Working Java REST Client Example to access CAS REST API - rest

I followed this tutorial to enable REST service on my local CAS server.
However there is no Java example
"Java REST Client Example
We need a real, working, example, the previous one is useless. Many people are emailing me that it is not working, and I confirm it does not work."
I was able to find this but that unfortunately did not work for me.
Any pointers/links? Much appreciated.

Got it!
Here is the complete solution on how to enable CAS REST API and be able to connect to it via JAVA REST client to benefit others
Get CAS source code.
Review this article
Add following to pom.xml like suggested by the article in #2
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jasig.cas</groupId>
<artifactId>cas-server-integration-restlet</artifactId>
<version>${cas.version}</version>
<type>jar</type>
</dependency>
Make sure to add following to pom.xml to avoid Spring jar collisions. In my case, cas-server-integration-restlet was dependent on spring-web, which used by default older version of Spring. So, I explicitly defined
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
<version>3.1.1.RELEASE</version>
</dependency>
Compile your cas code. Should get cas.war in your target folder.
Upload it to your server, change permissions to tomcat and wait for it to get deployed
In CATALINA/conf find server.xml and uncomment 8443 port configuration so that our sever will allow SSL connections. Also, specify your certs in here.
Now navigate to exploded cas.war file and drill down to WEB-INF folder to find deployerConfigContext.xml file. Specify what CAS would use to authenticate. In my case, I used LDAP.
Add following to web.xml per article above
<servlet>
<servlet-name>restlet</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>com.noelios.restlet.ext.spring.RestletFrameworkServlet</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>restlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/v1/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
Restart tomcat for changes to take effect.
Test that you can log in via standard CAS UI: https://server:8443/cas/login
Test that REST API was exposed via: https://server:8443/cas/v1/tickets
Now let's connect to it. I used this sample code. Make sure to give correct links and username/password
When I tried running the code as is, it complained about "Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target". Basically asking you to install certs. If you have the access to the server, just copy it over. If not, I found this code that will take care of the installation for you if you dont have access or just too lazy :)
Now, if you run the JAVA CAS Client with valid credentials you should see something like
201
https://server_name:8443/cas/v1/tickets/TGT-4-rhVWLapYuOYi4InSEcmfNcABzaLMCPJgGIzlKqU1vb50zxb6pp-server_name
Tgt is : TGT-4-rhVWLapYuOYi4InSEcmfNcABzaLMCPJgGIzlKqU1vb50zxb6pp-server_name.ndev.coic.mil
Service url is : service=https%3A%2F%2Fmyserver.com%2FtestApplication
https://server_name:8443/cas/v1/tickets/TGT-4-rhVWLapYuOYi4InSEcmfNcABzaLMCPJgGIzlKqU1vb50zxb6pp-server_name
Response code is: 200
200
ST-4-BZNVm9h6k3DAvSQe5I3C-server_name
You can see 200 code and the ticket. If you were to review logs of your cas on the server, you should see messages about successful athentication and ticket generation.
Change username/password to some dummy data and try to run the code. You will get 400 error message, which means that permission to access was denied.
Success!

For CAS 4.0 it's a little simpler (tested on apache-tomcat-7.0.55)
in your pom.xml add following dependency
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jasig.cas</groupId>
<artifactId>cas-server-integration-restlet</artifactId>
<version>4.0.0</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-webmvc</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-context</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-core</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
Direct dependency to springframework is not necesarry because exclusions prevent from duplicated packages
In your web.xml you need to add servlet mapping for restlet (mind package has changed from com.noelios.restlet... to org.restlet...
<servlet>
<servlet-name>restlet</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>org.restlet.ext.spring.RestletFrameworkServlet</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>restlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/v1/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
As a result of above steps in yuor WEB-INF/lib directory following new files should be added
ls target/cas/WEB-INF/lib/ | grep restlet
cas-server-integration-restlet-4.0.0.jar
org.restlet-2.1.0.jar
org.restlet.ext.servlet-2.1.0.jar
org.restlet.ext.slf4j-2.1.0.jar
org.restlet.ext.spring-2.1.0.jar

