I have a database containing a very large table including binary data which I want to update on a remote machine, once a day. Rather than dumping the entire table, transferring and recreating it on the remote machine, I want to dump only the updates, then use that dump to update the remote machine.
I already understand that I can produce the dump file as such.
mysqldump -u user -p=pass --quick --result-file=dump_file \
--where "Updated >= one_day_ago" \
database_name table_name
1) Does the resulting "restore" on the remote machine
mysql -u user -p=pass database_name < dump_file
only update the necessary rows? Or are there other adverse effects?
2) Is this the best way to do this? (I am unable to pipe to the server directly and using --host option)
If you only dump rows where the WHERE clause is true, then you will only get a .sql file that contains the values you want to update. So you will never get duplicate values if you use the current export options. However, inserting these into a database will not work. You will have to use the commandline parameter --replace, otherwise, if you dump your database and a row with id 6 in table table1 and try to import this into your other database, you'll get an error on duplicates if a row already has id = 6. Using the --replace parameter, it will overwrite older values, which can only happen if there is a new one (according to your WHERE clause).
So to quickly answer:
Yes, this will restore on the remote machine, but only if you saved using --replace (this will restore the latest version of the file you have)
I am not entirely sure if you can pipe backups. According to this website, you can, but I have never tried it before.
Related
Ok, I screwed up.
I dumped one of my psql (9.6.18) staging database with the following command
pg_dump -U postgres -d <dbname> > db.out
And after doing some testing, I "restored" the data using the following command.
psql -f db.out postgres
Notice the absence of -d option? yup. And that was supposed to be the username.
Annnd as the database happend to have the same name as its user, it overwrote the 'default' database (postgres), which had data that other QAs are using.
I cancelled the operation quickly as soon as I realised my mistake, but the damage was still done. Around 1/3 ~ 1/2 of the database is roughly identical to the staging database - at least in terms of the schema.
Is there any way to revert this? I am still looking for any other dumps if any of these guys made one. But I don't think there is any past two to three months. Seems like I got no choice but to own up and apologise to them in the morning.
Without a recent dump or some sort of PITR replication setup, you can't un-revert this easily. The only option is to manually go through the log of what was restored and remove/alter it in the postgres database. This will work for the schema, the data is another matter. FYI, the postgres database should not really be used as a 'working' database. It is there to be a database to connect to for doing other operations, such as CREATE DATABASE or to bootstrap your way into a cluster. If left empty then the above would not have been a problem. You could have done, from another database, DROP DATABASE postgres; and then CREATE DATABASE postgres.
Do you have a capture of the output of the psql -f db.out postgres run?
Since the pg_dump didn't specify --clean or -c, it should not have overwritten anything, just appended. And if your tables have unique or primary keys, most of the data copy operations should have failed with unique key violations and rolled back. Even one overlapping row (per table) would roll back the entire dataset for that table.
Without having the output, it will be hard to figure out what damage has actually been done.
You should also immediately copy the pg_xlog data someplace safe. If it comes down to it, you might be able to use pg_xlogdump to figure out what changes committed and what did not.
A new docker image was recently stood up to replace an existing postgres database. A dump was taken of the database before the old instance was shut down using the following command:
pg_dump -h localhost -p 5432 -d *dbname* -U postgres > *dbname*.pgdump
We'd like to concatenate or append this data to the new database in order to "backfill" some older historical data. The database name and schema of the two databases is identical. What is the easiest, safest way to do this? Secondly, need postgres be shut down during the process?
If overlapping primary keys or unique columns have been assigned to the new data, then there will be no clean way to merge them without putting in some work to clean that up. Assuming that hasn't happened...
The current dump file will have create statements for all the objects that already exists. If you replay that file into the current database, you will get a bunch of errors for all those objects. If you don't have it all run in one transaction, then you could simply ignore those errors. But, you might also load data in the wrong order and get foreign key violations. Those errors will be mixed in with all the other ones about existing object, so might be easy to overlook.
So what I would do is stand up an empty database server, and replay your current dump into that. Then retake the pg_dump, but with either -a or --section=data. Then you should be able to load that dump into your new database. This has two advantages, it will not dump out CREATE statements which are not needed and throw errors which would need to be ignored, and it should dump the tables in an order which will not cause foreign key violations.
I have a bit of a weird issue. We were trying to create a database baseline for our local environment that has very specific data pre-seeded into it. Our hopes were to make sure that everyone was operating with the same data, making collaboration and reviewing code a bit simpler.
My idea for this was to run a command to dump the database whenever we run a migration or decide a new account is necessary for local dev. The issue with this is the database dump is around 17MB. I'm trying to avoid us having to add a 17MB file to GitHub every time we update the database.
