I've created the following table:
CREATE TABLE updates
(
"table" text,
last_update timestamp without time zone
)
I want to update it whenever any table is updated, the problem is I don't know how, could someone please help me turn this pseudocode into a trigger?
this = current table on whitch operation is performed
ON ALTER,INSERT,DELETE {
IF (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM updates where table = this) = 1
THEN
UPDATE updates SET last_update = timeofday()::timestamp WHERE `table`=this
ELSE
INSERT INTO updates VALUES (this,timeofday()::timestamp);
}
You need a trigger function that is called whenever one of your tables is "updated", assuming that you mean that an INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE is successfully executed. That trigger function would look like this:
CREATE FUNCTION log_update() RETURNS trigger AS $$
BEGIN
UPDATE updates SET last_update = now() WHERE "table" = TG_TABLE_NAME;
IF NOT FOUND THEN
INSERT INTO updates VALUES (TG_TABLE_NAME, now());
END IF;
IF (TG_OP = 'DELETE') THEN
RETURN OLD;
ELSE
RETURN NEW;
END IF;
END; $$ LANGUAGE PLPGSQL;
Every table that has to be logged this way needs to have a trigger associated with it like this:
CREATE TRIGGER ZZZ_mytable_log_updates
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE ON mytable
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE log_update();
A few comments:
Trigger functions are created with PL/PgSQL; see chapter 40 in the documentation. Trigger functions come with some automatic parameters such as TG_TABLE_NAME.
Don't use reserved words ("table" in your case) as column names. Actually, in this case you are better off using the oid of the table, with the associated TG_RELID automatic parameter. It takes up less storage, it is faster, and it avoids confusion between tables with the same name in different schemas of your database. You can use the pg_tables system catalog table to look up the table name from the oid.
You must return the proper value depending on the operation, or the operation may fail. INSERT and UPDATE operations need to have NEW returned; DELETE needs to have OLD returned.
The name of the trigger starts with "ZZZ" to make sure that it fires after any other triggers on the same table have succeeded (they are fired in alphabetical order). If a prior trigger fails, this trigger function will not be called, which is the proper behaviour because the insert, update or delete will not take place either.
Related
I have an AFTER INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE trigger function which runs after any change to table campaigns and triggers an update on table contracts:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_campaign_target() RETURNS trigger AS $update_campaign_target$
BEGIN
UPDATE contracts SET updated_at = now() WHERE contracts.contract_id = NEW.contract_id;
END;
$update_campaign_target$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS update_campaign_target ON campaigns;
CREATE TRIGGER update_campaign_target AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE ON campaigns
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE update_campaign_target();
I have another trigger on table contracts that runs BEFORE UPDATE. The goal is to generate a computed column target which displays either contracts.manual_target (if set) or SUM(campaigns.target) WHERE campaign.contract_id = NEW.contract_id.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_contract_manual_target() RETURNS trigger AS $update_contract_manual_target$
DECLARE
campaign_target_count int;
BEGIN
IF NEW.manual_target IS NOT NULL
THEN
NEW.target := NEW.manual_target;
RETURN NEW;
ELSE
SELECT SUM(campaigns.target) INTO campaign_target_count
FROM campaigns
WHERE campaigns.contract_id = NEW.contract_id;
NEW.target := campaign_target_count;
RETURN NEW;
END IF;
END;
$update_contract_manual_target$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS update_contract_manual_target ON contracts;
CREATE TRIGGER update_contract_manual_target BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON contracts
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE update_contract_manual_target();
This works as expected on INSERT and UPDATE on campaigns, but does not work on DELETE. When a campaign is deleted, the result of SUM(campaigns.target) in the second trigger includes the deleted campaign's target, and thus does not update the contracts.target column to the expected value. A second update of contracts will correctly set the value.
Three questions:
Why doesn't this work?
Is there a way to achieve the behavior I'm looking for using triggers?
