When i type in my search form and i click search with this keyword make / people is read the first (make) but not the second (people)
This is my code
for($k=$no_words; $k>0 ;$k--)
{
$w=trim($search_array[$k-1]);
if($w!='')
{
$result[$i]['description'] = preg_replace('~'.$search_array[$k-1].'~i','<b>'.$search_array[$k-1].'</b>',$result[$i]['description']);
$result[$i]['title'] = preg_replace('~'.$search_array[$k-1].'~','<b>'.$search_array[$k-1].'</b>',$result[$i]['title']);
}
}
Related
public var O_RDONLY: Int32 { get }
When I'm looking at stuff inside Darwin.sys.* or Darwin.POSIX.* for example, a lot of these constants are defined as getters. But how does one see the actual value without evaluating the code?
public var O_RDONLY: Int32 { get }
is what the Swift importer generates from the macro definition
#define O_RDONLY 0x0000 /* open for reading only */
in the <sys/fcntl.h> include file. Although this is a fixed value, known at compile time, the Swift importer does not show the value in the generated Swift interface.
Note also that a macro definition in a C header file may depend on other macros, and on other “variables” such as compiler flags, the processor architecture, etc.
I am not aware of a way to navigate to that C definition from a Swift file, or any other way to show the defined value in a pure Swift project. As a workaround, one can
add a C file to the project,
use the macro in some C function, and
“jump to definition” from there.
I ended up with the following solution:
const fs = require('fs');
const { exec } = require("child_process");
const getterRegEx = /^(.*)public var (.+): (.+) { get }(.*)$/;
const code = String(fs.readFileSync('./generatedSwift.swift'));
const lines = code.split('\n').map((line, i) => {
const arr = getterRegEx.exec(line);
if (arr) {
const [all, prefix, constant, type, suffix] = arr;
return `print("let ${constant}: ${type} = ", ${constant}, separator: "")`;
}
return `print("""\n${line}\n""")`;
});
lines.unshift('import Foundation');
fs.writeFileSync('./regeneratedSwift.swift', lines.join('\n'));
exec('swift ./regeneratedSwift.swift', (err, stdout, stderr) => {
if (err) {
console.error(`exec error: ${err}`);
return;
}
if (stderr) {
console.log(`stderr: ${stderr}`);
return;
}
console.log(`stdout: ${stdout}`);
});
Copy definitions generated by the XCode and save into a file named generatedSwift.swift the run node index.js in the same folder.
The output will contain the Swift code where all
public var Constant: Type { get }
are replaced with
let Constant = Value
and all other lines will remain the same.
I can use tags in regular page fields without any issue. When using tags within blocks (within a streamfield), the UI works and the tags are saved BUT the current page tags do not show up when loading the page in the admin. That's because the current value is not in the template anymore, it's in a JSON loaded via telepath.
I can confirm that the tags are saved and present in the data passed to initBlockWidget in the page source but these are ignored. Also, if I used a regular text field instead of the tag-widget, I can see the saved-values in the admin.
This is the code I have (which used to be enough before the refactor with telepath).
from wagtail.admin.widgets import AdminTagWidget
class TagBlock(TextBlock):
#cached_property
def field(self):
field_kwargs = {"widget": AdminTagWidget()}
field_kwargs.update(self.field_options)
return forms.CharField(**field_kwargs)
I think the following link is what I need to complete somehow to get it to work: https://docs.wagtail.io/en/stable/reference/streamfield/widget_api.html#form-widget-client-side-api
I've tried with this:
class AdminTagWidgetAdapter(WidgetAdapter):
class Media:
js = [
"wagtailadmin/js/vendor/tag-it.js",
"js/admin/admin-tag-widget-adapter.js",
]
register(AdminTagWidgetAdapter(), AdminTagWidget)
And under js/admin/admin-tag-widget-adapter.js:
console.log("adapter"); // this shows up in the console
class BoundWidget { // copied from wagtail source code
constructor(element, name, idForLabel, initialState) {
var selector = ':input[name="' + name + '"]';
this.input = element.find(selector).addBack(selector); // find, including element itself
this.idForLabel = idForLabel;
this.setState(initialState);
}
getValue() {
return this.input.val();
}
getState() {
return this.input.val();
}
setState(state) {
this.input.val(state);
}
getTextLabel(opts) {
const val = this.getValue();
if (typeof val !== 'string') return null;
const maxLength = opts && opts.maxLength;
if (maxLength && val.length > maxLength) {
return val.substring(0, maxLength - 1) + '…';
}
return val;
}
focus() {
this.input.focus();
}
}
// my code here:
class AdminTagWidget {
constructor(html, idPattern) {
this.html = html;
this.idPattern = idPattern;
}
boundWidgetClass = BoundWidget;
render(placeholder, name, id, initialState) {
console.log("RENDER", placeholder, name, id, initialState); // this does not show
var html = this.html.replace(/__NAME__/g, name).replace(/__ID__/g, id);
var idForLabel = this.idPattern.replace(/__ID__/g, id);
var dom = $(html);
$(placeholder).replaceWith(dom);
// eslint-disable-next-line new-cap
return new this.boundWidgetClass(dom, name, idForLabel, initialState);
}
}
console.log("here") // does show in the console
// variants I've tried:
//window.telepath.register('wagtail.admin.widgets.tags.AdminTagWidget', AdminTagWidget);
//window.telepath.register('wagtail.widgets.AdminTagWidget', AdminTagWidget);
window.telepath.register('path.where.its.used.AdminTagWidget', AdminTagWidget)
The log from my custom render method does not show. It seems that I'm not calling the right path within window.telepath.register but I don't know how what the string is supposed to be...
I'm not even sure if this is the right way forward.
