I have a log file and I am trying to get the lines containing a specific pattern.
I have converted it from UNICODE to UTF8 format in order to access the content in it.
The code I am using is
Select-String -pattern "Requesting response from" -path .\log_name.log
I have set the current directory to the one containing the log file.
But I do not see any results. What am I missing in here ? Am I converting the file to wrong format ?
Note:
I have used
Get-Content $originallogFilePath |Set-Content -Encoding UTF8 .\log_name.log
to convert the file from UNICODE to UTF8.
You should be using:
Select-String -Encoding unicode $logpath
Related
I need to take a backup of the "Mail flow - Rules" in the "Exchange admin center"
$TransCollect = Export-TransportRuleCollection
$TransCollect1 = [System.Text.Encoding]::Unicode.GetString($TransCollect.FileData)
$TransCollect1 | Set-Content -path c:\temp\2.xml
But I cannot extract anything from the XML file because at the start of the XML file is a special character.
So If run ....
[XML]$AppConfig = Get-Content –Path "c:\temp\2.xml"
I get several errors.
Is there is a problem in the "[System.Text.Encoding]::Unicode.GetString" line itself OR
how do I remove this special character.
See the screenshot for the special character. It shows up at the beginning of the file"
The "special character" you see is the Byte Order Mark for Unicode (aka UTF-16LE) (\xFF\xFE) because you used [System.Text.Encoding]::Unicode.GetString(). To read that file with Get-Content, you need to specify that same encoding using its -Encoding parameter:
[XML]$AppConfig = Get-Content -Path "c:\temp\2.xml" -Encoding Unicode
Depending on the PowerShell version you are using, Get-Content by default uses different encodings:
Versions 5.1 and below use the encoding that corresponds to the system's active code page (usually ANSI)
Versions 6 and up use UTF8NoBOM
Is there a specific reason for writing the XML in UTF16 ? Usually, UTF-8 is used with XML
I was able to use this and bypass the special character entirely as well as getting the EXCHANGE RULES into a extractable format.
$File_Collect = "c:\temp\1.xml"
$TransCollect = Export-TransportRuleCollection
Set-Content -Path $File_Collect -Value $TransCollect.FileData -Encoding Byte
[XML]$TransXMLCollect = Get-Content –Path $File_Collect
$TransXMLCollect.SelectNodes("//rule") | % { $_.InnerText }
In PowerShell, what's the difference between Out-File and Set-Content? Or Add-Content and Out-File -append?
I've found if I use both against the same file, the text is fully mojibaked.
(A minor second question: > is an alias for Out-File, right?)
Here's a summary of what I've deduced, after a few months experience with PowerShell, and some scientific experimentation. I never found any of this in the documentation :(
[Update: Much of this now appears to be better documented.]
Read and write locking
While Out-File is running, another application can read the log file.
While Set-Content is running, other applications cannot read the log file. Thus never use Set-Content to log long running commands.
Encoding
Out-File saves in the Unicode (UTF-16LE) encoding by default (though this can be specified), whereas Set-Content defaults to ASCII (US-ASCII) in PowerShell 3+ (this may also be specified). In earlier PowerShell versions, Set-Content wrote content in the Default (ANSI) encoding.
Editor's note: PowerShell as of version 5.1 still defaults to the culture-specific Default ("ANSI") encoding, despite what the documentation claims. If ASCII were the default, non-ASCII characters such as ü would be converted to literal ?, but that is not the case: 'ü' | Set-Content tmp.txt; (Get-Content tmp.txt) -eq '?' yields $False.
PS > $null | out-file outed.txt
PS > $null | set-content set.txt
PS > md5sum *
f3b25701fe362ec84616a93a45ce9998 *outed.txt
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e *set.txt
This means the defaults of two commands are incompatible, and mixing them will corrupt text, so always specify an encoding.
Formatting
As Bartek explained, Out-File saves the fancy formatting of the output, as seen in the terminal. So in a folder with two files, the command dir | out-file out.txt creates a file with 11 lines.
Whereas Set-Content saves a simpler representation. In that folder with two files, the command dir | set-content sc.txt creates a file with two lines. To emulate the output in the terminal:
PS > dir | ForEach-Object {$_.ToString()}
out.txt
sc.txt
I believe this formatting has a consequence for line breaks, but I can't describe it yet.
File creation
Set-Content doesn't reliably create an empty file when Out-File would:
In an empty folder, the command dir | out-file out.txt creates a file, while dir | set-content sc.txt does not.
