hi following a tut at https://mobicents.ci.cloudbees.com/job/Mobicents-SipServlets-Release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/documentation/html_single/index.html#getting-started-with-MSS-Tomcat-AS7 i can make a call between 2 sofphones which both say they have registered but in mobicents click2call server page no information is displayed and it states "No registered users. Please register at least two SIP User Agents." which couldint be the case if i can make and take calls anyone have any idea why this would happen.
By default Mobicents SIP Servlets uses the following application by default https://code.google.com/p/sipservlets/wiki/HTML5WebRTCVideoApplication
If you want to change the default application, go to the Mobicents SIP Servlets management console http://127.0.0.1:8080/sip-servlets-management and change the application routing so the default application that receives the INVITE and REGISTER. More on default application routing (DAR) management at https://mobicents.ci.cloudbees.com/job/Mobicents-SipServlets-Release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/documentation/html_single/index.html#sssicar-SIP_Servlets_Server-Application-Router
Related
We have a Client Toolkit provided by our partner that allows us to access their web services. It started giving errors yesterday on any call and initially their support wanted us to provide a Fiddler log. I tried to do so, however there was no activity shown in Fiddler when the call was made.
From this I would have assumed that the error would have to have occurred before an actual web request was sent out. However, the issue turned out to be an update they did that requires an SSL connection. They rolled back the change but advised us to update our calls to use https so they can re-implement their update.
So if the change was on their end, that means that communications obviously were going on with their server. Why wouldn't that have shown up in Fiddler? Are there scenarios where communications occur but a request isn't fully created or something like that? I just assumed that if there was any communication whatsoever that "something" would show up in Fiddler.
We have come across similar problem, need your help to resolve this.
Can you please either let us know your contact number so that we can reach out to you or if you can provide your script if possible so that we can refer to
Here is the problem we are stuck with:
I am trying to test a Rest service through HTTP sampler using Jmeter. Not sure how to capture token from the sampler generates a token and to use this token for authorization in the header manager of another HTTP.
Loadrunner is not displaying the web address when trying to enter in the truclient browser. Below is the problem as this web address automatically redirect to another web address which is the authentication server.
Can you please suggest another solution for the below issue?
Here is the exact scenario we are trying to achieve
we want to loadtest the portal however due to redirect and different authentication method being used we are unable to do it using truclient protocol in loadrunner. Also tried Multiple protocol selecting LDAP, SMTP, HTTP/HTML etc but no luck.**
Thank You,
Sonny
JMETER is going to architecturally be the HTTP protocol layer equivalent with LoadRunner, with the exception of the number of threads per browser emulation.
In contrast to the code request, I want to architecturally visualize the problem. You mention redirect, is this an HTTP 301/302 redirect or one which is handled with information passed back to the client, processed on the client and then redirected to another host? You mention dynamic authentication via header token, have you examined the web_add_header() and web_add_auto_header() in Laodrunner web virtual users for passing of extra header messages, including ones which have been correlated from previous requests, such as the token being passed back as you note?
This authentication mechanism is based upon? LDAP? Kerberos? Windows Integrated Authentication? Simple Authentication based upon username/password in header? Can you be architecturally more specific and when this comes into play, such as from the first request to gain access to the test environment through the firewall or from a nth request to gain access within a business process?
You mention RESTFul services. These can be transport independent, such as being passed over SMTP using a mailbox to broker the passing of data between client and server, or over HTTP similar to SOAP messages. Do you have architectural clarity on this? Could it be that you need to provide mailbox authentication across SMTP and POP3 to send and receive?
Does anyone know if any SIP providers provides an API allowing users to register directly from the iPhone application. As a user register with my application, they should be registered with the sip provider(a sip account) as-well. Is this possible.
Once you have a SIP account at a specific provider, all standard SIP providers allows you to register via the standard SIP protocol. It is a HTTP like protocol and you can assemble the messages directly. But most likely you will need something like called SIP client that creates the messages, handles the call state, etc. There are plenty of open source SIP clients with open APIs out there even for iPhone. One very popular such client is called pjsip, it might be interesting for you.
I've never come across a SIP provider that has an API that duplicates a SIP registration. It's actually a bit of a strange request since the purpose of a SIP registration is to let the server know that the SIP client is available and where it can be contacted. If you perform that function outside of SIP can you be sure that the SIP client is available? And if so will you always know what address it can be contacted on especially considering that contact addresses used in SIP often get mangled due to NAT?
What a lot of providers do offer is the ability to set up static SIP URI forwards, for example you could set a rule that states all incoming calls should be forwarded to SIP URI sip:me#somewhere.com. Setting up that kind of rule can remove the need to register in a lot of cases since the provider will now always forward calls to that SIP URI irrespective of whether any devices are registered on the account or not.
I want to properly markup all the phone numbers on my website so that they are clickable.
The solution has been offered on SO: in general and specifically for an iPhone.
However when targeting the iPhone this evokes the normal phone application.
Is it possible to have a link that invokes the SIP VoIP application if one is installed( I guess on pc's a tel link always invokes a VoIP application, because they simply don't have regular phones built in...)
It's possible, but with some limitations.
Any application can register custom URL scheme. But this URL scheme "must" be unique. For example my-cool-sip-app:..., another application can have scheme like super-duper-sip-app:, etc. You can check if an application with selected URL scheme is installed or not (UIApplication, canOpenURL:).
Or, several applications can have same custom URL scheme, in your case sip:... for example. But if you have 2 or more applications with the same scheme installed, you can't say which one should handle sip:... URL. Apple's documentation:
If your URL type includes a scheme
that is identical to one defined by
Apple, the Apple-provided application
is launched instead of your
application. If multiple third-party
applications register to handle the
same URL scheme, it is undefined as to
which of the applications is picked to
handle URLs of that type.
Valid SIP URLs are:
SIP:someone#10.1.2.3 SIP URL with IP
address.
SIP:someone#example.com;transport=TCP SIP
URL with transport specified as TCP.
The default transport is UDP if none
is specified.
SIP:someone#example.com Basic SIP
URL.
SIP:+12225550189#example.com;user=phone SIP
URL with global phone number and
specified gateway.
SIP:+1 206
555-0146#10.2.3.4;user=phone SIP URL
with global phone number format and
specified gateway.
So, if you have a SIP application installed, you should try one of the mentioned SIP URLs. Any SIP application should support it.
Here's an Acrobits Softphone application where you can read (in description) that it supports asoftphone:number URL scheme. It's good if you want to use just this application, but it's bad for the end user, because other developers are not willing to go through AppStore and add support for all custom URL schemes other than sip:...
My answer is - try sip:... and if you have good SIP application, it should handle these links flawlessly.
is it possible include one web application into several sso federations
Yes, at least in the SAML-P and WS-Federation protocols there is nothing that forbids this. A web application can inspect the incoming HTTP request (the URL and/or cookies), and use that to choose the STS to redirect to.
However, a specific SSO library/framework might have restrictions in this area.
For example, if your web application is in .NET based on WIF, then the WSFederationAuthenticationModule has exactly one Issuer, which is used for all sign-in requests. (This is usually set in the web.config file in the <wsFederation issuer="..."> attribute). It may be possible to override the CreateSignInRequest() method of this module, temporarily setting Issuer to a different value while the request is created (and applying the proper locking). But WIF was apparently not designed to support this multi-SSO-federation scenario.