I am trying to understand how to correctly implement a LeafValueEditor for a non immutable object. Which of the two way is correct, or should something else be used?
public class Address {
public String line1;
public String city;
public String zip;
}
Option 1:
public class AddressEditor implements LeafValueEditor<Address>
{
private String line1;
private String city;
private String zip;
private Address address;
public void setValue(Address value)
{
this.line1 = value.line1;
this.city = value.city;
this.zip = value.zip;
this.address = value;
}
public Address getValue()
{
this.address.line1 = this.line1;
this.address.city = this.city;
this.address.zip = this.zip;
return this.address;
}
}
Option 2:
public class AddressEditor implements LeafValueEditor<Address>
{
private String line1;
private String city;
private String zip;
public void setValue(Address value)
{
this.line1 = value.line1;
this.city = value.city;
this.zip = value.zip;
}
public Address getValue()
{
Address a = new Address();
this.a.line1 = this.line1;
this.a.city = this.city;
this.a.zip = this.zip;
return a;
}
}
Probably neither, though both technically could work.
A LeafValueEditor is an Editor for leaf values - that is, values that don't generally contain other values. Usually a text or date or number field that would be visible on the page is the leaf editor, and those leaf nodes are contained in a normal Editor.
In this case, it could look something like this:
public class AddressEditor extends Composite implements Editor<Address> {
// not private, fields must be visible for the driver to manipulate them
// automatically, could be package-protected, protected, or public
protected TextBox line1;//automatically maps to getLine1()/setLine1(String)
protected TextBox city;
protected TextBox zip;
public AddressEditor() {
//TODO build the fields, attach them to some parent, and
// initWidget with them
}
}
See http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideUiEditors.html#Editor_contract for more details on how this all comes together automatically with just that little wiring.
Related
How can we convert the Flux< Employe> to Mono< Customers > object?
Flux< Employe> empFlux = getService(); // It will return list of Employe Employe { private String id; private String info;}
// need transform the empFlux data to Mono< Customers>
public class CusData {
private String id;
private String dept;
private String info;
public String getId() {
return id;
}
}
public class Customers {
private List<CusData> cusDataList;
public List<CusData> getCusDataList() {
return cusDataList;
}
public void setCusDataList(List<CusData> cusDataList) {
this.cusDataList = cusDataList;
}
}
public class Employe {
private String id;
private String info;
}
If I understood your code, you must have something like that:
Mono<Customers> customers = getService().map( employee -> CusData.builder()
.id( employee.getId() )
.info( employee.getInfo() )
.build() )
.collectList()
.map( cusDatas -> Customers.builder()
.cusDataList( cusDatas )
.build() );
Flux has a handy method collectList() which takes care of performing the transformation for you.
I have used the String in the example below.
Code Snippet below.
Flux<String> stringFlux = Flux.just("Spring", "Spring Boot", "Reactive Spring")
.log();
Mono<List<String>> stringMono = stringFlux.collectList();
I am still somewhat of a novice with Spring Boot and Spring Data Rest and hope someone out there with experience in Accessing by Property. Since I cannot change a database which stores types for Letters in an unnormalized fashion (delimited string in a varchar), I thought that I could leverage some logic in properties to overcome this. However I notice that when using property access, some of my getters are never called.
My Model code:
package ...
import ...
#Entity
#Table(name="letters", catalog="clovisdb")
#Access(AccessType.PROPERTY)
public class Letter {
public enum PhoneticType {
VOWEL, SHORT, LONG, COMMON;
public static boolean contains(String s) { ... }
}
public enum PositionType {
ALL, INITIAL, MEDIAL, FINAL;
public static boolean contains(String s) { ... }
}
public enum CaseType {
ALL, LOWER, UPPER;
public static boolean contains(String s) { ... }
}
private int id;
private String name;
private String translit;
private String present;
private List<PhoneticType> phoneticTypes;
private CaseType caseType;
private PositionType positionType;
#Id
public int getId() { return id; }
public void setId(int id) { this.id = id; }
public String getName() { return name; }
public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; }
public String getTranslit() { return translit; }
public void setTranslit(String translit) { this.translit = translit; }
public String getPresent() { return present; }
public void setPresent(String present) { this.present = present; }
public String getTypes() {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); //
if (phoneticTypes!=null) for (PhoneticType type : phoneticTypes) sb.append(" ").append(type.name());
if (caseType!=null) sb.append(" ").append(caseType.name());
if (positionType!=null) sb.append(" ").append(positionType.name());
return sb.substring( sb.length()>0?1:0 );
}
public void setTypes(String types) {
List<PhoneticType> phoneticTypes = new ArrayList<PhoneticType>();
CaseType caseType = null;
PositionType positionType = null;
for (String val : Arrays.asList(types.split(" "))) {
String canonicalVal = val.toUpperCase();
if (PhoneticType.contains(canonicalVal)) phoneticTypes.add(PhoneticType.valueOf(canonicalVal));
else if (CaseType.contains(canonicalVal)) caseType = CaseType.valueOf(canonicalVal);
else if (PositionType.contains(canonicalVal)) positionType = PositionType.valueOf(canonicalVal);
}
this.phoneticTypes = phoneticTypes;
this.caseType = (caseType==null)? CaseType.ALL : caseType;
this.positionType = (positionType==null)? PositionType.ALL : positionType;
}
#Override
public String toString() { .... }
}
My Repository/DAO code:
package ...
import ...
