public class ThreadSafeSingleton implements Serializable {
#Override
public String toString() {
return "ThreadSafeSingleton [i=" + i + ", str=" + str + "]";
}
int i;
String str;
private static ThreadSafeSingleton instance;
public int getI() {
return i;
}
public void setI(int i) {
this.i = i;
}
public String getStr() {
return str;
}
public void setStr(String str) {
this.str = str;
}
private ThreadSafeSingleton(){
}
public static synchronized ThreadSafeSingleton getInstance(int i,String str){
if(instance == null){
synchronized (ThreadSafeSingleton.class) {
if(instance == null){
instance = new ThreadSafeSingleton();
}
}
}
instance.setI(i);
instance.setStr(str);
return instance;
}
public Object readResolve(){
System.out.println("readResolve executed");
return getInstance(this.i,this.str);
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException, Exception {
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(
"B://Serilization//text1.txt");
ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(fos);
ThreadSafeSingleton obj = new ThreadSafeSingleton();
obj.setI(1);
obj.setStr("katrina kaif");
oos.writeObject(obj);
System.out.println("serilization done");
FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream("B://Serilization//text1.txt");
ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(fis);
ThreadSafeSingleton copy=(ThreadSafeSingleton) ois.readObject();
System.out.println("copy "+copy);
System.out.println("deserilization done");
}
}
in the above code i have a singleton class containing int i and String str attributes and i have implemented Serializable interface my requirement is that when i serialized a class i will serialize the class with some attributes values on one JVM and when i deserialize on another JVM i should get the same instance of my singleton class but the attributes in the class should get updated with the values i provided during serialization
here on internet i checked the solution i got to use readResolve method there you can write a logic which will set the values of attributes i provided during serialization of my singleton class so if you will see the code of readResolve i have written a code like this "return getInstance(this.i,this.str);" here i have used "this" keyword which means a current object is being used therefore i have question
i have doubt that is this code creating new object here as "this" refers to the current object apart from the object i created in the getInstance(int i,String str) method can anybody please explain is this breaking singleton ?
You may want to read up on Java serialization: readObject() vs. readResolve(). When readResolve() is called, your object has already been deserialized from the stream and fully created. Your this pointer, in that case, will be the object that the deserialization process has constructed, complete with the i and str values from the stream. If you use this.i and this.str to construct the new Singleton, you're not creating a new object with the new JVM's specific parameters.
Related
How can i use the values from hashset (the docid and offset) to the reduce writable so as to connect map writable with reduce writable?
The mapper (LineIndexMapper) works fine but in the reducer (LineIndexReducer) i get the error that it can't get string as argument when i type this:
context.write(key, new IndexRecordWritable("some string");
although i have the public String toString() in the ReduceWritable too.
I believe the hashset in reducer's writable (IndexRecordWritable.java) maybe isn't taking the values correctly?
I have the below code.
IndexMapRecordWritable.java
import java.io.DataInput;
import java.io.DataOutput;
import java.io.IOException;
import org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable;
import org.apache.hadoop.io.Text;
import org.apache.hadoop.io.Writable;
public class IndexMapRecordWritable implements Writable {
private LongWritable offset;
private Text docid;
public LongWritable getOffsetWritable() {
return offset;
}
public Text getDocidWritable() {
return docid;
}
public long getOffset() {
return offset.get();
}
public String getDocid() {
return docid.toString();
}
public IndexMapRecordWritable() {
this.offset = new LongWritable();
this.docid = new Text();
}
public IndexMapRecordWritable(long offset, String docid) {
this.offset = new LongWritable(offset);
this.docid = new Text(docid);
}
public IndexMapRecordWritable(IndexMapRecordWritable indexMapRecordWritable) {
this.offset = indexMapRecordWritable.getOffsetWritable();
this.docid = indexMapRecordWritable.getDocidWritable();
}
#Override
public String toString() {
StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder()
output.append(docid);
output.append(offset);
return output.toString();
}
#Override
public void write(DataOutput out) throws IOException {
}
#Override
public void readFields(DataInput in) throws IOException {
}
}
IndexRecordWritable.java
import java.io.DataInput;
import java.io.DataOutput;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.HashSet;
import org.apache.hadoop.io.Writable;
public class IndexRecordWritable implements Writable {
// Save each index record from maps
private HashSet<IndexMapRecordWritable> tokens = new HashSet<IndexMapRecordWritable>();
public IndexRecordWritable() {
}
public IndexRecordWritable(
Iterable<IndexMapRecordWritable> indexMapRecordWritables) {
}
#Override
public String toString() {
StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
return output.toString();
}
#Override
public void write(DataOutput out) throws IOException {
}
#Override
public void readFields(DataInput in) throws IOException {
}
}
Alright, here is my answer based on a few assumptions. The final output is a text file containing the key and the file names separated by a comma based on the information in the reducer class's comments on the pre-condition and post-condition.
