So I decided to take a look at this new Visual Studio 14 CTP. When I tried to add a package from Nuget library (Raven Database Server precisely) to my ASP.NET vNext Web Application, it felt like nothing really happened. Not a single piece of solution has changed, and the References remained the same.
I tried adding it manually using my "Project.json" file (as seen in this article), but IntelliSense didn't provide me with any fill. I actually tried it in a lot of different ways, with a whole lot of Nuget packages, with the same result.
Can anybody explain this situation?
ASP.NET vNext supports two targets: .NET 4.5 and CoreCLR. When targeting .NET 4.5 (net45) you can add any existing NuGet reference. When targeting CoreCLR (k10) you can only add NuGet references that support it; today, only some packages support that.
The package that you mention is only available for net45. To add a reference to it, add the package as a dependecy in the net45 section of project.json - just like autofac is added in this file
The entry should be: "RavenDB.Server":"2.5.2879"
PS: the manage NuGet references dialog is not functional for ASP.NET vNext projects in this version of VS
Related
We have a bunch of legacy dll's (basically could be anything, some are old fortran, some .NET) and we want to move them to Azure Artifacts. Can I create NuGet packages from these legacy dll's that are not based on .NET (like the Fortran ones) by themselves.
I've already tried creating the NuGet packages, but I get warnings on my dependencies because it looks like they are trying to load the packages on a .NET framework. Is the only real workaround here to build a .NET say class library or something, then reference the dll through that, and create a NuGet package with that library and just add the legacy dll's as references?
Can I create a NuGet package (or other package) with legacy dll's that are not on a .NET Framework?
The answer is yes.
You could target those legacy dlls to the tools folder instead of the lib folder. like:
<files>
<file src="legacy\*.dll" target="Tools" />
<!-- Other files -->
</files>
Then pack this .nuspec file when you build the pipeline, those legacy dlls are located in the tools folder, which will not add as references.
Check the From a convention-based working directory for some details.
Hope this helps.
I assume what you mean is that your managed code is usng DllImport attributes to call native code, which in the .NET ecosystem is called Platform Invoke, or P/Invoke. I mention this because if you googled terms around P/Invoke and nuget you probably would have had better luck finding existint stack overflow questions, blog posts and so on. For this reason it's useful to try to find out the official or commonly used names of the features you use, so you know what to search for. Unfortunately I don't think the NuGet team has any docs on this scenario at the moment.
SDK style projects support the runtime\ directory in the package, although I think that's somewhat undocumented as well. I don't know about traditional projects using PackageReference (PR), but packages.config (PC) definately does not support runtimes\. For PC projects, the package author typically (always?) includes build targets to copy the native assemblies after build. In the package, the native dlls are elsewhere, often the author puts them in the build directory next to the targets, but I think I've also seen the targets copy from the runtime directory so that the package supports both PC and SDK style projects.
I suggest you try to think of some commonly used native libraries that have .NET bindings and see how the package works (nupkg is just a zip renamed). My guesses would be sqlite or curl, or how asp.net core's kestrel web server bundles libuv (or did in earlier versions if it no longer does). I'm on vacation at the moment, so don't have the motivation to dig deep myself.
I have a project that targets two different operating systems/frameworks:
net461 on Windows and
netcoreapp2.0 on OSX
I'm trying to figure out how to correctly package this for NuGet. According to this post I should be able to package them like this:
/runtimes/win/lib/net461/myassembly.dll
/runtimes/osx/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly.dll
By when I add the NuGet package to another project, the packaged assemblies aren't added as references to the target project.
Then I read somewhere that you also need to add reference libraries to the /ref folder so I tried this:
/runtimes/win/lib/net461/myassembly.dll
/runtimes/osx/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly.dll
/ref/net461/myassembly.dll
/ref/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly.dll
In this case the assemblies get added as a reference to the target project and I can build it, but the required assemblies aren't copied to the output folder.
The documentation on all this is extremely vague and I'm fairly lost.
What am I missing?
Associated NuGet Issue: https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/7316
Update: I've put together a sample project that demonstrates what I'm trying to achieve. In particular see the bottom of the readme, titled "NuGet Packaging".
This is what I've finally figured out/guessed (because as best I can tell there's no official documentation for some of this)
Files added to the /runtimes folder aren't automatically added as references to the target project.
The /ref and /runtime folder should be used in conjunction with each other and only for the .NET Core target. As best I can .NET Framework targets apparently don't support these folders.
The /ref folder is for compile time references and anything added here will be added as a reference to the target project.
Assemblies in the /ref folder don't need to have an implementation - every public API could just throw a not implemented exception. In practice however you typically just take a copy of one of the implementation assemblies and declare it as the compile time API.
I've read (but haven't tested myself) that assemblies in the /ref folder must be "Any CPU" builds. You can use CorFlags utility to patch an implementation assembly for this if necessary.