#RepositoryRestResource
public interface LetterRepository extends CrudRepository<Letter, Integer> {
List<Letter> findByTypesLike(#Param("types") String types);
}
Hitting this URI: http://mytestserver.com:8080/greekLetters/6
and setting breakpoints on all the getters and setters, I can see that the properties are called in this order:
setId
setName
setPresent
setTranslit
setTypes
(getId not called)
getName
getTranslit
getPresent
(getTypes not called !!)
The json returned for the URI above reflects all the getters called, and there are no errors
{
"name" : "alpha",
"translit" : "`A/",
"present" : "Ἄ",
"_links" : {
"self" : {
"href" : "http://mytestserver.com:8080/letters/6"
}
}
}
But why is my getTypes() not being called and my JSON object missing the “types” attribute? I note that the setter is called, which makes it even stranger to me.
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance
That's probably because you don't have a field types, so getTypes() isn't a proper getter. Try adding this to your entity
#Transient
private String types;
I don't know how the inner works, but it's possible that the class is first scanned for its fields, and then a getter is called for each field. And since you don't have types field, the getter isn't called. Setter getting called could be a feature but I wouldn't be surprised if it is a bug, because findByTypesLike should translate to find Letters whose types field is like <parameter>, and types is not a field.
Another thing you can try, is to annotate that getter with #JsonInclude. Jackson 2 annotations are supported in Spring versions 3.2+ (also backported to 3.1.2).
Say I have the below test case
I want to be able to bind camel case parameters:
anyData.put("my_id", "bob#gmail.com");
How can I get this test to pass??
public class FormBindingExampleTest {
public static class FormBindingExampleModel {
public String myid;
public String email;
public String getMyid() {
return myid;
}
public void setMyid(String myid) {
this.myid = myid;
}
public String getEmail() {
return email;
}
public void setEmail(String email) {
this.email = email;
}
}
#Test
public void itShouldBindForm(){
Form<FormBindingExampleModel> userForm = form(FormBindingExampleModel.class);
Map<String,String> anyData = new HashMap();
anyData.put("my_id", "bob#gmail.com");
anyData.put("email", "secret");
FormBindingExampleModel user = userForm.bind(anyData).get();
System.out.println(user.myid);
assert(user.myid.equals("bob#gmail.com"));
}
}
Use form's fill() method inorder to populate the form with existing value.
#Test
public void itShouldBindForm(){
Form<FormBindingExampleModel> userForm = form(FormBindingExampleModel.class);
FormBindingExampleModel formModel = new FormBindingExampleModel();
formModel.setMyid("bob#gmail.com");
formModel.setEmail("secret");
userForm.fill(formModel);
FormBindingExampleModel user = userForm.get();
System.out.println(user.getMyid);
assert(user.getMyid.equals("bob#gmail.com"));
}
Documentation available here.
I am having issues with RPC calls and GWT. Essentially, I have a Person class (common code between client and server) that is created in the client side web code, sent to the server code via an RPC call, and then saved to a DB (OrientDB). I have verified that the following work:
RPC call - I am able to send info to the server and retrieve info from the server
save to DB - have verified that a Person object is saved to the DB
Where I am having issues is the transfer of the POJO from the client to the server. I have verified that the POJO's properties are intact right before it is sent to the server, however, the object passed to the server contains null values for all properties. Essentially, the class is transferred but the information is not. It then saves to the DB, but obviously without any relevant information contained within it.
I will copy what I feel is relevant below, please let me know what else I can provide to make this problem easier to identify. Note these are still in a testing state, so mind the comments :)
Any idea why my POJO's information is being lost in translation?
