database : postgresql
language : plpythonu
topic: trigger function
create trigger request_received_trigger
after insert on req_table
for each row
execute procedure request_received_function();
I need to do something after every insert but the inserted record dose not appear in queries that I make inside request_received_function(). Is inserted record locked inside trigger function?
trigger fires well and I can debug it
on the second insert record is show itself
Related
I would like to create trigger to execute function to truncate local database table and insert new data.
Trigger execution must start after new row have insert in foreign database table.
I have read a lot about creating triggers on foreign table, but for me its not working. Trigger seems to not execute function when new row will be inserted in foreign table. It seems like trigger cant see this new row insert event.
What I did:
Created foreign table in my local database, lets call it 'foreign_table'. I tested, I can read data.
Created function to truncate local table and insert new data:
CREATE or replace FUNCTION public.reset_insert_table()
RETURNS TRIGGER
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
SET search_path=public
AS $BODY$
BEGIN
create temporary table temporary_table_tmp
as select * from public.table1;
TRUNCATE TABLE public.table2;
insert into table2
select * from temporary_table_tmp;
DROP table temporary_table_tmp;
END;
$BODY$;
Created trigger to launch function 'reset_insert_table()'
CREATE TRIGGER local_table_update
AFTER INSERT
ON 'foreign_table'
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE reset_insert_table();
Made test: inserted new row in foreign database table 'foreign_table', but I cant see that table is truncated and new data is not inserted. Insertion to foreign_tale was done in foreign database.
Problem was also testing does this trigger function work, executing manually will produce error:
EXECUTE PROCEDURE reset_insert_table();
ERROR: syntax error at or near "execute"
Tried also CALL and SELECT.
I created same function for testing but instead defining 'RETURNS TRIGGER'used 'RETURNS VOID' and function is working.
Can anyone tell why my solution is not working and does trigger on foreign tables must see events happening in foreign tables?
According to your comments, you seem to be using logical replication.
While data modifications are replayed on the standby with logical replication, the parameter session_replication_role is set to replica to keep triggers and foreign key constraints from working.
If you want a trigger to be triggered by the replay of data via logical replication, you have to declare it as a replica trigger:
ALTER TABLE a2 ENABLE REPLICA TRIGGER trigger_name;
So I am new to using procedures and triggers and it is really confusing me
I have used temporal tables and want to basically create a history table of records inserted,updated or deleted.
Infact I have created my history table and works fine when I use this trigger sql
DROP TRIGGER if exists versioning_trigger on mytable;
CREATE TRIGGER versioning_trigger BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE ON mytable FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE versioning('sys_period', 'table_history', true);
This creates records of the rows updated or deleted,precisely copies the old row record from mytable into table_history table and updates the record in mytable.But I want to insert the updated record from mytable to table_history also so that it has records of all types('current active record'and 'record before updation').Also insert some other fields in table_history when the trigger is executed.
I want to ask
How is it possible to have different trigger events(BEFORE or AFTER) together in one CREATE TRIGGER query in temporal_tables?
Is it possible to insert new field values in table_history on trigger execution? How can I accomplish this?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plpgsql-trigger.html
A trigger procedure is created with the CREATE FUNCTION command,
declaring it as a function with no arguments and a return type of
trigger
and also
same trigger can't fire both before and after event - just create two triggers if you really need it
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-createtrigger.html
Determines whether the function is called before, after, or instead of
the event.
use NEW instead of OLD for new values
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plpgsql-trigger.html
NEW
Data type RECORD; variable holding the new database row for
INSERT/UPDATE operations in row-level triggers. This variable is
unassigned in statement-level triggers and for DELETE operations.
Situation
I have a database in PostgreSQL 9.5 used to store object locations by time.
I have a main table named "position" with the columns (only relevant):
position_id
position_timestamp
object_id
It is partitioned into 100 child tables on object_id with the condition:
CREATE TABLE position_object_id_00
( CHECK object_id%100 = 0 )
INHERITS ( position );
And so on for the others children. I partitioned with a modulus relation to distribute equally the objects.
Each child is indexed on position_id and object_id (two different indexes).
The trigger to redirect inserts on children is:
CREATE TRIGGER insert_position_trigger
BEFORE INSERT ON position
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE insert_position();
And the procedure insert_position() looks for the right child table to insert the data, inserts it and then return the NEW object:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION insert_position() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $insert_position$
DECLARE
BEGIN
--Look for child table
[...]
--Insert data in right child table
[...]
RETURN NEW;
END;
$insert_position$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
I have a summary table object_last_known_position with the same columns that is updated with the trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER update_object_last_known_position
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON position
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE update_object_last_known_position();
The procedure update_object_last_known_position() basically checks if the position_timestamp is more recent, then delete the older entry and create a new entry with the data passed on the INSERT or UPDATE query (NEW).
