I am working in Eclipse, specifically Code Composer Studio. When activating Content Assist (autocomplete), I get a list of results throughout the entire project. This is starting to reduce the efficiency of autocomplete, as many similar results will show up and I have to look through and possibly scroll to find the correct one.
I really only need results limited to the current scope. Is there a way to limit the search to the current scope?
Related
The current editor I have open contains the name of a file or part of the name of a file that I have in my workspace. I want to search for that file by selecting the text of that name from the editor, and then putting that text in the Quick Open search box. Currently, I need to manually copy and paste the text, but I want to have behaviour similar to the cmd + F search box where the selected text from the editor immediately appears in the search bar when it is opened. Is it possible to configure Quick Open to do this as well? Or maybe there is an extension for this?
At the time of this writing, this is currently not configurable.
If you look in the settings, all the settings that allow enabling or disabling this behaviour contain the word "seed" in them: search.seedOnFocus, search.seedWithNearestWord, editor.find.seedSearchStringFromSelection. From my reading/searching, there is no other setting with the word "seed" in it.
I googled "github vscode issues quickopen seed" and found this GitHub feature-request on the VS Code GitHub repo: Fuzzy quick open should use selected text as a starting point #59957 asking for such behaviour to be the default behaviour. The issue didn't get enough support from other users to get added to their backlog (a feature request needs to get a certain number of thumbs up reactions from users within a certain time period after it is created to get considered for implementation), so that feature-request is now closed.
If you want to get such a configuration option, create a feature-request issue ticket. If you want to increase your feature-request's visibility (and therefore its chance of getting enough user support), share a link to it on various programming platforms such as r/vscode.
I didn't find any extensions that do this by googling "vscode marketplace quick open seed" and looking at the top results, but maybe you'll have better luck with different queries.
I would like to find a way to get the folded regions in the active editor using a custom extension.
I have done a lot of researches, but I didn't find anything on this subject.
Also, I tried to query the state.vscdb of the workspace, but I am not getting consistent results, as I think, VS Code is keeping this db in memory and I am not sur when it is updating it on disk.
I'm searching in Eclipse and getting multi results on multiple modules.
When results returns I have option to Expand All.
Also option to expand a module using * key
But sometimes I need "high level expanding", just seeing the relevant classes or relevant packages in all modules without seeing the specific code lines.
I expected to open one level at a time.
I didn't find such option, is it achievable somehow? Can this requirements be added as an enhancement to Eclipse?
Opened an enhancement Bug 547752 - Add option expand one level at a time in search results
You can vote for it.
I gave 2 options for showing folders relevant to search:
First option is to open one level at a time on every click
Second option is to open all folders not including files in one click
First option is longer to get specific packages/folders
Second option is just open the packages/folders level of relevant files
I use auto-complete heavily...
When I invoke the auto-completion with tab key...
Powershell also includes any files from the current folder
or in the current path in the autocomplete list
How can I configure Powershell to ignore these files
(eg. auto-complete only with Powershell commands/functions)
There is no simple way to get the behavior you're looking for.
At best, you can define your own function named TabExpansion2 and either fully implement tab completion yourself (definitely not recommended) or filter the results returned from the default implementation of TabExpansion2.
I recall discussing this idea recently, I thought there might even be an open issue, but I didn't see it after a quick search here.
I don't know the exact history, but at one point we did implement the behavior you're wanting. It did break some tests, and I think some people preferred seeing effectively useless completions over no completions, perhaps it was reassuring that completions were still working.
At any rate, I think it's a reasonable feature request, I'd suggestion opening an issue if you can't find one.
In my project there are large no. of FIXME / TODO which are to addressed at some point of time. Actually there about 480 which can be seen from 'TASKS' list but not organised.
I googled and found the Task Tag Decorator plugin.
But unfortunately this is not working.
Can anyone suggest a plugin for FIXME/TODO
apart from this.
I would also wanted to hear from all how these situations are usually managed
What you don't want to hear is that how these situations are usually managed is by not letting them grow so big. But I'm afraid that is the case.
The Pragmatic Programmers advise us Don't live with broken windows. The point being, that if we leave something broken instead of fixing it then other things will be left and before we know it we have 480 items on our TODO list. Plus, there is a danger that some part of our application will come to rely on the "broken" behaviour, so when we address the TODO item we also have fix that as well.
Not everybody can live up to the Pragmatic Programmers' high standards. An alternative approach is to have a list of stuff which needs to be worked on (sometimes known as the Kaizen list). People who are blocked on their assigned work can pick up one of those tasks.
As for your current situation....
I have a rule of thumb which states that nothing can be done in less than half-a-day: not once you include source control, documentation, discussing the change with Bob, etc. Of course, my rule of thumb doesn't apply to truly trivial tasks, but if these tasks were truly trivial they would have been fixed on the spot, not marked as TODO, right?
So you're looking down the barrel of 240 days of effort. If lots of those tasks can be combined into a single fix then you can reduce the per task overhead. But first you've got a chunk of work just to sift through the tasks, categorising and prioritising them. This is why thay call it "technical debt": the longer we leave it the more it costs to fix, and it has the compound interest rate of the average doorstep loanshark.
Unless you have a very understanding project manager/paying customer I think you will have to accept that you aren't going to be able to clear all these items. So you need a brief triaging exercise: assign each TODO into one of three categories:
Stuff that is intolerable and needs
to be fixed right now
Stuff that ought to be fixed as and
when there is an opportunity
Stuff that you're just going to have
to live with
Good luck!
Just wanted to chime in and say that I was able to get the Task Tags Decorator working in eclipse 3.5.0. Here's how.
Install from the update site : Task Tags Decorator Update Site
In preferences: General->Appearance->Label Decorators->Task Tag Decorators
Set up your decorators there.
Then go to: General->Appearance->Label Decorators and check the "Task Tag Decorator" box and Apply
I found this very frustrating to figure out and I hope it helps others. I really like the plugin and have found it helpful for me to visually keep track of TODOs. I think it also helps me keep the TODO list short since it's not out-of-sight-out-of-mind.
In what way do you want them to be organised? More specifically what doesn't the Task View do that you want to do?
For information you can do the following with the standard tasks view:
Click each column header in the task view to sort by that column ascending/descending.
Select the View Menu (downward triangle in top right of view) and
Group tasks by type
Show only a particular task type
Select Configure Contents... then :
Select a Scope to restrict the tasks shown to your desired scope (I find On selected element and its children particularly handy).
Filter tasks by description text (using contains or does not contain)
Filter based on Priority and/or Completed status and Task Type
There are also a few other options you may find useful if you dig through the View Menu.
You might want to look into Mylyn.
It might also be worth considering what it means to use one of these tags.
The trouble is that if you have almost five hundred of these things it doesn't seem likely that you are going to be able to delete them as 'stuff to do' at any point soon. Thus, the impact of using the tag and the process implied therein is diminished, and you end up with the problem you are citing, that the data set has become unmanageable.
The point is that the code is the truth, not the comments, whether they are marked up with task tags or not. You have to have something measurable by which you improve the code.
As an example, when I do code reviews I use these tags in a first pass before the code review pairing begins. The aim is that by the time the code review is complete the tags do not exist.