In Objective C, one could do the following to check for strings:
if ([myString isEqualToString:#""]) {
NSLog(#"myString IS empty!");
} else {
NSLog(#"myString IS NOT empty, it is: %#", myString);
}
How does one detect empty strings in Swift?
There is now the built in ability to detect empty string with .isEmpty:
if emptyString.isEmpty {
print("Nothing to see here")
}
Apple Pre-release documentation: "Strings and Characters".
A concise way to check if the string is nil or empty would be:
var myString: String? = nil
if (myString ?? "").isEmpty {
print("String is nil or empty")
}
I am completely rewriting my answer (again). This time it is because I have become a fan of the guard statement and early return. It makes for much cleaner code.
Non-Optional String
Check for zero length.
let myString: String = ""
if myString.isEmpty {
print("String is empty.")
return // or break, continue, throw
}
// myString is not empty (if this point is reached)
print(myString)
If the if statement passes, then you can safely use the string knowing that it isn't empty. If it is empty then the function will return early and nothing after it matters.
Optional String
Check for nil or zero length.
let myOptionalString: String? = nil
guard let myString = myOptionalString, !myString.isEmpty else {
print("String is nil or empty.")
return // or break, continue, throw
}
// myString is neither nil nor empty (if this point is reached)
print(myString)
This unwraps the optional and checks that it isn't empty at the same time. After passing the guard statement, you can safely use your unwrapped nonempty string.
In Xcode 11.3 swift 5.2 and later
Use
var isEmpty: Bool { get }
Example
let lang = "Swift 5"
if lang.isEmpty {
print("Empty string")
}
If you want to ignore white spaces
if lang.trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespaces).isEmpty {
print("Empty string")
}
Here is how I check if string is blank. By 'blank' I mean a string that is either empty or contains only space/newline characters.
struct MyString {
static func blank(text: String) -> Bool {
let trimmed = text.trimmingCharacters(in: CharacterSet.whitespacesAndNewlines)
return trimmed.isEmpty
}
}
How to use:
MyString.blank(" ") // true
You can also use an optional extension so you don't have to worry about unwrapping or using == true:
extension String {
var isBlank: Bool {
return self.trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespacesAndNewlines).isEmpty
}
}
extension Optional where Wrapped == String {
var isBlank: Bool {
if let unwrapped = self {
return unwrapped.isBlank
} else {
return true
}
}
}
Note: when calling this on an optional, make sure not to use ? or else it will still require unwrapping.
To do the nil check and length simultaneously
Swift 2.0 and iOS 9 onwards you could use
if(yourString?.characters.count > 0){}
isEmpty will do as you think it will, if string == "", it'll return true.
Some of the other answers point to a situation where you have an optional string.
PLEASE use Optional Chaining!!!!
If the string is not nil, isEmpty will be used, otherwise it will not.
Below, the optionalString will NOT be set because the string is nil
let optionalString: String? = nil
if optionalString?.isEmpty == true {
optionalString = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet"
}
Obviously you wouldn't use the above code. The gains come from JSON parsing or other such situations where you either have a value or not. This guarantees code will be run if there is a value.
Check check for only spaces and newlines characters in text
extension String
{
var isBlank:Bool {
return self.stringByTrimmingCharactersInSet(NSCharacterSet.whitespaceAndNewlineCharacterSet()).isEmpty
}
}
using
if text.isBlank
{
//text is blank do smth
}
Swift String (isEmpty vs count)
You should use .isEmpty instead of .count
.isEmpty Complexity = O(1)
.count Complexity = O(n)
isEmpty does not use .count under the hood, it compares start and end indexes startIndex == endIndex
Official doc Collection.count
Complexity: O(1) if the collection conforms to RandomAccessCollection; otherwise, O(n), where n is the length of the collection.