For this type of data synchronization, is it better to achieve this using triggers or views? Triggers make sense to me because this is a table that we will read many magnitudes of times more than we'll write to it, but I'm not sure what the best practices are.
The reason this doesn't work is the usage of NEW.contract_id in the AFTER DELETE trigger:
UPDATE contracts SET updated_at = now() WHERE contracts.contract_id = NEW.contract_id;
Per the Triggers on Data Changes documentation, NEW is NULL for DELETE triggers.
Updating the code to use OLD instead of NEW fixes the issue:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_campaign_target() RETURNS trigger AS $update_campaign_target$
BEGIN
IF TG_OP = 'DELETE'
THEN
UPDATE contracts SET updated_at = now() WHERE contracts.contract_id = OLD.contract_id;
ELSE
UPDATE contracts SET updated_at = now() WHERE contracts.contract_id = NEW.contract_id;
END IF;
RETURN NULL;
END;
$update_campaign_target$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Thanks to Anthony Sotolongo and Belayer for your help!
I have two tables in this scenario. One is my "hot sync" table which is near-realtime bi-directional sync of data from my Salesforce Org to a Postgres table. As data changes in the source system (Salesforce), it updates that table on Postgres.
On this table in Postgres, I have a trigger that runs some logic. It basically checks to see if the record triggering it has a sent date that meets some business logic, copy that row into another schema/table to "archive" it.
This all works fine.
What I need to do however is once this row has been copied into the other table, I need to update the status of the record hot sync table. Since it is bi-directional, this will allow the data in Salesforce to reflect the changes I make from the Postgres side.
Can I place this update statement within the originating trigger or is this going to cause recursion issues?
CREATE FUNCTION salesforce.archivelogicfunc()
RETURNS trigger
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
COST 100
VOLATILE NOT LEAKPROOF
AS $BODY$ BEGIN
IF (DATE(NEW.et4ae5__datesent__c) < NOW() - INTERVAL '180 days'
AND DATE(NEW.et4ae5__datesent__c) > NOW() - INTERVAL '540 days')
THEN
INSERT INTO archive.individualemailresult__c
(dateopened__c,
numberoftotalclicks__c,
datebounced__c,
fromname__c,
hardbounce__c,
fromaddress__c,
softbounce__c,
name,
lastmodifieddate,
opened__c,
ownerid,
subjectline__c,
isdeleted,
contact__c,
systemmodstamp,
lastmodifiedbyid,
datesent__c,
dateunsubscribed__c,
createddate,
createdbyid,
lead__c,
tracking_as_of__c,
numberofuniqueclicks__c,
senddefinition__c,
mergeid__c,
triggeredsenddefinition__c,
sfid,
id,
_hc_lastop,
_hc_err,
isarchived)
VALUES
(NEW.et4ae5__dateopened__c,
NEW.et4ae5__numberoftotalclicks__c,
NEW.et4ae5__datebounced__c,
NEW.et4ae5__fromname__c,
NEW.et4ae5__hardbounce__c,
NEW.et4ae5__fromaddress__c,
NEW.et4ae5__softbounce__c,
NEW.name,
NEW.lastmodifieddate,
NEW.et4ae5__opened__c,
NEW.ownerid,
NEW.et4ae5__subjectline__c,
NEW.isdeleted,
NEW.et4ae5__contact__c,
NEW.systemmodstamp,
NEW.lastmodifiedbyid,
NEW.et4ae5__datesent__c,
NEW.et4ae5__dateunsubscribed__c,
NEW.createddate,
NEW.createdbyid,
NEW.et4ae5__lead__c,
NEW.et4ae5__tracking_as_of__c,
NEW.et4ae5__numberofuniqueclicks__c,
NEW.et4ae5__senddefinition__c,
NEW.et4ae5__mergeid__c,
NEW.et4ae5__triggeredsenddefinition__c,
NEW.sfid,
NEW.id,
NEW._hc_lastop,
NEW._hc_err,
NEW.isarchived__c)
ON CONFLICT (id)
DO NOTHING;
-- Update SF to reflect the archive
UPDATE salesforce."et4ae5__individualemailresult__c" SET isarchived__c = true, isdeleted = true WHERE id = NEW.id;
END IF;
RETURN NULL;
END;
$BODY$;
ALTER FUNCTION salesforce.archivelogicfunc()
OWNER TO ....;
My understanding is that the NEW.* is only going to contain the rows that caused the trigger to fire in the first place. Therefore if my trigger was fired for a single record, the update statement NEW.id should only update one record on the source table?