Pipeline Variable
Set-Content takes the filename from the pipeline; allowing you to set a number of files' contents to some fixed value.
Out-File takes the data as from the pipeline; updating a single file's content.
Parameters
Set-Content includes the following additional parameters:
Exclude
Filter
Include
PassThru
Stream
UseTransaction
Out-File includes the following additional parameters:
Append
NoClobber
Width
For more information about what those parameters are, please refer to help; e.g. get-help out-file -parameter append.
Out-File has the behavior of overwriting the output path unless the -NoClobber and/or the -Append flag is set. Add-Content will append content if the output path already exists by default (if it can). Both will create the file if one doesn't already exist.
Another interesting difference is that Add-Content will create an ASCII encoded file by default and Out-File will create a little endian unicode encoded file by default.
> is an alias syntactic sugar for Out-File. It's Out-File with some pre-defined parameter settings.
Well, I would disagree... :)
Out-File has -Append (-NoClober is there to avoid overwriting) that will Add-Content. But this is not the same beast.
command | Add-Content will use .ToString() method on input. Out-File will use default formatting.
so:
ls | Add-Content test.txt
and
ls | Out-File test.txt
will give you totally different results.
And no, '>' is not alias, it's redirection operator (same as in other shells). And has very serious limitation... It will cut lines same way they are displayed. Out-File has -Width parameter that helps you avoid this. Also, with redirection operators you can't decide what encoding to use.
HTH
Bartek
Set-Content supports -Encoding Byte, while Out-File does not.
So when you want to write binary data or result of Text.Encoding#GetBytes() to a file, you should use Set-Content.
Wanted to add about difference on encoding:
Windows with PowerShell 5.1:
Out-File - Default encoding is utf-16le
Set-Content - Default encoding is us-ascii
Linux with PowerShell 7.1:
Out-File - Default encoding is us-ascii
Set-Content - Default encoding is us-ascii
Out-file -append or >> can actually mix two encodings in the same file. Even if the file is originally ASCII or ANSI, it will add Unicode by default to the bottom of it. Add-content will check the encoding and match it before appending. Btw, export-csv defaults to ASCII (no accents), and set-content/add-content to ANSI.
TL;DR, use Set-Content as it's more consistent over Out-File.
Set-Content behavior is the same over different powershell versions
Out-File as #JagWireZ says produces different encodings for the default settings, even on the same OS(Windows) the docs for powershell 5.1 and powershell 7.3 state that the encoding changed from unicode to utf8NoBOM
Some issues like Malformed XML arise from using Out-File, that could of course be fixed by setting the desired encoding, however it's likely to forget to set the encoding and end up with issues.
I've written a script to make lots of regular expression modifications to a file and overwrite the file with the changes. However I have just noticed all the files are being written with UTF-16LE encoding. I realise that I can specify the encoding for the Out-File cmdlet, but I'm not confident that all the input files are the same encoding. Can I get the encoding from Get-Content somehow, or should I be using some other method of I/O? An outline of the script is below
Get-ChildItem *.aspx -Recurse| ForEach-Object {
MakeWritable($_)
(Get-Content -raw $_) | FixUp($_.FullName)
}
Filter FixUp($filename)
{
DoReplacements($_) | Out-File $filename
}
In PowerShell, what's the difference between Out-File and Set-Content? Or Add-Content and Out-File -append?
I've found if I use both against the same file, the text is fully mojibaked.
(A minor second question: > is an alias for Out-File, right?)
Here's a summary of what I've deduced, after a few months experience with PowerShell, and some scientific experimentation. I never found any of this in the documentation :(
[Update: Much of this now appears to be better documented.]
Read and write locking
While Out-File is running, another application can read the log file.
While Set-Content is running, other applications cannot read the log file. Thus never use Set-Content to log long running commands.
Encoding
Out-File saves in the Unicode (UTF-16LE) encoding by default (though this can be specified), whereas Set-Content defaults to ASCII (US-ASCII) in PowerShell 3+ (this may also be specified). In earlier PowerShell versions, Set-Content wrote content in the Default (ANSI) encoding.
Editor's note: PowerShell as of version 5.1 still defaults to the culture-specific Default ("ANSI") encoding, despite what the documentation claims. If ASCII were the default, non-ASCII characters such as ü would be converted to literal ?, but that is not the case: 'ü' | Set-Content tmp.txt; (Get-Content tmp.txt) -eq '?' yields $False.
PS > $null | out-file outed.txt
PS > $null | set-content set.txt
PS > md5sum *
f3b25701fe362ec84616a93a45ce9998 *outed.txt
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e *set.txt
This means the defaults of two commands are incompatible, and mixing them will corrupt text, so always specify an encoding.
