Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated.
I'm looking for what I would consider a standard setup for modern day web design/development. Basically I have a dual monitor setup and I would like to code on one screen and have the changes displayed in real-time on the other screen.
Up until yesterday I was using jsbin in this way and it was working great. I had one browser setup with the coding stuff (HTML/CSS/jQuery) and I then had another separate browser open on the second monitor which updated instantly as I typed. So if I changed a CSS rule for example it was shown in real-time on the second monitor without me having to do ANYTHING. No saving, no refreshing, no switching tabs - NOTHING.
However, for whatever reason jsbin now refuses to update in real-time and it will only show the code changes if I manually refresh the browser. I've emailed jsbin about this but they can't diagnose the issue.
So what I'm looking for is either an online alternative, or a local alternative. However, everything (and I mean EVERYTHING) that I've tried so far can't do what jsbin did.
dabblet.com, jsFiddle.net, liveweave.com, codepen.io, cssdeck.com etc
But all of the above don't offer a second tab/browser that I can move to the second monitor to show the code updates in real-time which is the most important thing.
Surely there must be an easy solution to this? Is it not common to code in this way on 2 monitors whilst developing a website? I'd really appreciate any help on this.
Many thanks
Ben
For local option, Brackets has Live Preview mode.
After you open your project or file for editing, select File -> Live Preview
It launches a browser window, then your changes are reflected as you type, no save or browser refresh needed.
I use Liveweave with my dual monitor setup. I keep the HTML/CSS in my left window/monitor and the JS/Preview in my right monitor. Works great!
Related
I'm using EWW Emacs browser for opening various remote pages(mostly documentation) which is very handy most of the time.
I'm still trying to understand why certain pages take 4-5-6+ seconds to be rendered in eww(which take <1s in Chrome, for comparison).
For my tasks, I only care about the loaded content - images and fancy styles are not needed.
Is there any simple way to speed it up?
Like setting readable mode/disabling images before calling eww? If that's possible at all.
Update from a few weeks later
I made a few experiments and from what I found the biggest contributing factor in my case is when a page has lots of third-party fonts.
I wasn't able to find a way to disable font fetching in eww source code so probably true "text based" browser like w3m was a better solution in the first place.
Any clarification comments and answers are still very welcome.
I am trying to set initial focus to the first input field in each page of my app.
I have implemented the code in the following post and it is working great:
How to Set Initial Focus in a View?
But I found that it is not working for first view/page in app when it opens from Fiori Launchpad. I found the following code which is getting executed after my onAfterShow:
From sap/ushell/renderers/fiori2/Shell-dbg.controller.js
Could you please help to solve this?
I am using SAP UI5 version 1.56.7.
Author of that answer here. After browsing through the source code and documentation quite a while, I have to admit I couldn't find any acceptable solutions to this question either. My impression is that FLP developers want to make sure that the app doesn't interfere with setting the initial focus.
The lack of APIs and documentation thereof strongly suggests that there are compelling reasons behind this prevention (probably a11y related).
My advice is not to rely on timeouts but maintaining consistent UX by keeping the focus on the app title on its launch - as designed by SAP.
Solved the issue by passing around 200ms into setTimeout function for first page and it is working fine
Facebook recently announced the introduction of messenger codes which can be used to add new contacts and, more importantly, communicate directly with businesses and business pages (which is why I'm interested in it).
It took me ages to find it but on the bottom left of the messages tab on my Facebook page I have the option to download my code in three different sizes - clicking the disc will open a modal window where you can click the Download button and choose from 300, 600 or 1000px PNG file downloads.
NOTE: While they are PNG files the background is not transparent which seems like a bit of an oversight to me but hey ho that's what Photoshop is for I guess.
The problem is that while I can download my code I can't find any way to test it on printed materials (or even electronically at the moment!). The scanning feature doesn't seem to have been rolled out for me yet (I tried re-installing the Messenger app to see if I got a newer version but that didn't work) and nor for anyone I know (I'm in the UK). The codes are bespoke to Messenger so can't be scanned or tested using any other app.
