I wrote a client (Java) to a web service requiring WS Security headers. I used cxf to generate my sources from the WSDL. When I run my client on Tomcat, it works fine, however, when I move it to Websphere, I get a fault back from the service saying the signature is invalid. I compared the generated soap envelopes and all of the tags match between the two and the key values are the same. The only difference is that WAS has added the namespaces for soapenc, xsi and xsd. These prefixes then get added to the IncludedNamespaces of the canonicalized method. And from what I've read, can get in the mix of the signature. I can't tell if Websphere is adding these or if it is perhaps a different version of a class being picked up. Either way, the webservice will not accept it with these namespaces. Can these be removed?
WebSphere namespace inclusion
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<soapenv:Header xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
Websphere canonicalized tags
<ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#">
<ec:InclusiveNamespaces xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" PrefixList="soapenc xsd xsi" />
</ds:Transform>
</ds:Transforms>
Tomcat namespace inclusion
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SOAP-ENV:Header xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
Tomcat canonicalized tags
<ds:Transforms>
<ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#">
<ec:InclusiveNamespaces xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" PrefixList="wsse soap" />
</ds:Transform>
</ds:Transforms>
Here is my WSS4jOutInterceptor Spring Config (some data removed)
<bean class="org.apache.cxf.ws.security.wss4j.WSS4JOutInterceptor"
id="outbound-security">
<constructor-arg>
<map>
<entry key="action" value="Timestamp Signature" />
<entry key="user" value=--REMOVED-- />
<entry key="signaturePropFile" value=--REMOVED-- />
<entry key="encryptionPropFile" value=--REMOVED-- />
<entry key="encryptionUser" value=--REMOVED--/>
<entry key="useSingleCertificate" value="true"/>
<entry key="signatureKeyIdentifier" value="DirectReference" />
<entry key="passwordCallbackClass" value=--REMOVED-- />
<entry key="signatureParts"
value="{Element}{http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd}Timestamp;{Element}{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Body" />
<entry key="signatureAlgorithm" value="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha256" />
<entry key="sigCanonicalization" value="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" />
<entry key="signatureDigestAlgorithm" value="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#sha256" />
</map>
</constructor-arg>
</bean>
EDIT: This looks to be caused by some archive in the runtime. Does anyone know what package builds the soap envelope in the jre and the websphere 8 runtime? That might be where the differences exist. Any help is greatly appreciated!
This actual turned out to have nothing to do with incorrect namespaces or the canonicalization methods. Websphere, by default, was making this call "BSP_compliant" which added some values to the key.
These lines fixed the problem.
Map<String, Object> ctx = ((BindingProvider)port).getRequestContext();
ctx.put(WSHandlerConstants.IS_BSP_COMPLIANT, "false");
Related
We have a Service Fabric Service project with multiple services: Actors, Stateful services and Stateless services combined into one ServiceManifest.
Two stateful services did not work: the constructors were called, the communicationlisteners (through remoting) were created, but the RunAsync method was not called.
After removing the endpoint listing from the ServiceManifest.xml the services started working again. But now we are left wondering why and how this works. Could someone explain?
To illustrate, the relevant section was
<Resources>
<Endpoints>
<Endpoint Name="WebServiceEndpoint" Type="Input" Protocol="http" Port="80" />
<Endpoint Name="StatelessServiceEndpoint1" Type="Input" Protocol="http" Port="10101" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceEndpoint1" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint1" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceEndpoint2" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint2" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceEndpoint3" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint3" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceEndpoint4" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint4" />
<Endpoint Name="StatefulServiceEndpoint1" Type="Input" Protocol="http" />
<Endpoint Name="StatefulServiceReplicatorEndpoint1" />
<Endpoint Name="StatefulServiceEndpoint2" Type="Input" Protocol="http" />
<Endpoint Name="StatefulServiceReplicatorEndpoint2" />
<Endpoint Name="StatelessServiceEndPoint2" Type="Input" Protocol="http" />
</Endpoints>
</Resources>
After changing it to this
<Resources>
<Endpoints>
<Endpoint Name="WebServiceEndpoint" Type="Input" Protocol="http" Port="80" />
<Endpoint Name="StatelessServiceEndpoint1" Protocol="http" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint1" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint2" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint3" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint4" />
<Endpoint Name="StatefulServiceReplicatorEndpoint1" />
<Endpoint Name="StatefulServiceReplicatorEndpoint2" />
</Endpoints>
</Resources>
everything worked. But why?