If you wish to skip cert validation add this to your Java Client
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// this block of code turns off the certificate validation so the client can talk to an SSL
// server that uses a self-signed certificate
//
// !!!! WARNING make sure NOT to do this against a production site
//
// this block of code owes thanks to http://www.exampledepot.com/egs/javax.net.ssl/trustall.html
//
TrustManager[] trustAllCerts = new TrustManager[] {
new X509TrustManager() {
public java.security.cert.X509Certificate[] getAcceptedIssuers() {
return null;
}
public void checkClientTrusted(java.security.cert.X509Certificate[] certs, String authType){}
public void checkServerTrusted(java.security.cert.X509Certificate[] certs, String authType){}
}
};
SSLContext sslContext = SSLContext.getInstance("SSL");
sslContext.init(null, trustAllCerts, new java.security.SecureRandom());
HttpsURLConnection.setDefaultSSLSocketFactory(sslContext.getSocketFactory());
//
//
// end of block of code that turns off certificate validation
// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Usually devs are confused on how to get rest client working when accessing secured CAS web service. Most of the question out there were asking how to get restlet CAS secures a webservice and how to call those web service, because no real example were working.
Well actually there is. Groovy example is on the JASIG Cas restlet example https://wiki.jasig.org/display/casum/restful+api is clearly show how to get authenticated to call a service (its using Groovy, but converting to Java should be straight forward) . But in my opinion, it do not clearly explain that client need to authenticate to the designated web service first before accessing CAS secured web service.
For example, assume there is a JSON service that secured with CAS and build with Java and Spring. And you are using code that describe on the groovy section on https://wiki.jasig.org/display/casum/restful+api
String casUrl="https://yourcas.com/v1/tickets"
String springTicketValidation="http://yourservice.com/j_spring_cas_security_check"
String serviceToCall="http://yourservice.com/serviceToCall"
To get your service client be able to call the service, you need to follow these simple rules:
Get your ticket granting ticket from CAS
Get your Service Ticket from cas for the designated service call (service to call)
Authenticate to your service ticket validator (at this point url specified on springTicketValidation)
finally call your service
or in code perspective
String ticketGrantingTicket = getTicketGrantingTicket(casUrl, username, password)
String serviceTicket = client.getServiceTicket(casUrl, ticketGrantingTicket, serviceToCall)
// validate your ticket first to your application
getServiceCall(springTicketValidation, serviceTicket)
getServiceCall(serviceToCall, serviceTicket)
And for your note, all these operation should be done in following condition:
Your call (both restlet call and service call) should be done in the same HttpClient object. It seems that CAS put "something" in the session object that validated when you call your service. Fails this, and you will always get logon page on the HTTP result.
Your cas client should be able to recognized your CAS SSL certificate, otherwise it will throw you PKIX path building failed
This example is based on the cas secured web service that using Spring Security to secured service with CAS. I'm not sure whether other cas secured should need ticket validation on the application side or not
Hope this help

Related

Pentaho CDA: Basic Authentication and CORS conflict

Working on a web app which queries Pentaho BI server 7 with a Tomcat 8 inside I'm facing some issues.
First of all to avoid CORS (Cross-origin resource sharing) problems I have added the CORS filter inside the web.xml config file of the tomcat:
<filter>
<filter-name>CorsFilter</filter-name>
<filter-class>org.apache.catalina.filters.CorsFilter</filter-class>
<init-param>
<param-name>cors.allowed.headers</param-name>
<param-value>Content-Type,X-Requested-With,accept,Origin,Access-Control-Request-Method,Access-Control-Request-Headers,Authorization</param-value>
</init-param>
</filter>
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>CorsFilter</filter-name>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
</filter-mapping>
Afterwards, everything was fine until it was necessary to get some resources through Pentaho CDA (Pentaho Community Data Access). I've added a Basic Auth header and one line in the plugin settings file (pentaho-solutions/system/cda/settings.xml):
<allow-cross-domain-resources>true</allow-cross-domain-resources>
Every request my aplication does gets the same error:
XMLHttpRequest cannot load http://localhost:8080/pentaho/plugin/cda/api/doQuery?path=/whatever/dashboard.cda&dataAccessId=mdxGetSmth. Response to preflight request doesn't pass access control check: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource. Origin 'http://127.0.0.1:xxx' is therefore not allowed access. The response had HTTP status code 401.
The funny thing is that the same query is working in Postman (of course with the same Basic auth header) just because Postman just jumps over the OPTIONS (preflight) request.
Used Ngnix as Reverse proxy on Apache-Tomcat and resolved this CORS error

how can I stop the application part of the url being passed to my servlet in tomcat6

