I'm trying to identify the Parent Id for a list item.
I'm making the following call;
https://{sitecollection}/{personal_site}/_api/Web/Lists(guid'blabla')/Items(blabla)?$select=ParentUniqueId
But it is giving me the following error;
{
"error": {
"code": "-1, Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException",
"message": {
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "The field or property 'ParentUniqueId' does not exist."
}
}
}
The same issue is with "ParentLeafName" and some others.
However, when I get the /fields (meta of fields for a list) for this list, it mentions this field along with others, which means I'm doing the right call as I'm successfully getting other fields like
https://{sitecollection}/{personal_site}/_api/Web/Lists(guid'blabla')/Items(blabla)?$select=ServerUrl
Result
{
"d": {
"__metadata": {
"id": "blabla",
"uri": "blabla",
"etag": "\"10\"",
"type": "SP.Data.DocumentsItem"
},
"ServerUrl": "/personal/{site}/{filepath}"
}
}
One thing I have noticed though, that these fields are case sensitive, that is, if i write "serverurl" it gives me the same error. Is this a case issue with "ParentUniqueId" field?
Unfortunately ListItem resource in SharePoint 2013 REST interface does not expose ParentUniqueId property.
But you could use the following query to return ParentUniqueId property for ListItem:
/_api/Web/Lists/getByTitle('<list title>')/items(<item id>)/FieldValuesAsText?$select=ParentUniqueId
References
Lists and list items REST API reference
Related
I have an entity stored in the backend which translates to the json format as,
{
"id": 123,
"name": "test",
"key": "test1",
"description": "",
"models": [
{
content
},
{
content
}
]
}
So when i want to retrieve the list of elements using the api
GET /elements
Should i return the elements metadata only(id, name, descriptions) or should also include the content(models[])?
Normally
GET /elements
would return a list of complete entities.
You could add another endpoint:
GET /elements/meta or GET /elements?mode=meta
which would return a List of the metadata only.
I would like to create custom attribute list of list of objects in Infobip by API.
I have try to sent POST but in doesn't work.
Can you give me please the example of POST request to create the list of the list.
Thx!
Off Doc: https://www.infobip.com/docs/api#customer-engagement/people/create-a-custom-attribute
Request examples:
1.{
"name": "payrollData",
"dataType": "LIST_OF_OBJECTS",
"objectSchema": {
"DATE": "DATE",
"Transactions": "LIST_OF_OBJECTS"
}
}
2.{
"name": "payrollData",
"dataType": "LIST_OF_OBJECTS",
"objectSchema": {
"DATE": "DATE",
"Transactions":{
"Input": "DECIMAL",
"Output": "DECIMAL"
}
}
}
Responses:
1.{
"errorCode": 40001,
"errorMessage": "Bad Request",
"validationErrors": [
{
"code": 501,
"message": "Custom attribute schema is invalid.",
"propertyPath": "valueSchema"
}
]
}
2.{
"requestError": {
"serviceException": {
"messageId": "BAD_REQUEST",
"text": "Bad request"
}
}
}
At this point is not possible to achieve what you are trying via using Infobip API.
The functionality for creating custom attributes is limited only to top layer and does not support nesting of the list objects.
The team in charge will include that explanation in API docs description. But, there are no plans on including additional complexity layers on this endpoint in the short future.
So generally, you can use LIST_OF_OBJECTS as described on the endpoint URL you also linked to. But you are not able to layer it furthermore.
Valid example for LIST_OF_OBJECTS usage:
{
"name": "ShoppingCartList",
"dataType": "LIST_OF_OBJECTS",
"objectSchema": {
"productName": "STRING",
"productPrice": "DECIMAL",
"productCategory": "STRING",
"productImage": "STRING"
}
}
I know it does not resolve your issue as you would have hoped for, but it is a correct answer. :)
I have a GraphQL query that calls a REST service to get the return object. The query contains an Id parameter that is then passed to the service. However, the REST service can respond with http status 404 Not Found if an object with that Id does not exist. That seems like the right response.
How do you model a Not Found response in GraphQL?
Is there a way to inform the GQL caller that something does not exist?
