please help me. I am beginner to magento. I have 50 products in 3 categories. I want to show only the product 1, 10,20,25 in magento cms page. how to do, guide me with step by step please.
select cpe.SKU as ProdcutCode,cpev.value as ProductName,ccev.value as from catalog_product_entity cpe left join catalog_product_entity_varchar cpev on cpev.entity_id = cpe.entity_id left join catalog_category_product ccp on ccp.product_id = cpe.entity_id left join catalog_category_entity_varchar ccev on ccev.entity_id = ccp.category_id
where cpev.attribute_id = 71 and cpev.entity_type_id = 4 and ccev.attribute_id = 41 and ccev.store_id = 0 and ccev.entity_type_id = 3 and cpe.sku =1 or cpe.sku=10 or cpe.sku=20 and cpe.sku=25
i given u all possibility it will show u productcode,productname,and value
Related
I m doing a query and it is showing me the output but not as expected.
Above image it is giving me two extra row (blue indicator) after doing group by which not should be exists in the output. Here is my query
SELECT som.customer_po,
pro.product_id,
pro.product_name,
som.mo_id,
ri.status
FROM schema_order_map som
JOIN product pro ON som.label_reference_id = pro.product_id
JOIN risk_information ri ON som.customer_po = ri.customer_po
WHERE ri.created_by = 18
AND ri.product_id = som.label_reference_id
GROUP BY som.customer_po,
pro.product_id,
product_name,
som.mo_id,
ri.status
I tried different way but it is giving me the same result.
It solves my problem somehow. but i don't know it is best practice or not
SELECT max(som.customer_po) AS customer_po,
max(pro.product_id) AS product_id,
max(pro.product_name) product_name,
max(som.mo_id) mo_id,
max(ri.status) AS risk_status
FROM schema_order_map som
JOIN product pro ON som.label_reference_id = pro.product_id
JOIN risk_information ri ON som.customer_po = ri.customer_po
WHERE ri.created_by = 18
AND ri.product_id = som.label_reference_id
GROUP BY som.customer_po,
pro.product_id
I'm trying to find the greatest number of days (and the reviewer's badge number) it took one of several reviewers to approve a particular document in a workflow. For example, I have a table that holds several workflow approval steps (submitter, manager, controller, QA), along with their badge numbers, and date they approved. The table is called "Workflow" and has those four workflow steps mentioned above as records in the table, and the main table Design that has a one-to-many relationship with Workflow.
I'm trying to determine how many days for the longest review step (number of days), and the badge number of the reviewer for that step (who is holding up the approval workflow, basically). I've been trying to set independent variables to be used later, but not sure how to also set the badge number and I'm confused. I have tried CASE, IIF, and COALESCE but am not having any luck because I don't want the first true value returned and then stop, I want it to continue to evaluate all the steps. Here is an example of my SQL:
declare #managerTime int = 0
declare #controllerTime int = 0
declare #qaTime int = 0
SET #managerTime = (SELECT DATEDIFF(day, manager.BadgeDate, submitter.BadgeDate)
from Design d
left outer join Workflow submitter on (d.DCRId = submitter.DCRId and submitter.RoleName = 'Submitter')
left outer join Workflow manager on (d.DCRId = manager.DCRId and manager.RoleName = 'System Manager')
SET #controllerTime = (SELECT DATEDIFF(day, controller.BadgeDate, manager.BadgeDate)
from Design d
left outer join Workflow manager on (d.DCRId = manager.DCRId and manager.RoleName = 'System Manager')
left outer join Workflow controller on (d.DCRId = controller.DCRId and controller.RoleName = 'DCR Controller')
This is how I would do it:
Create table WorkflowDefinition with flow definiton:
Source Destination Description
Submitter System Manager Submitter -> System Manager
System Manager DCR Controller System Manager -> DCR Controller
DCR Controller QA DCR Controller -> QA
Now we use this table to join workflow elements and calculate greatest number of days:
SET #MaxTime = (SELECT MAX(DATEDIFF(day, source.BadgeDate, destination.BadgeDate))
from Design d
inner join Workflow source on d.DCRId = source.DCRId
inner join WorkflowDefinition flow on source.RoleName = flow.source
inner join Workflow destination on d.DCRId = destination.DCRId
