My database looks like this:
{
_id: 1,
values: [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]
},
{
_id: 2,
values: [ 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 ]
}, ...
I'd like to update every value in every document's nested array ("values") that meets some criterion. For instance, I'd like to increment every value that's >= 4 by one, which ought to yield:
{
_id: 1,
values: [ 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 ]
},
{
_id: 2,
values: [ 2, 5, 7, 8, 11 ]
}, ...
I'm used to working with SQL, where the nested array would be a seperated table connected with a unique ID. I'm a little lost in this new NoSQL world.
Thank you kindly,
This sort of update is not really possible using nested arrays, the reason for this is given in the positional $ operator documentation, and that states that you can only match the first array element for a given condition in the query.
So a statement like this:
db.collection.update(
{ "values": { "$gte": 4 } },
{ "$inc": { "values.$": 1 } }
)
Will not work in the sense that only the "first" array element that was matched would be incremented. So on your first document you would get this:
{ "_id" : 1, "values" : [ 1, 2, 3, 6, 6 ] }
In order to update the values as you are suggesting you would need to iterate the documents and the array elements to produce the result:
db.collecction.find({ "values": { "$gte": 4 } }).forEach(function(doc) {
for ( var i=0; i < doc.values.length; i++ ) {
if ( doc.values[i] >= 4 ) {
doc.values[i]++;
}
}
db.collection.update(
{ "_id": doc._id },
{ "$set": { "values": doc.values } }
);
})
Or whatever code equivalent of that basic concept.
Generally speaking, this sort of update does not lend itself well to a structure that contains elements in an array. If that is really your need, then the elements are better off listed within a separate collection.
Then again, the presentation of this question is more of a "hypothetical" situation without understanding your actual use case for performing this sort of udpate. So if you possibly described what you actually need to do and how your data really looks in another question, then that might get a more meaningful response in terms of the best approach for you to use.
Related
I am fairly new to MongoDB and cant seem to find a solution to this problem.
I have a database of documents that has this structure:
{
id: 1
elements: [ {elementId: 1, nr1: 1, nr2: 3}, {elementId:2, nr1:5, nr2: 10} ]
}
I am looking for a query that can add a value nr3 which is for example nr2/nr1 to all the objects in the elements array, so that the resulting document would look like this:
{
id: 1
elements: [ {elementId: 1, nr1: 1, nr2: 3, nr3:3}, {elementId:2, nr1:5, nr2: 10, nr3: 2} ]
}
So I imagine a query along the lines of this:
db.collection.updateOne({id:1}, {$set:{"elements.$[].nr3": nr2/nr1}})
But I cant find how to get the value of nr2 and nr1 of the same object in the array.
I found some similar questions on stackoverflow stating this is not possible, but they were 5+ years old, so I thought maybe they have added support for something like this.
I realize I can achieve this with first querying the document and iterate over the elements-array doing updates along the way, but for the purpose of learning I would love to see if its possible to do this in one query.
You can use update with aggregation pipeline starting from MongoDB v4.2,
$map to iterate loop of elements
divide nr2 with nr1 using $divide
merge current object and new field nr3 using $mergeObjects
db.collection.updateOne(
{ id: 1 },
[{
$set: {
elements: {
$map: {
input: "$elements",
in: {
$mergeObjects: [
"$$this",
{ nr3: { $divide: ["$$this.nr2", "$$this.nr1"] } }
]
}
}
}
}
}]
)
Playground
db.collection.update(
{ id:1},
{ "$set": { "elements.$[elem].nr3":elements.$[elem].nr2/elements.$[elem].nr1} },
{ "multi": true }
);
I guess this should work
I have a structure whereby a user-created object can end up in a specific Document key. I know what the key is, but I have no idea what the structure of the underlying value is. For the purposes of my problem, let's assume it's an array, a single value, or a dictionary.
For extra fun, I am also trying to solve this problem for nested dictionaries.
What I am trying to do is run an aggregation across all objects that have this key, and summarize the values of the terminal nodes of the structure. For example, if I have the following:
ObjectA.foo = {"a": 2, "b": 4}
ObjectB.foo = {"a": 8, "b": 16}
ObjectC.bar = {"nested": {"d": 20}}
ObjectD.bar = {"nested": {"d": 30}}
I want to end up with an output value of
foo.a = 10
foo.b = 20
bar.nested.d = 50
My initial thought is to try to figure out how to get Mongo to flatten the keys of the hierarchy. If I could break the source data down from objects to a series of key-values where a key represents the entire path to the value, I could easily do the aggregation on that. However, I am not sure how to do that.
Ideally, I'd have something like $unwindKeys, but alas there is no such operator. There is $objectToArray, which I imagine I could then $unwind, but at that point I already start getting lost in stacking these operators. It also does not answer the problem of arbitrary depth, though I suppose a single-depth solution would be a good start.
Any ideas?
