I have a problem with creating default value of 'All values' for a cascading parameter group last parameter. Actually I don't neccesary need that value to be default, but that would be preferable.
I have tried where I create additional data set with the needed value and additional data set with value All which uses different scripted data source, and another data set with computed column with full outer join, that column uses this code
if(row["userName"]==null ){
row["All"];
}else{
row["userName"];
}
and in the last cascaded parameter JDSuser which I need that All value I have added default value (All users).
In the data set with one value All in open I have script
ii=0;
in fetch
if( ii > 0 ){
return false;
}else{
row["All"] = "(All Users)";
ii++
return true;
}
and in the query data set, in beforeOpen script in if statement I have
if( params["JDSuser"].value!=null && params["JDSuser"].value[0] != "(All Users)" ){
This is used if I haven't selected All users value, and this works, though if I select All Users, it retrieves me no data.
I'm creating from this source example actuate link for example rptdesign download
If someone could give me some help, I would be very grateful.
The way you generate "(All values)" item in your selection list seems to me over complicated but if i understood correctly your case this part is working fine, the problem is not in the definition of the cascading parameter but the way it is used in the main dataset of the report.
Furthermore we have to assume we speak about the same query & beforeOpen script involved in this topic. No data are returned because if we don't do anything special when this item "All values" has been selected, then those filters are still active:
and role.name in ( 'sample grupa' )
and userbase.userName in ( 'sample' )
There are a couple of options to handle this. An elegant one is to declare a dataset parameter linked to your report parameter "JDSuser", and use a clause "OR" such:
and role.name in ( 'sample grupa' )
and (?='(All users)' OR userbase.userName in ( 'sample' ))
Notice this question mark, which represents a dataset parameter in your query. It is not intrusive: the beforeOpen script doesn't have to be changed. You probably need to do something similar with the other filter role.name, but you don't provide any information related to this. One more thing, in order to avoid bad surpises may be you should choose as value something more simple without brackets such "_allitems", and set "(All items)" as label.
Please refer to this topic for more informations about handling optional parameters. See a live example of optional parameters in a cascading group here.
Related
In FileMaker Pro, when using number field, the user can choose to use a thousand separator or not. For example, if I have a database with a field for the price of an item, the user can either enter 1,000 or 1000.
I am using my database to generate an XML file that needs to be uploaded. The thing is, that my XML scheme dictates that only a value of 1000 is allowed and not 1,000. Therefore, I want to either automatically remove the comma, or (my preference in this case) alert the user when trying to enter a value with a thousand separator.
What I tried is the following.
For the field, I am setting Validation options. For example:
Require Strict data type: Numeric Only
Validated by calculation: Position ( Self ; ","; 1 ; 1 ) = 0
Validated by calculation: Self = Substitue ( Self, ",", "")
Auto-enter calculation: Filter( Self ; "0123456789." )
Unfortunately, none of these work. As the field is defined as a number (and I want to keep it like this, as I am also performing calculations based on this number), the Position function and the Substitute function apparently ignore the thousand separator!
EDIT:
Note that I am generating my XML by concatenating a string, for example:
"<Products><Product><Name>" & Name & "</Name><Price>" & Price & "</Price></Product></Product>"
The reason is that what I am exporting is dependent on the values in my database. Therefore, I am not using the [File][Export records...] function.
Auto-enter calculation will work, but you need to uncheck the box "Do not replace existing value of field" (which is checked by default).
I'd suggest using the calculation GetAsNumber(self) as the auto-enter calc. If it should only contain integers, wrap that in a call to Int()
I am using my database to generate an XML file that needs to be uploaded. The thing is, that my XML scheme dictates that only a value of 1000 is allowed and not 1,000.
If this is only a problem when you export, why not handle it when exporting?
If you are exporting as XML using XSLT, you can add an instruction to
your stylesheet to remove the comma from all number fields;
Alternatively, you can export from a layout where the field is
formatted to display without the comma and select the Apply current's layout data formatting to exported data option when
exporting.
Added:
Perhaps I should have clarified. I am not using the export function to generate the XML as there is some logic involved in how the XML should be formatted (dependent on the data that I want to export). What I do instead is that I make a string where I combine XML-tags and actual values from the database.
IMHO, you're making a mistake by not taking advantage of the built-in XML/XSLT export option. Any imaginable logic can be implemented this way, without burdening your solution with the fragile task of creating a valid XML.
In any case, if you're using the field in a calculation, you can replace all references to it with:
GetAsNumber (YourField )
to get an unformatted, numeric-only, value.
Your question puzzles me. As far as I know, FileMaker does not store the thousands separator, but rather offers it only as a display option.
That's also why those functions can't find it.
Are you sure you are exporting the raw data and not a "formatted as layout" variant?
Drools 5.4
I have a decision table that sets values in the BlueReport object based on Channel Name attribute. Everything works, except if a Channel name contains an unknown channel for which we don't have mappings, we need to set the values to indicate this condition. The picture below should illustrate this more clearly, I'm sure. Here is what we want:
How can we achieve the "ALL OTHERS" default condition?!
I've evolved my spreadsheet rules to this now:
In this version of DT above, I have left B15 blank, and then I have added a new condition on C15 which checks the auditRule field for presence of string variable "DIV". I don't know if I have the right syntax for it in C9?! The ruleAudit field is update everytime there is a match for Channel Name (F11 - F15). Therefore, absence of DIV rule name, would indicate that there is no match to any of the patterns on B11 - B14. What do you think?!