Single character can be represented by many combinations of Unicode scalar values(different memory footprint), that is why to calculate count we should iterate all Unicode scalar values
String = alex
String = \u{61}\u{6c}\u{65}\u{78}
[Char] = [a, l, e, x]
Unicode text = alex
Unicode scalar values(UTF-32) = u+00000061u+0000006cu+00000065u+00000078
1 Character == 1 extended grapheme cluster == set of Unicode scalar values
Example
//Char á == extended grapheme cluster of Unicode scalar values \u{E1}
//Char á == extended grapheme cluster of Unicode scalar values \u{61}\u{301}
let a1: String = "\u{E1}" // Unicode text = á, UTF-16 = \u00e1, UTF-32 = u+000000e1
print("count:\(a1.count)") //count:1
// Unicode text = a, UTF-16 = \u0061, UTF-32 = u+00000061
// Unicode text = ́, UTF-16 = \u0301, UTF-32 = u+00000301
let a2: String = "\u{61}\u{301}" // Unicode text = á, UTF-16 = \u0061\u0301, UTF-32 = u+00000061u+00000301
print("count:\(a2.count)") //count:1
For optional Strings how about:
if let string = string where !string.isEmpty
{
print(string)
}
if myString?.startIndex != myString?.endIndex {}
I can recommend add small extension to String or Array that looks like
extension Collection {
public var isNotEmpty: Bool {
return !self.isEmpty
}
}
With it you can write code that is easier to read.
Compare this two lines
if !someObject.someParam.someSubParam.someString.isEmpty {}
and
if someObject.someParam.someSubParam.someString.isNotEmpty {}
It is easy to miss ! sign in the beginning of fist line.
public extension Swift.Optional {
func nonEmptyValue<T>(fallback: T) -> T {
if let stringValue = self as? String, stringValue.isEmpty {
return fallback
}
if let value = self as? T {
return value
} else {
return fallback
}
}
}
What about
if let notEmptyString = optionalString where !notEmptyString.isEmpty {
// do something with emptyString
NSLog("Non-empty string is %#", notEmptyString)
} else {
// empty or nil string
NSLog("Empty or nil string")
}
You can use this extension:
extension String {
static func isNilOrEmpty(string: String?) -> Bool {
guard let value = string else { return true }
return value.trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespaces).isEmpty
}
}
and then use it like this:
let isMyStringEmptyOrNil = String.isNilOrEmpty(string: myString)
Related
I have below func in my class.
static func getFirstCharInName(strName: String) -> String {
let firstCharInName = String(strName.first)
return firstCharInName.trim()
}
I encountered this err:
Value of optional type 'Character?' must be unwrapped to a value of type 'Character'
What seems to be the problem?
Thanks
func getFirstCharInName(strName: String) -> String {
let indexStartOfText = strName.index(strName.startIndex, offsetBy: 0)
let indexEndOfText = strName.index(strName.startIndex, offsetBy: 0)
let firstChar = String(strName[indexStartOfText...indexEndOfText])
return firstChar
}
This error means that the expression has optional value (the value can be nil) that is not yet unwrapped, strName.first returns an optional value of Character?, but your function demands a returning type of String which is not an optional type.
So, in order to fix this, you need to unwrap the optional value strName.first, it seems like you are not familiar with optionals, here's the code for your case (choose one from two options):
func getFirstCharInName(strName: String) -> String {
// option 1: force unwrap - can cause fatal error
return String(strName.first!)
// option 2: optional binding
if let firstCharInName = strName.first {
return String(firstCharInName)
} else {
// if the optional value is nil, return an empty string
return ""
}
}
PS. I don't really understand the function trim() in your question, but if you mean to strip away the blank spaces like " ", you can do:
firstCharInName.trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespaces)
Avoid the optional simply with prefix, it's totally safe. if there is no first character you'll get an empty string.
static func getFirstChar(in name: String) -> String { // the function name getFirstChar(in name is swiftier
return String(name.prefix(1))
}
I don't know what the trim function is supposed to do.
It means that value of optional type 'Character?' (as result of your part of code strName.first) must be unwrapped to a value of type 'Character' before you will be gonna cast it to String type.
