I have a console program that is being debugged under Eclipse. Eclipse provides a Console Panel, but it does not appear to provide a terminal.
The program has a few signal handlers installed, including SIGHUP, SIGINT and SIGTRAP. When I try and send a CTRL+C to the program, the signal SIGINT never makes it to the debugee.
To date, I've had to open a separate terminal, do a ps, and then send the signal with kill (for example, kill -s SIGINT <pid>). But that's seems like overkill (not to mention a lot of extra work) since all I should need is a CTRL+C on a foreground window or terminal.
How does one send signals to a program under the debugger?
Related
I'm using VS Code to write and debug a C++ program binding to libfuse.
Unfortunately, if you kill a libfuse process with SIGKILL, you then have to use sudo umount -f <mountpoint> before you can start the program again. It's a minor nuisance if I have to do this every time I want to stop or restart debugging, especially as I shouldn't have to authenticate to do such a regular task (the sudo is somehow necessary despite the mount occurring as my user).
While I think this is mainly FUSE's fault (it should gracefully recover from a process being ungracefully killed and unmount automatically instead of leaving the directory saying Transport endpoint is not connected), I also think there should be a way to customise VS Code (or any IDE) to run some clean-up when you want to stop debugging.
I've found that entering -exec signal SIGTERM in the Debug Console will gracefully unmount the directory correctly, stop the process and tell VS Code it's no longer debugging (status bar changes back from orange to blue). But I can't seem to find a way to automate this. I've tried using a .gdbinit file, with some inspiration from this question:
handle SIGTERM nostop
# This doesn't work as hook-quit isn't run when quitting via MI mode, which VS Code uses...
define hook-quit
signal SIGTERM
end
But as noted in the linked question, GDB ignores quit hooks when in MI mode, and VS Code uses MI mode.
The ideal solution for me would be if I could put something in a .vscode configuration file telling it to send -exec signal SIGTERM when I click the stop or restart buttons (and then wait for whatever notification it's getting that debugging has stopped, before restarting if applicable) but I imagine there probably isn't an option for that.
Even if the buttons can't be customised, I'd be happy with the ability to have a keybinding that would just send -exec signal SIGTERM to the Debug Console without me having to open said console and enter the command, though the Command Palette doesn't show anything useful here (nothing that looks like it will send a specified Debug Console command), so I don't expect there's a bindable command for that either.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Or would these belong as feature requests over on the VS Code github? Any way to get GDB to respect its quit hook in MI mode, or to get FUSE to gracefully handle its process being killed would be appreciated too.
When trying to use Gatling CLI mode, the gatling starts successfully and recording is also happening. But the problem is when stopping the recording. As mentioned by the documentation (https://gatling.io/docs/2.3/http/recorder/), it can be stopped either by CTRL-C or by killing the pid available in .gatling-recorder-pid file.
I have used the second approach. Though the recording is stopped successfully, it is unable to create the simulation file. After doing some trial and error the only understanding i have now is that unless CTRL-C is pressed, it can never create a simulation file and killing pid only stops the recorder just before the file creation. But i am unable to simulate the CTRL-C action in windows command prompt from java. Please help. Thanks in advance
The kill command sends a SIGTERM (termination) signal. The SIGINT (interrupt) signal is the one equivalent to Ctrl+C.
kill -SIGINT processPIDHere
NonStop
Sets nonstop mode. If a terminal's already been set up, it's too late;
the debugger remembers the setting in case you restart, though. (source)
When is it useful,why do I need to debug if it doesn't ever stop?
As I understand it, you can use the debugger in rendez-vous-mode. In this setting, the debugger runs the application NonStop without a tty first, but when an event interrupt occurs, it stops the application and sets the tty up for you to debug.
Update: Rendez-vous-Mode is useful for attaching to a running perl process after it has been started (by something out of your control). If your application is prepared for dynamically loading the debugger, you can enter the debugger even if you did not start it with a -d option at all.
I am trying to find a hook in Emacs, which should fire right before emacs server graceful shutdown.
I tried kill-emacs-query-functions, kill-emacs-hook, server-done-hook with elisp like :
(add-hook 'server-done-hook
'(lambda ()
(savehist-save)
)
)
... but none of them is called when OS shuts down, so history is not saved.
Maybe someone could give a hint?
P.S. I am on Gentoo Linux, emacs-vcs-23.2.9999 package, terminal only. For testing desired behaviour Emacs is stopped using start-stop-daemon utility.
Since Emacs 24.1, Emacs runs kill-emacs which runs the functions in kill-emacs-hook. So the question, and the rest of this answer, are only relevant to older versions.
The right place to run something before Emacs shuts down is either kill-emacs-query-function if you want to be able to cancel the shutdown or kill-emacs-hook if you don't. The problem you're facing is that your OS does not notify Emacs to shut down gracefully in a way that Emacs understands, or to look at it the other way, Emacs does not understand your OS's request to suht down gracefully.