The /runtimes folder is used to provide an implementation assemblies for any references included in the /ref folder. These assemblies are used at runtime and during deployment.
The /runtimes folder can include additional assemblies that are only required at runtime and don't need to be seen by the client project. These additional assemblies won't be included as references in the target project but will be available for run/deployment.
As mentioned by others, the files in the /runtimes folder aren't copied to the output folder of the build. Instead config files are placed there that tell the runtime how to locate the /runtimes files from the NuGet cache.
For .NET Framework targets (ie: net461) just use the /lib folder as there's no other runtimes for .NET aside from Windows anyway.
Putting this all together, my original example, should have looked like this:
/lib/net461/myassembly.dll (net461/Windows Compile and Runtime)
/runtimes/osx/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly.dll (netcore/OSX Runtime)
/runtimes/win/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly.dll (netcore/Win Runtime)
/ref/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly.dll (netcore/* Compile Time)
I spent a fair amount of time trying your project on OSX in both Visual Studio for Mac and VS Code. I'll try to stick with factual observations without getting into "why don't you do X instead".
The runtimes/{rid}/lib/{tfm}/*.dll paths look ok
target="lib/{tfm}/..." assemblies are automatically referenced, runtimes/... are not
Using target framework of netstandard seems like it would make your package work in both netcoreapp and netstandard projects (e.g. use target="lib/netstandard1.6/..."). Compare with this
runtimes/ seems to be intended for platform-dependent assemblies you'll load at runtime. For example, 32/64-bit native assemblies in runtimes/win-x64/native/ and runtimes/win-x86/native/) loaded with AssemblyLoadContext (another post by McMaster)
Using separate slns for Windows and OSX, or separate platform-specific projects that reference platform-agnostic projects (like Xamarin) would obviate some of the configuration wrangling
I found no documentation on target="ref/...", but you can add Explicit Assembly <references> (inside the nuspec <metadata> block)
Packaged assemblies won't appear in the output directory, but when prepared for distribution with dotnet publish they'll be included:
.NET Core and .NETSTANDARD don't copy dependencies to output directory, they are mapped using deps.json which points to relative paths from local NuGet cache.
This has been a very useful thread to get more information and hints on how to create a NuGet package that references native DLLs, and is consumed in both .NET Framework as well as .NET Core / modern .NET libraries / applications.
My experience so far has been that if this library (let's call it library A) only targets .NET Standard, consuming this library in a .NET Core / 5.0 or 6.0 application does lead to the native assemblies being pulled in correctly from the runtimes folder. In a .NET Framework 4.7 application however, this does not appear to be the case. Unless the runtime is explicitly specified when compiling, e.g.:
dotnet build ... --runtime win-x86
When using library A in a .NET Core or .NET 5.0/6.0 application however, this runtime identifier is not required - all runtimes are made available and the right one is selected at runtime.
If you want library A to be consumed in applications that also target .NET Framework, and you don't want the user to have to specify the runtime explicitly, then it seems to be necessary to:
Target both .NET Standard and .NET Framework
Ensure that the native assemblies end up in the following folder structure in the NuGet package:
"lib/{tfm}/..."
While the .NET documentation referenced by tm1 earlier here talks about how to get this to work using nuspec files, it is less clear how to do so in the SDK .csproj format. I managed to do this in the NLoptNet project, see the relevant .csproj file here. Final relevant point (in addition to the two bullets above):
Use "<None Include" rather than "<None Update" to add the native assemblies
So far - this works, but there is one quirk - as you can see here it generates warning MSB3246 when consuming library A in a .NET Framework application. See also this Stack Overflow post. This leads me to believe that maybe the above is not the right approach, and therefore to some questions:
Is this the intended way to consume library A in .NET Core, modern .NET and .NET Framework applications?
Should one always specify the runtime identifier when using dotnet build / dotnet test?
Can you try to target .NET Standard 2.0 instead of net461 and netcoreapp2.0? Libraries built against netstandard2.0 should work with .NET Core 2.0 and .NET Framework 4.6.1: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/net-standard
Are you using the new csproj format? If so it has built in support for multiple target frameworks.
For example running dotnet pack against a .csproj file with this content:
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFrameworks>net461;netcoreapp2.1;netstandard2.0</TargetFrameworks>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
will result in a .nupkg that works for .NET Framework 4.6.1, .NET Core 2.1 and .NET Standard 2.0.
Various trick can then be used to include specific parts for each framework depending on what's available.
I'm trying to solve the same problem.
The solution proposed by you works fine, but there is one question ...
The case of Win and net46 is clear. And now I need to add a reference to the assembly in the project for a netcoreapp for the Win and for Linux. The problem is that this is a DIFFERENT assembly with the SAME name. Those my package looks like this:
/lib/net461/myassembly1.dll (net461/Windows Compile and Runtime)
/runtimes/ubuntu/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly2.dll (netcore/Ubuntu Runtime)
/runtimes/win/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly1.dll (netcore/Win Runtime)
/ref/netcoreapp2.0/???