You may use this variant:
func getFirstCharInName(strName: String) -> String {
return strName.count != 0 ? String(strName.first!) : ""
}
As you can see, the exclamation point is in the string strName.first! retrieves the optional variable as it was needed.
you can do something like that:
extension String {
var firstLetter: String {
guard !self.isEmpty else { return "" }
return String(self[self.startIndex...self.startIndex])
}
}
then
let name = "MilkBottle"
let first = name.firstLetter // "M"
i am new to swift i just started with the basics. In one of the Blog i saw a simple task which goes like this read a line from the stdin and check whether it is a integer,float,String.
I tried with the following code
let input = readLine()
var result = test(input)
print (result)
func test (obj:Any) -> String {
if obj is Int { return "This input is of type Intger." }
else if obj is String { return "This input is of type String." }
else { return "This input is something else. " }
}
when the input of 3245 is given it stores in the string format. and returns output as string.
how to overcome it..?
The readLine function returns a value of type String?. So your input variable can only be a String. It will never be Int or anything else.
If you want to see if the entered value is a valid number, you can try to convert the string to an Int.
if let input = readLine() {
if let num = Int(input) {
// the user entered a valid integer
} else {
// the user entered something other than an integer
}
}
As others have pointed out, readline() always returns a String?. It's up to you to parse that into whatever format you use it.
This is how I would do this:
let line = readLine()
switch line {
case let s? where Int(s) != nil:
print("This input is of type Intger.")
case let s? where Float(s) != nil:
print("This input is of type Float.")
case let s? where s.hasPrefix("\"") && s.hasSuffix("\""):
print("This input is of type String.")
default: print("This input is something else. ")
}
It exploits the ability of Int and Float's initializers to test the validity of a String, which almost entirely defeats the purpose of this exercise. But hey, it works, right? 😄
You can find of the type of object as
if let intt = obj as? Int {
// obj is a String. Do something with intt
}
else if let str = obj as? String {
// obj is a String. Do something with str
}
else {
//obj is something else
}
Every example of trimming strings in Swift remove both leading and trailing whitespace, but how can only trailing whitespace be removed?
For example, if I have a string:
" example "
How can I end up with:
" example"
Every solution I've found shows trimmingCharacters(in: CharacterSet.whitespaces), but I want to retain the leading whitespace.
RegEx is a possibility, or a range can be derived to determine index of characters to remove, but I can't seem to find an elegant solution for this.
With regular expressions:
let string = " example "
let trimmed = string.replacingOccurrences(of: "\\s+$", with: "", options: .regularExpression)
print(">" + trimmed + "<")
// > example<
\s+ matches one or more whitespace characters, and $ matches
the end of the string.
In Swift 4 & Swift 5
This code will also remove trailing new lines.
It works based on a Character struct's method .isWhitespace
var trailingSpacesTrimmed: String {
var newString = self
while newString.last?.isWhitespace == true {
newString = String(newString.dropLast())
}
return newString
}
This short Swift 3 extension of string uses the .anchored and .backwards option of rangeOfCharacter and then calls itself recursively if it needs to loop. Because the compiler is expecting a CharacterSet as the parameter, you can just supply the static when calling, e.g. "1234 ".trailing(.whitespaces) will return "1234". (I've not done timings, but would expect faster than regex.)
extension String {
func trailingTrim(_ characterSet : CharacterSet) -> String {
if let range = rangeOfCharacter(from: characterSet, options: [.anchored, .backwards]) {
return self.substring(to: range.lowerBound).trailingTrim(characterSet)
}
return self
}
}
In Foundation you can get ranges of indices matching a regular expression. You can also replace subranges. Combining this, we get:
import Foundation
extension String {
func trimTrailingWhitespace() -> String {
if let trailingWs = self.range(of: "\\s+$", options: .regularExpression) {
return self.replacingCharacters(in: trailingWs, with: "")
} else {
return self
}
}
}
You can also have a mutating version of this:
import Foundation
extension String {
mutating func trimTrailingWhitespace() {
if let trailingWs = self.range(of: "\\s+$", options: .regularExpression) {
self.replaceSubrange(trailingWs, with: "")
}
}
}
If we match against \s* (as Martin R. did at first) we can skip the if let guard and force-unwrap the optional since there will always be a match. I think this is nicer since it's obviously safe, and remains safe if you change the regexp. I did not think about performance.
