Im trying to connect to my openid provider through play scala.
I use openID.redirectURL and than send the answer to a map function but somehow it never .sends any request to my provider. It always goes into the recover part.
My code
OpenID.redirectURL(myProviderUrl,ComeBackUrl).map( url => Redirect(url)).recover{ case t:Throwable =>{ Logger.info("recover") Redirect(routes.testCallBack.authError)}}
BTW, i dont have ide on my computer for scala, so if everything seems right at my code, i would be grateful if you would write the necessary imports for this code.
P.S. - if someone can pls edit this text to code block it would be great, im posting this through my phone..
Thanks !!
Try logging the actual error and you will probably see what is wrong:
OpenID.redirectURL(myProviderUrl, ComeBackUrl)
.map( url => Redirect(url))
.recover{
case t: Throwable =>
Logger.warn("Openid failed", t)
Redirect(routes.testCallBack.authError)
}
Related
I have a list of routes, some are using parameters and everything is working correctly.
My problem happen when I try to constrain the parameter (to check the it is valid before executing my controller).
Following the documentation I did it this way :
$router->group(['middleware' => 'auth:api'], function () use ($router) {
$router->get('/user/{userId:[a-z0-9]+}', 'UserController#userByUserIdGet');
});
But all I receive is a NotFoundHttpException meaning that it doesn't match my route.
I can't see where my mistake is. Any idea?
Thank you.
The error you recieve, if your route doensn't exists is a MethodNotAllowedHttpException - your code and the regex for your route do work correctly, so I am assuming, that your error could have an other reason.
Maybe you should check this:
NotFoundHttpException with Lumen
OK stupid error from my side.
I'm passing UUID as userID parameter... AND they have a dash in them.
So my regex should be this one
$router->group(['middleware' => 'auth:api'], function () use ($router) {
$router->get('/user/{userId:[a-z0-9\-]+}', 'UserController#userByUserIdGet');
});
I am pretty sure that this is a config problem, so I'll post my code and the relevant application.conf options of my play app.
I have a play server that needs to interact with another server "B" (basically multi-file upload to B). The interaction happens inside an async -Action which should result in an OK with B's response on the upload. This is the reduced code:
def authenticateAndUpload( url: String) = Action.async( parse.multipartFormData) { implicit request =>
val form = authForm.bindFromRequest.get
val (user, pass) = (form.user, form.pass)
//the whole following interaction with the other server happens in a future, i.e. login returns a Future[Option[WSCookie]] which is then used
login(user, pass, url).flatMap {
case Some(cookie) => //use the cookie to upload the files and collect the result, i.e. server responses
//this may take a few minutes and happens in yet another future, which eventually produces the result
result.map(cc => Ok(s"The server under url $url responded with $cc"))
case None =>
Future.successful(Forbidden(s"Unable to log into $url, please go back and try again with other credentials."))
}
}
I am pretty sure that the code itself works since I can see my server log which nicely prints B's responses every few seconds and proceeds until everything is correctly uploaded. The only problem is that the browser hangs up with a server overloaded message after 120s which should be a play default value - but for which config parameter?
I tried to get rid of it by setting every play.server.http. timeout option I could get my hands on and even decided to use play.ws, specific akka, and other options of which I am quite sure that they are not necessary... however the problem remains, here is my current application.config part:
ws.timeout.idle="3600s"
ws.timeout.request ="3600s"
ws.timeout.response="3600s"
play.ws.timeout.idle="3600s"
play.ws.timeout.request="3600s"
play.ws.timeout.response="3600s"
play.server.http.connectionTimeout="3600s"
play.server.http.idleTimeout="3600s"
play.server.http.requestTimeout="3600s"
play.server.http.responseTimeout="3600s"
play.server.http.keepAlive="true"
akka.http.host-connection-pool.idle-timeout="3600s"
akka.http.host-connection-pool.client.idle-timeout= "3600s"
The browser hang up happened both on Safari and Chrome, where Chrome additionally started a second communication with B after about 120 seconds - also both of these communications succeeded and produced the expected logs, only the browsers had both hang up.