Person object, followed by the abstract class it inherits from:
public class Person extends org.matesweb.shared.AbsPerson implements Serializable
{
#Id
private String id; // DON'T CREATE GETTER/SETTER FOR IT TO PREVENT THE CHANGING BY THE USER APPLICATION,
// UNLESS IT'S NEEDED
//sets new user details
public void setPerson(String fIrstName, String mIdInit, String lAstName, String email, String password)
{
firstName = fIrstName;
middleInitial = mIdInit;
lastName = lAstName;
}
/*getter and setter methods - required for every
* field due to restrictions imposed by OrientDB*/
public Object getId()
{
String tmp;
tmp = id.toString();
return tmp;
}
//end class
}
public class AbsPerson implements Serializable
{
String firstName;
String middleInitial;
String lastName;
// public sys.Login login;
public org.matesweb.shared.Group[] groups;
private org.matesweb.shared.Purchase[] purchases;
/*this method adds a new purchase to the purchases variable*/
/* public void addPurchase(float price, String description)
{
people.Purchase newPurchase = new people.Purchase(login, price, description);
}
*/
/*adds a person to a group by comparing the passed in group ID and PWD*/
public void addGroup(String groupID, String groupPWD)
{
//compare group ID with group PWD to add a user to the group
}
/*getter and setter methods - required for every
* field due to restrictions imposed by OrientDB*/
public String getFirstName()
{
return firstName;
}
public void setFirstName(String name)
{
firstName = name;
}
public String getMiddleInitial()
{
return middleInitial;
}
public void setMiddleInitial(String midInit)
{
middleInitial = midInit;
}
public String getLastName()
{
return lastName;
}
public void setLastName(String ln)
{
lastName = ln;
}
/*
public sys.Login getLogin()
{
return login;
}
public void setLogin(sys.Login log)
{
login = log;
}
*/
public org.matesweb.shared.Group[] getGroups()
{
return groups;
}
public void setGroups(org.matesweb.shared.Group[] gro)
{
groups = gro;
}
public org.matesweb.shared.Purchase[] getPurchases()
{
return purchases;
}
public void setPurchases(org.matesweb.shared.Purchase[] purch)
{
purchases = purch;
}
}
Service
package org.matesweb.client;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.RemoteService;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.RemoteServiceRelativePath;
import org.matesweb.shared.Person;
#RemoteServiceRelativePath("peopleService")
public interface PeopleService extends RemoteService {
//test services
String stringTest(String outgoingString);
Person getPerson(String persId);
//production services
String savePerson(Person p);
}
ServiceAsync
import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.AsyncCallback;
import org.matesweb.shared.Person;
public interface PeopleServiceAsync
{
//tests
void stringTest(String outgoingString, AsyncCallback<String> incomingString);
void getPerson(String persId, AsyncCallback<Person> retPerson);
//production services
void savePerson(Person p , AsyncCallback<String> st);
}
ServiceImpl call for this particular method:
//production calls
#Override
public String savePerson(Person p) {
String st = ioObj.saveObj(p);
if(st.equals("Success")){
return "Your information has been saved successfully!";
} else{
return "Something has gone wrong on our end... Sorry! Error:<br /> " + st;
}
}
and finally, the call itself
private static void savePerson(Person p)
{
// Initialize the service proxy.
if (peopleSvc == null) {
peopleSvc = GWT.create(PeopleService.class);
}
//resets status
st="";
// Set up the callback object.
AsyncCallback<String> callback = new AsyncCallback<String>() {
#Override
public void onFailure(Throwable caught) {
st = caught.getMessage();
Label stLabel= new Label(st);
personTable.setWidget(3,1,stLabel);
}
#Override
public void onSuccess(String result) {
st = result;
HTML stLabel= new HTML(st);
joinPanel.add(stLabel);
}
};
// Make the call to the people service.
peopleSvc.savePerson(p, callback);
}
I was able to fix this issue by implementing GWT's IsSerializable interface. I also removed the Serializable interface from the Person class and let it inherit IsSerializable from the abstract class it inherits from.
I have a SimpleBeanEditorDriver to edit my account bean but i always get null values when i edit and call flush(). i checked everything, Google documentations, stackoverflow, google groups but didn't find any problem like. did i miss something ?
here is my View
public class AccountCreatorViewImpl extends Composite {
interface Driver extends SimpleBeanEditorDriver<Account, AccountEditor> {
}
interface AccountCreatorViewImplUiBinder extends UiBinder<HTMLPanel, AccountCreatorViewImpl> {
}
Driver driver = GWT.create(Driver.class);
private static AccountCreatorViewImplUiBinder ourUiBinder = GWT.create(AccountCreatorViewImplUiBinder.class);
private AccountCreatorPresenter presenter;
#UiField
AccountEditor accountEditor;
#UiField
Button create;
public AccountCreatorViewImpl() {
HTMLPanel rootElement = ourUiBinder.createAndBindUi(this);
initWidget(rootElement);
Account account = new Account();
driver.initialize(accountEditor);
driver.edit(account);
}
#UiHandler("create")
public void onCreate(ClickEvent event) {
Account editedAccount = driver.flush();
if (driver.hasErrors()) {
Window.alert("Has errors! ->"+driver.getErrors().toString());
}
Window.alert(editedAccount.getEmail() + "/" + editedAccount.getPassword());
// presenter.create(editedAccount);
}
}
and here is my simple editor
public class AccountEditor extends Composite implements Editor<Account> {
interface AccountEditorUiBinder extends UiBinder<HTMLPanel, AccountEditor> {
}
private static AccountEditorUiBinder ourUiBinder = GWT.create(AccountEditorUiBinder.class);
#UiField
TextBox email;
#UiField
PasswordTextBox password;
public AccountEditor() {
HTMLPanel rootElement = ourUiBinder.createAndBindUi(this);
initWidget(rootElement);
}
}
and this is my Account class
Account
public class Account implements Serializable {
private String email;
private String password;
public Account(String email) {
this.email = email;
}
public Account() {
}
public Account(String email, String password) {
this.email = email;
this.password = password;
}
public String getEmail() {
return email;
}
public String getPassword() {
return password;
}
}
i also have the same problem with another editor in my app. actually neither one works. when i press save or create i get null values of the entity.
Try adding setEmail() and setPassword() methods to your account class