A graceful way of shutting down Emacs 23 from the outside is to run emacsclient -n -e '(kill-emacs)'. That's obviously not a generic way of telling a program to shut down gracefully.
The normal way to shut down a process gracefully on unix is to send it a SIGHUP or SIGTERM signal. Unfortunately, Emacs treats almost all signals as fatal, and only runs an emergency auto save and no lisp code when it receives them. This is not configurable from lisp. A different behavior has been requested, but turned down.
A partial workaround (found here) is to run session saving hooks in delete-frame-functions. This hook is likely to be run before the system shutdown sequence, either when you close your last frame or when the X server dies (taking your terminals with them if you run Emacs in a terminal). Make sure you don't run the hook that kills the server in delete-frame-functions.
By the way, if you were going to use this exact hook, note that your code is a complicated way of writing (add-hook 'server-done-hook 'savehist-save), and that's not useful since there's already savehist-autosave in kill-emacs-hook.
Howdy, I am trying to run matlab remotely on windows via OpenSSH installed with Cygwin, but launching matlab in windows without the GUI seems to be impossible.
If i am logged in locally, I can launch matlab -nodesktop -nodisplay -r script, and matlab will launch up a stripped down GUI and do the command.
However, this is impossible to do remotely via ssh, as, matlab needs to display the GUI.
Does anyone have any suggestions or work arounds?
Thanks,
Bob
Short story: is your script calling exit()? Are you using "-wait"?
Long story: I think you're fundamentally out of luck if you want to interact with it, but this should work if you just want to batch jobs up. Matlab on Windows is a GUI application, not a console application, and won't interact with character-only remote connectivity. But you can still launch the process. Matlab will actually display the GUI - it will just be in a desktop session on the remote computer that you have no access to. But if you can get it to do your job without further input, this can be made to work, for some value of "work".
Your "-r script" switch is the right direction. But realize that on Windows, Matlab's "-r" behavior is to finish the script and then go back to the GUI, waiting for further input. You need to explicitly include an "exit()" call to get your job to finish, and add try/catches to make sure that exit() gets reached. Also, you should use a "-logfile" switch to capture a copy of all the command window output to a log file so you can see what it's doing (since you can't see the GUI) and have a record of prior runs.
Also, matlab.exe is asynchronous by default. Your ssh call will launch Matlab and return right away unless you add the "-wait" switch. Check the processes on the machine you're sshing to; Matlab may actually be running. Add -wait if you want it to block until finished.
One way to do this stuff just use -r to call to a standard job wrapper script that initializes your libraries and paths, runs a job, and does cleanup and exit. You'll also want to make a .bat wrapper that sets up the -logfile switch to point to a file with the job name, timestamp, and other info in it. Something like this at the M-code level.
function run_batch_job(jobname)
try
init_my_matlab_library(); % By calling classpath(), javaclasspath(), etc
feval(jobname); % assumes jobname is an M-file on the path
catch err
warning('Error occurred while running job %s: %s', jobname, err.message)
end
try
exit();
catch err
% Yes, exit() can throw errors
java.lang.System.exit(1); % Scuttle the process hard to make sure job finishes
end
% If your code makes it to here, your job will hang
I've set up batch job systems using this style in Windows Scheduler, Tidal, and TWS before. I think it should work the same way under ssh or other remote access.
A Matlab batch system on Windows like this is brittle and hard to manage. Matlab on Windows is fundamentally not built to be a headless batch execution system; assumptions about an interactive GUI are pervasive in it and hard to work around. Low-level errors or license errors will pop up modal dialog boxes and hang your job. The Matlab startup sequence seems to have race conditions. You can't set the exit status of MATLAB.exe. There's no way of getting at the Matlab GUI to debug errors the job throws. The log file may be buffered and you lose output near hangs and crashes. And so on.
Seriously consider porting to Linux. Matlab is much more suitable as a batch system there.
If you have the money or spare licenses, you could also use the Matlab Distributed Computing toolbox and server to run code on remote worker nodes. This can work for parallelization or for remote batch jobs.
There are two undocumented hacks that reportedly fix a similar problem - they are not guarantied to solve your particular problem but they are worth a try. Both of them depend on modifying the java.opts file:
-Dsun.java2d.pmoffscreen=false
Setting this option fixes a problem of extreme GUI slowness when launching Matlab on a remote Linux/Solaris computer.
-Djava.compiler=NONE
This option disables the Java just-in-time compiler (JITC). Note that it has no effect on the Matlab interpreter JITC. It has a similar effect to running Matlab with the '–nojvm' command-line option. Note that this prevents many of Matlab's GUI capabilities. Unfortunately, in some cases there is no alternative. For example, when running on a remote console or when running pre-2007 Matlab releases on Intel-based Macs. In such cases, using the undocumented '-noawt' command-line option, which enables the JVM yet prevents JAVA GUI, is a suggested compromise.
Using putty use ssh -X remote "matlab" it should work