My schema is as below.
Customer: {
orders: [{
...
status: 'Pending'
...
}]
}
I have a list of order ids whose which are delivered to the customer. So I need to change the Status to closed. This is my simple requirement. I have my below code, which updates the status 'closed' only for the first order id in the OrderIdList.
orderIdList = ["54899c0cbdde6b281e9aaa22","54899c28bdde6b281e9aaa23","54899c2abdde6b281e9aaa24","54899c2cbdde6b281e9aaa25"]
Customer.update({
'orders._id': {
$in: orderIdList
}
}, {
'$set': {
'orders.$.status': 'Closed'
}
}, {
multi: true,
upsert: true
}, function(err, rows) {
console.log("error");
console.log(err);
console.log("rows updated");
console.log(rows);
});
Only one row is updated. for the orderId "54899c0cbdde6b281e9aaa22"
Why is it not updating for all the order Ids. Please suggest me the solution.
Thanks in advance.
which updates the status 'closed' only for the first order id in the
OrderIdList.
Yes, that is how the positional operator($) works. It updates only the first item in an array that has matched the condition in the query.
From the docs,
the positional $ operator acts as a placeholder for the first element
that matches the query document.
multi: true is applicable for parent documents and not for embedded documents. If this parameter is set to true, all the documents that have an order matching the required Id, will be updated. But the positional operator will update only the first sub document that matched the query in all these documents.
To update all the matching orders for all the matching document, currently it is not possible in a single mongo update query. You need to perform the logic in the application code.
One way of doing it in the application code:
Match all the customer documents which contain an order that we are
looking for.
For each customer document identify the orders that we need to
update.
Modify the order.
Perform an update based on the Customer document _id.
Sample Code:
var orderIdList = ['54899c0cbdde6b281e9aaa22'];
Customer.find({"orders._id":{$in:orderIdList }},function(err,resp){
resp.forEach(function(doc){
var orders = doc.orders;
orders.forEach(function(order){
if(orderIdList.indexOf(order._id.toString()) != -1){
order.status = 'closed';
Customer.update({"_id":doc._id},{$set:{"orders":orders}},function(err,aff,raw){
console.log("Updated: "+aff);
});}})})})
Related
I've got a question on the design of documents in order to be able to efficiently perform aggregation. I will take a dummy example of document :
{
product: "Name of the product",
description: "A new product",
comments: [ObjectId(xxxxx), ObjectId(yyyy),....]
}
As you could see, I have a simple document which describes a product and wraps some comments on it. Imagine this product is very popular so that it contains millions of comments. A comment is a simple document with a date, a text and eventually some other features. The probleme is that such a product can easily be larger than 16MB so I need not to embed comments in the product but in a separate collection.
What I would like to do now, is to perform aggregation on the product collection, a first step could be for example to select various products and sort the comments by date. It is a quite easy operation with embedded documents, but how could I do with such a design ? I only have the ObjectId of the comments and not their content. Of course, I'd like to perform this aggregation in a single operation, i.e. I don't want to have to perform the first part of the aggregation, then query the results and perform another aggregation.
I dont' know if that's clear enough ? ^^
I would go about it this way: create a temp collection that is the exact copy of the product collection with the only exception being the change in the schema on the comments array, which would be modified to include a comment object instead of the object id. The comment object will only have the _id and the date field. The above can be done in one step:
var comments = [];
db.product.find().forEach( function (doc){
doc.comments.forEach( function(x) {
var obj = {"_id": x };
var comment = db.comment.findOne(obj);
obj["date"] = comment.date;
comments.push(obj);
});
doc.comments = comments;
db.temp.insert(doc);
});
You can then run your aggregation query against the temp collection:
db.temp.aggregate([
{
$match: {
// your match query
}
},
{
$unwind: "$comments"
},
{
$sort: { "comments.date": 1 } // sort the pipeline by comments date
}
]);
This is my MongoDB query:
db.events.update({date:{$gte: ISODate("2014-09-01T00:00:00Z")}},{$set:{"artists.$.soundcloud_toggle":false}},{multi:true,upsert:false})
Apparently I cannot use "artists.$.soundcloud_toggle" to update all artist documents within the artists array:
"The $ operator can update the first array element that matches
multiple query criteria specified with the $elemMatch() operator.
http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/reference/operator/update/positional/"
I'm happy to run the query a number of times changing the index of the array in order to set the soundcloud_toggle property of every artist in every event that matches the query e.g
artists.0.soundcloud_toggle
artists.1.soundcloud_toggle
artists.2.soundcloud_toggle
artists.3.soundcloud_toggle
The problem is: when there is say, only one artist document in the artists array and I run the query with "artists.1.soundcloud_toggle" It will insert an artist document into the artist array with a single property:
{
"soundcloud_toggle" : true
},
(I have declared "upsert:false", which should be false by default anyways)
How do I stop the query from inserting a document and setting soundcloud_toggle:false when there is no existing document there? I only want it to update the property if an artist exists at the given artists array index.
If, like you said, you don't mind completing the operation with multiple queries, you can add an $exists condition to your filter.
E.g. in the 5th iteration, when updating index=4, add: "artists.4": {$exists: true}, like:
db.events.update(
{ date: {$gte: ISODate("2014-09-01T00:00:00Z")},
"artists.4": {$exists: true} },
{ $set:{ "artists.4.soundcloud_toggle" :false } },
{ multi: true, upsert: false }
)
I want to query for a document with a given condition and have it return the _id for that document. Here is what I tried, but it doesn't work:
User.find(
{phone: phone},
null,
{},
function (err, data) {
user_id = data._id;
}
);
Basically, I'm trying to query the Users collection for a user/document with a certain phone number, and then have it return the _id for that user. What am I doing wrong?
