I am trying to check if specific results exist on a page. There can be up to 6 sponsored results on any given page. I have tried to set to create the count so it checks until no more results are present but it only checks the first result and does not proceed to check the rest.
I have created the following
#continue='yes'
#count=0
until #continue=='no'
if #b.div(:class=>'result sponsored',:index=> #count).link(:index, 0).exists?
puts 'PASS - this advert is for a trade vehicle'
else
puts 'FAIL - this advert is not for a trade vehicle.'
end
sleep (1)
#count+=1
#continue='no'
end
Can you please advise why this only checks the first result on the page?
Apologies if being vague but am new to this. If you need me to provide more information let me know.
Thanks
Mark
Try this:
result = 'FAIL - this advert is not for a trade vehicle.'
#b.divs(:class=>'result sponsored').each do |div|
if div.link.exists?
result = 'PASS - this advert is for a trade vehicle'
break
end
end
puts result
Related
I apologize if this is too vague a question, but we're having the following problem:
We use a search form to find a record, then load it in a bound-control form where changes are made. Then we return to the search form and open another record. When we do that, the form's BeforeUpdate property fires a 3020 error, "Update without Add New or Edit" and stepping through the code it's referring to the FIRST opened record. This is strange because there is no explicit update call, but after much trial and error I think the error is thus:
Record #1 is opened via the form and changes are made. Record #2 is opened on that same form without closing the first recordset. Even though we now re-opened the form with the second record, Access still assumes we're editing record 1, i.e. that we're trying to edit 2 records concurrently. Same as though we had a datasheet form and we edited one row and then tried to edit a second row without saving the first. What I want to be able to do is have it automatically do an update on the first record when the form deactivates so loading a new record doesn't cause this conflict.
So the bottom line is this: **Is there a way, on say the form's Dirty or Deactivate event, that we can force the form's recordset to update and close ** before loading a second record?
I hope I made this clear enough, it's a complex problem, so any small guidance would help. Btw, you may ask, "Why are you running the same code to open the same form twice?" Good question! Hey it's an old and badly written app (the thing has GoSubs in it for Pete's sake) but I have no choice but to make the best of a bad situation.
EDIT: I was asked to post code, which is reasonable, but it's in several different places. So I have the data form, it has a "Search" button to go back to the search form for opening another record. The search button on the data entry form is:
Private Sub CommandSearch_Click()
On Error GoTo Err_CommandSearch_Click
DoCmd.OpenForm "Reference Form", acNormal 'This is the form that does the searching
Exit_CommandSearch_Click:
Exit Sub
Err_CommandSearch_Click:
MsgBox Err.Description
Resume Exit_CommandSearch_Click
End Sub
When a record is selected on that search form, then the new form is opened with this code. Now this is where it gets tricky. I'm not the original programmer, as I said I think it was written in Access 97 by someone after taking an hour to read "Access for Dummies" :). But it always looks like only one copy of the form is open, so maybe it's re-opening it?
Public Sub CommandLoadCase_Click()
Dim LoadUTUCaseNumber As String, lengthUTUCaseNumber As Integer
lengthUTUCaseNumber = InStr(Forms![Reference Form]![Reference Query SubForm]![UTU Case Number], "-") - 1
If (lengthUTUCaseNumber = 0) Then
LoadUTUCaseNumber = ""
Else
LoadUTUCaseNumber = Left$(Forms![Reference Form]![Reference Query SubForm]![UTU Case Number], lengthUTUCaseNumber)
End If
On Error Resume Next
Forms![Case Appeal_Add-On Form].UTUCaseKeyToFind = LoadUTUCaseNumber
DoCmd.OpenForm "Case Appeal_Add-On Form", acNormal, , , , , LoadUTUCaseNumber
'Case Appeal Add On Form referred to here is the data entry form I refer to above.
End Sub
Finally, the Error 3020 (Update without Add/Edit) is occurring after it executes this line on the data entry form. (I know the code is complicated which is why I didn't enter it at first).
