Worklight PushAdapter sample works fine in development env, i.e. worklight studio, but couples issues occur while moving to production.
backend application can not call the push procedure due to security issues. if set securityTest="wl_unprotected" , it might be a risk in production, any other solutions?
in the onPoll function of the eventSource, if call other adapters' procedure, it raise security issues in production too, though works fine in dev.
e.g.
PushAdapter:
WL.Server.createEventSource({
name: 'PushEventSource',
onDeviceSubscribe: 'deviceSubscribeFunc',
onDeviceUnsubscribe: 'deviceUnsubscribeFunc',
securityTest:'SingleStepAuthAdapter-securityTest',
poll:{
interval: 120,
onPoll: 'getNotificationFromBackend'
}
});
function getNotificationFromBackend(){
var notifications = WL.Server.invokeProcedure({
adapter : 'MessageAdapter',
procedure : 'getMessages',
parameters : []
});
WL.Logger.error("notifications: " + JSON.stringify(notifications));
...
}
Error Messages:
[14-2-13 9:11:45:382 CST] 0000003d ht.integration.js.JavaScriptIntegrationLibraryImplementation E notifications: {"isSuccessful":false,"errors":["Runtime: The resource 'proc:MessageAdapter.getMessages' should only be accessed when authenticated in realm 'wl_antiXSRFRealm'."],"warnings":[],"info":[]} [project XXX]
Could you help pls? thanks in advanced.
The default security test for adapter procedures contains Anti-XSRF protection, but this configuration can be overridden by either:
a.Implementing your own authentication realm.
b.Disabling the authentication requirement for a specific procedure. You can do so by adding
the securityTest="wl_unprotected" property to the element in the adapter XML file.
Please refer to below post for a similar question.
IBM Worklight 6.0.0.1 - Push notifications polling not working in Production environment
Worklight should allow a listening port number which is protected by the enterprise firewall to be assigned to the push adapter. If such feature exists, then it should be just a matter of configuring the firewall on production to allow only the push requests from a specific push source.
If such a feature is not available, then the push adapter should be protected by a security test. And the push source should authenticate using a special login ID when pushing data. This should be doable.
Related
I have fabric composer 0.72 installed on my mac, and I was able to follow this thread to get it connected to my Blockchain (v.61 of Fabric) on Bluemix.
fabric-composer-integration-with-bluemix-blockchain-service
Now I am trying to build an ubuntu (16.04) docker container and run composer-rest-server there. When I try to connect to my blockchain service from my docker container (using the same id, WebAppAdmin, that I used on my mac) I get an error:
Discovering types from business network definition ...
Connection fails: Error: Identity or token does not match.
It will be retried for the next request.
{ Error: Identity or token does not match.
at /home/composer/.nvm/versions/node/v6.10.3/lib/node_modules /composer-rest-server/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:417:17 code: 2, metadata: Metadata { _internal_repr: {} } }
I tried copying the cert from my mac to my docker container:
/home/composer/.composer-credentials/member.WebAppAdmin
but when I did that I got a different error that says "signature does not verify". I did some additional testing, and I discovered that if I used an id that I had not previously used with composer (i.e. user_type1_0) then I could connect, and I could see a new cert in my .composer-credentials directory.
I tried deleting that container and building a new one (I dorked something else up) I could not use that same userid again.
Does anybody know how security and these certs are supposed to work? It would seem as though something to do with certificate generation/validation is tied to the client (i.e. hardware address), such that if I try to re-use an id on a different machine, the certs or keys or something don't match. I have a way to make things work, but it doesn't seem like it's the right way if I can't use the same id from different machines.
Thanks!
Hi i tried to recreate this by having blockchain running on a unix machine and then i copied my connection profile and certificate to my mac and then edited my connection profile to update the ip address and key store. I then did a composer network ping and it worked fine.
I am using composer v0.7.4 so you could try that?
I have also faced this issue, and concluded that
There is inconsistent behavior while deploying network using composer on Cloud environment includeing Bluemix. Problem is not with composer, but with fabric 0.6.
I am assuming that this issue is also indirectly related to following known bugs into fabric 0.6, which will not be fixed in fabric 0.6.
ERROR:
"
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error
at ClientDuplexStream._emitStatusIfDone (/home/ubuntu/.nvm/versions/node/v6.9.5/lib/node_modules/composer-cli/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:189:19)
at ClientDuplexStream._readsDone (/home/ubuntu/.nvm/versions/node/v6.9.5/lib/node_modules/composer-cli/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:158:8)
at readCallback (/home/ubuntu/.nvm/versions/node/v6.9.5/lib/node_modules/composer-cli/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:217:12)
"
So far, We have understood that following three JIRA are root cause , where essentially the cloud networking layer ends up killing the idle event hub connection after a period of inactivity and the fabric SDK cannot handle this.
https://jira.hyperledger.org/browse/FAB-4002 FAB-3310
https://jira.hyperledger.org/browse/FAB-3310
or FAB-2787
Conclusion:
There is no alternative way of fixing this issue with Bluemix or any cloud environment with fabric 0.6
You may not experience this issue with Fabric 1.0, but there is still possibilities as all above mentioned defects are not fixed yet.