Trying to ensure the trigger isn't going to fire again with the update statement causing some recursive loop that I am not expecting.
My concern is:
Record is Updated
Trigger Fires and inserts record into an archive table
Update runs on the source table to update the record for the new.id
This update causes the trigger to run again. The insert would fail due to the on conflict, but the update would then run again, and again etc..
The original trigger is fired AFTER INSERT/UPDATE.
TRIGGER:
CREATE TRIGGER archivelogic_firetrigger
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE
ON salesforce.et4ae5__individualemailresult__c
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE salesforce.archivelogicfunc();
UPDATE:
I added a WHEN condition to my trigger. It appeared to work on a basic test, but willing to take any other advice if suggested.
CREATE TRIGGER archivelogic_firetrigger
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE
ON salesforce.et4ae5__individualemailresult__c
FOR EACH ROW
WHEN (pg_trigger_depth() = 0) // <-- Added to prevent recursion
EXECUTE PROCEDURE salesforce.archivelogicfunc();
The easiest would be to make it a before trigger, and to replace the update by
NEW.isarchived__c = true;
NEW. isdeleted = true;
[...]
RETURN NEW;
Otherwise, you can filter the rows before running the trigger: it will be called only when isarchived__c and isdeleted have NOT changed (it may be dangerous though, just imagine someone updating ALL fields)
CREATE TRIGGER archivelogic_firetrigger
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE
ON salesforce.et4ae5__individualemailresult__c
FOR EACH ROW
WHEN (NEW.isarchived__c IS NOT DISTINCT FROM OLD.isarchived__c
AND NEW.isdeleted IS NOT DISTINCT FROM OLD.isdeleted )
EXECUTE PROCEDURE salesforce.archivelogicfunc();
I am trying to write a trigger which gets data from the table attribute in which multiple rows are inserted corresponding to one actionId at one time and group all that data into the one object:
Table Schema
actionId
key
value
I am firing trigger on rows insertion,SO how can I handle this multiple row insertion and how can I collect all the data.
CREATE TRIGGER attribute_changes
AFTER INSERT
ON attributes
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE log_attribute_changes();
and the function,
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION wflowr222.log_task_extendedattribute_changes()
RETURNS trigger AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
_message json;
_extendedAttributes jsonb;
BEGIN
SELECT json_agg(tmp)
INTO _extendedAttributes
FROM (
-- your subquery goes here, for example:
SELECT attributes.key, attributes.value
FROM attributes
WHERE attributes.actionId=NEW.actionId
) tmp;
_message :=json_build_object('actionId',NEW.actionId,'extendedAttributes',_extendedAttributes);
INSERT INTO wflowr222.irisevents(message)
VALUES(_message );
RETURN NULL;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE
COST 100;
and data format is,
actionId key value
2 flag true
2 image http:test.com/image
2 status New
I tried to do it via Insert trigger, but it is firing on each row inserted.
If anyone has any idea about this?
I expect that the problem is that you're using a FOR EACH ROW trigger; what you likely want is a FOR EACH STATEMENT trigger - ie. which only fires once for your multi-line INSERT statement. See the description at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createtrigger.html for a more through explanation.