Private Sub Form_BeforeUpdate(Cancel As Integer)
[UTU Claim Sequence Key] = [UTU Claim Alpha Sequence] & CStr([UTU Claim Numeric Sequence])
End Sub
I'm trying to inject users to a scenario in such a way that it will keep inserting user until every single entry of the feed file is used since the feed file contains log in information. I would like all the users in the feed file to log in. Right now all I could think of is two possible approaches.
Here I insert the number of rows in the feedfile at once.
scenario("Verified_Login")
.exec(LoginScenario.scn)
.inject(atOnceUsers(number_of_entries_in_feedfile))
Here I insert a very high time duration, for example, 100 seconds and then make the feedfile circular.
scenario("Verified_Login")
.exec(LoginScenario.scn)
.inject(atOnceUsers(1),constantUsersPerSec(1) during(100 seconds)
The problem with the first approach is I have to find the number of entries in the feed file which can be tedious as there could be thousands there. The problem with the second is that entries could and probably will be repeated. So is there a way to keep injecting users till feed file runs out of entries?
According to this source, from last year, Stéphane Landelle - who is the leading contributor of gatling, says that you must provide enough data for a simulation to complete using this method.
The post I linked from Stéphane does suggest to simply read the length of the file and use that to drive the amount of users, as you have already mentioned in your question.
I suggest you read the post as it will give you an alternate method to achieving what you want. Seems to be as close as you will ever get unless things have changed.
Here is their code.
val systemsIdentifier = jdbcFeeder(databaseUrl, databaseUser, databasePassword, sql_systemsIdentifier)
val count = new AtomicInteger(systemsIdentifier.records.size).asLongAs(_ => count.getAndIncrement < systemsIdentifier.records.size)
val comScn = scenario("My scenario")
.repeat(systemsIdentifier.records.size / count) {
feed(systemsIdentifier)
.exec(performActionsChain)
}
setUp(comScn.inject(rampUsers(count) over (60 seconds))).protocols(httpConf)
I want to build kind of an automatic system to update some race results for a championship. I have an automated spreadsheet were all the results are shown but it takes me a lot to update all of them so I was wondering if it would be possible to make a form in order to update them more easily.
In the form I will enter the driver name and the number o points he won on a race. The championship has 4 races each month so yea, my question is if you guys know a way to update an existing data (stored in a spreadsheet) using a form. Lets say that in the first race, the driver 'X' won 10 points. I will insert this data in a form and then call it from the spreadsheet to show it up, that's right. The problem comes when I want to update the second race results and so on. If the driver 'X' gets on the second race 12 points, is there a way to update the previous 10 points of that driver and put 22 points instead? Or can I add the second race result to the first one automatically? I mean, if I insert on the form the second race results can it look for the driver 'X' entry and add this points to the ones that it previously had. Dunno if it's possible or not.
Maybe I can do it in another way. Any help will be much appreciated!
Thanks.
Maybe I missed something in your question but I don't really understand Harold's answer...
Here is a code that does strictly what you asked for, it counts the total cumulative value of 4 numbers entered in a form and shows it on a Spreadsheet.
I called the 4 questions "race number 1", "race number 2" ... and the result comes on row 2 so you can setup headers.
I striped out any non numeric character so you can type responses more freely, only numbers will be retained.
form here and SS here (raw results in sheet1 and count in Sheet2)
script goes in spreadsheet and is triggered by an onFormSubmit trigger.
function onFormSubmit(e) {
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('Sheet2');
var responses = []
responses[0] = Number(e.namedValues['race number 1'].toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[1] = Number(e.namedValues['race number 2'].toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[2] = Number(e.namedValues['race number 3'].toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[3] = Number(e.namedValues['race number 4'].toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
var totals = sh.getRange(2,1,1,responses.length).getValues();
for(var n in responses){
totals[0][n]+=responses[n];
}
sh.getRange(2,1,1,responses.length).setValues(totals);
}
edit : I changed the code to allow you to change easily the number of responses... range will update automatically.