Formatting
As Bartek explained, Out-File saves the fancy formatting of the output, as seen in the terminal. So in a folder with two files, the command dir | out-file out.txt creates a file with 11 lines.
Whereas Set-Content saves a simpler representation. In that folder with two files, the command dir | set-content sc.txt creates a file with two lines. To emulate the output in the terminal:
PS > dir | ForEach-Object {$_.ToString()}
out.txt
sc.txt
I believe this formatting has a consequence for line breaks, but I can't describe it yet.
File creation
Set-Content doesn't reliably create an empty file when Out-File would:
In an empty folder, the command dir | out-file out.txt creates a file, while dir | set-content sc.txt does not.
Pipeline Variable
Set-Content takes the filename from the pipeline; allowing you to set a number of files' contents to some fixed value.
Out-File takes the data as from the pipeline; updating a single file's content.
Parameters
Set-Content includes the following additional parameters:
Exclude
Filter
Include
PassThru
Stream
UseTransaction
Out-File includes the following additional parameters:
Append
NoClobber
Width
For more information about what those parameters are, please refer to help; e.g. get-help out-file -parameter append.
Out-File has the behavior of overwriting the output path unless the -NoClobber and/or the -Append flag is set. Add-Content will append content if the output path already exists by default (if it can). Both will create the file if one doesn't already exist.
Another interesting difference is that Add-Content will create an ASCII encoded file by default and Out-File will create a little endian unicode encoded file by default.
> is an alias syntactic sugar for Out-File. It's Out-File with some pre-defined parameter settings.
Well, I would disagree... :)
Out-File has -Append (-NoClober is there to avoid overwriting) that will Add-Content. But this is not the same beast.
command | Add-Content will use .ToString() method on input. Out-File will use default formatting.
so:
ls | Add-Content test.txt
and
ls | Out-File test.txt
will give you totally different results.
And no, '>' is not alias, it's redirection operator (same as in other shells). And has very serious limitation... It will cut lines same way they are displayed. Out-File has -Width parameter that helps you avoid this. Also, with redirection operators you can't decide what encoding to use.
HTH
Bartek
Set-Content supports -Encoding Byte, while Out-File does not.
So when you want to write binary data or result of Text.Encoding#GetBytes() to a file, you should use Set-Content.
Wanted to add about difference on encoding:
Windows with PowerShell 5.1:
Out-File - Default encoding is utf-16le
Set-Content - Default encoding is us-ascii
Linux with PowerShell 7.1:
Out-File - Default encoding is us-ascii
Set-Content - Default encoding is us-ascii
Out-file -append or >> can actually mix two encodings in the same file. Even if the file is originally ASCII or ANSI, it will add Unicode by default to the bottom of it. Add-content will check the encoding and match it before appending. Btw, export-csv defaults to ASCII (no accents), and set-content/add-content to ANSI.
TL;DR, use Set-Content as it's more consistent over Out-File.
Set-Content behavior is the same over different powershell versions
Out-File as #JagWireZ says produces different encodings for the default settings, even on the same OS(Windows) the docs for powershell 5.1 and powershell 7.3 state that the encoding changed from unicode to utf8NoBOM
Some issues like Malformed XML arise from using Out-File, that could of course be fixed by setting the desired encoding, however it's likely to forget to set the encoding and end up with issues.
I have a file saved as UCS-2 Little Endian I want to change the encoding so I ran the following code:
cat tmp.log -encoding UTF8 > new.log
The resulting file is still in UCS-2 Little Endian. Is this because the pipeline is always in that format? Is there an easy way to pipe this to a new file as UTF8?
As suggested here:
Get-Content tmp.log | Out-File -Encoding UTF8 new.log
I would do it like this:
get-content tmp.log -encoding Unicode | set-content new.log -encoding UTF8
My understanding is that the -encoding option selects the encdoing that the file should be read or written in.
load content from xml file with encoding.
(Get-Content -Encoding UTF8 $fileName)
If you are reading an XML file, here's an even better way that adapts to the encoding of your XML file:
$xml = New-Object -Typename XML
$xml.load('foo.xml')
PowerShell's get-content/set-content encoding flag doesn't handle all encoding types. You may need to use IO.File, for example to load a file using Windows-1252:
$myString = [IO.File]::ReadAllText($filePath, [Text.Encoding]::GetEncoding(1252))
Text.Encoding::GetEncoding
Text.Encoding::GetEncodings