I have a ASP.NET MVC application which uses EF (v6) as data access layer. My application works fine on IIS Express and also when deployed to the server running IIS 7.5.
The problem is that I'm getting the following exception when I deploy it to Azure (Web Sites).
Code generated using the T4 templates for Database First and Model First development may not work correctly if used in Code First mode. To continue using Database First or Model First ensure that the Entity Framework connection string is specified in the config file of executing application. To use these classes, that were generated from Database First or Model First, with Code First add any additional configuration using attributes or the DbModelBuilder API and then remove the code that throws this exception.
I've searched the web and I made sure my connection string starts with "metadata=" + checked my db context class' constructor to be sure it contains the correct name (in my case it's "name=PsDataEntities"))
My connection string looks like this: <add name="PsDataEntities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/PsDataModel.csdl|res://*/PsDataModel.ssdl|res://*/PsDataModel.msl;
provider=System.Data.SqlClient;
provider connection string="data source=SERVER_NAME;initial catalog=DB_NAME;user id=UID;password=PWD;
MultipleActiveResultSets=True;App=EntityFramework"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
Anybody had the same problems?
Any help is appreciated
I did a few more tests (like changing metadata in the connection string to use fully qualified names instead of '*') without success, then I decided to set my metadata (regarding .csdl/.ssdl/.msl) programatically with the help from this post. Application now works correctly when deployed to Azure.
Related
I am using ASP.NET MVC4 deployed on WebApps, EF6, Azure SQL Database
I have two connectionstrings, one direct to the DB and one that is needed as I am using Entity Framework. If I setup the first via Azure and leave the EF string in web.config, all works fine. Once I try to move the EF connectionstring to Azure, it breaks.
I have tried to follow all the posts on how to setup an EF connection string in Azure Management Portal, and the advice seems to be to use the following:
In Management Portal:
Name:
EFConnectionString
Value:
metadata=res://MyModel/model.csdl|res://MyModel/model.ssdl|res://MyModel/model.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="Data Source=tcp:myserver.database.windows.net,1234;Initial Catalog=mydatabase;User ID=Admin#myserver.database.windows.net;Password=12345678"
SQL Database:
Custom
Note:
" is replaced by " in the Azure string.
In Web.config I still need the following:
<add name="EFConnectionString" connectionString="" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient"/>
I have changed certain details in the connectionstring for security reasons, but the true string does work fine in Web.config.
However when I do attempt the above, I get :
The page cannot be displayed because an internal server error has occurred.
Further Log error message:
The specified named connection is either not found in the configuration, not intended to be used with the EntityClient provider, or not valid.
Any help appreciated. I am trying to do this to enhance the security of stored passwords for accessing DB on Azures, as I understand that setting them up via the portal encrypts them.
Thanks.
First check your deployment. I've run in a similar problem, and after a couple of hours struggling I found out that I was deploying without actually sending connection strings, falling back to whatever was in the portal config... the others keys in the we.config were being sent over, but the conn strings weren't... after I properly set it up on the portal, everything went back to normal...
I am using Entity Framework using Code First and the Fluent API.
When developing on my local machine, the database and tables are created as expected and everything works fine.
When deploying to my Azure web role the database is created, but the tables are never created. If I try a HTTP request touching DbContext, the request times out and finally my web role only returns "Service Unavailable".
The model is large, but not extremely so (43 tables are created on my dev machine).
What can be wrong here? Here is my Azure SQL connection string, where you can see that I set the timeout quite high:
<add name="MyConnectionString" connectionString="Server=tcp:myserveronazure.database.windows.net,1433;Database=MyDatabase;User ID=MyUser#myserveronazure;Password=thepassword;Trusted_Connection=False;Encrypt=True;Connection Timeout=120;PersitSecurityInfo=true;" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
EDIT: After RDP:ing into the Azure VM, I see in the Event Log that w3wp.exe (the IIS worker process, if I'm not mistaken) crashes. The log doesn't list any error message.
Enityframework have three Database Initializer by default CreateDatabaseIfNotExists,DropCreateDatabaseWhenModelChanges and DropCreateDatabaseAlways that are executed when you hit the context for the first time, if you are using migrations (i think is the case) you must use the MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion initializer to work in the application deployment. Hope it works!
When on my dev machine, all works perfectly. Even using production connection values (so even when I connect to production from the dev machine). I don't think it's a permission problem because I am using the same credentials, just using EF5 instead of linq2sql, as the previous version of the service that worked. Also, the sql-profiler does not show a failed login attempt.
