We are storing some serialized objects in an Xml-column in Sql Server.
I would like to create a query that gives me the list of serialized objects (rows) where a specific field has a specific value.
My Xml looks like this:
<MessageContainer xmlns="http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/D3A.Messages" xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:z="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/" z:Id="1" z:Type="D3A.Messages.MessageContainer" z:Assembly="D3A.Messages, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null">
<Messages xmlns:a="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays" z:Id="2" z:Type="System.Collections.Generic.List`1[[D3A.Messages.IMessage, D3A.Messages, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null]]" z:Assembly="0">
<a:_items z:Id="3" z:Size="512">
<a:anyType z:Id="4" z:Type="D3A.Messages.MessageAlarmLog" z:Assembly="D3A.Messages, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null">
<_x003C_Id_x003E_k__BackingField>00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000</_x003C_Id_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_StorageOperation_x003E_k__BackingField>Create</_x003C_StorageOperation_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_Comment_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="5" />
<_x003C_ErrorCodeTranslation_x003E_k__BackingField>Ok</_x003C_ErrorCodeTranslation_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_ErrorCode_x003E_k__BackingField>0</_x003C_ErrorCode_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_GroupType_x003E_k__BackingField>System</_x003C_GroupType_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_LogType_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="6">1</_x003C_LogType_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_Parameter_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="7">Timed out.</_x003C_Parameter_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_TimeStampOff_x003E_k__BackingField i:nil="true" />
<_x003C_TimeStamp_x003E_k__BackingField>2014-05-10T03:10:04Z</_x003C_TimeStamp_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_Unit_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="8">100001</_x003C_Unit_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_UserName_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="9">e2_fælles</_x003C_UserName_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_Value_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="10">50101</_x003C_Value_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_WindFarm_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="11">HR2</_x003C_WindFarm_x003E_k__BackingField>
</a:anyType>
<a:anyType z:Id="12" z:Type="D3A.Messages.MessageAlarmLog" z:Assembly="D3A.Messages, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null">
<_x003C_Id_x003E_k__BackingField>00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000</_x003C_Id_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_StorageOperation_x003E_k__BackingField>Create</_x003C_StorageOperation_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_Comment_x003E_k__BackingField z:Ref="5" i:nil="true" />
<_x003C_ErrorCodeTranslation_x003E_k__BackingField>Ok</_x003C_ErrorCodeTranslation_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_ErrorCode_x003E_k__BackingField>0</_x003C_ErrorCode_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_GroupType_x003E_k__BackingField>System</_x003C_GroupType_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_LogType_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="13">1</_x003C_LogType_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_Parameter_x003E_k__BackingField z:Ref="5" i:nil="true" />
<_x003C_TimeStampOff_x003E_k__BackingField i:nil="true" />
<_x003C_TimeStamp_x003E_k__BackingField>2014-05-10T03:10:09Z</_x003C_TimeStamp_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_Unit_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="14">100001</_x003C_Unit_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_UserName_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="15">e2_fælles</_x003C_UserName_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_Value_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="16">50100</_x003C_Value_x003E_k__BackingField>
<_x003C_WindFarm_x003E_k__BackingField z:Ref="11" i:nil="true" />
</a:anyType>
</a:_items>
</Messages>
</MessageContainer>
I am particularly interested in those Xml-chunks that have a specific value in the Xml-field called _x003C_Unit_x003E_k__BackingField. There may be many <a:anytype>-fragments, and I am interested in a result with the complete <MessagesContainer>-fragments with at least one <a:anyType> matching my criteria.
Can you help here? I cannot seem to get the namespace declarations in place in the query.
Thank you :-)
In the query below, replace "100001" with the required value. You can use sql:variable() to make this value dynamic if required.
select #x.query('
declare namespace d3a="http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/D3A.Messages";
declare namespace a="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays";
/d3a:MessageContainer[
d3a:Messages[
a:_items[
a:anyType[d3a:_x003C_Unit_x003E_k__BackingField/text() = "100001"]
]
]
]'
);
See this article for more details on how to handle namespaces in XQuery.