I am using Scala 2.12.2 with play 2.6.2 in an SBT environment, the server is under development, pre-compiled but then started via run - I read that it may not pick up the application.conf options - but it did on some file size customizing. Can someone tell me the correct config options or my mistake on the run process?
I'm trying to set up some tests for an API made by a coworker with spray.io, and I'm encountering some odd behavior. When a request results in an error for any reason, we want to return a JSON value along the lines of:
{"status":false,"message":"useful message here"}
This happens just fine in the actual browser. I have navigated to an unhandled route in the web browser, and I get the desired JSON value. So, I want to test this. Now, since I'm new to spray.io, I started off with the very simple test:
"leave GET requests to root path unhandled" in {
Get() ~> myRoute ~> check {
handled must beFalse
}
}
This went fine, no problems. Since it's my first time playing with spray.io, I looked at some of the sample tests for testing false routes, and wrapped myRoute with sealRoute() so I could check the response without failing tests:
"leave GET requests to root path unhandled" in {
Get() ~> sealRoute(myRoute) ~> check {
handled must beTrue
}
}
This also works fine. So, I decided to just make sure the text of the response was usable with this, before I went to the trouble of parsing JSON and verifying individual values:
"leave GET requests to root path unhandled" in {
Get() ~> sealRoute(myRoute) ~> check {
responseAs[String] contains "false"
}
}
This is failing. To investigate, I threw a simple line of code in to log the actual value of responseAs[String] to a file, and I got this:
The requested resource could not be found.
Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? I'm thinking that one of the following is occurring:
responseAs[String] is doing more than taking the exact response and giving it back to me, applying some type of filter along the way
The framework itself is not fully evaluating the query, but rather making a mockup object for the test framework to evaluate, and therefore not executing the desired 'turn errors to json' methods that my co-worker has implemented
I have tried searching google and stack overflow specifically for similar issues, but I'm either not putting in the right queries, or most other people are content to have the default error messages and aren't trying to test them beyond checking handled must beFalse.
Edit - This is the relevant part of the RejectionHandler:
case MissingQueryParamRejection(paramName) :: _=>
respondWithMediaType(`application/json`) {
complete(BadRequest, toJson(Map("status" -> false, "message" -> s"Missing parameter $paramName, request denied")))
}
Okay, so with insight from here and a coworker, the problem has been found:
Basically, the custom RejectionHandler was defined within our custom Actor object, and it wasn't coming into scope in the tests. To resolve this, the following steps were taken:
Moved the definition for the custom RejectionHandler into its own object in a separate file (as it had to do its own imports, it was causing a "encountered unrecoverable cycle resolving import" error)
Imported this new object into both the original file and the test spec.
(fun fact - http://spray.io/documentation/1.2.2/spray-routing/key-concepts/rejections/#rejectionhandler seems to demonstrate the RejectionHandler as a top-level object but you can't have top-level implicit vals in Scala, hence the need for an object)
I'm having an issue with assertRedirectTo() in a test I have created, below is the code I have used:
public function testLoggedInIndexAction() {
$this->dispatch('/');
$this->assertController('index');
$this->resetResponse();
$this->request->setPost(array(
'type' => 'login',
'username' => 'root',
'password' => 'asdasd',
));
$this->request->setMethod('POST');
$this->dispatch('/');
$this->assertRedirectTo('/feed/');
}
You log in through / (index.php/) and submit post details there and the it redirects you to /feed/ (index.php/feed/). The details I have supplied are correct and should work however I am having issues whereby PHPUnit is saying they are incorrect:
There was 1 failure:
1) IndexControllerTest::testLoggedInIndexAction
Failed asserting response redirects to "/feed/"
/home/public_html/mashhr/library/Zend/Test/PHPUnit/Constraint/Redirect.php:190
/home/public_html/mashhr/library/Zend/Test/PHPUnit/ControllerTestCase.php:701
/home/public_html/mashhr/tests/application/controllers/UserControllerTest.php:36
#poelinca: No, it is simply a case of Zend_Test being unreliable in registering a redirect (even if it has been called correctly!)
