Sending an http put request to django-tastypie invokes 1 call to obj_update followed by 2 calls to obj_create.
I know that by overriding those functions and printing notifications to the screen.
Does anyone know why that happen and how can I make sure that only 1 call to obj_update will be invoked?
Thanks
Update:
Solved!
In function put_detail() in file tastypie/resources.py there is a try-except statement around obj_update. In case of NotFound exception, obj_create is called instead.
Related
My code is working ok for GET/POST/PUT to/from restApi1 and restApi2.
However, my problem I need to implement HEAD/OPTIONS (no body!) and GET uri1
HEAD/OPTIONS could return 204 or 200 depends on a process status. I am getting error "Stream closed". Sounds like Camel want body bytes, but I don't indend to have it. Even I set ExchangePattern.InOnly or optional etc error occur...
What is correct way to see responses and handle requests WITHOUT body, just statuses exchange?
How to see response from restApi2 on Camel rest("/restApi1").head().route().routeId("id1")
.to("direct:restApi2").routeId("/id1").setHeader(Exchange.HTTP_METHOD,constant("HEAD"))
setExchanggePattern(ExchangePattern.OutOptionalIn).recepientList(simple(restApi2));
I figured it out. Need to set '.convertBodyTo(String.class)' even I don't have a body.
I'm getting rejected only on the accountSummaries/list management call, everything else works fine - heck, it works even when executing it from the reference page! I double checked that the account being used was correct and, as I said, I have no issues performing the simple accounts/list call.
I'm using the python library, and for both of those calls no parameters are needed (so the chance of some embarrassing error are very low).
Basically I'm simply getting the service client and performing the simplest possible call:
a = client.AnalyticsManagementClient() # super simple wrapper
a._service.management().accounts().list().execute()
a._service.management().accountSummaries().list().execute()
The first call works fine, the second one returns a 403 error. Anyone have an idea why that might happen?
Full error is HttpError: <HttpError 403 when requesting https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/management/accountSummaries?alt=json returned "Insufficient Permission">
It was just a scope issue: accounts needs at least one among
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/analytics
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/analytics.edit
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/analytics.readonly
while accountSummaries allows only the last two; it seems to be the only one that does not work with the analytics scope, which is the one our client was requesting.
I have a route /products. In App.ProductsRoute, I am using a setupController hook to assign list of products fetched from server to local App.Product objects.
I am setting the model in setupController hook as :
self_controller.set('model', self_controller.store.find('product'));
This works well when HTTP status is 200. But when server returns some HTTP error (like 500-Internal Server Error, 401-Unauthorized Errors, etc) I am getting error as JSON.parse. I am not sure how to handle errors for this.store.find() calls.
Note: It returns Ember's promiseArray which I need to check once resolved (before actually assigning it to model). Any help on this topic would be much appreciated. Thanks.
What about using the promise's catch callback to handle the errors? Untested, but something like this should work:
self_controller.store.find('product').then(function(products) {
self_controller.set('model', products);
}).catch(function(reason) {
// Do something to handle the error response...
});
I need your help with the gwt requestfactory
considering following scenario:
I get an existing entity (let's say a invoice) from the server:
InvoiceEntityProxy invoice = request1.getInvoice();
I want to make some changes, so I edit it with a new request:
InvoiceEntityProxy editableInvoice = request2.edit(invoice);
//make some changes to editableInvoice
Now I send the changes made with the second request to the server, to create a preview:
request2.createPreview(editableInvoice);
When the request is sent, the invoice proxy is frozen and I re-enable editing by assigning the proxy to a new request:
editableInvoice = request3.edit(editableInvoice);
If everything is okay, i want to update the proxy and send it to the server, using the latest request:
request3.update(editableInvoice);
But the changes never arrive on the server, because the latest request (request3) doesn't know anything about the changes made to the proxy assigned to the request2.
I thought about following solutions:
I could redo the changes on the latest proxy. But for that, I've to iterate over all attributes and set them again (not very friendly solution, because I've to adjust the method each time I add some attributes to the proxy)
Another approach would be to send the proyx without an id to the server and send the id as second parameter of the update-method. But this would be a shame, because not only the deltas would be sent to the server (which is one of the greate features of the requestFactory).
So what is the best and most common practice to let the request3 know about the changes already made to the proxy, when it was assigned to another request.
You simply forget to call fire(). Example
request2.createPreview(editableInvoice).fire();
Bear in mind that if the following request depend on the result of the previous one, you should put your code in the OnSuccess methode because the request is asynchronous
It's also possible to append multiple requests
EDIT
It important to use the same request for the edit and fire operations. So replace this line
request.update(editableInvoice);
with
request3.update(editableInvoice);
Nice! I found the solution for my problem.
I still have an instance of the original proxy, because the edit() method of the context always return a new instance of the proxy. So I save the original proxy before sending any request.
After each successful request, I re-enable editing the proxy by call the edit method again:
editableInvoice = request3.edit(editableInvoice);
Now the crux:
I can set the original proxy of a proxy, which is used to consider if it changed and what changed. This is done by using AutoBean and set the PARENT_OBJECT Tag like this:
AutoBean<InvoiceEntityProxy> editableInvoiceBean = AutoBeanUtils.getAutoBean(editableInvoice);
AutoBean<InvoiceEntityProxy> originalInvoiceBean = AutoBeanUtils.getAutoBean(originalInvoice);
editableInvoiceBean.setTag(Constants.PARENT_OBJECT, originalInvoiceBean);
On the next request all changed properties are send to the server again.
Thank you for your help and thank you for the hint with the AutoBean #Zied Hamdi
You also can use AutoBeans to duplicate the object before you start changing it. You can keep the original one untouched then request.edit() it and apply changes (introspection like changes) from the "dirty" object.
You'll maybe have to do some research on how to handle EntityProxies since they are "special AutoBeans" : I had to use special utility objects to serialize them to json (available in GWT). So there might be some special handling in doing a deep copy too.
There is an issue maybe with GWT keeping only one version of each EntityProxy (I never checked if it is global or only in the context of a request)
This is driving me nuts and it may be something simple, but every time I call the following from Fiddler script is throws a NullReferenceException:
if (oSession.oResponse.headers.ExistsAndContains("Content-Type", "html")){...
This is straight off the Fiddler script knowledge base and I've got the same thing happening on two different Win 8 machines. It seems that oSession.oResponse.headers is null and yes, I am calling this from within OnBeforeRequest!
Same deal with oSession.responseBodyBytes - it looks like the response is null inside OnBeforeRequest. Otherwise Fiddler is behaving normally, traffic proxies through just fine and everything else looks good.
Ideas?
The oResponse.headers and oSession.responseBodyBytes objects don't exist until after the request has been sent to the server and the response has been read back. If you want to interact with the Response headers and body, do so inside the OnBeforeResponse function instead.
The KB was mangled a bit when updated for the new site. I'll file a bug to have this made more explicit.