How to get Reverse routing access at global.scala? - scala

On global.scala, I initiallize some pictures address and write it into the database.
I want to get the path and address of picture address dynamically, since I do not want to rewrite the database string everytime.
for example how to get address
#routes.Assets.at(pic_url.getOrElse(default_server_pic))
in global.scala, what kind of headers I should import?

The routes object is generated under the controllers package, so:
controllers.routes.Assets.at("something")

Related

Add query params to an Icecast relay mount source

I am trying to relay a audio stream but besides the mount point /mount_source I need to pass query params so It would look like this:
/mount_source?option1=a&option2=b
Is there a way to do this? I tried specifying in my config file under exactly what I described above but that does not work.
my exact setup is
<relay>
<server>stream.com</server>
<port>8000</port>
<mount>/fm?option1=123&option2=456</mount>
<local-mount>/localfm</local-mount>
<on-demand>0</on-demand>
<relay-shoutcast-metadata>1</relay-shoutcast-metadata>
</relay>
If i type in the address with the query options in the browser I will get the correct stream. But without the params I get a place holder stream which is basicly saying it is out of service. And that is what is happening in icecast too. It is getting the mount point but not passing the query options.

how call REST service with path variable in webmethod?

I'm using WM9.8. I want to know how to call a GET REST service with path variable like:
http://localhost:8080/client/1 in webmethod.
I can call POST rest service using pub.client.http. But it dosen't work to GET.
Use String varible called "method" to set type of Http request method.
Just put the path variable in the URL and made a substitution to the path variable
e.g: http://localhost:8080/client/%yourPathVariableHere%
Holy cow this is an old question but I just tumbled across it and I thought I might helps somebody else who does.
URLs in webmethods are fixed to a single value, like /client unless you enable watt.server.url.alias.partialMatching=true
After that, you can simply alias a service to /client and all subURLs like /client/1 are sent to that service. You still have to parse them to get the ID out.
Be careful, though, because ALL sub URLs are sent to the service. So after enabling this flag I get /client, /client/1, /client/1/name all going to the same service. You can see how this can quickly become REST-unfriendly.

Unable to get coordinates from bing map REST api

We have a list of address, And trying to get coordinates of them using server side script.
Due to limitation of google map api(2500 query per 24 hour), We move to bing map REST api.
But when we are calling API its not giving the coordinates, While google map api returning the correct coordinates.
Please tell me what i am doing wrong?
Here is the sample call
http://dev.virtualearth.net/REST/v1/Locations?query=A+Beka+Acadamdy,2303+Maravilla,Lompoc,CA,93436,&incl=queryParse&key=MY_API_KEY
if I replace everything with %20 in address then still its not returning data
http://dev.virtualearth.net/REST/v1/Locations?query=A%20Beka%20Acadamdy%202303%20Maravilla%20Lompoc%20CA%2093436&incl=queryParse&key=MY_API_KEY
Another URL is
http://dev.virtualearth.net/REST/v1/Locations?query=103+Black+Men+of+the+Bay+Area+Community,3403+Malcolm+Avenue,Oakland,CA,94607-1407,&incl=queryParse&key=MY_API_KEY
We also tried with this
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff817004.aspx#sectionToggle6
But sometimes we don't know the country, That's why its not working correctly.
A couple of things to change. First, drop the name of the location, you only need the street address.
So geocoding "2303 Maravilla, Lompoc, CA, 93436" will work.
Secondly, it looks like you are escaping the query value rather than encoding it. Escaping isn't as good as encoding and will result in some queries failing all together. For example if a query had "first & Main" in it, escaping it would not escape the ampersand which would make everything after it a new URL parameter which would likely either cause an error or mean your query is just for "first". By encoding it the ampersand would be changed to %26. This is documented in the best practices here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn894107.aspx
By encoding your query parameter your address will look like this:
"2303%20Maravilla,%20Lompoc,%20CA,%2093436"

Add fields to email

I am looking for the syntax to add node fields to the body of an email. Examples I looked at the documentation, and the format is [content_type:content_type_title].
However, my email arrives with just the string [content_type:content_type_title].
Even better would be a PHP snippet that loads the node and dumps filed title and filed value into the body of the message.
Rules supports the Token module, which should allow you to do something like that.
Use node_load($nid) or db_query to get the node you want, use that in the email function you are creating.

RESTful, efficient way to query List.contains(element)?

Given:
/images: list of all images
/images/{imageId}: specific image
/feed/{feedId}: potentially huge list of some images (not all of them)
How would you query if a particular feed contains a particular image without downloading the full list? Put another way, how would you check whether a resource state contains a component without downloading the entire state? The first thought that comes to mind is:
Alias /images/{imageId} to /feed/{feedId}/images/{imageId}
Clients would then issue HTTP GET against /feed/{feedId}/images/{id} to check for its existence. The downside I see with this approach is that it forces me to hard-code logic into the client for breaking down an image URI to its proprietary id, something that REST frowns upon. Ideally I should be using the opaque image URI. Another option is:
Issue HTTP GET against /feed/{feedId}?contains={imageURI} to check for existence
but that feels a lot closer to RPC than I'd like. Any ideas?
What's wrong with this?
HEAD /images/id
It's unclear what "feed" means, but assuming it contains resources, it'd be the same:
HEAD /feed/id
It's tricky to say without seeing some examples to provide context.
But you could just have clients call HEAD /feed/images/{imageURI} (assuming that you might need to encode the imageURI). The server would respond with the usual HEAD response, or with a 404 error if the resource doesn't exist. You'd need to code some logic on the server to understand the imageURI.
Then the client either uses the image meta info in the head, or gracefully handles the 404 error and does something else (depending on the application I guess)
There's nothing "un-RESTful" about:
/feed/{feedId}?contains={imageURI}[,{imageURI}]
It returns the subset as specified. The resource, /feed/{feedid}, is a list resource containing a list of images. How is the resource returned with the contains query any different?
The URI is unique, and returns the appropriate state from the application. Can't say anything about the caching semantics of the request, but they're identical to whatever the caching semantics are of the original /feed/{feedid}, it simply a subset.
Finally, there's nothing that says that there even exists a /feed/{feedid}/image/{imageURL}. If you want to work with the sub-resources at that level, then fine, but you're not required to. The list coming back will likely just be a list of direct image URLS, so where's the link describing the /feed/{feedid}/image/{imageURL} relationship? You were going to embed that in the payload, correct?
How about setting up a ImageQuery resource:
# Create a new query from form data where you could constrain results for a given feed.
# May or may not redirect to /image_queries/query_id.
POST /image_queries/
# Optional - view query results containing URIs to query resources.
GET /image_queries/query_id
This video demonstrates the idea using Rails.