various breeds and creates a number of links between these breeds.
to go
reset-ticks
make-link find-partner
tick
end
The two procedures would be called until the needed level of degree distribution as been met.
What I want to do is use the find-partner procedure to move towards preferential attachment to do this I need to modify this code to create a link from the node find partner has selected to one of each of the other three types of breeds in my network.
to make-node [old-node]
crt 1
[
set color red
if old-node != nobody
[ create-link-with old-node [ set color green ]
;; position the new node near its partner
move-to old-node
fd 8
]
]
end
My own attempts have lead no where to be honest. I know I'm asking for a lot of help but I'm at my wits end here, thank you for your help and patience.
I was unable to completely understand your question. I am guessing that you wish to create another type of link which you call preferential attachment (with green color) between turtles who are already a part of the network.
One thing you might want in this situation is that you do not pick turtles which are already in a preferential attachment network. [this is just my assumption]
I have modified your code (as follows) to get the desired network with preferential attachment shown with green colored links, have added a turtle-variable already-attached which is used to exclude turtles which are already preferentially attached to others.
Hope this helps!
breed [ children child ]
breed [ adults adult ]
breed [ toddlers toddler ]
children-own [ already-attached ]
adults-own [ already-attached ]
toddlers-own [ already-attached ]
to setup-scale-free-network
clear-all
let num-children 5
let num-adults 5
let num-toddlers 5
let probability 1
;; Make a circle of turtles
create-children num-children [ set color orange ]
create-adults num-adults [ set color green ]
create-toddlers num-toddlers [ set color blue ]
layout-circle turtles (max-pxcor - 8)
ask turtles
[
create-links-with turtles with [self > myself and random-float 5 < probability]
]
end
to go
setup-scale-free-network
ask turtles with [already-attached = 0]
[
attach-to-one-of-each-breed self
]
end
to attach-to-one-of-each-breed [ source-node ]
ask source-node
[
if any? other children with [ already-attached = 0 ]
[
ask one-of other children
[
set already-attached 1
create-link-with source-node [ set color green ]
]
]
if any? other adults with [ already-attached = 0 ]
[
ask one-of other adults
[
set already-attached 1
create-link-with source-node [ set color green ]
]
]
if any? other toddlers with [ already-attached = 0 ]
[
ask one-of other toddlers
[
set already-attached 1
create-link-with source-node [ set color green ]
]
]
]
end