In his case, the real app is no doubt redirecting the user properly, but the Zend_Test environment is having trouble registering properly called redirects. The best response I can think of is to omit any failing assertRedirect which actually works in the application.
This is not an optimal situation, but unless you're prepared to dig into the Zend code to see where the problem is, this may be your best bet for efficiency. This is an example of what causes unit testing to get a bad name: Having to alter code to pass tests which actually work already.
See http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-7496 Which is misleadingly specific in its title: the problem relates to all redirects, especially those which must set headers and exit instead of dispatching the original controller.
For whatever reason, this behavior causes Redirects not to always fail, but to be highly unreliable instead! If anyone knows a better workaround to this problem (which is general, and probably unrelated to the OP's code) please let us know.
stumbled on this question while having the same problem. I ended up doing the following:
$this->assertRedirect();
$responseHeaders = $this->response->getHeaders();
$this->assertTrue(count($responseHeaders) != 0);
$this->assertArrayHasKey('value', $responseHeaders[0]);
// in my case I'm redirecting to another module
$this->assertEquals('/module/controller/action', $responseHeaders[0]['value']);
I've responded this answer in http://zend-framework-community.634137.n4.nabble.com/Zend-Test-failing-on-AssertRedirectTo-td3325845.html#a4451217
I'm having this same issue... A possible way to assert it could be in
PHPUnit and Zend Framework assertRedirectTo() issue
But the problem is there.. My example is (wich actually works if done manually):
// controller modules/picking/orders/product
$orderId = $this->_getParam('oId');
if (empty($orderId)) {
return $this->_redirect('picking/orders/browse/invalid/empty');
}
// test
$this->dispatch('picking/orders/product');
$this->assertRedirect(); // ok
$this->assertRedirectTo('picking/orders/browse'); // error
$this->assertRedirectTo('picking/orders/browse/invalid/empty'); // error
After I've found the error!
Actually, following the example above i've found that the string comparizon in my example has an error:
'.../public//picking/orders/browse/invalid/empty'
'.../public/picking/orders/browse/invalid/empty'
... fixing the preprended slash solve the problem! ;)
So if i understand right , you wrote a test that fails ( id say this is perfect ) .
In order to make the test pass you need to debug you're app and see where the problem is , in this case you need to have a look at the actual redirection ( or eaven the post fields sent by the form ) , maybe check the routing too . I gues nobody here will be able to answer you're question unless you post the code in you're index controller/form/view and feed controller .
For future reference, I had this issue today and it was caused by the Url class failing to build a valid url (I was passing the wrong parameters) but not reporting an error to PHPUnit (probably because PHPUnit masks the error).
Correcting the url parameters fixes the url and with it the assertion.
Hi I'm having some trouble with Lift and URL rewriting. I've written a simple rewrite rule:
LiftRules.rewrite.append {
case RewriteRequest(
ParsePath(List("user", userID), _, _, _), _, _) => {
println(userID)
RewriteResponse(List("viewUser"), Map("userID" -> urlDecode(userID)))
}
}
So when I enter http://localhost:8080/user/brian I expect a call to be made to the viewUser.html file I have placed in the webroot directory.
The mark up of viewUser.html is very simple:
<lift:surround with="default" at="content">
<p>ViewUser</p>
</lift:surround>
But instead of seeing viewUser I get an error:
The Requested URL /user/brian was not found on this server
Also if I enter the URL of viewUser by hand: http://localhost:8080/user/brian I get the same error.
I am out of ideas on this one, I did find a similar error which happens through the SiteMap system.
I've tried this with a cleanly checked out lift-archetype-blank project, by adding the viewUser.html and adding the single chunk of rewrite code.
Make sure you've added "viewUser" to the site map. Without doing so Lift doesn't know where to find page.