Related
I load this DMN file (dmnFile):
<definitions name="MyDecision" id="def_12f8a48f-3978-0e29-4251-a66b6e6459bc"
xmlns:ns="http://sample.dmn" namespace="http://sample.dmn"
xmlns:feel="http://www.omg.org/spec/FEEL/20140401" exporter="ex" exporterVersion="12"
xmlns="http://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/20180521/MODEL/">
<itemDefinition name="MyItemDefinition" id="_850f24d9-57a3-131f-2194-ca15bb049a7a">
<itemComponent name="myNumber" id="_29d92e98-3c97-67a3-22f1-d342622424f7">
<typeRef>NumberDefinition</typeRef>
</itemComponent>
</itemDefinition>
<itemDefinition name="NumberDefinition" id="_e6972775-7973-b755-8714-9eff9d61e48e">
<typeRef>number</typeRef>
</itemDefinition>
<inputData name="MyInput" id="_d6395e05-d35c-d667-f227-398d93a97759">
<variable name="MyInput" id="_121ab3bc-b4e2-a6bb-51be-ef8fcc6623a6" typeRef="MyItemDefinition" />
</inputData>
<decision name="MyDecision" id="_12f8a48f-3978-0e29-4251-a66b6e6459bc">
<variable name="MyDecision" id="_098e9619-fa0c-3796-b3da-c4d018a79009" typeRef="boolean" />
<informationRequirement>
<requiredInput href="#_d6395e05-d35c-d667-f227-398d93a97759" />
</informationRequirement>
<context id="_6dcdac84-b03f-badd-a2d7-78c668ece883">
<contextEntry>
<variable name="containsMyNumber" id="_f6078cbe-54e6-d682-b3b7-8ffc638e4846" typeRef="boolean" />
<literalExpression id="_a022013e-4f0c-cfb3-1792-673a9e69be33">
<text>if list contains([0,1,2,3], MyInput.myNumber) then true else false</text>
</literalExpression>
</contextEntry>
<contextEntry>
<literalExpression id="_19c3853c-c63b-a8ac-0608-639ea685f321">
<text>containsMyNumber</text>
</literalExpression>
</contextEntry>
</context>
</decision>
</definitions>
like this:
KieServices ks = KieServices.Factory.get();
KieContainer kieContainer = KieHelper.getKieContainer(ks.newReleaseId("org.kie", "dmn-test-" + UUID.randomUUID(), "1.2"), ks.getResources().newFileSystemResource(dmnFile));
and I get an exception with the following error message:
[Message [id=1, kieBase=defaultKieBase, level=ERROR, path=C:/Users/AppData/Local/Temp/tmpBA10.tmp.dmn, line=4, column=-1
text=DMN: Unable to resolve type reference '{http://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/20180521/MODEL/}NumberDefinition' on node 'MyItemDefinition' (resource: C:/Users/AppData/Local/Temp/tmpBA10.tmp.dmn, DMN id: _29d92e98-3c97-67a3-22f1-d342622424f7, The listed type definition was not found) ]]
Type reference with prefix ("ns:NumberDefinition") results in the following error message:
[Message [id=1, kieBase=defaultKieBase, level=ERROR, path=C:/Users/AppData/Local/Temp/tmpBA10.tmp.dmn, line=4, column=-1
text=DMN: Unable to resolve type reference '{http://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/20180521/MODEL/}ns:NumberDefinition' on node 'MyItemDefinition' (resource: C:/Users/AppData/Local/Temp/tmpBA10.tmp.dmn, DMN id: _29d92e98-3c97-67a3-22f1-d342622424f7, The listed type definition was not found) ]]
What do I do wrong?
When using DMN 1.1 (xmlns="http://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/20151101/dmn.xsd") and type references as QNames (with prefixes) I get the expected result.
Since DMNv1.2, the idiomatic way to reference is ns.<itemDef>.
In your original DMN xml file this happens on line 7 and 14.