Update: Actually, the myassembly1.dll and myassembly2.dll are both called myassembly.dll. But to show that one is assembled for Windows, and the second one for Linux, I will leave here such a name.
The most interesting thing is that I tried to put any assembly in the folder ref, and it works on both Windows and Linux.
This version works on both systems
/lib/net461/myassembly1.dll
/runtimes/ubuntu/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly2.dll
/runtimes/win/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly1.dll
/ref/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly1.dll
And this too
/lib/net461/myassembly1.dll
/runtimes/ubuntu/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly2.dll
/runtimes/win/lib/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly1.dll
/ref/netcoreapp2.0/myassembly2.dll
But I think this is not right and I was wrong somewhere.
I have converted some of my class libraries to .NET Standard with Visual Studio 2017.
This was easy, add a .NET Standard class library project in place of the original project and add all the files in there. The .csproj file even looks like a nuspec file now with package information and such. Inside the project options there was a checkbox for "Generate NuGet package on build", which I checked. Easy peasy.
However, .NET Framework consumers of my class library now gets a ton of dependencies, I counted at least 20 other nuget packages that were added, most of which was completely unecessary for my library. In other words, was "easy peasy too easy?"
Is this just a byproduct of me using .NET Standard as the only build output and I should add back a .NET Framework library as well?
Packages such as the following will be added to a project that consumes my library, even though they are completely unnecessary:
System.Security.Cryptography.*
System.Xml.*
System.IO.*
etc. there's plenty of packages being added. My library does "glorified" array analysis and doesn't require much at all.
The Visual Studio project is configured to target .NET Standard 1.0 and the only reference visible is the "NETStandardLibrary" so it's not like I added all of those myself.
I've inspected the package and it doesn't seem to list all of those either.
Can I add only the packages I need and still target .NET Standard 1.0?
My class library is open source here: https://github.com/lassevk/DiffLib
The nuget package is here: http://www.nuget.org/packages/difflib/2017.4.24.2347
This is quite a complex situation at the moment:
Can I add only the packages I need and still target .NET Standard 1.0?
Yes you can do it, but this is no longer recommended. In essence, .NET Standard is a specification that is made up of the packages referencing it. The supported way is to reference NETStandard.Library since it guarantees to bring you all needed compilation references and logic that you need in order to build correctly.
Beginning with the upcoming netstandard2.0, NETStandard.Library will be a flat package without dependencies and the individual packages will be removed from the dependency tree if your project or any other project references them. Also, NETStandard.Library will not be published as a dependency - so if you build a netstandard2.0 library, the resulting NuGet package will have no dependencies. (NETStandard.Library.NETFramework is required to be installed when using it in .net framework projects - NuGet is supposed to do this automatically).
That being said, if you really want to do it, you can set
<DisableImplicitFrameworkReferences>true</DisableImplicitFrameworkReferences>
in the csproj file and then add items like <PackageReference Include="System.[Something]" Version="4.3.0" /> for everything you need.
I would expect some kind of filter to exists on website or in console.
This isn't easy right now, unfortunately. There's an issue open on the NuGet Github about adding a filter to the website.
Right now, the best way to tell if a package will work with .NET Core is by examining the frameworks it supports in the Dependencies section.
If .NETStandard is listed, the package supports .NET Core via the .NET Platform Standard:
If a package's Dependencies section doesn't mention .NETStandard, or the Dependencies section is completely empty, it does not support .NET Core:
Setup a .NET Core project in the version you want. I keep 1.1 and 2.0 projects around for futzing with this. Then try and add the nuget to the project.
For instance, ASPOSE will NOT add to a 1.1 project, but will add to a 2.0 project.
Easiest route in the short term until they fix this somehow.
Obviously this is no guarantee it still works but gives you a good idea if its api compat.
I coordinate a project (Fluent Assertions.MVC) which has a separate builds for MVC 3 and 4. At the moment it is distributed via two NuGet packages.
Is this the best (only?) way, or is it possible to ship one package and have NuGet reference the correct .dll in the target project?
The solution is quite simple:
you add into your package the DLLs for all supported versions of MVC
(3 and 4 in your case);
then write install.ps1 script to find out
what version of MVC is used in the target project and remove
unnecessary DLLs from project references.
Here you can find more detailed instructions and an example of install.ps1 script:
http://blogs.korzh.com/2013/12/nuget-package-different-mvc-versions.html
Currently NuGet can install separate sets of reference dlls by target framework, such as .net40, net45, netcore45 etc. Please refer to http://docs.nuget.org/docs/creating-packages/creating-and-publishing-a-package for more details.
For MVC3 vs. MVC4 though, the best I can think of is to have install.ps1 in your package and try to use DTE objects to determine which version of MVC the project is using (maybe by checking MVC assembly version) and then install references accordingly.