EDIT
The complete ServiceManifest is this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ServiceManifest Name="Service" Version="1.0.0"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2011/01/fabric"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<ServiceTypes>
<StatefulServiceType ServiceTypeName="ActorService1Type" />
<StatefulServiceType ServiceTypeName="ActorService1Type" HasPersistedState="true" />
<StatefulServiceType ServiceTypeName="ActorService3Type" />
<StatefulServiceType ServiceTypeName="ActorService4Type" HasPersistedState="true" />
<StatefulServiceType ServiceTypeName="StatefulService1Type" HasPersistedState="true" />
<StatefulServiceType ServiceTypeName="StatefulService2Type" HasPersistedState="true" />
<StatelessServiceType ServiceTypeName="StatelessService1Type" />
<StatelessServiceType ServiceTypeName="StatelessService2Type" />
<StatelessServiceType ServiceTypeName="WebServiceType" />
</ServiceTypes>
<CodePackage Name="Code" Version="1.0.0">
<SetupEntryPoint>
<ExeHost>
<Program>Setup.exe</Program>
</ExeHost>
</SetupEntryPoint>
<EntryPoint>
<ExeHost>
<Program>Service.exe</Program>
</ExeHost>
</EntryPoint>
</CodePackage>
<ConfigPackage Name="Config" Version="1.0.0" />
<Resources>
<Endpoints>
<Endpoint Name="WebServiceEndpoint" Type="Input" Protocol="http" Port="80" />
<Endpoint Name="StatelessServiceEndpoint1" Protocol="http" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint1" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint2" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint3" />
<Endpoint Name="ActorServiceReplicatorEndpoint4" />
<Endpoint Name="StatefulServiceReplicatorEndpoint1" />
<Endpoint Name="StatefulServiceReplicatorEndpoint2" />
</Endpoints>
</Resources>
</ServiceManifest>
Hard to know what happened in your initial reported case since there's no specific error or error message to work off of, but usually this is port conflicts when you end up sharing ports that you don't really want to or which can't be shared, or port exhaustion.
The endpoint resource in your service manifest is mainly for times when:
you want SF to help with allocating communication resources like ports for your services
you want SF to help configure those resources:
Allocating some port and consistently assigning it to some set of workloads
Punching a hole in the local firewall
Setting up a URLACL (relevant to http on windows through http.sys only)
Setting up and configuring certs to enable secure communication (same caveat)
In general you're free to ignore the endpoint resource if you don't need/want the help, since SF really is expecting the service code to do it's setup. In cases where you're not really using SF's programming models then the endpoint resource is more important since it's how you communicate to SF what your endpoints are.
The behavior you get really depends on the transport you're using, as well as the OS's dynamic port range and the Application port range that you've defined, as well as what the service code actually does.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/service-fabric/service-fabric-cluster-fabric-settings#section-name-fabricnode
Let's say you're setting up an http communication listener in your service like so, and walk through a few examples of what happens when you define and endpoint in your manifest or don't.
1) Let's say you put nothing in your service manifest about endpoints. This means that effectively you're specifying 0 as the port in code. In this case SF's not doing any allocation or management. The port is getting assigned by the OS from the OS dynamic port range. The port that actually gets assigned will be different for each service instance listener. This should work as a reasonable default choice in most scenarios.
2) Let's say you're specifying an endpoint in the manifest and not specifying any port at all, i.e.:
<Endpoint Name="HealthServiceEndpoint"/>
In this case, the port that is assigned will come from the SF application port range. It will be the same for any service instances hosted in the same process, but different across processes. (So it matters if you are using the Exclusive or Shared process hosting model) This also presumes that reusing the port is supported for your transport. Most transports don't (like http on via Kestrel in .NET, TCP under most cases), but there are some notable examples (http.sys based http transports on Windows like WebListener/HttpSys, tcp via net.tcp in WCF probably a few others).
3) Let's say you're specifying an endpoint in the service fabric manifest and explicitly specifying 0 for that port i.e.:
<Endpoint Name="HealthServiceEndpoint" Port="0" Protocol="http"/>
In this case the port that gets assigned will be from the OS dynamic port range, and it will end up the same/shared for any service instances hosted in the same process that use that endpoint. The port will be different across processes. (So again it matters if you are using the Exclusive or Shared process hosting model)
4) Naturally if the endpoint is specified and a specific port is specified, that port will be used for all service instances both within and across processes. This somewhat implicitly assumes that such sharing is going to work, which again depends on your transport and platform, or that you're never planning on running more than one instance of the service on this node.
Other trivia:
the "transport" element mainly determines whether SF registers your url with http.sys on windows or configures certificates to secure traffic (most of this can be done within your service code or a SetupEntryPoint).
as of this writing Type is ignored (this is a holdover from an older version of SF)
PathSuffix is used to create a default uri fragment that gets appended to the IP and port assigned by the platform. This is used in cases where there's code not using SF's listener APIs that sets up some listener on a different path like /api/value, like a the code inside a container might do.