Issue
So these two triggers react to the same event: insert on position, one is before, the other is after
Returning new for insert_position() allows me to use NEW in the trigger update_object_last_known_position(), and this is absolutely necessary. But doing that, it also insert the data on the master table position. So my data is now duplicated.
I tried to put the two triggers before, they both execute when I insert data if I let it like that, but if I remove the "return new" from the procedure insert_position(), update_object_last_known_position() is not executed.
I am stuck with this issue and I didn't find a way to execute both of these triggers without filling the master table position when I insert data.
So if you have any ideas, I will really appreciate :)
Thank you for your help!
EDIT
Solution
Thanks to the answer
I "merged" my two triggers: insert_position() now calls update_object_last_known_position directly. For that, I modified update_object_last_known_position to a stored procedure with a parameter. The parameter is the id of the position insert_position() just created, so I am able to find it and retrieve information.
(Calling update_object_last_known_position inside the other trigger means we cannot use NEW anymore)
And obviously return type for insert_position() is now NULL, and everything works fine :)
If I understand you correctly you are trying to:
Stop the insert, and replace it with an insert into another table (determined by the trigger)
Update a summary table (delete/insert) to point to the new row.
Your problem is that 1 stops 2 from happening? That's logical because you've stopped the insert so you've stopped any processing on the insert as well.
So to solve this you have a couple of options (options 1 and 2 are similar)
Call update_object_last_known_position() from insert_position() and only have one trigger
Create a wrapper method for both insert_position() and update_object_last_known_position() and have only one trigger.
Put the trigger for update_object_last_known_position() on all of the tables that insert_position() might insert into.
I want to call a stored procedure in three different cases: after an insert, after an update and before a delete. Is it possible to combine these cases into one create trigger statement? Like so (I know, this won't work):
CREATE TRIGGER update_pntzzz3
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR BEFORE DELETE ON onedee
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE update_pntzzz3();
Right now I create a new trigger for the delete case.
CREATE TRIGGER update_pntzzz3
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON onedee
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE update_pntzzz3();
CREATE TRIGGER del_pntzzz3
BEFORE DELETE ON onedee
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE update_pntzzz3();
I have a pretty simple trigger:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f_log_datei()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
INSERT INTO logs (aktion, tabelle, benutzer_id) VALUES(TG_OP, 'dateien', NEW.benutzer_id);
END; $$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
CREATE TRIGGER log_datei AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE
ON dateien
FOR EACH STATEMENT
EXECUTE PROCEDURE f_log_datei();
My table logs is the following:
CREATE TABLE logs(
id int PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT NEXTVAL('logs_id_seq'),
zeit timestamp DEFAULT now(),
aktion char(6),
tabelle varchar(32),
alt varchar(256),
neu varchar(256),
benutzer_id int references benutzer(id)
);
After inserting something in dateien I get the following error:
ERROR: record "new" is not assigned yet
DETAIL: The tuple structure of a not-yet-assigned record is indeterminate.
CONTEXT: SQL statement "INSERT INTO logs (aktion, tabelle, benutzer_id) VALUES(TG_OP, 'dateien', NEW.benutzer_id)"
PL/pgSQL function "f_log_datei" line 3 at SQL statement
Why did I get this error? I looked into the documentation and it seems they use new in the same way I do.
From the fine manual:
36.1. Overview of Trigger Behavior
[...]
For a row-level trigger, the input data also includes the NEW row for INSERT and UPDATE triggers, and/or the OLD row for UPDATE and DELETE triggers. Statement-level triggers do not currently have any way to examine the individual row(s) modified by the statement.
And from Trigger Procedures:
NEW
Data type RECORD; variable holding the new database row for INSERT/UPDATE operations in row-level triggers. This variable is NULL in statement-level triggers and for DELETE operations.
Note what it says about row-level triggers and statement-level triggers.
You have a statement-level trigger:
...
FOR EACH STATEMENT
EXECUTE PROCEDURE f_log_datei();
Statement-level triggers are triggered once per statement and a statement can apply to multiple rows so the notion of affected row (which is what NEW and OLD are about) simply doesn't apply.
If you want to use NEW (or OLD) in a trigger then you want the trigger to execute for each affected row and that means you want a row-level trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER log_datei AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE
ON dateien
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE f_log_datei();
I just changed FOR EACH STATEMENT to FOR EACH ROW.
Your trigger should also be returning something:
A trigger function must return either NULL or a record/row value having exactly the structure of the table the trigger was fired for.
[...]
The return value of a row-level trigger fired AFTER or a statement-level trigger fired BEFORE or AFTER is always ignored; it might as well be null. However, any of these types of triggers might still abort the entire operation by raising an error.
So you should RETURN NEW; or RETURN NULL; in your trigger. You have an AFTER trigger so it doesn't matter which RETURN you use but I'd go with RETURN NEW;.