Handy String extension In Swift 4
extension String {
func trimmingTrailingSpaces() -> String {
var t = self
while t.hasSuffix(" ") {
t = "" + t.dropLast()
}
return t
}
mutating func trimmedTrailingSpaces() {
self = self.trimmingTrailingSpaces()
}
}
Swift 4
extension String {
var trimmingTrailingSpaces: String {
if let range = rangeOfCharacter(from: .whitespacesAndNewlines, options: [.anchored, .backwards]) {
return String(self[..<range.lowerBound]).trimmingTrailingSpaces
}
return self
}
}
Demosthese's answer is a useful solution to the problem, but it's not particularly efficient. This is an upgrade to their answer, extending StringProtocol instead, and utilizing Substring to remove the need for repeated copying.
extension StringProtocol {
#inline(__always)
var trailingSpacesTrimmed: Self.SubSequence {
var view = self[...]
while view.last?.isWhitespace == true {
view = view.dropLast()
}
return view
}
}
No need to create a new string when dropping from the end each time.
extension String {
func trimRight() -> String {
String(reversed().drop { $0.isWhitespace }.reversed())
}
}
This operates on the collection and only converts the result back into a string once.
It's a little bit hacky :D
let message = " example "
var trimmed = ("s" + message).trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespacesAndNewlines)
trimmed = trimmed.substring(from: trimmed.index(after: trimmed.startIndex))
Without regular expression there is not direct way to achieve that.Alternatively you can use the below function to achieve your required result :
func removeTrailingSpaces(with spaces : String) -> String{
var spaceCount = 0
for characters in spaces.characters{
if characters == " "{
print("Space Encountered")
spaceCount = spaceCount + 1
}else{
break;
}
}
var finalString = ""
let duplicateString = spaces.replacingOccurrences(of: " ", with: "")
while spaceCount != 0 {
finalString = finalString + " "
spaceCount = spaceCount - 1
}
return (finalString + duplicateString)
}
You can use this function by following way :-
let str = " Himanshu "
print(removeTrailingSpaces(with : str))
One line solution with Swift 4 & 5
As a beginner in Swift and iOS programming I really like #demosthese's solution above with the while loop as it's very easy to understand. However the example code seems longer than necessary. The following uses essentially the same logic but implements it as a single line while loop.
// Remove trailing spaces from myString
while myString.last == " " { myString = String(myString.dropLast()) }
This can also be written using the .isWhitespace property, as in #demosthese's solution, as follows:
while myString.last?.isWhitespace == true { myString = String(myString.dropLast()) }
This has the benefit (or disadvantage, depending on your point of view) that this removes all types of whitespace, not just spaces but (according to Apple docs) also including newlines, and specifically the following characters:
“\t” (U+0009 CHARACTER TABULATION)
“ “ (U+0020 SPACE)
U+2029 PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR
U+3000 IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE
Note: Even though .isWhitespace is a Boolean it can't be used directly in the while loop as it ends up being optional ? due to the chaining of the optional .last property, which returns nil if the String (or collection) is empty. The == true logic gets around this since nil != true.
I'd love to get some feedback on this, esp. in case anyone sees any issues or drawbacks with this simple single line approach.
Swift 5
extension String {
func trimTrailingWhiteSpace() -> String {
guard self.last == " " else { return self }
var tmp = self
repeat {
tmp = String(tmp.dropLast())
} while tmp.last == " "
return tmp
}
}
I have the need to parse some unknown data which should just be a numeric value, but may contain whitespace or other non-alphanumeric characters.
Is there a new way of doing this in Swift? All I can find online seems to be the old C way of doing things.
I am looking at stringByTrimmingCharactersInSet - as I am sure my inputs will only have whitespace/special characters at the start or end of the string. Are there any built in character sets I can use for this? Or do I need to create my own?
I was hoping there would be something like stringFromCharactersInSet() which would allow me to specify only valid characters to keep
I was hoping there would be something like stringFromCharactersInSet() which would allow me to specify only valid characters to keep.