In summary the file in the idiomatic DMNv1.2 form should be:
<definitions name="MyDecision" id="def_12f8a48f-3978-0e29-4251-a66b6e6459bc"
xmlns:ns="http://sample.dmn" namespace="http://sample.dmn"
xmlns:feel="http://www.omg.org/spec/FEEL/20140401" exporter="ex" exporterVersion="12"
xmlns="http://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/20180521/MODEL/">
<itemDefinition name="MyItemDefinition" id="_850f24d9-57a3-131f-2194-ca15bb049a7a">
<itemComponent name="myNumber" id="_29d92e98-3c97-67a3-22f1-d342622424f7">
<typeRef>ns.NumberDefinition</typeRef>
</itemComponent>
</itemDefinition>
<itemDefinition name="NumberDefinition" id="_e6972775-7973-b755-8714-9eff9d61e48e">
<typeRef>number</typeRef>
</itemDefinition>
<inputData name="MyInput" id="_d6395e05-d35c-d667-f227-398d93a97759">
<variable name="MyInput" id="_121ab3bc-b4e2-a6bb-51be-ef8fcc6623a6" typeRef="ns.MyItemDefinition" />
</inputData>
<decision name="MyDecision" id="_12f8a48f-3978-0e29-4251-a66b6e6459bc">
<variable name="MyDecision" id="_098e9619-fa0c-3796-b3da-c4d018a79009" typeRef="boolean" />
<informationRequirement>
<requiredInput href="#_d6395e05-d35c-d667-f227-398d93a97759" />
</informationRequirement>
<context id="_6dcdac84-b03f-badd-a2d7-78c668ece883">
<contextEntry>
<variable name="containsMyNumber" id="_f6078cbe-54e6-d682-b3b7-8ffc638e4846" typeRef="boolean" />
<literalExpression id="_a022013e-4f0c-cfb3-1792-673a9e69be33">
<text>if list contains([0,1,2,3], MyInput.myNumber) then true else false</text>
</literalExpression>
</contextEntry>
<contextEntry>
<literalExpression id="_19c3853c-c63b-a8ac-0608-639ea685f321">
<text>containsMyNumber</text>
</literalExpression>
</contextEntry>
</context>
</decision>
</definitions>
That said, with your report we uncovered a bug when the DMN xml file is using the DMN namespace as the default namespace, which we are addressing with
DROOLS-4797.
Thank you for the report !
There is a way to avoid being forced to use ns.<itemDef> and simply use <itemDef>, and that is by setting the default namespace in the DMN xml to be the model's namespace, and just prefixing the DMN xml element with the namespace prefix targeting the DMN namespace.
In other words, the file can make use of <itemDef> reference without having to ns. prefix them:
<semantic:definitions name="MyDecision" id="def_12f8a48f-3978-0e29-4251-a66b6e6459bc"
xmlns="http://sample.dmn" namespace="http://sample.dmn"
xmlns:feel="http://www.omg.org/spec/FEEL/20140401" exporter="ex" exporterVersion="12"
xmlns:semantic="http://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/20180521/MODEL/">
<semantic:itemDefinition name="MyItemDefinition" id="_850f24d9-57a3-131f-2194-ca15bb049a7a">
<semantic:itemComponent name="myNumber" id="_29d92e98-3c97-67a3-22f1-d342622424f7">
<semantic:typeRef>NumberDefinition</semantic:typeRef>
</semantic:itemComponent>
</semantic:itemDefinition>
<semantic:itemDefinition name="NumberDefinition" id="_e6972775-7973-b755-8714-9eff9d61e48e">
<semantic:typeRef>number</semantic:typeRef>
</semantic:itemDefinition>
<semantic:inputData name="MyInput" id="_d6395e05-d35c-d667-f227-398d93a97759">
<semantic:variable name="MyInput" id="_121ab3bc-b4e2-a6bb-51be-ef8fcc6623a6" typeRef="MyItemDefinition" />
</semantic:inputData>
<semantic:decision name="MyDecision" id="_12f8a48f-3978-0e29-4251-a66b6e6459bc">
<semantic:variable name="MyDecision" id="_098e9619-fa0c-3796-b3da-c4d018a79009" typeRef="boolean" />
<semantic:informationRequirement>
<semantic:requiredInput href="#_d6395e05-d35c-d667-f227-398d93a97759" />
</semantic:informationRequirement>
<semantic:context id="_6dcdac84-b03f-badd-a2d7-78c668ece883">
<semantic:contextEntry>
<semantic:variable name="containsMyNumber" id="_f6078cbe-54e6-d682-b3b7-8ffc638e4846" typeRef="boolean" />
<semantic:literalExpression id="_a022013e-4f0c-cfb3-1792-673a9e69be33">
<semantic:text>if list contains([0,1,2,3], MyInput.myNumber) then true else false</semantic:text>
</semantic:literalExpression>
</semantic:contextEntry>
<semantic:contextEntry>
<semantic:literalExpression id="_19c3853c-c63b-a8ac-0608-639ea685f321">
<semantic:text>containsMyNumber</semantic:text>
</semantic:literalExpression>
</semantic:contextEntry>
</semantic:context>
</semantic:decision>
</semantic:definitions>
In this other variant, the default namespace in the xml is the DMN model's namespace, so any itemDef reference does not need any prefix.
