Is there some reason (maybe a setting) that Google Cloud SQL fails to escape "Order" when using back ticks, but does work on other reserved words?
In one instance of Google Cloud SQL, the following command is successful:
CREATE TABLE `Order`
(
Test CHAR(1) NULL
);
In a different instance, recently created under a new App Engine, I get the following error:
Error Code: 1005. Can't create table 'roms.Order' (errno: 150)
However, in the same instance, escaping "ORDER" or "order" does work to create table.
Thanks for any suggestions.
After I dropped and recreated the database, I was able to create the Order table.
The very first time I tried to create the Order table, there was failure (I believe a connection error). I am thinking the table was partially created and not rollback back properly after the failure. Causing any subsequent creation attempts to fail.
The table was never shown the schema and drop table did not work.
Related
We installed Superset in our development environment and trying to display data in reports format. Reports will be generated form DB2 Database. I am able to access reports properly and i can execute select statements without any issues.
Along with reports, we need to create few tables also. So we created a user with necessary permissions. When I tried to create a table from Superset I am getting the following error message. Same query is working fine from DBeaver (where I connected to the same database with same user name).
Any suggestions/ideas on what I can try?
db2 error:
ibm_db_dbi::ProgrammingError: The last call to execute did not produce
any result set.
Query: MSACCESS is the schema where I am creating MMR1 Table
CREATE TABLE MSACCESS.MMR1(
zip_code VARCHAR(6)
);
Below statement should create a table . Userid has necessary permissions
CREATE TABLE MSACCESS.MMR1(
zip_code VARCHAR(6)
);
So I have been altering a table in QMF. After 3 alters I believe the table has gone into a pending reorg state so that I cannot alter it additionally. Am I correct in this assumption? If so what implications does this have and to get around it can I simply reorganize the table and continue altering it? If so, what does the syntax look like for reorganizing a table? I tried
REORG TABLE PIDJBIP.TABLE_NAME_T
and receive the error:
an unexpected token "PIDJBIP" was found following "REORG TABLE".
Expected tokens may include: "JOIN". SQL state = 42601.
I haven't gotten much help out of the IBM pages regarding this subject.
REORG is not an SQL statement, so it cannot be issued using a SQL interface (such as QMF). You will need to run it using the DB2 Command Line Processor.
Alternatively, you might use the administrative stored procedure, which you could call via QMF:
call sysproc.admin_cmd('reorg table PIDJBIP.TABLE_NAME_T')
In SQL Server 2005, I built a trigger that contains a SQL statement that unpivot's some data. Somewhat similar to the following simple example: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/cdc1b/1/0. Let's say that the table the trigger is built on is "table1" and it's set run after updates.
Within SSMS whenever I update "table1" everything works fine. Unfortunately, whenever I update "table1" in a proprietary application (which I don't have the source code to), it fails with the message "The type of column conflit with the type of other columns specified in the UNPIVOT list".
After doing a bit of searching I added COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT to my cast's in the view without any luck. It was a bit of a long shot because the collation all matched whenever I queried INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS.
I then changed the casts from VARCHAR to CHAR and it worked without issue. For obvious reasons, I'd rather use VARCHAR. What is different between a SSMS and application connection? I assume the application isn't using a connection property that SSMS uses.
PS: The database is a bit funky because it does not use NULLs and uses CHAR instead of VARCHAR.
I have two tables that have a column named id_user in common. These two tables are created in my Drupal webpage at some point (that I don't know because I didn't created the Netbeans project).
I checked on the internet and found that probably by adding REFERENCES 1sttable (id_user) to the second table, it should copy the value of the 1sttable (that is always created when a new user arrives) to the id_user value of the 2ndtable (that I don't know at which point is created). Is it correct?
If it's not correct I would like to know a way in pgAdmin that could make me synchronize those tables, or at least create both of them in the same moment.
The problem I have is that the new user has a new row on 1sttable automatically as soon as he registers, while to get a new row on 2ndtable it needs some kind of "activation" like inserting all of the data. What I'm looking for is a way that as soon as there is a new row in the 1sttable, it automatically creates the new row on the other table too. I don't know how to make it more clear (English is not my native language).
