Is it possible to generate private and public key in PKCS#1 format using phpseclib and my own primes? I mean I already have p and q and I want to generate both keys. I am trying to do something like this:
$p = new Math_BigInteger(...);
$q = new Math_BigInteger(...);
$custom_primes = serialize(array('primes'=>array(1=>$p,2=>$q)));
extract($rsa->createKey(512,10,$custom_primes));
But this gives me the fatal error:
Fatal error: Call to a member function divide() on a non-object in /volume1/web/phpseclib/Crypt/RSA.php on line 705
I checked this and it is trying to divide:
list($temp) = $lcm['top']->divide($lcm['bottom']);
Obviously I am not setting up lcm in my $custom_primes structure as I only have my two primes. So the question is: is it possible at all in phpseclib?
It looks like you're trying to use phpseclib's partial key functionality to achieve this. Problem is that expects more than just primes. See this, for example:
return array(
'privatekey' => '',
'publickey' => '',
'partialkey' => serialize(array(
'primes' => $primes,
'coefficients' => $coefficients,
'lcm' => $lcm,
'exponents' => $exponents
))
);
$lcm is defined, initially, like this:
$lcm = array(
'top' => $this->one->copy(),
'bottom' => false
);
So maybe try doing that as well. You can probably strip out all of the calculation functions
from phpseclib, do them yourself and then pass $partial into phpseclib and let it generate a key in whatever format you want it generated in.
Related
I am working on Elasticsearch and I have to do aggregations (i.e used for summarize our data) I shared my code below....
CODE:
my $portal_es = Search::Elasticsearch->new(nodes => [$es_ip.':'.$es_port],request_timeout => 180);
my $result = $portal_es->scroll_helper(index => 10002500,size =>"10000", params=>{rest_total_hits_as_int =>true},{
#"size": 0,
aggs=> {
"my-agg-name"=> {
terms=> {
field=> "tcode"
}
}
}
});
I am getting following error
[Param] ** Expecting a HASH ref or a list of key-value pairs, called from sub Search::Elasticsearch::Role::Client::Direct::Main::scroll_helper at /home/prity/Desktop/BL_script/search_index_processor/aggregation.pl line 15. With vars: {'params' => ['index','10002500','size','10000','params',{'rest_total_hits_as_int' => 'true'},{'aggs' => {'my-agg-name' => {'terms' => {'field' => 'tcode'}}}}]}
The data structure in your argument list is probably broken.
my $result = $portal_es->scroll_helper(
index => 10002500,
size => "10000",
params => {
rest_total_hits_as_int => 'true'
},
{ # <---- here
aggs => {
# ...
You are passing a list of key/value pairs into the scroll_helper, but there is one extra last argument after params. It's a hash reference with aggs in it that has no key for it.
Turn on use warnings and you'll get a warning that your data structure is missing a value (because that hashref will stringify into a key).
You probably shouldn't have closed the hashref for params and opened a new one. But that's just a guess, I don't know what this method expects.
The title is rather self explanatory, but what i would like to have is a dynamic default value.
The idea behind it is to get the biggest number from a column in the database and then add one to the result. This result should be saved as the default value.
Lets take for example this code:
$GLOBALS['TCA'][$modelName]['columns']['autojobnumber'] = array(
'exclude' => true,
'label' => 'LLL:EXT:path/To/The/LLL:tx_extension_domain_model_job_autojobnumber',
'config' => [
'type' => 'input',
'size' => 10,
'eval' => 'trim,int',
'readOnly' =>1,
'default' => $result,
]
);
The SQL looks like this:
$queryBuilder = GeneralUtility::makeInstance(ConnectionPool::class)->getQueryBuilderForTable('tx_extension_domain_model_job');
$getBiggestNumber = $queryBuilder
->select('autojobnumber')
->from('tx_extension_domain_model_job')
->groupBy('autojobnumber')
->orderBy('autojobnumber', 'DESC')
->setMaxResults(1)
->execute()
->fetchColumn(0);
$result = $getBiggestNumber + 1;
So how can i do that "clean"?
I thought about processCmdmap_preProcess but i dont know how to pass the value to the coorisponding TCA field. Plus i do not get any results on my backend when i use the DebuggerUtility like i get them when i use processDatamap_afterAllOperations after saving the Object.