Because the default namespace in the xml is the DMN model's namespace, the xml element need to be prefixed with the namespace prefix targeting now the DMN namespace.
Hope this clarifies and provide an insightful explanation!
I have an .Net MVC project with SSO working. The SSO config looks like this:
<system.identityModel>
<identityConfiguration saveBootstrapContext="true">
<caches>
<sessionSecurityTokenCache type="Vixion.IdentityModel.Cache.SharedSessionSecurityTokenCache, Vixion.IdentityModel.Cache">
<cacheServiceAddress url="http://tvwapps35434d.kpnis.nl:1008/SessionSecurityTokenCacheService.svc" />
</sessionSecurityTokenCache>
</caches>
<audienceUris>
<add value="http://localhost:24442/" />
</audienceUris>
<securityTokenHandlers>
<remove type="System.IdentityModel.Services.Tokens.MachineKeySessionSecurityTokenHandler, System.IdentityModel.Services, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" />
<add type="System.IdentityModel.Tokens.SessionSecurityTokenHandler, System.IdentityModel, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" />
<add type="System.IdentityModel.Tokens.Saml2SecurityTokenHandler, System.IdentityModel, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" />
</securityTokenHandlers>
<certificateValidation certificateValidationMode="None" />
<issuerNameRegistry type="System.IdentityModel.Tokens.ValidatingIssuerNameRegistry, System.IdentityModel.Tokens.ValidatingIssuerNameRegistry">
<authority name="http://vix-make-o:8080">
<keys>
<add thumbprint="5137c779a1e77a0f4a78abd356b0238912637469" />
</keys>
<validIssuers>
<add name="http://vix-make-o:8080" />
</validIssuers>
</authority>
</issuerNameRegistry>
</identityConfiguration>
</system.identityModel>
<system.identityModel.services>
<federationConfiguration>
<cookieHandler requireSsl="false" path="/" />
<wsFederation passiveRedirectEnabled="true" issuer="http://vix-make-o:8080" realm="http://localhost:24442/" requireHttps="false" reply="http://localhost:24442/" />
</federationConfiguration>
</system.identityModel.services>
According to the example here:
https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2/tree/master/Sustainsys.Saml2.AspNetCore2
I write this code in a new .NetCore app:
services.AddIdentity<IdentityUser, IdentityRole>()
.AddDefaultTokenProviders();
services.AddDistributedMemoryCache();
services.AddSession(options =>
{
options.Cookie.HttpOnly = true;
});
services.AddMvc()
.AddJsonOptions(options => options.SerializerSettings.ContractResolver = new DefaultContractResolver());
services.AddAuthentication()
.AddSaml2(options =>
{
options.SPOptions.EntityId = new EntityId("http://vix-make-o:8080");
options.IdentityProviders.Add(
new IdentityProvider(
new EntityId("http://vix-make-o:8080/ws_saml_metadata"), options.SPOptions)
{
//LoadMetadata = true
});
});
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseSession();
app.UseMvc(routes =>
{
routes.MapRoute(
name: "default",
template: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
});
When I start the app, the browser goes straight to the index page. No error, no nothing. When I check with SAML Chrome Panel it shows no traffic at all.
I do not expect my code working, but it should at least do something to give me a hint to how to go further.
Any suggestions are welcome.
Thank you.
S.
Remove the web.config content. It is not used with the ASP.NET Core module.
Set back the LoadMetadata flag, or add the necessary config manually.
Set Saml2 as the default challenge protocol for authentication.
Finally, add an [Authorize] attribute to your controllers that should require authentication to initiate the authentication process.
I'm trying to extend the modx modresource object, but keep getting errors & I can't seem to figure out why. It is related to the schema (I think) but everything looks correct.