You can either use trimmingCharacters with the inverted character set to remove characters from the start or the end of the string. In Swift 3 and later:
let result = string.trimmingCharacters(in: CharacterSet(charactersIn: "0123456789.").inverted)
Or, if you want to remove non-numeric characters anywhere in the string (not just the start or end), you can filter the characters, e.g. in Swift 4.2.1:
let result = string.filter("0123456789.".contains)
Or, if you want to remove characters from a CharacterSet from anywhere in the string, use:
let result = String(string.unicodeScalars.filter(CharacterSet.whitespaces.inverted.contains))
Or, if you want to only match valid strings of a certain format (e.g. ####.##), you could use regular expression. For example:
if let range = string.range(of: #"\d+(\.\d*)?"#, options: .regularExpression) {
let result = string[range] // or `String(string[range])` if you need `String`
}
The behavior of these different approaches differ slightly so it just depends on precisely what you're trying to do. Include or exclude the decimal point if you want decimal numbers, or just integers. There are lots of ways to accomplish this.
For older, Swift 2 syntax, see previous revision of this answer.
let result = string.stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString("[^0-9]", withString: "", options: NSStringCompareOptions.RegularExpressionSearch, range:nil).stringByTrimmingCharactersInSet(NSCharacterSet.whitespaceCharacterSet())
Swift 3
let result = string.replacingOccurrences( of:"[^0-9]", with: "", options: .regularExpression)
You can upvote this answer.
I prefer this solution, because I like extensions, and it seems a bit cleaner to me. Solution reproduced here:
extension String {
var digits: String {
return components(separatedBy: CharacterSet.decimalDigits.inverted)
.joined()
}
}
You can filter the UnicodeScalarView of the string using the pattern matching operator for ranges, pass a UnicodeScalar ClosedRange from 0 to 9 and initialise a new String with the resulting UnicodeScalarView:
extension String {
private static var digits = UnicodeScalar("0")..."9"
var digits: String {
return String(unicodeScalars.filter(String.digits.contains))
}
}
"abc12345".digits // "12345"
edit/update:
Swift 4.2
extension RangeReplaceableCollection where Self: StringProtocol {
var digits: Self {
return filter(("0"..."9").contains)
}
}
or as a mutating method
extension RangeReplaceableCollection where Self: StringProtocol {
mutating func removeAllNonNumeric() {
removeAll { !("0"..."9" ~= $0) }
}
}
Swift 5.2 • Xcode 11.4 or later
In Swift5 we can use a new Character property called isWholeNumber:
extension RangeReplaceableCollection where Self: StringProtocol {
var digits: Self { filter(\.isWholeNumber) }
}
extension RangeReplaceableCollection where Self: StringProtocol {
mutating func removeAllNonNumeric() {
removeAll { !$0.isWholeNumber }
}
}
To allow a period as well we can extend Character and create a computed property:
extension Character {
var isDecimalOrPeriod: Bool { "0"..."9" ~= self || self == "." }
}
extension RangeReplaceableCollection where Self: StringProtocol {
var digitsAndPeriods: Self { filter(\.isDecimalOrPeriod) }
}
Playground testing:
"abc12345".digits // "12345"
var str = "123abc0"
str.removeAllNonNumeric()
print(str) //"1230"
"Testing0123456789.".digitsAndPeriods // "0123456789."
Swift 4
I found a decent way to get only alpha numeric characters set from a string.
For instance:-
func getAlphaNumericValue() {
var yourString = "123456789!##$%^&*()AnyThingYouWant"
let unsafeChars = CharacterSet.alphanumerics.inverted // Remove the .inverted to get the opposite result.