I use "Liberty for Java" app and Statica service(Proxy) on Bluemix.
We set http.proxyHost/http.proxyPort/https.proxyHost/https.proxyPort as system properties in Java code every transactions.
for example:
URL url = new URL(xxx);
HttpURLConnection connection = (HttpURLConnection) url.openConnection();
........
System.setProperty("http.proxyHost", host);
System.setProperty("http.proxyPort", port);
System.setProperty("https.proxyHost", host);
System.setProperty("https.proxyPort", port);
........
DataOutputStream out = new DataOutputStream(connection.getOutputStream());
I have an issue that one transaction go from the app to a target server directly in spite of tens of thousands of transactions passed the proxy.
Question 1:
Do "Liberty for Java" app on Bluemix clear or update system properties, http.proxyHost/http.proxyPort/https.proxyHost/https.proxyPort?
I wonder "Liberty for Java" app updated with null to access outer servers in multi-thread environment.
Question 2:
Do "Liberty for Java" app on Bluemix communicate with outer servers?
I found the following log in Statica.
https://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.agents.na.apm.ibmserviceengage.com
https://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.gateway.prd.na.ca.ibmserviceengage.com
( I masked a part of URL.)
P.S. We will change java code with ProxySelector class or Proxy class.
Re #1: No.
Re #2: Potentially yes. In your case, it seems your app is bound with a Monitoring & Analytics service? If so, a data collector will be installed and will send collected data to remote servers.
What's the reason that you need to set the proxy system properties in your code? Is it because you want some connections to go through the proxy and others not?
If so, then the way you do this is not right because the system proxy setting is a global setting, not a thread-scoped setting. This means if one thread sets the proxy setting, all threads will then use that proxy; if one thread unsets it, all threads will then do direct connections. That may explain why you are intermittently seeing some direct connections. The right way is to use a http client lib that supports proxy as parameters, like https://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/httpclient/apidocs/org/apache/http/client/config/RequestConfig.Builder.html#setProxy%28org.apache.http.HttpHost%29
If you want all connections to go through the http proxy, then you should simply set the JAVA_OPTS environment variable to pass in those system properties, e.g., "-Dhttp.proxyHost=x.x.x.x -Dhttp.proxyPort=xx".
I have configured spring cloud config which picks up property from Github. If I post to /refresh, I am also able to get the updated value in my application.
Now I want to get properties updated automatically. That means I don't want to hit refresh API to get the changes reflected in my application from Github property file to my application.
Do I need to implement Rabbitmq and cloud bus for it or there is any other simple way to do it?
Also there document says that we need to add a dependency on the spring-cloud-config-monitor library for push notification.
http://projects.spring.io/spring-cloud/spring-cloud.html#_push_notifications_and_spring_cloud_bus
But I did not find any such dependency in maven to be added. Not sure if my understanding is wrong. Please help.
You would need a Config server with Spring Cloud Bus and RabbitMQ (or Kafka or Redis) support.
RabbitMQ with the following exchange:
name: springCloudBus
type: topic
durable: true
autoDelete: false
internal: false
The config server would send data to the topic once it receives push events from Git (Github, Bitbucket, GitLab) via a webhook to http://<config-server>/monitor
And a client application with Config and RabbitMQ libraries, subscribed to the previous exchange to receive messages of the properties that need to be refreshed.
More could be found in my blog at: http://tech.asimio.net/2017/02/02/Refreshable-Configuration-using-Spring-Cloud-Config-Server-Spring-Cloud-Bus-RabbitMQ-and-Git.html with a brief explanation of the configuration, logs and full source code for the Config server and client app.
They are not generally available yet. You need to add http://repo.spring.io/milestone/ as a maven repository and use a milestone release.
I am using Confluence 4.2.5 (build 3284) with CAS SSO connected to my LDAP server and would like to be able to call synchroniseUserDirectories() from the LDAP server when a user changes their password so that the change is instantaneous.
The way it works now is that users have to wait for the Confluence to run it's periodic LDAP synchronization which can be disconcerting for them.
I have tried using the XML-RPC interface to call changeUserPassword() (as an administrator) but it doesn't work. The operation raises an exception "Error changing password for user ...". I presume that that is because the user is defined in the LDAP but I can't tell for sure because the exception message wasn't clear about the cause.
Here is example code that I would like to be able to use. It doesn't work.