I have a Mule flow to fetch data from a table in a PostgreSQL database and convert the data into XML format and write to a file:
<mule ...>
<spring:bean id="Postgres-jdbcDataSource"
class="org.enhydra.jdbc.standard.StandardDataSource" destroy-method="shutdown">
<spring:property name="driverName" value="org.postgresql.Driver" />
<spring:property name="url"
value="jdbc:postgresql://host:port/schema?user=username&password=password" />
</spring:bean>
<jdbc:connector name="Postgres-jdbcConnector"
dataSource-ref="Postgres-jdbcDataSource" pollingFrequency="60000"
transactionPerMessage="false">
<jdbc:query key="read" value="SELECT * FROM tablename" />
</jdbc:connector>
<file:connector name="file_connector" fileAge="500"
streaming="false" pollingFrequency="60000" />
<flow name="Postgres-flow">
<jdbc:inbound-endpoint queryKey="read"
connector-ref="Postgres-jdbcConnector">
<jdbc:transaction action="ALWAYS_BEGIN" />
<property key="receiveMessageInTransaction" value="true" />
</jdbc:inbound-endpoint>
<custom-transformer name="Postgres-transformer"
class="com.example.transformer.DbToXmlTransformer" ignoreBadInput="false"
encoding="UTF-8" />
<file:outbound-endpoint connector-ref="file_connector"
path="/home/path" outputPattern="file.xml" responseTimeout="10000"
encoding="UTF-8" />
</flow>
</mule>
When I run this flow, the flow does not fetch data from DB and write to file. It does not throw any errors or exceptions either. But when I run the same flow for MySQL or SQLServer database, changing driverName and url properties accordingly, the flow works fine.
Any idea why the Postgres database does not work? Probably it requires different DataSource class?
There is also a Postgre data source for mule and you can use it instead of spring beans :
<jdbc:postgresql-data-source name="PostgreSQL_Data_Source" user="your user name" password="your pwd" url="jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/TestDB" transactionIsolation="UNSPECIFIED" doc:name="PostgreSQL Data Source"/>
Anyways... , with your existing config you can just check by keeping the JDBC inbound endpoint in a poll component and place a logger before File outbound to check the payload value.. If it gets payload value in logger ..that means it is fetching the value ..Let me know if it works ... you can try the following :-
<mule ...>
<spring:bean id="Postgres-jdbcDataSource"
class="org.enhydra.jdbc.standard.StandardDataSource" destroy-method="shutdown">
<spring:property name="driverName" value="org.postgresql.Driver" />
<spring:property name="url"
value="jdbc:postgresql://host:port/schema?user=username&password=password" />
</spring:bean>
<jdbc:connector name="Postgres-jdbcConnector"
dataSource-ref="Postgres-jdbcDataSource" pollingFrequency="60000"
transactionPerMessage="false">
<jdbc:query key="read" value="SELECT * FROM tablename" />
</jdbc:connector>
<file:connector name="file_connector" fileAge="500"
streaming="false" pollingFrequency="60000" />
<flow name="Postgres-flow">
<poll frequency="1000" doc:name="Poll">
<jdbc:inbound-endpoint queryKey="read"
connector-ref="Postgres-jdbcConnector">
<jdbc:transaction action="ALWAYS_BEGIN" />
<property key="receiveMessageInTransaction" value="true" />
</jdbc:inbound-endpoint>
</poll>
<!-- You can also use object to xml transformer if you are not using any custom transformer -->
<!--<mulexml:object-to-xml-transformer doc:name="Object to XML"/> -->
<custom-transformer name="Postgres-transformer"
class="com.example.transformer.DbToXmlTransformer" ignoreBadInput="false"
encoding="UTF-8" />
<logger message="Payload :- #[message.payload]" level="INFO" doc:name="Logger"/>
<file:outbound-endpoint connector-ref="file_connector"
path="/home/path" outputPattern="file.xml" responseTimeout="10000"
encoding="UTF-8" />
</flow>
</mule>
For more find the reference here for Postgre Database with Mule :- http://www.dotnetfunda.com/articles/show/2068/using-mule-studio-to-read-data-from-postgresqlinbound-and-write-it-to
I am using JBoss AS 5.1.0 and Jboss ESB 4.10
I am trying to Invoke a Service which has a single action. I have Set MEP = oneWay for the Service.