and destination.RoleName = flow.destination
)
When we have this value we can select all workflow elements which took this exact number of days to complete:
Select
destination.BadgeNumber
from Design d
inner join Workflow source on d.DCRId = source.DCRId
inner join WorkflowDefinition flow on source.RoleName = flow.source
inner join Workflow destination on d.DCRId = destination.DCRId
and destination.RoleName = flow.destination
where DATEDIFF(day, source.BadgeDate, destination.BadgeDate) = #MaxTime
If you want to know max value of days for every type of step separately then we can do something like this: Calculate max value of days per step type and put this into temp table:
SELECT
MAX(DATEDIFF(day, source.BadgeDate, destination.BadgeDate)) as maxDays,
flow.Description as StepDescription
into #tmp
from Design d
inner join Workflow source on d.DCRId = source.DCRId
inner join WorkflowDefinition flow on source.RoleName = flow.source
inner join Workflow destination on d.DCRId = destination.DCRId
and destination.RoleName = flow.destination
group by flow.Description
And now use this table to select steps matching max number of days and step description:
Select
destination.BadgeNumber
from Design d
inner join Workflow source on d.DCRId = source.DCRId
inner join WorkflowDefinition flow on source.RoleName = flow.source
inner join Workflow destination on d.DCRId = destination.DCRId
and destination.RoleName = flow.destination
inner join #tmp on DATEDIFF(day, source.BadgeDate, destination.BadgeDate) = maxDays and StepDescription = flow.Description
I ended up tackling this from the "many" table (Workflow), instead of the Design table. I used the following SQL which got me the results I was after. Thank you all for trying to make sense of my ramblings.
select
w.DesignId,
w.RoleName,
w.BadgeNumber,
w.BadgeDate,
DATEDIFF(day,
(select x.BadgeDate from Workflow x
where x.BadgeDate is not null
and x.DesignId = w.DesignId
and x.StepOrder = w.StepOrder - 1),
(select b.BadgeDate from Workflow b
where b.BadgeDate is not null
and b.DesignId = w.DesignId
and b.StepOrder = w.StepOrder))
as StepDuration,
w.StepOrder,
TotalDuration = DATEDIFF(day,
(select y.BadgeDate from Workflow y
where y.RoleName = 'Submitter'
and y.DesignId = w.DesignId),
(select v.BadgeDate from Workflow v
where v.RoleName = 'Approver'
and v.DesignId = w.DesignId)),
d.VersionNumber,
d.Title
from Workflow w
inner join Design d on d.DesignId = w.DesignId
I am using moodle2.4.6. I want a list of user with their groups and their courses.
You will need to do an SQL query to get this information.
Assuming you are using the default 'mdl_' prefix for tables, you will need to join together the following tables:
mdl_user - the details of the users
mdl_user_enrolments - (user_enrolments.userid = user.id) which course enrolments the user
has
mdl_enrol - (enrol.id = user_enrolments.enrolid) details of which
enrolment instances these are
mdl_course - (course.id = enrol.courseid) details of the courses these users are enroled in
mdl_groups_members - (groups_members.userid = user.id) details of the
groups these users are in
mdl_groups - (groups.id =
groups_members.groupid AND groups.courseid = course.id) name and
description of the groups the user is in (for each course)
Please comment if you need help turning that pseudo code into actual SQL, or if you need help with the Moodle database access API ( http://docs.moodle.org/dev/Data_manipulation_API )
SELECT
mdl_user.username,
mdl_user.firstname,
mdl_user.lastname,
mdl_course.fullname,
mdl_course.idnumber,
mdl_groups_members.groupid,
mdl_groups.name
FROM (mdl_groups_members
INNER JOIN ((mdl_course
INNER JOIN (mdl_user_enrolments
INNER JOIN mdl_enrol ON mdl_user_enrolments.enrolid = mdl_enrol.id)
ON mdl_course.id = mdl_enrol.courseid) INNER JOIN mdl_user ON mdl_user_enrolments.userid = mdl_user.id)
ON mdl_groups_members.userid = mdl_user.id) INNER JOIN mdl_groups
ON (mdl_groups.courseid = mdl_course.id) AND (mdl_groups_members.groupid = mdl_groups.id)
WHERE (((mdl_user.username) = "102993") AND ((mdl_course.category) = "36"))
I have a SQL 2008 R2 database with some tables on it having some of those tables a Full-Text Index defined. I'd like to know how to determine the size of the index of a specific table, in order to control and predict it's growth.