In this case, you really don't need IndexRecordWritable class. You can simply write to your context using
context.write(key, new Text(valueBuilder.substring(0, valueBuilder.length() - 1)));
with the class declaration line as
public class LineIndexReducer extends Reducer<Text, IndexMapRecordWritable, Text, Text>
Don't forget to set the correct output class in the driver.
That must serve the purpose according to the post-condition in your reducer class. But, if you really want to write a Text-IndexRecordWritable pair to your context, there are two ways approach it -
with string as an argument (based on your attempt passing a string when you IndexRecordWritable class constructor is not designed to accept strings) and
with HashSet as an argument (based on the HashSet initialised in IndexRecordWritable class).
Since your constructor of IndexRecordWritable class is not designed to accept String as an input, you cannot pass a string. Hence the error you are getting that you can't use string as an argument. Ps: if you want your constructor to accept Strings, you must have another constructor in your IndexRecordWritable class as below:
// Save each index record from maps
private HashSet<IndexMapRecordWritable> tokens = new HashSet<IndexMapRecordWritable>();
// to save the string
private String value;
public IndexRecordWritable() {
}
public IndexRecordWritable(
HashSet<IndexMapRecordWritable> indexMapRecordWritables) {
/***/
}
// to accpet string
public IndexRecordWritable (String value) {
this.value = value;
}
but that won't be valid if you want to use the HashSet. So, approach #1 can't be used. You can't pass a string.
That leaves us with approach #2. Passing a HashSet as an argument since you want to make use of the HashSet. In this case, you must create a HashSet in your reducer before passing it as an argument to IndexRecordWritable in context.write.
To do this, your reducer must look like this.
#Override
protected void reduce(Text key, Iterable<IndexMapRecordWritable> values, Context context) throws IOException, InterruptedException {
//StringBuilder valueBuilder = new StringBuilder();
HashSet<IndexMapRecordWritable> set = new HashSet<>();
for (IndexMapRecordWritable val : values) {
set.add(val);
//valueBuilder.append(val);
//valueBuilder.append(",");
}
//write the key and the adjusted value (removing the last comma)
//context.write(key, new IndexRecordWritable(valueBuilder.substring(0, valueBuilder.length() - 1)));
context.write(key, new IndexRecordWritable(set));
//valueBuilder.setLength(0);
}
and your IndexRecordWritable.java must have this.
// Save each index record from maps
private HashSet<IndexMapRecordWritable> tokens = new HashSet<IndexMapRecordWritable>();
// to save the string
//private String value;
public IndexRecordWritable() {
}
public IndexRecordWritable(
HashSet<IndexMapRecordWritable> indexMapRecordWritables) {
/***/
tokens.addAll(indexMapRecordWritables);
}
Remember, this is not the requirement according to the description of your reducer where it says.
POST-CONDITION: emit the output a single key-value where all the file names are separated by a comma ",". <"marcello", "a.txt#3345,b.txt#344,c.txt#785">
If you still choose to emit (Text, IndexRecordWritable), remember to process the HashSet in IndexRecordWritable to get it in the desired format.