Connection string is:
Data Source=MYSQLSERVER;Database=MYDB;Integrated Security=True;
The error is:
Invalid value for key 'attachdbfilename'.
I have logged the connection string being passed into the dbContext code:
Database.Connection.ConnectionString = settings.DbConnectionHourly;
This is a class that inherits from my real dbContext (which packaged in a dll) and the settings get injected. Again, this works in Dev but not in production (server 2008 r2, IIS 7.5, framework.4).
Turns out that entity framework was trying to be very smart, but it was giving a very un-smart error message. So by convention, if you don't pass the context name in as a constructor, entity framework will assume the classname as the name of the connection string. What it will also do (which I was unaware of), is in development it will automatically connect to and create a schema using the visual studio built in sqlExpress. So in development, everything worked because this 'automagic' creation succeeded and since I later changed the connection to a different database, I was none the wiser about what EF was doing under the covers (EF was doing the wrong things but the end result worked).
However, when the application went to production, there is no sqlexpress or any database on the webserver so the automagic connection/creation sequence failed. Now if the error message had any useful information in it, this would be obvious. But since I had never set an 'attachdbfilename', nor did it tell me what the value of 'attachdbfilename' was or any context or what it was trying to do, this made figuring this out that much more challenging.
The fix was simple:
public HourlyContext(ISettingsWrapper settings)
: base(settings.DbConnectionHourly)
{ }
Instead of setting the connection after the context gets created (the creation process will immediately try to work it's magic with it's built in conventions/defaults), I now set it immediately through the constructor.
I am using SQL Server CE 4.0 with WebApi on Windows Azure Websites. I have been successfully able to deploy SQL Server CE. The weird problem I am facing is that my site is able to log me in using the same DB but I am not able to use any of the controllers to fetch the data.
I am using same connection string for both. The only difference is that for logging in I am using WebSecurity as I have enabled OAuth on the site.
Can someone throw some light on how to debug and fix this issue? The error I am getting for the calls is
Format of the initialization string does not conform to specification
starting at index 0.
However the same string works for authentication, change password, adding OAuth connections etc.
Thanks in advance
I connected to the site using FTP. I was not giving the site name as domain name and it was denying me access earlier. On connecting, I got hold of the Web.config file and I found something interesting. While publishing the site, the web.config was modified to add another connectionstring with the name of context_DatabasePublish.
This string had following details connectionString="ContextName_DatabasePublish.ConnetionString" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"
Also there was a new section called context added to the entityframework section of the config file with all the details for the context to use but again pointing to same connection string. The provider it is using is sql and not sqlce. I believe that is the reason it was failing.
I uploaded my normal config file and the site started working. I need to explore more on to why and how the new connection string got added. I will post the details in comments.
I'm new to ef code first and have just used the reverse engineer code first to create a model of an existing database on Microsoft SQL Server 2008.
The problem I'm having is that even though I'm providing User ID and Password in the connection string, it's giving me an authentication error while complaining about my computer name as if I were using Integrated Security (which I'm not.)
The error I get is this:
Cannot open database \"edmTestDBContext\" requested by the login. The login failed.\r\nLogin failed for user 'jwelty-thinkpad\jwelty'.
My connectionString is this:
Data Source=srv-123;Initial Catalog=edmTestDB;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=user;Password=userpass;MultipleActiveResultSets=True
It seams to me like it's ignoring my User ID and using my machine name instead.
It's interesting that the connection string was auto generated by the Entity Framework tool and it worked for building the model but not for actually connecting the model back to the source database.
Any thoughts on what's going on?
I do have full permissions with my username/password as this is what I use with Sql Server Management Studio and that's also how I created the database in the first place.
I tried adding "Integrated Security=False;" and that was no help.
It looks like EF isn't finding your connection string. Make sure that it is in the config file being used (you might need to copy it from the class library config to the application config) and that it either has the same name as the context class or that you provide DbContext with the name by calling the appropriate base constructor. For example:
public EdmTestDBContext()
: base("name=MyConnectionStringName")
{
}
There are some built-in conventions in EF Code-first such as using the name of derived context class from DbContext to find the related connection string in the .config file.
So if your context class is named BlogContext, it will look for the following connectionString first:
<connectionStrings>
<clear />
<add
name="BlogContext"
...