EDIT: So I've solved the single-depth problem using $objectToArray. Behold:
db.mytable.aggregate(
[
{
'$project': {
'_id': false,
'value': {
'$objectToArray': '$data.input_field_with_dict'
}
}
},
{
'$unwind': '$value'
},
{
'$group': {
'_id': '$value.k',
'sum': {
'$sum': '$value.v'
}
}
}
]
)
This will give you key-value pairs across your chosen docs that you can then iterate on. So in case of my sample above involving ObjectA and ObjectB, the result of the above query would be:
{"_id": "a", "sum": 10}
{"_id": "b", "sum": 20}
I still don't know how to traverse the structure recursively though. The $objectToArray solution works fine on a single known level with unknown keys, but I don't have a solution if you have both unknown keys and unknown depth.
The search goes on: how do I recursively sum or at least project fields with nested structures and preserve their key sequences? In other words, how do I flatten a structure of unknown depth? If I could flatten, I could easily aggregate on keys at that point.
If your collection is like this
/* 1 */
{
"a" : 2,
"b" : 4
}
/* 2 */
{
"a" : 8,
"b" : 16
}
/* 3 */
{
"nested" : {
"d" : 20
}
}
/* 4 */
{
"nested" : {
"d" : 30
}
}
the below the query will get you the required result.
db.sof.aggregate([
{'$group': {
'_id': null,
'a': {$sum: '$a'},
'b': {$sum: '$b'},
'd': {$sum: '$nested.d'}
}}
])
So, I have this collection. I am trying to add responseId of value 9 to the array of responsesIds, where the requestId is 2.
[
{
_id: 1,
partsIds: [
{
requestId: 1,
responesIds: [1, 2, 3, 4]
},
{
requestId: 2,
responesIds: [5, 6, 7, 8]
}
]
}
]
So the pseudocode here would be: $addToSet:{responseIds:9} where requestId:2
How can I achieve this?
So, I found out a solution that works, I haven't given it an extensive test yet, if you find a better solution, I'd be more than happy to listen.
db.collection.update(
{ _id: 1, 'partsIds.requestId': 2 },
{ $addToSet: { 'partsIds.$.responsesIds': 9 } }
);
The $ is called positional operator, which gets the index of the first matching item in the query, (in my case that's index of 1) and you can use it in updating like so.
I have a Mongo collection that contains data sets with a pmID and a replyID, where the replyID can be null or a pmID. I'm trying to figure out, if I select by a pmID, how I can also get the PM where the pmID = replyID, and if that set's replyID isn't null, the object that matches that, etc.
{
pmID: 1,
replyID: null
},
{
pmID: 2,
replyID: null
},
{
pmID: 3,
replyID: 1
},
{
pmID: 4,
replyID: 3
}
So if I selected on pmID = 4, I also wanna get 3 and 1. I'm debating just doing a one by one select, but I'm hoping there's an easier answer.
Not really sure of your use case here, but from a glance I would personally model to store the "ancestors" in order with the object like so:
{
"pmId": 1,
"replyIds": [ ]
},
{
"pmId": 3,
"replyIds": [ 1 ]
},
{
"pmId": 4,
"replyIds": [ 3, 1 ]
}
In either that order or in reverse depending on how you implement the ancestor history.
The point being that when issuing a "reply" to an existing object, you should already have the data loaded that tells you if there are any existing replies. The new object then pushes the id of the the object it is being issued in reply to onto the the existing "replyIds" array when that new object is created:
// data is "pmId": 3 object
data.replyIds.unshift( data.pmId );
data.pmId = getNewPmId(); // whatever
db.collection.insert(data);
It's a fairly simple pattern which obviates the need to "recursively walk" through queries on read requests, and also allows for simple writes.
Retrieving all ancestors is just a simple matter of passing the array of replies to $in:
var data = db.collection.findOne({ "pmId": 4 });
db.collection.find({ "pmId": { "$in": data.replyIds } })
In addition to Neil's suggestion to use ancestor arrays, if you're modelling conversations you can group together conversations with a conversation_id and recall all messages connected to a given one by conversation_id:
{
"pmId": 1,
"conversationId" : 0
},
{
"pmId": 3,
"conversationId" : 0
},
{
"pmId": 4,
"conversationId" : 0
}
> var pm = db.test.findOne({ "pmId" : 3 })
> db.test.find({ "conversationId" : pm.conversationId })
Is this possible?
I have a collection C, with an array of attributes A1.
Each attribute has an array of subattributes A2.
How can I add a subdocument to a specific C.A1 subdocument ?
Here is an example.
db.docs.insert({_id: 1, A1: [{A2: [1, 2, 3]}, {A2: [4, 5, 6]}]})
If you know the index of the subdocument you want to insert, you can use dot notation with the index (starting from 0) in the middle:
db.docs.update({_id: 1}, {$addToSet: {'A1.0.A2': 9}})
This results in:
{
"A1" : [
{
"A2" : [
1,
2,
3,
9
]
},
{
"A2" : [
4,
5,
6
]
}
],
"_id" : 1
}
Yes, this is possible. If you post an example I can show you more specifically what the update query would look like. But here's a shot:
db.c.update({ A1: value }, { $addToSet: { "A1.$.A2": "some value" }})
I haven't actually tried this (I'm not in front of a Mongo instance right now) and I'm going off memory, but that should get you pretty close.
Yes, $push can be used to do the same. Try below given code.
db.c.update({ A1: value }, { $push: { "A1.$.A2": num }});