Can someone point me to the right direction?
I don't think it is supported to create a dynamic default value, see default property of input field.
What you can do however, is to create your own type (use this instead of type="input"). You can use the "user" type. (It might also be possible to create your own renderType for type="input", I never did this, but created custom renderTypes for type= "select").
You can look at the code of InputTextElement, extend that or create your own from scratch.
core code: InputTextElement
documentation for user type
more examples in FormEngine documentation
Example
(slightly modified, from documentation)
ext_localconf.php:
$GLOBALS['TYPO3_CONF_VARS']['SYS']['formEngine']['nodeRegistry'][<current timestamp>] = [
'nodeName' => 'customInputField',
'priority' => 40,
'class' => \T3docs\Examples\Form\Element\CustomInputElement::class,
];
CustomInputElement
<?php
declare(strict_types = 1);
namespace Myvendor\MyExtension\Backend\FormEngine\Element\CustomInputElement;
use TYPO3\CMS\Backend\Form\Element\AbstractFormElement;
// extend from AbstractFormElement
// alternatively, extend from existing Type and extend it.
class CustomInputElement extends AbstractFormElement
{
public function render():array
{
$resultArray = $this->initializeResultArray();
// add some HTML
$resultArray['html'] = 'something ...';
// ... see docs + core for more info what you can set here!
return $resultArray;
}
}
Can someone provide a sample code chunk of php using the sugarcrm API/nusoap for adding creating an acct. and then linking a lead to the acct?
I've got a sample function that adds a lead, and I can see how to create an acct, but I can't see how to tie a lead to the acct, to simulate the subpanel process in the sugarcrm acct/subpanel process.
thanks
// Create a new Lead, return the SOAP result
function createLead($data)
{
// Parse the data and store it into a name/value list
// which will then pe passed on to Sugar via SOAP
$name_value_list = array();
foreach($data as $key => $value)
array_push($name_value_list, array('name' => $key, 'value' => $value));
// Fire the set_entry call to the Leads module
$result = $this->soap->call('set_entry', array(
'session' => $this->session,
'module_name' => 'Leads',
'name_value_list' => $name_value_list
));
return $result;
}
$result = $sugar->createLead(array(
'lead_source' => 'Web Site',
'lead_source_description' => 'Inquiry form on the website',
'lead_status' => 'New',
'first_name' => $_POST['first_name'],
'last_name' => $_POST['last_name'],
'email1' => $_POST['email'],
'description' => $_POST['message']
));
You need to find the ID for the account and assign that ID to whatever the account_id field name is in the Lead Module. I have run into a couple things like this before and I have found it easier to go straight to the Sugar database. So, write a statement that will return the account is, for example: SELECT id WHERE something_in_the_account_table = something else;
Then you can assign that id in your $result array. I hope it helps. I didn't have any code or documentation in front of me or I would have helped more.
For example, if I process a form:
my $form_input = { input_data => '123' };
$form->process($form_input);
Then I want to alter the value of 'input_data':
my $clearme = $form->get_field('input_data');
$clearme->value("546"); # doesn't seem to work
..Before pushing the form object to TT:
template 'index' => { form => $form }; # using Dancer
'input_data' seems to retain it's original value (123). Any hints on what I'm doing wrong, or what I should be doing?
Thanks
After looking at the documentation and doing some testing, I think you want
$form->add_valid(input_data => '546');
I tried the following
my $filter = POE::Filter::Line->new(OutputLiteral => '');
my $wheel = POE::Wheel::ReadWrite->new(
Handle => $socket,
Filter => $filter,
InputEvent => 'on_input',
ErrorEvent => 'on_error',
FlushedEvent => 'on_flush',
);
But on_input is called several times with each line separately in ARG0. How do I get it all together? Doesn't setting setting OutputLiteral to '' change the filter's understanding of what a "line" is?
First of all, you are reading from the filter, so it's InputLiteral which is important here, not OutputLiteral. Second, you can't have an empty InputLiteral (if you try, it will just autodetect the input literal). Consequently, you can't use POE::Filter::Line to get all the data, because it is made for parsing line-terminated records. Use POE::Filter::Stream instead.