purpose of installing a perl module with apt-get instead of cpan - perl

Question

While loading necessities into my crouton, apt-get recommended that I install libtemplate-perl. This seemed a jolly idea, and I obeyed.
Reading this answer, I see a fellow traveler install Plack and Starman via CPAN, but then use apt-get to install Dancer.
Minutes before reading said answer, I had installed Dancer via CPAN. And it had worked. It had worked real good!
What happens differently when I install a CPAN package via a non-CPAN package manager? Are there pitfalls I need to be wary of because my libtemplate-perl came from apt-get, or my Dancer came from CPAN?

Answer 1

On Debian or Debian based distros like Ubuntu, CPAN (/usr/bin/cpan utility) installs modules into /usr/local/lib/ by default. And Debian packages keep their files in /usr/share/perl5/ and /usr/lib/perl5/.
It's a better way to choose dh-make-perl tool to package any CPAN distribution not available in your apt repositories, to avoid making mess (serious risk of conflict between apt and CPAN):
dh-make-perl --build --cpan Some::Module
dpkg -i some-module*.deb
Also check out about local::lib and perlbrew.

Answer 2

A lot of tutorials, Stack Overflow answers, walk throughs, etc. will not want to assume that you know how to use /usr/bin/cpan and will instead suggest that you use your system's package manager, which you are more likely to be familiar with.
This is especially true if you are using a tool written in a particular language, but you don't know that language. For example many people wouldn't care whether crouton is written in Perl, Python or Lisp, they just want a tool they can use. Your average Debian or Ubuntu user is more likely to be familiar with apt-get than with cpan.
If you are looking to program in Perl I recommend installing things by cpan, using perlbrew and/or local::lib. If you are just looking to install a tool you can use, I would recommend using apt-get.
Additionally apt-get has the advantage that non-Perl dependencies will be installed automatically. For example the CPAN module XML::LibXML requires that the libxml2 headers are available on the system; the CPAN distribution has no way of stating that as a dependency, and will simply fail on install if it can find the headers to link against. The Debian package can actually specify that libxml2 is a dependency, and will install the dependency automatically for you.
Despite that if you are looking to use XML::LibXML as a Perl programmer, I would recommend installing it with cpan and installing the libxml2 package via apt-get. Having all your Perl modules installed in the same place - again, via perlbrew or local::lib - will help you keep your sanity in the future. CPAN is preferable to apt-get in this case because not all distributions have been packaged for Debian, and so you get a lot more options if you use CPAN directly.
In summary: TIMTOWTDI ;-)

Answer 3

Another difference to mention that I don't see in other answers, is that if you use CPAN to install a module then the module version you get will be set, until you decide to upgrade that module. Whereas, if you use apt and a later version appears in Debian at some point in the future, then apt-get upgrade will update it.
Maybe you want that, maybe you don't. It's neither necessarily an advantage, nor a disadvantage. Simply a difference to be noted.

Answer 4

The good things about apt-get are
that you can uninstall the packages afterwards should you need to
if you are maintaining any number of servers it is quicker to use apt-get as there is no building required
there are definite versions of packages which are tested for compatibility
The downsides are
not necessarily the latest version of packages
not all packages are available

Answer 5

apt-get installs are generally easier and better than cpan because of dependencies alone.
If you are so lucky as to need SOAP::Lite, for example, it is many dozens of dependencies, and a one-line "apt-get install libsoap-lite-perl".
It is sometimes not clear how Perl CPAN names map to their repository package names, but "apt-cache search " is your friend.

Answer 6

Another approach, that can be used for any distro in HOME install as simple user:
Pros
avoid conflicts
up to date version of perl and modules
when you reinstall, you keep your home/perl as-si
you can upgrade all installed modules with $ cpan -r
Cons
you need to upgrade Perl manually
How to
Edit ~/.bashrc or such, and add:
export PERL5LIB=~/localperl/lib/
export PATH=~/localperl/bin:$PATH
Then
source ~/.bashrc
Install latest Perl5 from sources: https://www.cpan.org/src/README.html
Now, you have an isolate Perl installation in your home.
Enjoy the power to install any libs via:
$ cpan -i Whatever::Module