#!/usr/bin/env python
import xmlrpclib
url = 'https://docs.example.com'
admin_user = 'frobisher'
admin_pass = 'supersecretstuff'
username = 'bigbob'
new_password = 'bigbobsbigsecret'
server = xmlrpclib.ServerProxy(url + '/rpc/xmlrpc')
token = server.confluence2.login(admin_user, admin_pass)
# CITATION: https://developer.atlassian.com/display/CONFDEV/Remote+Confluence+Methods
# this doesn't exist but would be my preferred approach.
# It raises a NoSuchMethodException exception.
server.confluence2.synchroniseUserDirectories(token)
# this throws a general exception, because of the LDAP? The message
# wasn't clear about the source of the problem.
#server.confluence2.changeUserPassword(token,
# username,
# password)
server.confluence2.logout(token)
Is there any way to do this using SOAP or REST? I was concerned about REST because it sounds like it is still a prototype.
If none of those approaches will work, can it be done with a simple plugin considering that this must be a push operation from the LDAP server to the Confluence server? I have no experience writing plugins but I do some java work occasionally.
Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
The short answer is "no". The ability to synchronise remote user directories is not exposed as a remote operation in Confluence.
The long answer is "yes", you can write a plugin to do this. If you're already familiar with java, then perhaps the best answer is to just show you some source code I've written that performs a similar function: https://bitbucket.org/jaysee00/confluence-user-sync-api This plugin gives you SOAP, XML-RPC and JSON-RPC methods to force an individual user account to be synced in to Confluence from a remote directory.
That might suit your purposes as-is, but I imagine it would be possible to edit the source of this plugin and change it to synchronise an entire directory, too.
I have a web app that I've created using Entity Framework Code First. In setting it up I have managed to match my DB connection string to my DBContext by specifying the full namespace and class of the DBContext as the name of the connection string.
<add name="MyClassProject.EfDbContext" connectionString="Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=MyDatabase;Integrated Security=true;User Id=MyUsername;Password=MyPassword;" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>
Initially when I set up the project, I just had it created in c:\inetpub\wwwroot, and just ran it through Visual Studio. Everything worked fine.
Now I'm trying to have the code build to a separate website folder, and have the website run as it's own website and app pool in IIS. I've set up the website, and my hosts file but when I went to run it I received the following error.
Cannot open database "MyDatabase" requested by the login. The login failed.
Login failed for user 'IIS APPPOOL\MyAppPool'.
I'm wondering why this is happening, as I seem to be specifying the security username and password to use for the DB in my connection string....so why is it trying to connect as the app pool that my website is running in?
Also, how can I fix this, without having to give MyAppPool (or Network Service if I changed it to that) DB permissions in SQL Server?
Update: I should've mentioned that I initialise my DBContext class using:
namespace MyClassProject
{
public class EfDbContext : DbContext
{
public EfDbContext() : base ("MyDatabase")
{
}
}
}
I found the issue.
When I initialise my DBContext class with : base("MyDatabase"), it overrides the connection string specified in the web.config.
Removing that from my DBContext class, with the database already existing, the site now works in IIS.
However, if I don't have the database created already, (or if I have my database initialiser use DropCreateDatabaseWhenModelChanges or DropCreateDatabaseAlways so that it'll needs to recreate the DB), the initialiser will fail, as it'll try to use an SQL user that doesn't have permissions to create the DB.
My way around it is to use the : base("MyDatabase") and run from Visual Studio initially so the database is created.
Then remove it from code, add the specified user to the DB security in SQL Server, and it'll allow my site to run in IIS thereafter.
Remove Integrated Security=true;. That is the setting that passes the current user off.
When using Integrated Security, the DB is given a token from the user who is currently running the process. In all likelihood, you run Visual Studio from your user account, which likely has Admin permissions on your SQL Server instance.
When IIS runs your app, it uses something called an Application Pool (or App pool). You can have multiple apps in a single pool to be managed together. The app pool also runs under a special user account named for the pool. App pool users exist under a container called "IIS AppPool", so the local user for the DefaultAppPool is IIS AppPool\DefaultAppPool. If you want to grant access to a resource on your local system (including file permissions), you can also grant it to the app pool user or local group IIS_IUSRS to grant it to all app pools.
Remember that these are local accounts, so they will not cross network boundaries. To grant permissions on a different server, you'll need to either use a domain user (or even better, a domain Managed Service Account) or you can set the app pool user to NETWORK SERVICE and then you can grant permissions to MyDomain\MyWebServer$ (the dollar sign is important).
You can use Web.config Transform to have Local connection stirng different from Remote (say in Release mode). To start using it you need to publish your Web App using One-Click Publish from Visual Studio. That's really very handy way to publish web apps!
Looks like that's what you're looking for.
Or set connection string name base on a condition:
public EfDbContext() : base (GetConnectionStringName())
{
}
private static GetConnectionStringName()
{
return RunLocally() : "LocalDatabase" : "RemoteDatabase";
}
private static bool RunLocally()
{
// implement some how
}