I am using the below code block in CF9 to get all the mail data,
<cfimap
action="GETHEADERONLY"
name="LOCAL.checkEmail"
secure="true"
folder="Inbox"
server="#ImportAquireMailServer#"
username="#ImportAquireUsername#"
password="#ImportAquirePassword#" />
This query object provides the information about all the mails present in inbox. While doing so it takes a lot of time and also times out frequently.
Is there any way to get the latest mail only, so that it will not provide the information about all the mails and will also not run into time out situation?
Please help.
you may need to update the read messages to "read" like:
<cfimap action="MarkRead" connection = "Conn" messagenumber="#getHeaders.messagenumber#">
after the message id done with work.
so you can query the latest messages as:
<cfquery dbtype="query" name="getMails">
select * from getHeaders
where seen=<cfqueryparam value="no" cfsqltype="cf_sql_varchar">
</cfquery>also you can filter with received date
you can refer http://shemy-coldfusion.blogspot.in/2013/03/coldfusion-code-to-get-multiple-mail.html
Related
I've been trying to test something out, basically looking to do one of the following things:
Change name of recipient in a sent file. I've tried using Outlook Spy (great tool) but every time I changed the recipient in PR_DISPLAY_TO_W it returned the following error:
Could not edit the property: HrSetOneProp returned MAPL_E_COMPUTED
Attaching a file to a sent email file. (I don't know if this one is possible, but would be useful if it was.)
I appreciate any responses.
PR_DISPLAY_TO / CC / BCC are computed properties. The store provider updates them whenever recipients list is modified.
Use the MailItem.Recipients collection to modify the recipients.
MailItem.Attachments.Add.
I have an Email to Email flow that needs to send specific senders depending on the email subject. I was using #[message.inboundProperties.subject.substring(40,3) to get the value but its ending up in error. I'm not sure which function to use to get the value I need from the subject since the order number is also there. Any tips? All my needed values are on the subject line at the moment.
Also, Can I use this value to generate an email body for the message?
To: [Sender]
Hi [Sender]
Your order no [Order] was successfully imported
Thanks Mule
The first question that comes to mind is from where are you getting the Subject ? Is it a Fixed statement ?
What you can do is other way round. You can store the [Order] and [Sender] in flow variables and then you can construct a Subject line and email body out of it.
For example let you store your [Order] in a flow variable as follows:-
<set-variable variableName="Order" value="#[message.inboundProperties.'order']" doc:name="Variable"/>
and [Sender] in another flow variable :-
<set-variable variableName="Sender" value="someone#example.com" doc:name="Variable"/>
Then you can send [Order] and [Sender] in subject line :-
Hi #[flowVars.Sender.split('#')[0]] your order number #[flowVars.Order] is ready
And in email body you can write as following :-
Hi #[flowVars.Sender.split('#')[0]]
Your order no#[flowVars.Order] was successfully imported
Thanks Mule
Please note I have used flowVars.Sender.split('#')[0] to get the sender name from email address ...
reference :- How can I extract the user name from an email address using javascript?
I was hoping someone can shed some light on how the Quickfixn engine handles outgoing FIX messages... I have an outgoing connection set up, and I'm getting heartbeats. When I generate an outgoing message however, it gets rejected because it says that tag 58 is invalid for this message type... (35=AE) ... Normally, if this was an inbound connection, I could just modify the Data Dictionary and everything would be fine... but seeing as how this is an outgoing connection, plus I have my
UseDataDictionary property set to 'N' ... what does the quickfix engine use to validate the outgoing message? Can something be changed to allow the engine to pass the message ? Or is the only resolution not to include this tag in my outgoing message?
Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Edit-
The message is getting rejected by the quickfix engine. The message that I'm constructing and the respective reject message are:
8=FIX.4.4 9=400 35=AE 34=38 49=XXX 52=20130528-23:11:04.040 56=YYY 31=1.3022 32=1000000.00 39=0 55=EUR/USD 58=ABCD 60=20130528-22:34:52.000 64=20130531 75=20130529 570=N 571=ABCD 5495=0 5971=1302200.00 552=1 54=2 37=ABCD 453=3 448=LP1-DBAB 447=D 452=17 448=XXX 447=D 452=1 448=XXX 447=D 452=19 15=EUR 120=USD 10=082
8=FIX.4.4 9=130 35=3 34=38 49=YYY 52=20130528-23:11:04.283 56=XXX 45=38 58=Tag not defined for this message type 371=58 372=AE 373=2 10=033
I've seen incoming messages get rejected by the quickfix engine because the data dictionary didn't have the correct specs for the message... I thought this might be the same thing but the outgoing connection doesn't seem to use the data dictionary.