Is there a way of doing this?
The catalog view sys.fulltext_index_fragments keeps track of the size of each fragment, regardless of catalog, so you can take the SUM this way. This assumes the limitation of one full-text index per table is going to remain the case. The following query will get you the size of each full-text index in the database, again regardless of catalog, but you could use the WHERE clause if you only care about a specific table.
SELECT
[table] = OBJECT_SCHEMA_NAME(table_id) + '.' + OBJECT_NAME(table_id),
size_in_KB = CONVERT(DECIMAL(12,2), SUM(data_size/1024.0))
FROM sys.fulltext_index_fragments
-- WHERE table_id = OBJECT_ID('dbo.specific_table_name')
GROUP BY table_id;
Also note that if the count of fragments is high you might consider a reorganize.
If you are after a specific Catalogue
Use SSMS
- Clik on [Database] and expand the objects
- Click on [Storage]
- Right Click on {Specific Catalogue}
- Choose Propertie and click.
IN General TAB.. You will find the Catalogue Size = 'nn'
I use something similar to this (which will also calculate the size of XML-indexes, ... if present)
SELECT S.name,
SO.name,
SIT.internal_type_desc,
rows = CASE WHEN GROUPING(SIT.internal_type_desc) = 0 THEN SUM(SP.rows)
END,
TotalSpaceGB = SUM(SAU.total_pages) * 8 / 1048576.0,
UsedSpaceGB = SUM(SAU.used_pages) * 8 / 1048576.0,
UnusedSpaceGB = SUM(SAU.total_pages - SAU.used_pages) * 8 / 1048576.0,
TotalSpaceKB = SUM(SAU.total_pages) * 8,
UsedSpaceKB = SUM(SAU.used_pages) * 8,
UnusedSpaceKB = SUM(SAU.total_pages - SAU.used_pages) * 8
FROM sys.objects SO
INNER JOIN sys.schemas S ON S.schema_id = SO.schema_id
INNER JOIN sys.internal_tables SIT ON SIT.parent_object_id = SO.object_id
INNER JOIN sys.partitions SP ON SP.object_id = SIT.object_id
INNER JOIN sys.allocation_units SAU ON (SAU.type IN (1, 3)
AND SAU.container_id = SP.hobt_id)
OR (SAU.type = 2
AND SAU.container_id = SP.partition_id)
WHERE S.name = 'schema'
--AND SO.name IN ('TableName')
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS(
(S.name,
SO.name,
SIT.internal_type_desc),
(S.name, SO.name), (S.name), ())
ORDER BY S.name,
SO.name,
SIT.internal_type_desc;
This will generally give numbers higher than sys.fulltext_index_fragments, but when combined with the sys.partitions of the table, it will add up to the numbers returned from EXEC sys.sp_spaceused #objname = N'schema.TableName';.
Tested with SQL Server 2016, but documentation says it should be present since 2008.
Sorry, I am pretty much an SQL noob. This has to work in MSFT SQL, Oracle as well as Sybase. In the following snippet I need to change an inner join between IJ and KL on IJ.PO_id = KL.PO_id into a left join also on IJ.PO_id = KL.PO_id. So, I believe I have to re-factor this. Well, implicit joins are not the most readable, at least in my co-worker's eyes. I guess I will agree until I develop my own taste. Sorry, I mangled the table and field names just in case.