Update
Some options I am considering:
Return null
Change the GrqlhQL Query to return a list of objects and return empty list of nothing is found
Return some kind of error object with an error code
but it is unclear if there is a recommended practice in GQL API design.
You might treat it as an error and handle it accordingly.
I recommend you to check the GraphQL spec, the paragraph about error handling.
I hope it contains exactly what you are looking for.
Basically, you should return whatever you could, and inform a client about potential problems in the "errors" field.
The example from the documentation:
Request:
{
hero(episode: $episode) {
name
heroFriends: friends {
id
name
}
}
}
Response:
{
"errors": [
{
"message": "Name for character with ID 1002 could not be fetched.",
"locations": [ { "line": 6, "column": 7 } ],
"path": [ "hero", "heroFriends", 1, "name" ]
}
],
"data": {
"hero": {
"name": "R2-D2",
"heroFriends": [
{
"id": "1000",
"name": "Luke Skywalker"
},
{
"id": "1002",
"name": null
},
{
"id": "1003",
"name": "Leia Organa"
}
]
}
}
}
I'm trying to validate that the data I am returned it sensible. Validating data types is done. Now I want to validate that I've received all of the data needed to perform a task.
Here's a representative example:
{
"things": [
{
"id": "00fb60c7-520e-4228-96c7-13a1f7a82749",
"name": "Thing 1",
"url": "https://lolagons.com"
},
{
"id": "709b85a3-98be-4c02-85a5-e3f007ce4bbf",
"name": "Thing 2",
"url": "https://lolfacts.com"
}
],
"layouts": {
"sections": [
{
"id": "34f10988-bb3d-4c38-86ce-ed819cb6daee",
"name": "Section 1",
"content:" [
{
"type": 2,
"id": "00fb60c7-520e-4228-96c7-13a1f7a82749" //Ref to Thing 1
}
]
}
]
}
}
So every Section references 0+ Things, and I want to validate that every id value returned in the Content of Sections also exists as an id in Things.
The docs for Object.assert(..) implies that I need a concrete reference. Even if I do the validation within the Object.keys or Array.items, I can't resolve the reference at the other end.
Not that it matters, but my context is that I'm validating HTTP responses within IcedFrisby, a Frisby.js fork.
This wasn't really solveable in the way I asked (i.e. with Joi).
I solved this for my context by writing a plugin for icedfrisby (published on npm here) which uses jsonpath to fetch each id in Content and each id in Things. The plugin will then assert that all of the first set exist within the second.
I'm trying to create a report definition using the GoodData REST API. I use the following endpoint to invoke the rest call.
"/gdc/md/{project-id}/obj"
When i try to invoke the API call with the following dataset in which the projectId and the userId are valid, it gives me the error with the response code 500.
{
"reportDefinition": {
"content": {
"filters": [],
"format": "grid",
"grid": {
"rows": [],
"columns": [
"metricGroup"
],
"sort": {
"columns": [],
"rows": []
},
"columnWidths": [],
"metrics": [
{
"uri": "/gdc/md/qy48iv4flikdlcwpwioizuip74wt8nb5/obj/63f3cecd2a8d3ce2ec9378381c8f39e3",
"alias": ""
}
]
}
},
"meta": {
"title": "Sample report definition",
"summary": "This is a sample report",
"tags": "",
"deprecated": 0,
"category": "samplecategory"
}
}
}
{
"error": {
"message": "Internal server error. Please fill in bug report with request_id='lp78FL5S1IPMqB2n'"
}
}
I'm certain that the user project_id and the user_id are valid. Is this an error in the API?
Thank you in advance.
Apart from the metrics URI that looks weird (hash instead of numeric ID), I was able to dig in our logs an error that says: "Category is not equal to tag structure".
In your example you have its value set to "samplecategory". "category" property defines what type of object are you creating. If you are creating a report definition it should have value of "reportDefinition".
Last time I worked with GoodData API, metrics had numeric IDs. That seems most likely to be the culprit. Where did you get "/gdc/md/qy48iv4flikdlcwpwioizuip74wt8nb5/obj/63f3cecd2a8d3ce2ec9378381c8f39e3" from, especially the "63f3cecd2a8d3ce2ec9378381c8f39e3" part?