I have an existing app that I'm adding a "Suggested Products" feature to and I'm having trouble with my JSONP response not being properly transformed to the typed JsArray. I'm hoping someone can give me an idea of what I'm doing wrong?
I have defined my type that will be returned from the server in its own class:
import com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptObject;
public class SuggestedProduct extends JavaScriptObject {
protected SuggestedProduct() {}
public final native String getFormName();
public final native String getImageURL();
}
I have a method that uses the JsonpRequestBuilder to fire off a request to get my JSON.
private void loadSuggestedProducts() {
JsonpRequestBuilder builder = new JsonpRequestBuilder();
builder.requestObject(buildSuggestedProductURL(), new AsyncCallback<JsArray<SuggestedProduct>>() {
public void onFailure(Throwable caught) {
//Handle errors
}
public void onSuccess(JsArray<SuggestedProduct> data) {
if ( data == null) {
//Handle empty data
return;
}
SafeHtmlBuilder sb = new SafeHtmlBuilder();
sb.appendHtmlConstant("<h4>Suggested Products:</h4>");
for (int i=0; i < data.length(); i++) {
SuggestedProduct product = data.get(i); //<- This line throws the exception
sb.appendHtmlConstant("<div class=\"card\">");
sb.appendHtmlConstant("<img class=\"card-img-top\" src=\"" + product.getImageURL() + "\" alt=\"" + product.getFormName() + "\">");
sb.appendHtmlConstant("<div class=\"card-body\">");
sb.appendHtmlConstant("<h5 class=\"card-title\">" + product.getFormName() + "</h5>");
sb.appendHtmlConstant("<a onclick=\"javascript:addItems();\" class=\"cmd-add\">Add <i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"fa fa-plus-circle\"></i></a>");
sb.appendHtmlConstant("</div></div>");
}
view.getSuggestedProducts().setInnerSafeHtml(sb.toSafeHtml());
}
});
}
When I try to use a SuggestedProduct from the response, I get an error:
java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Found interface
com.google.gwt.cor.client.JsArray, but class was expected
I've been following the guide in the GWT documentation. I don't see any difference between what I'm trying and what they say will work. When I debug, it looks as though the returned data is an array of SuggestedProducts, so I'm stumped as to how to proceed. Any help would be appreciated.
After closer inspection I realized my overlay type was missing method bodies for what fields to return from the JSON object they represented. The fix was to include the proper JSNI method definitions.
import com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptObject;
public class SuggestedProduct extends JavaScriptObject {
protected SuggestedProduct() {}
public final native String getFormName() /*-{ return this.formname; }-*/;
public final native String getImageURL() /*-{ return this.imageurl; }-*/;
}
is there a way to log username or user id (or some additional data) together with parameters on OnEntry/OnSuccess/OnException.
I need my log record to look like:
"... Method MethodName invoked with params [param1: value1, param2: value2 ...] by User : [username]"
Thanks.
The following code is taken from the Postsharp documentation site at Trace Sample with some minor modification
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Reflection;
using PostSharp.Aspects;
namespace Samples
{
[Serializable]
public sealed class TraceAttribute : OnMethodBoundaryAspect
{
// This field is initialized and serialized at build time, then deserialized at runtime.
private readonly string category;
// These fields are initialized at runtime. They do not need to be serialized.
[NonSerialized] private string enteringMessage;
[NonSerialized] private string exitingMessage;
// Default constructor, invoked at build time.
public TraceAttribute()
{
}
// Constructor specifying the tracing category, invoked at build time.
public TraceAttribute(string category)
{
this.category = category;
}
// Invoked only once at runtime from the static constructor of type declaring the target method.
public override void RuntimeInitialize(MethodBase method)
{
string methodName = method.DeclaringType.FullName + method.Name;
this.enteringMessage = "Entering " + methodName;
this.exitingMessage = "Exiting " + methodName;
}
// Invoked at runtime before that target method is invoked.
public override void OnEntry(MethodExecutionArgs args)
{
Trace.WriteLine(this.enteringMessage, this.category);
DisplayArgs(args);
}
// Invoked at runtime after the target method is invoked (in a finally block).