let cleanChars = yourString.components(separatedBy: unsafeChars).joined(separator: "")
print(cleanChars) // 123456789AnyThingYouWant
}
A solution using the filter function and rangeOfCharacterFromSet
let string = "sld [f]34é7*˜µ"
let alphaNumericCharacterSet = NSCharacterSet.alphanumericCharacterSet()
let filteredCharacters = string.characters.filter {
return String($0).rangeOfCharacterFromSet(alphaNumericCharacterSet) != nil
}
let filteredString = String(filteredCharacters) // -> sldf34é7µ
To filter for only numeric characters use
let string = "sld [f]34é7*˜µ"
let numericSet = "0123456789"
let filteredCharacters = string.characters.filter {
return numericSet.containsString(String($0))
}
let filteredString = String(filteredCharacters) // -> 347
or
let numericSet : [Character] = ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9"]
let filteredCharacters = string.characters.filter {
return numericSet.contains($0)
}
let filteredString = String(filteredCharacters) // -> 347
Swift 4
But without extensions or componentsSeparatedByCharactersInSet which doesn't read as well.
let allowedCharSet = NSCharacterSet.letters.union(.whitespaces)
let filteredText = String(sourceText.unicodeScalars.filter(allowedCharSet.contains))
let string = "+1*(234) fds567#-8/90-"
let onlyNumbers = string.components(separatedBy: CharacterSet.decimalDigits.inverted).joined()
print(onlyNumbers) // "1234567890"
or
extension String {
func removeNonNumeric() -> String {
return self.components(separatedBy: CharacterSet.decimalDigits.inverted).joined()
}
}
let onlyNumbers = "+1*(234) fds567#-8/90-".removeNonNumeric()
print(onlyNumbers)// "1234567890"
Swift 3, filters all except numbers
let myString = "dasdf3453453fsdf23455sf.2234"
let result = String(myString.characters.filter { String($0).rangeOfCharacter(from: CharacterSet(charactersIn: "0123456789")) != nil })
print(result)
Swift 4.2
let numericString = string.filter { (char) -> Bool in
return char.isNumber
}
You can do something like this...
let string = "[,myString1. \"" // string : [,myString1. "
let characterSet = NSCharacterSet(charactersInString: "[,. \"")
let finalString = (string.componentsSeparatedByCharactersInSet(characterSet) as NSArray).componentsJoinedByString("")
print(finalString)
//finalString will be "myString1"
The issue with Rob's first solution is stringByTrimmingCharactersInSet only filters the ends of the string rather than throughout, as stated in Apple's documentation:
Returns a new string made by removing from both ends of the receiver characters contained in a given character set.
Instead use componentsSeparatedByCharactersInSet to first isolate all non-occurrences of the character set into arrays and subsequently join them with an empty string separator:
"$$1234%^56()78*9££".componentsSeparatedByCharactersInSet(NSCharacterSet(charactersInString: "0123456789").invertedSet)).joinWithSeparator("")
Which returns 123456789
Swift 3
extension String {
var keepNumericsOnly: String {
return self.components(separatedBy: CharacterSet(charactersIn: "0123456789").inverted).joined(separator: "")
}
}
Swift 4.0 version
extension String {
var numbers: String {
return String(describing: filter { String($0).rangeOfCharacter(from: CharacterSet(charactersIn: "0123456789")) != nil })
}
}
Swift 4
String.swift
import Foundation
extension String {
func removeCharacters(from forbiddenChars: CharacterSet) -> String {
let passed = self.unicodeScalars.filter { !forbiddenChars.contains($0) }
return String(String.UnicodeScalarView(passed))
}
func removeCharacters(from: String) -> String {
return removeCharacters(from: CharacterSet(charactersIn: from))
}
}
ViewController.swift
let character = "1Vi234s56a78l9"
let alphaNumericSet = character.removeCharacters(from: CharacterSet.decimalDigits.inverted)
print(alphaNumericSet) // will print: 123456789
let alphaNumericCharacterSet = character.removeCharacters(from: "0123456789")
print("no digits",alphaNumericCharacterSet) // will print: Vishal
Swift 4.2
let digitChars = yourString.components(separatedBy:
CharacterSet.decimalDigits.inverted).joined(separator: "")
Swift 3 Version
extension String
{
func trimmingCharactersNot(in charSet: CharacterSet) -> String
{
var s:String = ""
for unicodeScalar in self.unicodeScalars
{
if charSet.contains(unicodeScalar)
{
s.append(String(unicodeScalar))
}
}
return s
}
}
I want to know that how can I check if a string contains Chinese in Swift?