AFAICT, you will also need to add REFERENCING NEW TABLE AS NEW in this mode to make the NEW reference available to the trigger function. So your CREATE TRIGGER syntax would need to be:
CREATE TRIGGER attribute_changes
AFTER INSERT
ON attributes
REFERENCING NEW TABLE AS NEW
FOR EACH STATEMENT
EXECUTE PROCEDURE log_attribute_changes();
I've read elsewhere that the required REFERENCING NEW TABLE ... syntax is only supported in PostgreSQL 10 and later.
Considering the version of postgres you have, and therefore keeping in mind that you can't use a trigger defined FOR EACH STATEMENT for your purpose, the only alternative I see is
using a trigger after insert in order to collect some information about changes in a utility table
using a unix cron that execute a pl/sql that do the job on data set
For example:
Your utility table
CREATE TABLE utility (
actionid integer,
createtime timestamp
);
You can define a trigger FOR EACH ROW with a body that do something like this
INSERT INTO utilty values(NEW.actionid, curent_timestamp);
And, finally, have a crontab UNIX that execute a file or a procedure that to something like this:
SELECT a.* FROM utility u JOIN yourtable a ON a.actionid = u.actionid WHERE u.createtime < current_timestamp;
// do something here with records selected above
TRUNCATE table utility;
If you had postgres 9.5 you could have used pg_cron instead of unix cron...
I am trying to set up triggers for insert and update events for the master table of some partition tables in PostgreSQL. Each time an insertion is made into the master table, the insert trigger event will redirect it into the correct partition table. Consequently, I will need to return NULL from this function call, since I don't want the master table to be populated as well. If the master table receives an update event, it will update a timestamp before making the change in the table. The problem is that the update trigger is never fired. I am using PostgreSQL version 9.6.
I have tried to combine the trigger functions into one, and merged the called trigger procedures into one as well, but the results are the same. The update trigger is only triggered if I return NEW from the insertion trigger function (which populates the master table), or if I comment out the insertion trigger function altogether.
DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS test CASCADE;
CREATE SCHEMA test;
SET SCHEMA 'test';
CREATE TYPE test_type AS ENUM ('unit', 'performance');
CREATE TABLE test (
type test_type NOT NULL,
score INTEGER NOT NULL CHECK (score > 0),
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT current_timestamp
);
CREATE TABLE performance_test (
CHECK (type = 'performance')
) INHERITS (test);
CREATE FUNCTION insert_test()
RETURNS trigger AS
$$
BEGIN
INSERT INTO performance_test VALUES (NEW.*);
RETURN NULL;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE FUNCTION update_timestamp()
RETURNS trigger AS
$$
BEGIN
RAISE NOTICE 'This is never reached.';
UPDATE performance_test
SET updated_at = current_timestamp
WHERE id = NEW.id;
RETURN NULL;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER test_insertion BEFORE INSERT ON test
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE insert_test();
CREATE TRIGGER test_update BEFORE UPDATE ON test
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE update_timestamp();
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
INSERT INTO test VALUES ('performance', 10);
SELECT * FROM performance_test;
UPDATE test SET score = 20 WHERE id = 1;
SELECT * FROM performance_test;
I am not sure if it is possible to achieve what I want with this method, so I'm reaching out here for any advice. Thanks in advance!
/ Hampus
Row triggers must be defined on individual partitions, not the partitioned table. See https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE-LIMITATIONS
I don't know why the documentation for 9.6 doesn't mention this
working update trigger:
CREATE FUNCTION update_timestamp()
RETURNS trigger AS
$$
BEGIN
NEW.updated_at = now();
RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER test_update BEFORE UPDATE ON performance_test
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE update_timestamp();
if you do UPDATE test SET score = 30, updated_at=DEFAULT; or UPDATE test SET score = 30, updated_at=current_timestamp; you might not need the update trigger.
Partitioning is not a free lunch because it has non-obvious effects on both behavior and performance, as you noticed by the trigger not behaving as you expected. If you make a mistake it can easily lead to failing queries and even bad data.