/* #IJ_id is an input stored proc patrameter. */
from AB,
CD,
EF,
GH,
IJ,
KL
where
EF.EF_id = IJ.EF_id and
IJ.EF_id = AB.EF_id and
EF.ZY_id = IJ.ZY_id and
IJ.ZY_id = AB.ZY_id and
IJ.IJ_id = AB.IJ_id and
IJ.IJ_id = #IJ_id and
EF.XW_id = GH.GH_id and
AB.VU_code = CD.VU_code and
IJ.TS > 0 and
IJ.RQ = 0 and
EF.RQ = 0 and
AB.RQ = 0 and
IJ.PO_id = KL.PO_id;
Now, my difficulty is that there is a lot going on in the where clause. Things that do not look like a.b = c.d will remain in the where clause, but not all stuff that does look like a.b = c.d look easy to convert into an explicit join. The difficult part is that ideally the conditions would be between neighbors - AB+CD, CD+EF, EF+GH, GH+IJ, IJ+KL but they are not that organized right now. I could re-order some, but ultimately I do not want to forget my goal: I want the new query to be no slower, and I want the new query to be no less readable. It seems that I might be better off hacking just the part that I need to change, and leave it mostly the same. I am not sure if I can do that.
If you understood my intent, please suggest a better query. if you did not, then please tell me how I can improve the question. Thanks.
I think it should be something like this:
FROM AB
JOIN CD ON AB.VU_code = CD.VU_code
JOIN IJ ON IJ.EF_id = AB.EF_id AND IJ.ZY_id = AB.ZY_id AND IJ.IJ_id = AB.IJ_id
JOIN EF ON EF.EF_id = IJ.EF_id AND EF.ZY_id = IJ.ZY_id
JOIN GH ON EF.XW_id = GH.GH_id
JOIN KL ON IJ.PO_id = KL.PO_id
WHERE
IJ.IJ_id = #IJ_id AND
IJ.TS > 0 AND
IJ.RQ = 0 AND
EF.RQ = 0 AND
AB.RQ = 0
I have tried to arrange the tables such that the following rules hold:
Every join condition mentions the new table that it joining on one side.
No table is mentioned in a join condition if that table has not been joined yet.
Conditions where one of the operands is a constant are left as a WHERE condition.
The last rule is a difficult one - it is not possible to tell from your mangled names whether a condition ought to be part of a join or part of the where clause. Both will give the same result for an INNER JOIN. Whether the condition should be part of the join or part of the where clause depends on the semantics of the relationship between the tables.
You need to consider each condition on a case-by-case basis:
Does it define the relationship between the two tables? Put it in the JOIN.
Is it a filter on the results? Put it in the WHERE clause.
Some guidelines:
A condition that includes a parameter from the user is unlikely to be something that should be moved to a join.
Inequalities are not usually found in join conditions.
It couldn't possibly get any less readable than the example you gave...
from AB a
join CD c on a.VU_Code = c.VU_Code
join EF e on a.EF_id = e.EF_id and e.RQ = 0
join GH g on e.XW_id = g.GH_id
join IJ i on a.IJ_id = i.IJ_id and e.EF_id = i.EF_id
and a.EF_id = i.EF_id and e.ZY_id = i.ZY_id
and a.ZY_id = i.ZY_id and i.TS > 0 and i.RQ = 0
LEFT join KL k on i.PO_id = k.PO_id
where
i.IJ_id = #IJ_id and
a.RQ = 0
Use:
FROM AB t1
JOIN CD t2 ON t2.VU_code = t1.VU_code
JOIN GH t4 ON t4.gh_id = t3.xw_id
JOIN IJ t5 ON t5.ZY_id = t1.ZY_id
AND t5.IJ_id = t1.IJ_id
AND t5.EF_id = t1.EF_id
AND t5.IJ_id = #IJ_id
AND t5.TS > 0
AND t5.RQ = 0
JOIN EF t3 ON t3.ef_id = t5.ef_id
AND t3.zy_id = t5.zy_id
AND t3.RQ = 0
JOIN KL t6 ON t6.po_id = t5.po_id -- Add LEFT before JOIN for LEFT JOIN
WHERE ab.qu = 0
They're aliased in the sequence of the original ANSI-89 syntax, but the order is adjusted due to alias reference - can't reference a table alias before it's been defined.
This is ANSI-92 JOIN syntax - there's no performance benefit, but it does mean that OUTER join syntax is consistent. Just have to add LEFT before the "JOIN KL ..." to turn that into a LEFT JOIN.