public override void OnExit(MethodExecutionArgs args)
{
Trace.WriteLine(this.exitingMessage, this.category);
DisplayArgs(args);
}
}
}
private void DisplayArgs(MethodExecutionArgs args)
{
var parameters = args.Method.GetParameters();
var arguments = args.Arguments;
var zipped = parameters.Zip(arguments, (f,s) => f.Name + ":" + s == null ? "null" : s.ToString());
string traceLine = string.Format("invoked with params [{0}] by User:[{1}]", string.Join(",", zipped),
System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent().Name);
System.Diagnostics.Trace.TraceInformation(traceLine);
}
I am using aspectj to add some field to a existing class and annotate it also.
I am using load time weaving .
Example :- I have a Class customer in which i am adding 3 string attributes. But my issues is that I have to set some values and get it also before my business call.
I am trying the below approach.
In my aj file i have added the below, my problem is in the Around pointcut , how do i get the attribute and set the attribute.
public String net.customers.PersonCustomer.getOfflineRiskCategory() {
return OfflineRiskCategory;
}
public void net.customers.PersonCustomer.setOfflineRiskCategory(String offlineRiskCategory) {
OfflineRiskCategory = offlineRiskCategory;
}
public String net.customers.PersonCustomer.getOnlineRiskCategory() {
return OnlineRiskCategory;
}
public void net.customers.PersonCustomer.setOnlineRiskCategory(String onlineRiskCategory) {
OnlineRiskCategory = onlineRiskCategory;
}
public String net.customers.PersonCustomer.getPersonCommercialStatus() {
return PersonCommercialStatus;
}
public void net.customers.PersonCustomer.setPersonCommercialStatus(String personCommercialStatus) {
PersonCommercialStatus = personCommercialStatus;
}
#Around("execution(* net.xxx.xxx.xxx.DataMigration.populateMap(..))")
public Object invoke(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable {
Object arguments[] = joinPoint.getArgs();
if (arguments != null) {
HashMap<String, String> hMap = (HashMap) arguments[0];
PersonCustomer cus = (PersonCustomer) arguments[1];
return joinPoint.proceed();
}
If anyone has ideas please let me know.
regards,
FT
First suggestion, I would avoid mixing code-style aspectj with annotation-style. Ie- instead of #Around, use around.
Second, instead of getting the arguments from the joinPoint, you should bind them in the pointcut:
Object around(Map map, PersonCustomer cust) :
execution(* net.xxx.xxx.xxx.DataMigration.populateMap(Map, PersonCustomer) && args(map, cust) {
...
return proceed(map, cust);
}
Now, to answer your question: you also need to use intertype declarations to add new fields to your class, so do something like this:
private String net.customers.PersonCustomer.OfflineRiskCategory;
private String net.customers.PersonCustomer.OnlineRiskCategory;
private String net.customers.PersonCustomer.PersonCommercialStatus;
Note that the private keyword here means private to the aspect, not to the class that you declare it on.
public class Temp
{
List<T> values = new List<T>;
static Temp()
{
System.Console.WriteLine("static constructor");
}
public Temp()
{
System.Console.WriteLine("general constructor");
}
}
Also please explain me when will the List object will be created and with what type it is created.
}
It appears the field gets initialized first, then the static constructor is called, then the constructor.
class Test
{
string variable = new Func<string>(() =>
{
Console.WriteLine("field initializer");
return "VARIABLE";
})();
static string staticvariable = new Func<string>(() =>
{
Console.WriteLine("static field initializer");
return "STATICVARIABLE";
})();
static Test()
{
System.Console.WriteLine("static constructor");
}
public Test()
{
System.Console.WriteLine("general constructor");
}
}
Test t = new Test();
outuput:
static field initializer
static constructor
field initializer
general constructor
[edit]
Oops sorry, it was a non-static field and I didn't notice it.
The static ctor will be called first.
Then values list will be second and the the ctor.
Read about beforefieldinit here.