EDIT 2 : a version that accepts empty responses using an "if" condition on result:
function onFormSubmit(e) {
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('Sheet2');
var responses = []
responses[0] = Number((e.namedValues['race number 1']==null ? 0 :e.namedValues['race number 1']).toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[1] = Number((e.namedValues['race number 2']==null ? 0 :e.namedValues['race number 2']).toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[2] = Number((e.namedValues['race number 3']==null ? 0 :e.namedValues['race number 3']).toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[3] = Number((e.namedValues['race number 4']==null ? 0 :e.namedValues['race number 4']).toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
var totals = sh.getRange(2,1,1,responses.length).getValues();
for(var n in responses){
totals[0][n]+=responses[n];
}
sh.getRange(2,1,1,responses.length).setValues(totals);
}
I believe you can found everything you want here.
It's a form url, when you answer this form you'll have the url of the spreadsheet where the data are stored. One of the information stored is the url to modify your response, if you follow the link it will open the form again and update the spreadsheet in consequence. the code to do this trick is in the second sheet of the spreadsheet.
It's a google apps script code that need to be associated within the form and triggered with an onFormSubmit trigger.
It may be too late now. I believe we need a few things (I have not tried it)
A unique key to map each submitted response, such as User's ID or email.
Two Google Forms:
a. To request the unique key
b. To retrieve relevant data with that unique key
Create a pre-filled URL (See http://www.cagrimmett.com/til/2016/07/07/autofill-google-forms.html)
Open the URL from your form (See Google Apps Script to open a URL)
I can use the following to obtain a list of all my credits
<?php
$marketplace = Balanced\Marketplace::mine();
$credits = $marketplace->credits->query()->all();
?>
I can modify this to obtain the credits for a specific customer
$credits = $customer->credits->query()->all();
Note the chance is from querying $marketplace to querying $customer.
Can I modify all() or by other means obtain credits with different parameters.
e.g. Credits in the last 24 hour or for a specific day,...
I know I can get the entire list of credits and then search though it but it seems resource hungry to get everything if only a sub-section is required.
I believe you can filter like this
$customer->credits->query()->filter(
Credit::$f->created_at->lt($before),
Credit::$f->created_at->gte($after),
)->all();
Here's another example on the internet that shows how to filter via the meta field too - https://gist.github.com/mjallday/5166040
I'm currently working on a Database which requires the following functionality:
For example given a specific project, I have a series of structures which belong to that project, which are displayed in a datasheet view on the project form. I am attempting to allow the user to on double click to navigate to that specific structure which is displayed on another form. Currently I am using filters to implement this behavior, however, this results in the filter being left on, and when I manually turn off the filter, the form I switch to returns back to the first entry.
I am using the current code on the datasheet:
Private Sub struct_name_DblClick(Cancel As Integer)
LookupValue = Me.struct_ID
Form_frm_control.pg_structure.SetFocus
Form_frm_control.subform_structure.Form.Filter = "struct_ID = " & LookupValue
Form_frm_control.subform_structure.Form.FilterOn = True
End Sub
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
It all depends on what you need to do.
If you want to display all records and navigate to the selected record, then you can use bookmark navigation:
With Forms!MyOtherForm
.RecordsetClone.FindFirst "struct_ID = " & Me!struct_ID
If Not .RecordsetClone.NoMatch Then
If .Dirty Then
.Dirty = False
End If
.Bookmark = .RecordsetClone.Bookmark
End If
End With
This assumes that the other form is open with all the records loaded.
Another approach to this problem, which I find more useful for popup situations like this, is to just open the other form as a dialog and require it be closed before returning to the calling context. In that case, you'd do this:
DoCmd.OpenForm "MyOtherForm", , , "struct_ID = " & Me!struct_ID, , acDialog
You'd then have to close the other form to get back to the original context.
You might think that with large numbers of records this would be inefficient, but it's actually very fast, as this operation is highly optimized within Access (moreso than filtering an already open form, in fact).