I am running tomcat6 and have hooked it up in eclipse as a server so I can quickly debug code changes - however I am running into an issue with the routes that are passed to my servlet.
I am running spring mvc3 with my routes annotated on the class eg:
#Controller
#RequestMapping(value="/rest")
public class HandleItController {
...
in web.xml I have
<welcome-file-list>
<welcome-file>welcome.html</welcome-file>
</welcome-file-list>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>handleit</servletmapping>
<url-pattern>/rest</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
However I can only get one of these settings to work as desired at a time.
lets say "Web Project Settings" has Context root set to be appname
now if I GET localhost:8080/appname I will get the welcome page as desired
however if I hit localhost:8080/appname/rest/yadda I get a warning saying
No mapping found for HTTP request with URI [/appname/rest/yadda] in
DispatcherServlet with name 'handleit'
If I change my servlet url-pattern to / then I get request routed through the servlet without the appname prepended and the servlet handles them as expected - however I cannot then hit the welcome page
I need a solution that does not involve hard coding appname into the web.xml or the controller mappings, there must be some way I can serve both the html file and the servlet that is independent of the uri to which my application is deployed - ie stop sending the context part of the url through to the servlet
The URI in the #RequestMapping will be appended to the url-mapping of the dispatcher servlet. So if both the servlet and controller is mapped to rest, the full URI will become /contextpath/rest/rest. If you don't want that, map your controller to /
Edit: The reason it doesn't work when you map your servlet to / is that the Spring dispatcher servlet handles everything under the context root. So to get that to work, you need to configure Spring MVC to serve static files.

Securing Glassfish REST Service with basic auth using annotations

I have been trying to secure an application, which is deployed to glassfish 3 using annotation instead of the deployment descriptor. However, I haven't been able to get it working correctly. If I try to access the service, I end up with a server error 500, which displays this message:
type Exception report
message
descriptionThe server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
exception
javax.servlet.ServletException: javax.ejb.AccessLocalException: Client not authorized for this invocation
root cause
javax.ejb.AccessLocalException: Client not authorized for this invocation
The EJB looks like this:
#Path("/myresource")
#Stateless
#RolesAllowed("user-role")
public class MyResource {
#GET
#Path("/{uuid}")
public Response getData(#PathParam("uuid") final String uuid) {
....
}
}
sun-web.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE sun-web-app PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD GlassFish Application Server 3.0 Servlet 3.0//EN"
"http://www.sun.com/software/appserver/dtds/sun-web-app_3_0-0.dtd">
<sun-web-app>
<security-role-mapping>
<role-name>user-role</role-name>
<group-name>user-group</group-name>
</security-role-mapping>
</sun-web-app>
This is the web.xml:
<web-app id="myservice" version="2.5" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-app_2_5.xsd">
<display-name>org.test.myservice</display-name>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>Jersey Web Application</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>com.sun.jersey.spi.container.servlet.ServletContainer</servlet-class>
<init-param>
<param-name>com.sun.jersey.config.property.packages</param-name>
<param-value>org.test.myservice.rest</param-value>
</init-param>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>Jersey Web Application</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<login-config>
<auth-method>BASIC</auth-method>
<realm-name>file</realm-name>
</login-config>
<security-role>
<role-name>user-role</role-name>
</security-role>
</web-app>
The file realm in glassfish is set up using the user and role specified in the sun-web.xml and has been working well, when setting up the application security via deployment descriptor.
If I understand this document correctly I do not have to link security role references if their names are the same. http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/5/tutorial/doc/bnbyl.html#bnbyt
Any ideas what I am missing?
Edit
Related to the problem of not being able to specify the required information with annotations, there is a another problem, which caused me to think about this issue. Maybe that will make the initial question a little clearer:
Taken above example, the resource /myresource/* is only available for users with role 'user-role'. However, if there is a second resource at path /myresource/*/thumbnail (translating to /myresource/[uuid]/thumbnail) which should be available without authentication, this is not possible by specifying security-constraints with url-mapping, since it does not seem to be possible to use the wildcard between constants. However, this would be doable by specifying the roles, that are allowed to access a method by annotions. As described above, I haven't been able to do so. How could a mapping like that be done?
You need to use the security-constraint element in web.xml descriptor in order to block specific resources and paths, and to specify the authorization constraints.
This doesn't mean that you can't add more fine-grained controls using Programmatic Security, as explained in Oracle's Java EE 6 Tutorial:
Programmatic security is embedded in an application and is used to make security decisions. Programmatic security is useful when declarative security alone is not sufficient to express the security model of an application.
As per your edited question.
I would use the security-constraint element for blocking the access to all non-registered users. This will force everybody to authenticate, so that your application knows the roles they have.
Then you can fine-grain control the access to the various resources using programmatic security.
With basic authentication I guess there are no other ways. If you want to avoid authentication for basic users, you need to go with form authentication and handle the authentication programmatically behind the scenes, authenticating them even if they aren't aware of, by using HttpServletRequest#login().
In both ways you should be able to setup rights in the way you have described. If you want to handle the unauthorized exception more smoothly, you'd better remove the #RolesAllowed annotation and instead use something like:
#GET
#Path("/{uuid}")
public Response getData(#PathParam("uuid") final String uuid, #Context SecurityContext sc) {
if (sc.isUserInRole("MyRole")) {
return result;
} else {
return notAllowedResult;
}
}
The Roles-Allowed is an EJB construct and not congruent with access to the resource, which is handled by the security constraint.
Unfortunately, the two security concepts do not mesh as well as they should, and instead of getting a 401 if you're not authorized (a web concept), you get the security exception that you are receiving (and EJB concept). In fact, I don't know what error you will receive if you annotate an EJB web service with a RolesAllowed and try to access the web service with an invalid role. I assume you'll get a SOAP fault, in that case.
The EJB security is a system that keeps unauthorized people out, but it's a last ditch effort. It assumes that any decisions to route folks to the method calls is already done up front. For example, there's no high level way to test if a method is allowed or not, rather you can only call it and catch the exception.
So the harsh truth is beyond coarse gatekeepers, you want to leverage Programmatic Security.