Your FIX library does not reject a message. The message is sent to the counter-party instead, which then rejects your message as invalid upon receiving and validating it. And the reason for that is because tag 58, if present, must be a part of “NoSides repeating group (tag 552), which in your case it is not, making the message ill-formed. What you have to do is send a "logically" correct message. I recommend you refer to the appropriate FIX protocol specification for a reference on how to construct a correct message.
Vlad's answer is correct, but I want to alert you to one other danger in your question.
I have my UseDataDictionary property set to 'N'
I am 90% sure you don't want to do this. Whatever you think you're gaining by using =N is probably based on a misunderstanding of something.
Without a DD, you can't read messages with repeating groups, because the engine won't know what fields go in what group.
In practice, every venue uses repeating groups. Therefore, you'll need to set UseDataDictionary=Y and you need to specify an xml file with DataDictionary=<file>.
The only reason we allow =N in QF/n is to be consistent with QF/C++ and QF/j.
I have a very special problem.
If we create a mail in Outlook, we add a UserProperty which contains a DataBase-ID of our System, so we can Link the mail to the representing DataBase-Item. On the service which reads the mails in each Mailbox and imports them automatically I can read this property by using ExtendedPropertyDefinitions. So far everything is fine...
If the User now forwards the message in Outlook, Olk copies the UserProperty to the new message. And now my problems beginn. Now my Service thinks the new message is also linked to our database and updates DB-Entry with the new Body and new Subject.
So does anyone now how to find out if a message is a forwarded one or how to tell Outlook not to copy the userproperty to the forwarded (new) message?
thx. Jay
What we thought about, but isnt working for our case
- a second userproperty containing a simple tag linke "fromSystem". Cause this would be copied too.
- a second userproperty containing a hashsum calculated from subject and Body. Cause both could be changed by the user. We just create the message, add all properties and Display it. from this Point on we no longer have control what is Happening to the mail until the Service handles it.
Your service consuming EWS should check the ConversationIndex and only update the database if it's 22 bytes long (original source message). Forward emails and reply emails keep appending 5 bytes (10 chars) to the ConversationIndex extending it beyond 22 bytes.
Sample ConversationIndexes
Original: 01CDD15D80E51C1D4522172840ACA96287DA28A15D97
Reply: 01CDD15D80E51C1D4522172840ACA96287DA28A15D970000018630
Forward: 01CDD15D80E51C1D4522172840ACA96287DA28A15D970000018630000000FC30
ConversationIndex represents the sequential ordering of the ConversationTopic (essentially GUID + timestamp). See Working with Conversations on MSDN. ConversationIndex is explicitly defined on MSDN here.
if (message.ConversationIndex.Length == 22)
{
// update DB body, subject, etc.
}
Also make sure you load the EmailMessageSchema.ConversationIndex before trying to access its value.
I receive offline message from openfire server, but it contains empty jabber:x:delay extension.
The message I receive is:
<message id="qU7N8-64" to="ac1#server.jj.ru" from="ac2#server.jj.ru/4847791" type="chat">
<body>test message</body>
<delay xmlns="urn:xmpp:delay"></delay>
<x xmlns="jabber:x:delay"></x>
</message>
This message I receive with smack library.
But when I connect to openfire with Miranda IM, openfire sends extension jabber:x:delay with data.
Why openfire sends empty jabber:x:delay only to smack library?
Add this line after connection.
ProviderManager.getInstance()addExtensionProvider("x","jabber:x:delay", new DelayInformationProvider());
Openfire doesn't do anything different since it doesn't know (or care) what client is connected. The packet you are showing is very peculiar, since it contains both the legacy and current versions of Delayed Delivery, but with missing required attributes in both.
Try running with VM argument -Dsmack.debugEnabled=true set. Then check the incoming raw packets for the actual message content. There is most likely one of 2 things happening.
The time is missing, so Miranda is compensating by populating it with some default value, like current date.
The time format is not according to spec, so the parser in Smack is omitting it.