Schema:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<model package="extresource" baseClass="xPDOObject" platform="mysql" defaultEngine="MyISAM" tablePrefix="modx_" version="1.0.0">
<object class="extResource" extends="modResource">
<composite alias="ResourceData" class="ResourceData" local="id" foreign="internalKey" cardinality="one" owner="local"/>
</object>
<object class="ResourceData" table="resource_data" extends="xPDOSimpleObject">
<field key="internalKey" dbtype="int" precision="11" phptype="integer" null="false" attributes="unsigned"/>
<field key="views" dbtype="int" precision="11" phptype="integer" null="true" />
<field key="starred" dbtype="int" precision="10" phptype="integer" null="false" />
<index alias="internalKey" name="internalKey" primary="false" unique="true" type="BTREE" >
<column key="internalKey" length="" collation="A" null="false" />
</index>
<aggregate alias="Resource" class="modResource" local="internalKey" foreign="id" cardinality="one" owner="foreign"/>
</object>
</model>
I'm testing it using:
$resource = $modx->getObject('modResource', 11112);
echo $resource->get('pagetitle'); //test I have the resource
$data = $resource->getOne('ResourceData');
The errors I get are:
Could not getOne: foreign key definition for alias ResourceData not
found. No foreign key definition for parentClass: modDocument using
relation alias: ResourceData
The table exists & has data, the package is registered in the modx extension packages. I've been over the schema many times & it looks right.
What is causing these errors?
You have to use the right object class in $modx->getObject. Otherwise you will get a modResource object, that does not know the extended object data and relationship.
$resource = $modx->getObject('extResource', 11112);
Does the resource you are loading have its class_key field set to extResource? That's needed for it to load the right resource object class.
I am trying to create a chart in MS CRM and I keep getting an error.
Unhandled Exception: System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[[Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk.OrganizationServiceFault, Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk, Version=7.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]]: SecLib::AccessCheckEx failed. Returned hr = -2147187962, ObjectID: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, OwnerId: e2e07c90-2105-e611-80f6-00155d293800, OwnerIdType: 8 and CallingUser: e2e07c90-2105-e611-80f6-00155d293800. ObjectTypeCode: 1112, objectBusinessUnitId: b4bd5fdf-2ccf-e311-80ca-00155d293800, AccessRights: CreateAccess Detail:
<OrganizationServiceFault xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/xrm/2011/Contracts">
<ErrorCode>-2147187962</ErrorCode>
<ErrorDetails xmlns:d2p1="http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/System.Collections.Generic" />
<Message>SecLib::AccessCheckEx failed. Returned hr = -2147187962, ObjectID: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, OwnerId: e2e07c90-2105-e611-80f6-00155d293800, OwnerIdType: 8 and CallingUser: e2e07c90-2105-e611-80f6-00155d293800. ObjectTypeCode: 1112, objectBusinessUnitId: b4bd5fdf-2ccf-e311-80ca-00155d293800, AccessRights: CreateAccess </Message>
<Timestamp>2016-08-08T06:05:22.5032353Z</Timestamp>
<InnerFault i:nil="true" />
<TraceText i:nil="true" />
</OrganizationServiceFault>
I understand this is a permissions error, but I can not find which permission to give.
ObjectTypeCode: 1112 is the user chart entity, and it looks like you are missing the CreateAccess right (e.g. create).
Its my first time setting up an OData Service and I'm of course having some problems...
The problem is that I can't get the service running, I keep getting an "Request Error".
I have researched on what the problem can be and I found that a common issue is that the access rules are incorrectly typed. So I have tried fixing this both with Singular names, Plural names and I have also tried with typeof(Post).getType().Name
Well here is my code. I hope you can help me, I've been stuck for hours.
public class ODataService : DataService<Entity>
{
// This method is called only once to initialize service-wide policies.
public static void InitializeService( DataServiceConfiguration config )
{
//config.SetEntitySetAccessRule( "Users", EntitySetRights.All );
//config.SetEntitySetAccessRule( "Posts", EntitySetRights.All );
//config.SetEntitySetAccessRule( "Albums", EntitySetRights.All );
config.SetEntitySetAccessRule( "*", EntitySetRights.AllRead );
config.SetServiceOperationAccessRule( "*", ServiceOperationRights.AllRead );
//config.SetServiceOperationAccessRule( "GetPosts", ServiceOperationRights.AllRead );
config.UseVerboseErrors = true;
config.DataServiceBehavior.MaxProtocolVersion = DataServiceProtocolVersion.V2;
}
[WebGet]
public IQueryable<Post> GetPosts()
{
return CurrentDataSource.Posts.AsQueryable();
}
}
The structure of my EntityFramework class (db first)
Methods and Members for Entity class. Here the entities are spelled in plural.