The solution you gave me seems clear for the question, but the problem is a little bigger: the two tables presents different kinds of variables, and it should be that they are, one in mySQL, with the user data (drupal default for users), then i have 2 in postgresql, both with the same primary key (id_user):
the first has 118 columns, most of them real integer;
the second has 50 columns, with mixed types.
the web application i'm using needs both this column with all the values NOT EMPTY (otherwise i get a NullPointerException) to work, so what i'm searching for is (i think):
when the user register -inserting his email- in drupal, automatically it creates the two fulfilled columns, to make the web automatically works as soon as the email is stored in mysql. Is it possible? Is it well explained?
My environment is:
windows server 2008 enterprise edition
glassfish 2.1
netbeans 6.7.1
drupal 6.17
postgresql 8.4
mysql 5.1.48
pgAdmin is just the GUI. You mean PostgreSQL, the RDBMS.
A foreign key constraint, like you have only enforces that no value can be used, that isn't present in the referenced column. You can use ON UPDATE CASCADE or ON DELETE CASCADE to propagate changes from the referenced column, but you cannot create new rows with it like you describe. You got the wrong tool.
What you describe could be achieved with a trigger. Another, more complex way would be a RULE. Go with a trigger here.
In PostgreSQL you need a trigger function, mostly using plpgsql, and a trigger on a table that makes use of it.
Something like:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION trg_insert_row_in_tbl2()
RETURNS trigger AS
$func$
BEGIN
INSERT INTO tbl2 (my_id, col1)
VALUES (NEW.my_id, NEW.col1) -- more columns?
RETURN NEW; -- doesn't matter much for AFTER trigger
END
$func$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
And a trigger AFTER INSERT on tbl1:
CREATE TRIGGER insaft
AFTER INSERT ON tbl1
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE trg_insert_row_in_tbl2();
You might want to read about using Drupal hooks to add extra code to be run when a user is registered. Once you know how to use hooks, you can write code (in a module) to insert a corresponding record in the 2nd table. A good candidate hook to use here would be hook_user for Drupal 6 or hook_user_insert for Drupal 7.
The REFERENCES you read about is part of an SQL command to define a foreign key constraint from the second table to the first. This is not strictly necessary to solve your problem, but it can help in keeping your database consistent. I suggest you read up on database structures and constraints if you want to learn more on this topic.
I have executed the following create statement using SQLWorkbench at my target postgresql database:
CREATE TABLE Config (
id serial PRIMARY KEY,
pub_ip_range_low varchar(100),
pub_ip_range_high varchar(100)
);
Right after table creation I request the table content by typing 'select * from config;' and see that table could be retrieved. Nevertheless, my java program that uses JDBC type 4 driver cannot access the table when I issue the same select statement in it. An exception is thrown when the program tries to access it which says says "Undefined relation" for the config table.
My questions are:
Why sqlworkbench where I had previously run the create statement recognizes the table while my java program cannot find it?
Where does the postgressql DBMS puts the tables I created? I don't see them neither in public nor in information schema.
NOTE:
I checked target postgres database and cannot see the table Config anywhere although SQL workbench can query it. Then I opened another SQL workbench instance and noticed that the table cannot be queried (i.e. not found). So, my conclusion is that PostgreSQL puts the table I created in the first running SQLBench instance into some location that is bound to that session. Another SQL Workbench instance or my java program is not bound to session, so cannot query the previously created table config.
The only "bloody location" that is session-local in PostgreSQL is the schema pg_temp, in other words: temporary tables. But your CREATE command does not display the keyword TEMP[ORARY]. Of course, as long as the transaction is not commited, nobody sees anything outside the transaction.
It's more likely you are seeing a switcheroo of hosts / databases / ports / or the schema search_path. A mixup with the mixed-case table name is a hot candidate, too. If you don't double-quote "Config", the table ends up all lower case in the system, so: config. If you later double quote the name, it won't match. The manual has the details.
Maybe the create failed on the extra trailing comma?
CREATE TABLE config (
id serial PRIMARY KEY,
pub_ip_range_low varchar(100),
pub_ip_range_high varchar(100) -- >> ,
);