If you're trying to find only one document you need to use findOne:
User.findOne({phone : phone}, function(err, data) {
if (err) return console.error(err);
user_id = data._id;
});
If multiple documents satisfy the query, this method returns the first document according to the natural order which reflects the order of documents on the disk.
If you want to get multiple documents you need to use find and your data parameter will then contain all users that matches your criteria.
I have a collected named foo hypothetically.
Each instance of foo has a field called lastLookedAt which is a UNIX timestamp since epoch. I'd like to be able to go through the MongoDB client and set that timestamp for all existing documents (about 20,000 of them) to the current timestamp.
What's the best way of handling this?
Regardless of the version, for your example, the <update> is:
{ $set: { lastLookedAt: Date.now() / 1000 } }
However, depending on your version of MongoDB, the query will look different. Regardless of version, the key is that the empty condition {} will match any document. In the Mongo shell, or with any MongoDB client:
$version >= 3.2:
db.foo.updateMany( {}, <update> )
{} is the condition (the empty condition matches any document)
3.2 > $version >= 2.2:
db.foo.update( {}, <update>, { multi: true } )
{} is the condition (the empty condition matches any document)
{multi: true} is the "update multiple documents" option
$version < 2.2:
db.foo.update( {}, <update>, false, true )
{} is the condition (the empty condition matches any document)
false is for the "upsert" parameter
true is for the "multi" parameter (update multiple records)
This code will be helpful for you
Model.update({
'type': "newuser"
}, {
$set: {
email: "abc#gmail.com",
phoneNumber:"0123456789"
}
}, {
multi: true
},
function(err, result) {
console.log(result);
console.log(err);
})
I have been using MongoDB .NET driver for a little over a month now. If I were to do it using .NET driver, I would use Update method on the collection object. First, I will construct a query that will get me all the documents I am interested in and do an Update on the fields I want to change. Update in Mongo only affects the first document and to update all documents resulting from the query one needs to use 'Multi' update flag. Sample code follows...
var collection = db.GetCollection("Foo");
var query = Query.GTE("No", 1); // need to construct in such a way that it will give all 20K //docs.
var update = Update.Set("timestamp", datetime.UtcNow);
collection.Update(query, update, UpdateFlags.Multi);
You can use updateMany() methods of mongodb to update multiple document
Simple query is like this
db.collection.updateMany(filter, update, options)
For more doc of uppdateMany read here
As per your requirement the update code will be like this:
User.updateMany({"created": false}, {"$set":{"created": true}});
here you need to use $set because you just want to change created from true to false. For ref. If you want to change entire doc then you don't need to use $set
I need to insert a document if it doesn't exist. I know that the "upsert" option can do that, but I have some particular needs.
First I need to create the document with its _id field only, but only if it doesn't exist already. My _id field is a number generated by me (not an ObjectId). If I use the "upsert" option then I get "Mod on _id not allowed"
db.mycollection.update({ _id: id }, { _id: id }, { upsert: true });
I know that we can't use the _id in a $set.
So, my question is: If there any way to a "create if doesn't exists" atomically in mongodb?
EDIT:
As proposed by #Barrie this works (using nodejs and mongoose):
var newUser = new User({ _id: id });
newUser.save(function (err) {
if (err && err.code === 11000) {
console.log('If duplicate key the user already exists', newTwitterUser);
return;
}
console.log('New user or err', newTwitterUser);
});
But I still wonder if it is the best way to do it.
I had the same problem, but found a better solution for my needs. You can use that same query style if you simply remove the _id attribute from the update object. So if at first you get an error with this:
db.mycollection.update({ _id: id }, {$set: { _id: id, name: 'name' }}, { upsert: true });
instead use this:
db.mycollection.update({ _id: id }, {$set: { name: 'name' }}, { upsert: true });
This is better because it works for both insert and update.
UPDATE: Upsert with _id can be done without $setOnInsert, as explaind by #Barrie above.
The trick is to use $setOnInsert:{_id:1} with upsert, that way the _id is only written to if it's an insert, and never for updates.
Only, there was a bug preventing this from working until v2.6 - I just tried it on 2.4 and it's not working.
The workaround I use is having another ID field with a unique index. Eg. $setOnInsert:{myId:1}.
You can just use insert(). If the document with the _id you specify already exists, the insert() will fail, nothing will be modified - so "create if it doesn't exist" is what it's already doing by default when you use insert() with a user-created _id.
Please note that $setOnInsert don't work easily when you upsert a simple key => value object (not $set or other).
I need to use that (in PHP):
public function update($criteria , $new_object, array $options = array()){
// In 2.6, $setOnInsert with upsert == true work with _id field
if(isset($options['upsert']) && $options['upsert']){
$firstKey = array_keys($new_object)[0];
if(strpos($firstKey, '$')===0){
$new_object['$setOnInsert']['_id'] = $this->getStringId();
}
//Even, we need to check if the object exists
else if($this->findOne($criteria, ['_id'])===null){
//In this case, we need to set the _id
$new_object['_id'] = $this->getStringId();
}
}
return parent::update($criteria, $new_object, $options);
}