If you are really sure you need it you should make sure you understand it in detail and otherwise I'd recommend you to avoid it, most issues with slow queries can be solved by making sure the table statistics is up to date, using the right indexes, optimizing queries, changing Postgres configuration or adding more hardware.
i have a function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION delete_student()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
IF (TG_OP = 'DELETE')
THEN
INSERT INTO cancel(eno, excode,sno,cdate,cuser)
VALUES ((SELECT entry.eno FROM entry
JOIN student ON (entry.sno = student.sno)
WHERE entry.sno = OLD.sno),(SELECT entry.excode FROM entry
JOIN student ON (entry.sno = student.sno)
WHERE entry.sno = OLD.sno),
OLD.sno,current_timestamp,current_user);
END IF;
RETURN OLD;
END; $BODY$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
and i also have the trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER delete_student
BEFORE DELETE
on student
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE delete_student();
the idea is when i delete a student from the student relation then the entry in the entry relation also delete and my cancel relation updates.
this is what i put into my student relation:
INSERT INTO
student(sno, sname, semail) VALUES (1, 'a. adedeji', 'ayooladedeji#live.com');
and this is what i put into my entry relation:
INSERT INTO
entry(excode, sno, egrade) VALUES (1, 1, 98.56);
when i execute the command
DELETE FROM student WHERE sno = 1;
it deletes the student and also the corresponding entry and the query returns with no errors however when i run a select on my cancel table the table shows up empty?
You do not show how the corresponding entry is deleted. If the entry is deleted before the student record then that causes the problem because then the INSERT in the trigger will fail because the SELECT statement will not provide any values to insert. Is the corresponding entry deleted through a CASCADING delete on student?
Also, your trigger can be much simpler:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION delete_student() RETURNS trigger AS $BODY$
BEGIN
INSERT INTO cancel(eno, excode, sno, cdate, cuser)
VALUES (SELECT eno, excode, sno, current_timestamp, current_user
FROM entry
WHERE sno = OLD.sno);
RETURN OLD;
END; $BODY$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
First of all, the function only fires on a DELETE trigger, so you do not have to test for TG_OP. Secondly, in the INSERT statement you never access any data from the student relation so there is no need to JOIN to that relation; the sno does come from the student relation, but through the OLD implicit parameter.
You didn't post your DB schema and it's not very clear what your problem is, but it looks like a cascade delete is interfering somewhere. Specifically:
Before deleting the student, you insert something into cancel that references it.
Postgres proceeds to delete the row in student.
Postgres proceeds to honors all applicable cascade deletes.
Postgres deletes rows in entry and ... cancel (including the one you just inserted).
A few remarks:
Firstly, and as a rule of thumb, before triggers should never have side-effects on anything but the row itself. Inserting row in a before delete trigger is a big no no: besides introducing potential problems related such as Postgres reporting an incorrect FOUND value or incorrect row counts upon completing the query, consider the case where a separate before trigger cancels the delete altogether by returning NULL. As such, your trigger function should be running on an after trigger -- only at that point can you be sure that the row is indeed deleted.
Secondly, you don't need these inefficient, redundant, and ugly-as-sin sub-select statements. Use the insert ... select ... variety of inserts instead:
INSERT INTO cancel(eno, excode,sno,cdate,cuser)
SELECT entry.eno entry.excode, OLD.sno, current_timestamp, current_user
FROM entry
WHERE entry.sno = OLD.sno;
Thirdly, your trigger should probably be running on the entry table, like so:
INSERT INTO cancel(eno, excode,sno,cdate,cuser)
SELECT OLD.eno OLD.excode, OLD.sno, current_timestamp, current_user;
Lastly, there might be a few problems in your schema. If there is a unique row in entry for each row in student, and you need information in entry to make your trigger work in order to fill in cancel, it probably means the two tables (student and entry) ought to be merged. Whether you merge them or not, you might also need to remove (or manually manage) some cascade deletes where applicable, in order to enforce the business logic in the order you need it to run.