Notes:
it works in regular field, the question is about tags in blocks
I'm using Wagtail version 2.13.2 but I've also tried with 2.15 without any difference.
In the console, I can log window.telepath and see my custom widget. It's just not "applied" to anything
Your WidgetAdapter class needs a js_constructor attribute:
class AdminTagWidgetAdapter(WidgetAdapter):
js_constructor = 'myapp.widgets.AdminTagWidget'
class Media:
js = [
"wagtailadmin/js/vendor/tag-it.js",
"js/admin/admin-tag-widget-adapter.js",
]
Any string value will work here - it just needs to uniquely identify the class, so it's recommended to use a dotted module-like path to avoid colliding with others. This then matches the string you pass to window.telepath.register on the Javascript side:
window.telepath.register('myapp.widgets.AdminTagWidget', AdminTagWidget)
I've tried to implement a new module that catches the keys written in the default search form and displays other results than the default search result page. With these other results I will make an external query, which is put in a special block.
Any idea on how to do this?
I've tried to use a custom module making a "hook_alter_form " with no success.
In other words :
I have a function like this:
function my_function_name_form_alter(&$form,&$form_state,$form_id){
switch($form_id){
case 'search-block-form':
//Here i want to catch the text that i wrote in the search box
break;
}
}
Thank u!
You can alter the search query in order to show other results:
function mymodule_query_alter(QueryAlterableInterface $query){
$is_search = FALSE;
foreach ($query->getTables() as $table) {
if ($table['table'] == 'search_index') {
$is_search = TRUE;
}
}
if ($is_search) {
global $language;
$db_or = db_or();
$db_or->condition('n.type', 'event', '=');
$db_or->condition('n.type', 'real_sitio', '=');
$query->condition($db_or);
$query->condition('n.language' , $language->language, '=');
}
}
This is a bit performance killer so there's a patch for drupal at http://drupal.org/node/1435834 that adds a hook for making the alter directly in the search query:
So finally it would look like:
function mymodule_search_query_search_node_alter(&$query) {
$query->condition('n.type', 'article', '=');
}
I'm writing a tinyMce plugin which contains a section of code, replacing one element for another. I'm using the editor's dom instance to create the node I want to insert, and I'm using the same instance to do the replacement.
My code is as follows:
var nodeData =
{
"data-widgetId": data.widget.widgetKey(),
"data-instanceKey": "instance1",
src: "/content/images/icon48/cog.png",
class: "widgetPlaceholder",
title: data.widget.getInfo().name
};
var nodeToInsert = ed.dom.create("img", nodeData);
// Insert this content into the editor window
if (data.mode == 'add') {
tinymce.DOM.add(ed.getBody(), nodeToInsert);
}
else if (data.mode == 'edit' && data.selected != null) {
var instanceKey = $(data.selected).attr("data-instancekey");
var elementToReplace = tinymce.DOM.select("[data-instancekey=" + instanceKey + "]");
if (elementToReplace.length === 1) {
ed.dom.replace(elementToReplace[0], nodeToInsert);
}
else {
throw new "No element to replace with that instance key";
}
}
TinyMCE breaks during the replace, here:
replace : function(n, o, k) {
var t = this;
if (is(o, 'array'))
n = n.cloneNode(true);
return t.run(o, function(o) {
if (k) {
each(tinymce.grep(o.childNodes), function(c) {
n.appendChild(c);
});
}
return o.parentNode.replaceChild(n, o);
});
},
..with the error Cannot call method 'replaceChild' of null.
I've verified that the two argument's being passed into replace() are not null and that their parentNode fields are instantiated. I've also taken care to make sure that the elements are being created and replace using the same document instance (I understand I.E has an issue with this).
I've done all this development in Google Chrome, but I receive the same errors in Firefox 4 and IE8 also. Has anyone else come across this?
Thanks in advance
As it turns out, I was simply passing in the arguments in the wrong order. I should have been passing the node I wanted to insert first, and the node I wanted to replace second.
In KRL, I'd like to detect whether a variable is an array or hash so that I know if I need to use the decode or encode operator on it. Is that possible?
I'd like to do something like this:
my_var = var.is_array => var.decode() | my_var
Update
The best way to do this is with the typeof() operator. This is new since the answer, but with the early interpretation of variables, the old way listed in the answer will no longer work.
Another useful operator for examining your data is isnull()
myHash.typeof() => "hash"
myArray.typeof() => "array"
...
The only way that I have figured out how to detect the data structure type is by coercing to a string and then checking to see if the resulting pointer string contains the word 'array' or 'hash'.
'One liner'
myHashIsHash = "#{myHash}".match(re/hash/gi);
myHashIsHash will be true/1
Example app built to demonstrate concept
ruleset a60x547 {
meta {
name "detect-array-or-hash"
description <<
detect-array-or-hash
>>
author "Mike Grace"
logging on
}
global {
myHash = {
"asking":"Mike Farmer",
"question":"detect type"
};
myArray = [0,1,2,3];
}
rule detect_types {
select when pageview ".*"
pre {
myHashIsArray = "#{myHash}".match(re/array/gi);
myHashIsHash = "#{myHash}".match(re/hash/gi);
myArrayIsArray = "#{myArray}".match(re/array/gi);
myArrayIsHash = "#{myArray}".match(re/hash/gi);
hashAsString = "#{myHash}";
arrayAsString = "#{myArray}";
}
{
notify("hash as string",hashAsString) with sticky = true;
notify("array as string",arrayAsString) with sticky = true;
notify("hash is array",myHashIsArray) with sticky = true;
notify("hash is hash",myHashIsHash) with sticky = true;
notify("array is array",myArrayIsArray) with sticky = true;
notify("array is hash",myArrayIsHash) with sticky = true;
}
}
}
Example app in action!