This question already has an answer here:
How do I de-obfuscate a Lua script?
(1 answer)
Closed 7 months ago.
the link: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ketamo/ybaa/main/yba
This is a script for a roblox game, but the raw code looks very strange for me. I cant understand it.
Another github raw lua script code for a roblox game: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ArponAG/Scripts/main/AnimeAdventures.lua
But its clean and understandable.
So how do i decipher this:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ketamo/ybaa/main/yba
So after i can make it a lua script
It looks like the creator of that script obfuscated it to presumably prevent others from modifying it. You can go through and try to decipher it by renaming variables and such, but it looks like the obfuscation they sent it through did a really great job of it.
If you just want to run it you should be able to still run it assuming this is the same code that runs the game.
How do I de-obfuscate a Lua script? This question may help out.
Also in case you didn't know that link corresponds to this repo. I found it using this other question What do raw.githubusercontent.com URLs represent?
This question already has answers here:
How do I make my Perl scripts act like normal programs on Windows?
(5 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
The reason I'm asking this is because after half an hour of failing to figure out what key word or jargon to use I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask here.
What I'm currently doing is getting a perl code to run using the good ol:
perl myPerlScript.pl
To get it to run. What I'd like to do for simplicity of presentation as a prototype would be to figure out how to make a script that I can run as an executable that would effectively be just a replacement of that. I know on Linux/Unix you can make bash scripts, but I'm trying to run this like I would Steam or other executables. Any advice or am I asking for something impossible? Having the command prompt pop up in the background is an option but preferably avoidable.
Also I've been using Cava Packager, but it's so bulky I figured since I'm only using one script there would be an easier way.
This answer shows how to make it so you can simply do
myPerlScript.pl
or even simply
myPerlScript
(Another way of achieving the latter is with the pl2bat tool.)
This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
Lisp Executable
Was getting started with Clisp and the biggest problem I faced is that there are very few tutorials out there to explain how to write clisp files. Most of the tutorials are about using it in command line.
I'm not using Emacs. I'm using Clisp + Sublime on Ubuntu. Thus, what should I do to write a file of lisp code and execute it.
See the CLISP documentation how to save an executable:
http://clisp.org/impnotes/image.html
The most common way is to load your file using Slime. I strongly suggest you start using it.
If you absolutely don't want to, you can, as Clisp documentation states, use the --lisp-file option.
This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
Restore Emacs Session/Desktop
I am using emacs for development. And there may be many buffers open. Is there a way that I can save the state when I close emacs. So that when emacs is again opened it restores the different windows?
I am looking at what browsers are able to do for restoring a previous browsing session.
Generally speaking, you don't ever "close" your Emacs. That's not meant to be a joke. The general style of working is to keep an Emacs running all the time and to just open new buffers in there using emacsclient. This is different from the vim style where vim is continuously opened and closed.
However, your question is an old one which has been asked by a lot of people and a lot of solutions have been proposed and coded up. There's a list of them on emacswiki. You can pick one that works for you.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
Does anyone know of a good Command Prompt replacement? I've tried bash/Cygwin, but that does not really meet my needs at work because it's too heavy. I'd like a function-for-function identical wrapper on cmd.exe, but with highlighting, intellisense, and (critically) a tabbed interface. Powershell is okay, but the interface is still lacking.
Edited: I've been using ConEmu (http://conemu.github.io/) for quite some time now. This one is a wrapper too, since it is not really possible to replace the Windows console without rewriting the whole command interpreter. Below the line is my original answer for an earlier alternative.
Not exactly a replacement (actually, it's a prettifying wrapper) but you might try Console (http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/)
I've been using JPSoft's products a long time (starting back with 4OS2 and 4DOS), and currently use Take Command 9. It works with existing batch files, has it's own improvements on top, a tabbed interface, and filename coloring options.
Looks like their site is having some problems right now, but you can find them at: http://jpsoft.com/
I use Take Command 9.0. I have used JPSoft's products for years. It has a tabbed interface. I have Take Command start with Take Command, Powershell, and CMD.exe each in their own tab. It doesn't do syntax highlighting. Take Command is syntactically compatible with CMD.exe and enhances each command quite a bit and adds many more.
PowerShell isn't a complete replacement for CMD.exe or Take Command. I find myself using both. You might ask why I would still use CMD.exe and it is because I will use Take Command to test a batch file that is limited to commands that work in CMD.exe and I then need to deploy the batch file on a workstation/server that doesn't have Take Command on it. I can create/test in Take Command and then verify it works in CMD.exe before deploying it.
I don't know of any IDE's that provide Intellisense for batch files specifically. If they did it would only be for a few keywords anyway. Most of the time in batch files you are running commands that are external to the batch language and wouldn't be included in the Intellisense.
I use Textpad to edit my batch files. Take Command has a debugger and it has logging capabilities which makes it very easy to test your batch files.
PowerCmd is a trial-ware wrapper for cmd.exe and costs 30$
It offers:
tabs
a "normal" selection mode
copy'n'paste
highlighting
auto complete
buttons to start Python, Powershell and others
If you want a more feature-rich UI for Powershell, try PowerGUI.
http://powergui.org/index.jspa
NYAOS
"NYAOS" is the tcsh-like enhanced commandline shell for Windows and OS/2 !
http://www.nyaos.org/
For decent completion and command history, try the PyCmd wrapper at https://sourceforge.net/projects/pycmd/
I use 4NT from the above mentioned JPSoft. It works great and has great added functionality. It is being replaced by TakeCommand but I do not need that much extra functionality.
Update:
It's no longer known as 4NT. Now its name is TCC/LE.
Nick, I know you asked this a long while ago but I've just found it while searching for something related. I have been using PromptPal and its been great. I got it about a year ago, early 2008, and it was through this discount software thing called BitsDujour. I just went there and noticed they had a deal for 51% off that product only a few days ago. Keep your eyes on that site and maybe the discount will come up again soon. Its well worth the $30 but I got 2 licenses for 1/2 off, one for each of my PCs...
If you want not to use cmd.exe totally then go for ZOC.exe terminal.ZOC is enterprise application.
Else just add some feature to your Command prompt by installing GOW.EXE.GOW is opensource application.
But always you can go for Git which is giving mostly commands in bash. Just add the bin folder to your environment path. Your command prompt will work as unix terminal.