I'm probably too far ahead of the game but is there any way I can test to see if my code scans correctly, or anywhere I can go to find out? I would like to use it on some promotional material which is likely to be long term materials that I don't want to have to update in the near future (several years, by which time it's likely these codes will be more commonplace).
I also need to know what the redundancy is like. For example the high redundancy QR codes I generate can have up to 30% of the code covered while still being usable, which is great for design purposes. I can't find any official documentation as yet for these codes at all, let alone what is required, what the spec. is etc.
I know the most likely option is 'sit and wait' but I really would rather not if possible. I've never been very patient...
Thanks
UPDATE: My Messenger app has now been updated so I can test, but I'm leaving this here in case anyone knows of another way to test perhaps? If someone doesn't have Messenger on their phone for example.
I've a legacy app that features a DND from a popup window to the main one.
It works fine in IE 8 but not in any of the newer versions of IE. The effect results in the drag ghost image being stuck in the source window and not going away after the drop had occurred.
Some debugging did in fact confirm that the 'mouseup' event does not get propagated back to the source window. What can be done to fix it? Many thanks!
ITs a bit hard to begin to answer your question without some code....
use the File>Properties menu to find out which IE security zones the two windows(domains) map too...IE uses a different security model to other browsers... drag/drop is probably not allowed between local web files (using file: protocol) and internet or intranet sites.
Have you used the Dev tool yet to debug it? If you are using showModalDialog (which normally disables context menus) you can right click on a link (a) or input element to display the context menu so you can display the debugger for showModal content page.
If possible include a link to your website or a mashup (jsfiddle) with your questions.
We we wondering what are some ways developers have added a help function to their apps. What are some techniques people have used?
One way we were thinking of is to us UIWebView to display a HTML file with help instructions.
Thoughts appreciated.
I'm using UIWebView right now which pretty much contains all the help in a single page, along with some JQuery things to display popups, etc. But I like the way iCab Mobile (et al.) are doing things which is a sectioned UITableView with each row a separate topic or section within their overall help information (complete with icons...) then in their bundle they have each section in its own html file, organized by localization.
Another thing in my queue for the next release is to provide a dynamic "News" view. The rough idea is as follows... I have on my server a file or CGI where I can place small bits of news I'd like to push out to users. On startup, my app checks for network availability and if present, start a thread to see if anything has changed on the server since last updating the News data. If changes present, post an alert letting user know, and asking if they'd like to read it now. At that point, the latest news is already downloaded and cached, so they can simply read it later if they want, and I won't post anymore alerts until the server file changes again. (And one could add a preference/setting to disable these alerts.)
I'm thinking this would be a good way to let people know that some nasty bug is known and fixed and an update is sitting in the queue, solicit beta testers, promote upcoming features or other apps, etc. I can see where constant alerts everytime I've got something new to promote would get annoying, so having a setting to disable them means the user never has to read them unless they want to. Although some kind of override to warn of recently discovered/fixed bugs seems sensible.
FWIW, the author of Mover+/Mover has just started doing a similar thing, though I think Emanuele is perhaps only showing one Notelet at a time, whereas I envision a bit more of a history (shown in UIWebView) until I decide to age stuff off the bottom of the stack.
I'm using a scroll/page view to show several images containing small notes. Each image then tells the user about the more advanced functions on a specific part of the app.
In my opinion the help should only contain information that isn't a 100% relevant for the use of the application. It should be things the advanced user should use to make more use of the app. It should contain gold for the power users. The "basics" should be so obvious that no help would ever be needed. If that's not the case, I think, you've failed as a developer on the iPhone platform.
(Here's a screen shot from my demo app)
I'm currently creating a fairly complicated app. I'm thinking of doing help as a semi-transparent overlay - help in text form is hard to swallow for users; it's much more helpful to just point at stuff and say "this does that".