GRANT ALL ON TABLE <table_name> TO <user_name>;
The above statement gives permission to a particular user to ALTER the table structures as well to users. How can we restrict the permission of ALTER to tables to users? I want the users only to SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE records rather than allowing them to ALTER the DB structures as well?
Will the below statement help me in achieving my requirement?
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON TABLE <table_name> TO <user_name>;
I want the issue related to postgres.
Refer to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/sql-grant.html & http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/sql-revoke.html
As you can see GRANT and REVOKE will do the job.
Suggestion: Keep in mind to use groups for the privileges and handle the assignment by membership to these groups.
Related
I am the admin of a PostgreSQL 11 DB on Azure.
Some of the users only have access to specific views.
The users were created by:
CREATE USER M1234 WITH PASSWORD '1234!';
GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA public TO M1234;
GRANT SELECT ON table v_xxx TO M1234;
GRANT SELECT ON table v_yyy TO M1234;
For some reason the grant for select on one or all the existing views is removed every so often and the users of course cannot access.
I would really appreciate it if anyone has any insight as to why and how this could happen and if there is a more long term solution.
You grant SELECT on existing tables, but for future tables, you need additional permissions
-- Grant access to future tables ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA a_given_schema GRANT SELECT ON TABLES TO read access;
I would like to seperate access to two existing data schemas (with tables already created) in redshift by creating two new users and granting them access to their relevant schemas.
So user_1 should have access only to schema_1 and user_2 should have access only to schema_2.
By access I mean that the users should be able to SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, DROP from all current tables (no matter who created them) and to CREATE new tables on their schemas.
I have found the below statements to create a new user and to give them specific access types:
Create new user:
CREATE USER user_1 WITH PASSWORD 'password_1';
Grant usage to the given schema:
GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA "schema_1" TO user_1;
Assign privileges:
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA "schema_1" TO user_1;
Alter Default Privileges to maintain the permissions on new tables
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA "schema_1" GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON TABLES TO user_1;
In the documentation it shows how to add all privileges required except for DROP tables. When testing this it errors with ERROR: must be owner of relation table_to_drop.
I alternatively have tried to grant all privileges as below...
GRANT ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA "schema_1" TO user_1;
...but this doesn't overwrite the requirement of it needing to be the owner of the table that drops is able to drop it.
So question is is it possible to restrict a user to a given schema with acccess to it as mentioned above?
Only the owner of the table, the schema owner, or a superuser can drop a table. So user_1 should be the owner of schema_1 and user_2 should be the owner of schema_2 if you want them to be able to drop tables in their respective schema.
I am assuming that user_1 and user_2 are not superusers or the question is moot.
I have reviewed this well-asked and answered PG permission question, and I use it as a starting point for my question:
https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/117109/how-to-manage-default-privileges-for-users-on-a-database-vs-schema
How can I observe the differences between:
alter default privileges for role schma_admin
grant select, insert, delete, truncate on tables to schma_mgr;
... and ...
alter default privileges for role schma_mgr -- "admin" and "mgr" are swapped
grant select, insert, delete, truncate on tables to schma_admin;
Many thanks!
After the first statement, all tables newly created by schema_admin will automatically have the specified privileges granted to schema_mgr.
So every table created by schema_admin will have SELECT, INSERT, DELETE and TRUNCATE privileges granted to schema_mgr (in addition to having all privileges granted to the owner).
In the second statement, the roles are reversed, so tables created by schema_mgr will have privileges granted to schema_admin.
Note that this does not affect tables created before the ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES statement.
I have a postgres instance with a user root that has full admin privileges.
I have two databases db1 and db2.
For every database, I would like to have two users dbN_user and dbN_admin. dbN_user will be the used by my application, and dbN_admin will be used for migrations that change the table structure.
No rows are ever deleted by the application, and I would like to enforce that with user privileges.
db1_user should be able to connect to db1, and be able to SELECT, INSERT and UPDATE, but not DELETE.
db1_admin should have additional privileges to DELETE, CREATE TABLE, ALTER TABLE.
What are the SQL statements to set this up?
dbN_admin would be the owner of the objects, so that user would have all privileges automatically.
You need to GRANT the privileges for dbN_user on the tables and other objects themselves, not on the database.
Just add the correct GRANT statements after the CREATE TABLE statements in the SQL script that populates the database.
You need to GRANT the USAGE privilege on the schema that contains the objects to dbN_user as well.
There is the possibility to define default privileges in a database:
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES FOR dbN_admin
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ON TABLES
TO dbN_user;
This will grant the privileges automatically whenever dbN_admin creates a new table (but it does not affect tables created before the ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES command).
admin:
create user db1_admin;
create schema app_relations;
alter schema app_relations owner to db1_admin;
app:
create user db1_user;
grant CONNECT ON DATABASE db1 to db1_user; --only if you have restricted connections on db previously
grant usage on schema app_relations to db1_user;
grant select,insert,update on all tables in schema app_relations to db1_user;
I have a bit of a funny situation in Amazon Redshift where I have a user X who has grant select on all tables in schema public, but once a new table is created, this grant doesn't seem to apply to the new table. Is this normal behaviour? If yes, how does one deal with it such that the schema level grants are maintained. Thank you.
Executing the following command as super user (master):
alter default privileges
for user staging_user
in schema staging
grant select on tables
to reporting_user;
will allow reporting_user to select data from all future tables created by staging_user in schema staging.
In Redshift tables and views do not automatically inherit the permissions of their parent schema. Your newly created tables are only accessible to the user who created them, and the superuser.
In a recent patch to Redshift a new feature to grant default privileges was implemented that addresses this issue.
Alter Default Privileges
The following code snippet will grant select privileges only for all future tables in the sales schema to the sales_admin group. If you want this to apply to existing tables in a schema you will need to combine it with a second grant statement.
alter default privileges in schema sales grant select on tables to group sales_admin;
This is a normal behavior. Only the object owner/superuser have permission to use the object by default.
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/r_Privileges.html
You can add grant command to your create table statement and grant needed privileges for the user.
When we first spotted new tables not appearing in our reporting tool, I discovered a quick workaround is to re-execute the following SQL statement for the groups/users impacted:
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA <SCHEMANAME> GRANT SELECT ON TABLES TO GROUP <USER/GROUPNAME>;