So the best solution I could think of was to setup a script to dump each individual table in the database. This way, if a single table is updated, we'd only be pushing that backup to GitHub and it would be more along a ~200kb file as opposed to 17mb.
The main issue I'm running into with this is trying to restore the database. With a full dump, handling the foreign keys is relatively simple as it's all done in a single restore command. But with multiple restores, it gets a bit more complicated.
I'm looking to find a way to restore all tables to a database, ignoring triggers and constraints, and then enabling them again once the data has been populated. (or find a way to export the tables based on the order the foreign keys are defined). There are a lot of tables to work with, so doing this manually would be a bit of a task.
I'm also concerned about the relational integrity of the database if I disabled/re-enable constraints. Any help or advice would be appreciated.
Right now I'm running the following on every single table:
pg_dump postgres://user:password#pg:5432/database -t table_name -Fc -Z9 -f /data/www/database/data/table_name.bak
And then this command to restore all backups to the DB.
$data_command = "pg_restore --disable-triggers -d $dbUrl -Fc \"%s\"";
$backups = glob("$directory*.bak");
foreach($backups as $data_file){
if($data_file != 'data_roles.bak') {
exec(sprintf($data_command, $data_file));
}
}
This obviously doesn't work as I hit a ton of "Relationship doesn't exist" errors. I guess I'm just looking for a better way to accomplish this.
I would separate the table data and the database metadata.
Create a pre- and post-data scfipt with
pg_dump --section=pre-data -f pre.sql mydb
pg_dump --section=post-data -f post.sql mydb
Then dump just the data for each table:
pg_dump --section=data --table=tab1 -f tab1.sql mydb
To restore the database, first restore pre.sql, then all the table data, then post.sql.
The pre- and post-data will change often, but they are not large, so that shouldn't be a problem.
I have a site that uses PostgreSQL. All content that I provide in my site is created at a development environment (this happens because it's webcrawler content). The only information created at the production environment is information about the users.
I need to find a good way to update data stored at production. May I restore to production only the tables updated at development environment and PostgreSQL will update this records at production or the best way would be to backup the users information at production, insert them at development and restore the whole database at production?
Thank you
You can use pg_dump to export the data just from the non-user tables in the development environment and pg_restore to bring that into prod.
The -t switch will let you pick specific tables.
pg_dump -d <database_name> -t <table_name>
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pgdump.html
There are many tips arounds this subject here and here.
I'd suggest you to take a look on these links before everything.
If your data is discarded at each update process then a plain dump will be enough. You can redirect pg_dump output directly to psql connected on production to avoid pg_restore step, something like below:
#Of course you must drop tables to load it again
#so it'll be reasonable to make a full backup before this
pg_dump -Fp -U user -h host_to_dev -T=user your_db | psql -U user -h host_to_production your_db
You might asking yourself "Why he's saying to drop my tables"?
Bulk loading data on a fresh table is faster than deleting old data and inserting again. A quote from the docs:
Creating an index on pre-existing data is quicker than updating it incrementally as each row is loaded.
Ps¹: If you can't connect on both environment at same time then you need to do pg_restore manually.
Ps²: I don't recommend it but you can append --clean option on pg_dump to generate DROP statements automatically. Be extreme careful with this option to avoid dropping unnexpected objects.
I have a test database connected to a test server. I want to run set of selenium tests and I have to restore database after every test.
I made a backup with cli command "createdb" and I just drop the main table every time, but how can I restore database without turning the whole server off and on (can't use createdb with any open connections), as it would take hours or days to make a full set of tests?
I probably won't be given constant admin access to the server, unless it's necessary.
You can kill all connections vis SQL (see https://stackoverflow.com/a/5109190/2352344). Instead of dropping the whole database you can just remove the schema:
DROP SCHEMA public CASCADE;
CREATE SCHEMA public;
I think that instead of dropping the table, how about undoing or deleting the rows in the table. When you run the test, you know what entries will be made in the Table. With this information, just before the test terminates, invoke a script to delete the rows created due to running this test.
You can use a real tool for your backup/restore (Wal-E, barman or backrest). Particularly with backrest, you can do a diff restore where it restores only files that have changes.
I solved the problem by making a bash script that i run from java code.
String[] args = new String[]{"./script.sh"};
Process proc = new ProcessBuilder(args).start();
proc.waitFor();
script.sh:
#!/bin/bash
psql dbname -c "drop schema \"public\" cascade;"
psql dbname -c "create schema \"public\";"
psql dbname < "path/backupname"
I had to use script and not just make it arguments in args, probably becouse of the "<" sign. I found no flag replacement to it.