For example, I want to check if there's Chinese inside:
var myString = "Hi! 大家好!It's contains Chinese!"
Thanks!
This answer
to How to determine if a character is a Chinese character can also easily be translated from
Ruby to Swift (now updated for Swift 3):
extension String {
var containsChineseCharacters: Bool {
return self.range(of: "\\p{Han}", options: .regularExpression) != nil
}
}
if myString.containsChineseCharacters {
print("Contains Chinese")
}
In a regular expression, "\p{Han}" matches all characters with the
"Han" Unicode property, which – as I understand it – are the characters
from the CJK languages.
Looking at questions on how to do this in other languages (such as this accepted answer for Ruby) it looks like the common technique is to determine if each character in the string falls in the CJK range. The ruby answer could be adapted to Swift strings as extension with the following code:
extension String {
var containsChineseCharacters: Bool {
return self.unicodeScalars.contains { scalar in
let cjkRanges: [ClosedInterval<UInt32>] = [
0x4E00...0x9FFF, // main block
0x3400...0x4DBF, // extended block A
0x20000...0x2A6DF, // extended block B
0x2A700...0x2B73F, // extended block C
]
return cjkRanges.contains { $0.contains(scalar.value) }
}
}
}
// true:
"Hi! 大家好!It's contains Chinese!".containsChineseCharacters
// false:
"Hello, world!".containsChineseCharacters
The ranges may already exist in Foundation somewhere rather than manually hardcoding them.
The above is for Swift 2.0, for earlier, you will have to use the free contains function rather than the protocol extension (twice):
extension String {
var containsChineseCharacters: Bool {
return contains(self.unicodeScalars) {
// older version of compiler seems to need extra help with type inference
(scalar: UnicodeScalar)->Bool in
let cjkRanges: [ClosedInterval<UInt32>] = [
0x4E00...0x9FFF, // main block
0x3400...0x4DBF, // extended block A
0x20000...0x2A6DF, // extended block B
0x2A700...0x2B73F, // extended block C
]
return contains(cjkRanges) { $0.contains(scalar.value) }
}
}
}
The accepted answer only find if string contains Chinese character, i created one suit for my own case:
enum ChineseRange {
case notFound, contain, all
}
extension String {
var findChineseCharacters: ChineseRange {
guard let a = self.range(of: "\\p{Han}*\\p{Han}", options: .regularExpression) else {
return .notFound
}
var result: ChineseRange
switch a {
case nil:
result = .notFound
case self.startIndex..<self.endIndex:
result = .all
default:
result = .contain
}
return result
}
}
if "你好".findChineseCharacters == .all {
print("All Chinese")
}
if "Chinese".findChineseCharacters == .notFound {
print("Not found Chinese")
}
if "Chinese你好".findChineseCharacters == .contain {
print("Contains Chinese")
}
gist here: https://gist.github.com/williamhqs/6899691b5a26272550578601bee17f1a
Try this in Swift 2:
var myString = "Hi! 大家好!It's contains Chinese!"
var a = false
for c in myString.characters {
let cs = String(c)
a = a || (cs != cs.stringByApplyingTransform(NSStringTransformMandarinToLatin, reverse: false))
}
print("\(myString) contains Chinese characters = \(a)")
I have created a Swift 3 String extension for checking how much Chinese characters a String contains. Similar to the code by Airspeed Velocity but more comprehensive. Checking various Unicode ranges to see whether a character is Chinese. See Chinese character ranges listed in the tables under section 18.1 in the Unicode standard specification: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode9.0.0/ch18.pdf
The String extension can be found on GitHub: https://github.com/niklasberglund/String-chinese.swift
Usage example:
let myString = "Hi! 大家好!It contains Chinese!"
let chinesePercentage = myString.chinesePercentage()
let chineseCharacterCount = myString.chineseCharactersCount()
print("String contains \(chinesePercentage) percent Chinese. That's \(chineseCharacterCount) characters.")