Cross domain REST/Jersey web services with CORS

I want to make Cross domain REST web services with CORS(Cross-Origin Resource Sharing). I am using Jersey Libraries for making services.
I need to know
What code/configuration changes i need to do from server side perspective?
How to invoke this services from HTML5/js.
Thanks
All the information for your server side configuration can be found at enable-cors.org.
There is no need to change any code clientside, but I would recommend checking the Browsers capability for CORS before using it. Testing code can be found, e.g., here.
I have chosen to solve this problem by providing the server CORS response at the Jersey container level. This might offer more convenience for some applications since it can apply for all responses from the container without modification to the resource handling code.
First one has to create a container response filter that will inject the appropriate header(s). For example for a container that indicates Access-Control-Allow-Origin:* for any response:
class CORSFilter implements ContainerResponseFilter {
#Override
public ContainerResponse filter(ContainerRequest request, ContainerResponse response) {
response.getHttpHeaders().add("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*");
return response;
}
}
Then the filter must be added be added to the Jersey response filter chain. This can be done through the resource config in use for the application.
...
DefaultResourceConfig rc = new ClasspathResourceConfig();
rc.getContainerResponseFilters().add(new CORSFilter());
// now create a simple lightweight server using this resource config.
HttpServer server = HttpServerFactory.create(uri,rc);
...
Steps which I used to enable CORS Filter in my Jersey based embedded Jetty application.
jetty-servlet version - 2.12
Added cors-filter dependency in pom
<dependency>
<groupId>com.thetransactioncompany</groupId>
<artifactId>cors-filter</artifactId>
<version>2.1.2</version>
</dependency>
Add the corsfilter to ServletContextHandler of your application.
ServletContextHandler context = new ServletContextHandler(ServletContextHandler.NO_SESSIONS);
context.addFilter(CORSFilter.class, "/*", EnumSet.of(DispatcherType.INCLUDE,DispatcherType.REQUEST));
server.setHandler(context);//set handle to your server

Rest - Jersey.Client pass #SecurityContext to Server

I want to pass a security context to my rest service.
On server side I try to get this with:
public Response postObject(#Context SecurityContext security, JAXBElement<Object> object) {
System.out.println("Security Context: " + security.getUserPrincipal());
.....
But actually the Syso is null.
On Client side im just doing:
ClientConfig config = new DefaultClientConfig();
Client client = Client.create(config);
client.addFilter(new HTTPBasicAuthFilter("user", "password"));
So, do I have to change in addition something in my web.xml to get it working?
I hoped its working without setting up static users in the tomcat user xml. So I can compare the user/password from security context with my "persistent" user/password hashmap located server sided. But when it is not working without tomcat user xml, how can it be done to add dynamically user to that user xml? When I ve static users I cant register a new user. I dont want to use this attempt: http://objecthunter.congrace.de/tinybo/blog/articles/89 cuz I want just to work with a semi persistence like a HashMap of user/password.
Besides another question: Why does everybody refer to Apache HttpClient when it is about security in Jersey, when it is working like I wrote as well?
My attempt refers to this post:
Jersey Client API - authentication
You need to set up your application on the server so that it requires Basic authentication. I.e. include something like the following in the web.xml in your application war file - otherwise Tomcat does not perform the authentication and does not populate the security context.
<security-constraint>
<display-name>Authentication Constraint</display-name>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>all</web-resource-name>
<description/>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<description>authentication required</description>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<login-config>
<auth-method>BASIC</auth-method>
<realm-name>realm_name</realm-name>
</login-config>