This is my Web.config:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!--
For more information on how to configure your ASP.NET application, please visit
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=169433
-->
<configuration>
<connectionStrings>
<add name="Entity" connectionString="metadata=res://*/;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="data source=XXX;Initial Catalog=XXX;persist security info=True;user id=XXX;password=XXX;MultipleActiveResultSets=True;App=EntityFramework"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
</connectionStrings>
<appSettings>
<add key="aspnet:UseTaskFriendlySynchronizationContext" value="true" />
<add key="ValidationSettings:UnobtrusiveValidationMode" value="WebForms" />
</appSettings>
<system.web>
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.5" />
<httpRuntime requestValidationMode="4.5" targetFramework="4.5" encoderType="System.Web.Security.AntiXss.AntiXssEncoder, System.Web, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" />
<pages controlRenderingCompatibilityVersion="4.5" />
<machineKey compatibilityMode="Framework45" />
</system.web>
<system.serviceModel>
<services>
<service name="LinkIT.Core.OData.ODataService" behaviorConfiguration ="DebugEnabled">
</service>
</services>
<behaviors>
<serviceBehaviors >
<behavior name="DebugEnabled">
<serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="True"/>
</behavior>
</serviceBehaviors>
</behaviors>
<serviceHostingEnvironment aspNetCompatibilityEnabled="true"/>
</system.serviceModel>
</configuration>
A detailed error message:
The server encountered an error processing the request. The exception
message is 'Value cannot be null. Parameter name:
propertyResourceType'. See server logs for more details. The exception
stack trace is:
at System.Data.Services.WebUtil.CheckArgumentNull[T](T value, String
parameterName) at
System.Data.Services.Providers.ResourceProperty..ctor(String name,
ResourcePropertyKind kind, ResourceType propertyResourceType) at
System.Data.Services.Providers.ObjectContextServiceProvider.PopulateMemberMetadata(ResourceType
resourceType, IProviderMetadata workspace, IDictionary2 knownTypes,
PrimitiveResourceTypeMap primitiveResourceTypeMap) at
System.Data.Services.Providers.ObjectContextServiceProvider.PopulateMetadata(IDictionary2
knownTypes, IDictionary2 childTypes, IDictionary2 entitySets) at
System.Data.Services.Providers.BaseServiceProvider.PopulateMetadata()
at System.Data.Services.Providers.BaseServiceProvider.LoadMetadata()
at
System.Data.Services.DataService1.CreateMetadataAndQueryProviders(IDataServiceMetadataProvider&
metadataProviderInstance, IDataServiceQueryProvider&
queryProviderInstance, BaseServiceProvider& builtInProvider, Object&
dataSourceInstance) at
System.Data.Services.DataService1.CreateProvider() at
System.Data.Services.DataService1.HandleRequest() at
System.Data.Services.DataService1.ProcessRequestForMessage(Stream
messageBody) at SyncInvokeProcessRequestForMessage(Object , Object[] ,
Object[] ) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.SyncMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object
instance, Object[] inputs, Object[]& outputs) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DispatchOperationRuntime.InvokeBegin(MessageRpc&
rpc) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage5(MessageRpc&
rpc) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage41(MessageRpc&
rpc) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage4(MessageRpc&
rpc) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage31(MessageRpc&
rpc) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage3(MessageRpc&
rpc) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage2(MessageRpc&
rpc) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage11(MessageRpc&
rpc) at
System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage1(MessageRpc&
rpc) at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.MessageRpc.Process(Boolean
isOperationContextSet)
WCF Data Services team confirms - this is the exact error faced when you use Enums (which is not yet supported).
Remove the Enum types (or use their suggested work-around and use a wrapper around the enum properties) and this should go away.