Add a new condition column again with declaration for blueReport and set this condition
channel_name!=$1 || channel_name!=$2 ||channel_name!=$3 || channel_name!=$4
New Condition's value field must be empty for the first four records except these values like ChannelName1,ChannelName2,ChannelName3,ChannelName4 in "ALL OTHERS" row. Though this isn't the standard solution try this workaround to check
I think the post can help you. It means you should not only declare sequential in the RuleSet, but also declare PRIORITY in RuleTable that the rules will be called according to the value of PRIORITY.
I have built a function to query data. I currently want to add another parameter to my function.
When the parameter is "ALL" it should display all data, else only the data that was queried.
if (p_agent = 'ALL') then
The above is what I have so far, I'm not sure what to do next to specify the ELSE statement. I am dealing with varchar/strings for that parameter.
the parameter is linked to this column:
bor.also_known_as
Link to CODE:
http://pastebin.com/h16BByfj
Thanks in advance
Hoping someone can tell me what is wrong with this BIRT report. I am trying to use a nested scripted data set, where the outer data set passes data to the inner data set through a report variable.
I find that the report isn't acting as I thought it would. It seems as though the report variable is outputting the last value it has for every row. For the below report I am seeing output such as:
key0
value[9][0]
value[9][1]
value[9][2]
value[9][3]
value[9][4]
key1
value[9][0]
value[9][1]
value[9][2]
value[9][3]
value[9][4]
....
key9
value[9][0]
value[9][1]
value[9][2]
value[9][3]
value[9][4]
Whereas I would expect to see this:
key0
value[0][0]
value[0][1]
value[0][2]
value[0][3]
value[0][4]
key1
value[1][0]
value[1][1]
value[1][2]
value[1][3]
value[1][4]
....
key9
value[9][0]
value[9][1]
value[9][2]
value[9][3]
value[9][4]
My (fully self contained) example report is here: click to see report xml in pastebin.
The key idea is that in the outer data set's fetch, I set the report variable:
vars["values"] = value;
And the inner data set's fetch will grab it:
values = vars["values"].iterator();
and the inner data set's fetch will take data from the report variable:
row["value"] = values.next();
You should be able to use dataSet parameters, to do this. In your example, you'd set up an output parameter in the outer data set's dataset editor. You'd set the value of this parameter to be your values you're passing to the other dataSet.
In the inner dataSet, you'd create an input parameter to take the values. In your layout, you'd need to refresh the bindings on the outer list, so that the output parameter is a binding. Then, you'd go to the binding tab, for the inner list, and choose to pass the outer list's output parameter binding to your input parameter.
Hope this helps.
I have a SSRS "statement" type report that has general layout of text boxes and tables. For the main text box I want to let the user supply the value as a parameter so the text can be customized, i.e.
Parameters!MainText.Value = "Dear Mr.Doe, Here is your statement."
then I can set the text box value to be the value of the parameter:
=Parameters!MainText.Value
However, I need to be able to allow the incoming parameter value to include a dataset field, like so:
Parameters!MainText.Value = "Dear Mr.Doe, Here is your [Fields!RunDate.Value] statement"
so that my report output would look like:
"Dear Mr.Doe, Here is your November statement."
I know that you can define it to do this in the text box by supplying the static text and the field request, but I need SSRS to recognize that inside the parameter string there is a field request that needs to be escaped and bound.
Does anyone have any ideas for this? I am using SSRS 2008R2
Have you tried concatenating?
Parameters!MainText.Value = "Dear Mr.Doe, Here is your" & [Fields!RunDate.Value] & "statement"
There are a few dramatically different approaches. To know which is best for you will require more information:
Embedded code in the report. Probably the quickest to
implement would be embedded code in the report that returned the
parameter, but called String.Replace() appropriately to substitute
in dynamic values. You'll need to establish some code for the user for which strings will be replaced. Embedded code will get you access to many objects in the report. For example:
Public Function TestGlobals(ByVal s As String) As String
Return Report.Globals.ExecutionTime.ToString
End Function
will return the execution time. Other methods of accessing parameters for the report are shown here.
1.5 If this function is getting very large, look at using a custom assembly. Then you can have a better authoring experience with Visual Studio
Modify the XML. Depending on where you use
this, you could directly modify the .rdl/.rdlc XML.
Consider other tools, such as ReportBuilder. IF you need to give the user
more flexibility over report authoring, there are many tools built
specifically for this purpose, such as SSRS's Report Builder.
Here's another approach: Display the parameter string with the dataset value already filled in.
To do so: create a parameter named RunDate for example and set Default value to "get values from a query" and select the first dataset and value field (RunDate). Now the parameter will hold the RunDate field and you can use it elsewhere. Make this parameter hidden or internal and set the correct data type. e.g. Date/Time so you can format its value later.
Now create the second parameter which will hold the default text you want:
Parameters!MainText.Value = "Dear Mr.Doe, Here is your [Parameters!RunDate.Value] statement"
Not sure if this syntax works but you get the idea. You can also do formatting here e.g. only the month of a Datetime:
="Dear Mr.Doe, Here is your " & Format(Parameters!RunDate.Value, "MMMM") & " statement"
This approach uses only built-in methods and avoids the need for a parser so the user doesn't have to learn the syntax for it.
There is of course one drawback: the user has complete control over the parameter contents and can supply a value that doesn't match the report content - but that is also the case with the String Replace method.
And just for the sake of completeness there's also the simplistic option: append multiple parameters: create 2 parameters named MainTextBeforeRunDate and MainTextAfterRunDate.
The Textbox value expression becomes:
=Parameters!MainTextBeforeRunDate.Value & Fields!RunDate.Value & Parameters!MainTextAfterRunDate.Value.
This should explain itself. The simplest solution is often the best, but in this case I have my doubts. At least this makes sure your RunDate ends up in the final report text.