When I Invoke the Service Using the Below Method I do not get a reply but an Exception.
new ServiceInvoker("Chapter3Sample", "Chapter3Service").deliverSync(esbMessage, 10000);
WHen I change mep=RequestResponse : I am able to get the Reply
As per my understanding ESB Message has a ReplyTo field (Since I am invkoing a Sync Request) the Message should be returned back by the last Action which is not happening in my case. Please find below the ESB XML:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<jbossesb parameterReloadSecs="5"
xmlns="http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossesb/trunk/product/etc/schemas/xml/jbossesb-1.0.1.xsd"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossesb/trunk/product/etc/schemas/xml/jbossesb-1.0.1.xsd http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossesb/trunk/product/etc/schemas/xml/jbossesb-1.0.1.xsd">
<providers>
<jms-provider connection-factory="ConnectionFactory" name="JBossMQ">
<jms-bus busid="chapter3GwChannel">
<jms-message-filter dest-name="queue/chapter3_Request_gw" dest-type="QUEUE"/>
</jms-bus>
<jms-bus busid="chapter3EsbChannel">
<jms-message-filter dest-name="queue/chapter3_Request_esb" dest-type="QUEUE"/>
</jms-bus>
</jms-provider>
</providers>
<services>
<service category="Chapter3Sample"
description="A template for Chapter3" name="Chapter3Service">
<listeners>
<jms-listener busidref="chapter3GwChannel" is-gateway="true" name="Chapter3GwListener"/>
<jms-listener busidref="chapter3EsbChannel" name="Chapter3Listener"/>
</listeners>
<actions mep="OneWay">
<action class="org.jboss.soa.esb.samples.chapter3.MyAction"
name="BodyPrinter">
<property name="process" value="displayMessage"/>
<property name="symbol" value="*"/>
<property name="count" value="50"/>
<property name="propertyName">
<hierarchicalProperty attr="value">
<inner name="myName" random="randomValue"/>
</hierarchicalProperty>
</property>
<property name="exceptionMethod" value="processException"/>
<property name="okMethod" value="processSuccess"/>
</action>
</actions>
</service>
</services>
</jbossesb>
When your are invoking call as synchronus.
new ServiceInvoker("Chapter3Sample", "Chapter3Service").deliverSync(esbMessage, 10000).
set mep=RequestResponse.
when your are invoking call asynchronus.
new ServiceInvoker("Chapter3Sample", "Chapter3Service").deliverASync(esbMessage, 10000).
set mep=oneWay .
It seems this should be simple but the solution has been eluding me. My flow is XML -> XSLT translation -> consume web service (IBM Web Sphere Web Service to be specific). I have the pieces working individually but I am having trouble figuring out how to add user/pass to the SOAP header. I would think that I should be able to add them to the keys in the security tab on the Mule SOAP Component (I have the operation set to Proxy Client). Unfortunately, I cannot figure out what the valid keys are. Maybe I am way off base even attempting to use the security tab. So ultimately I need my outgoing XML to contain:
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd">
<soapenv:Header>
<wsse:Security soapenv:mustUnderstand="1">
<wsse:UsernameToken>
<wsse:Username>
myUserName
</wsse:Username>
<wsse:Password Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText">
myPa33W0rd
</wsse:Password>
</wsse:UsernameToken>
</wsse:Security>
</soapenv:Header>
<soapenv:Body>
Currently my Mule flow is putting out:
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body>
Do I need to add the security information manually (maybe in the XSLT translation)? That doesn't feel right but I can't figure out how to add it.
Here are the relevant lines from my flow:
<mulexml:xslt-transformer maxIdleTransformers="2" maxActiveTransformers="5" xsl-file="src\main\resources\MappingMapToChangeCatalogEntry.xslt" outputEncoding="US-ASCII" doc:name="XSLT"/>
<cxf:proxy-client payload="body" enableMuleSoapHeaders="true" doc:name="SOAP"/>
<byte-array-to-string-transformer doc:name="Byte Array to String"/>
In order to add WS-Sec you need to configure the CXF WSS4J interceptors and inject them into Mule's CXF message processors.
Pre 3.3 =
<spring:bean name="wss4jOutConfiguration"
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.MapFactoryBean">
<spring:property name="sourceMap">
<spring:map>
<spring:entry key="action" value="Signature" />
<spring:entry key="user" value="joe" />
<spring:entry key="signaturePropFile" value="org/mule/module/cxf/wssec/wssecurity.properties" />
<spring:entry key="passwordCallbackClass" value="org.mule.module.cxf.wssec.ClientPasswordCallback" />
</spring:map>
</spring:property>
</spring:bean>
...
<cxf:proxy-client payload="body" enableMuleSoapHeaders="true" doc:name="SOAP">
<cxf:outInterceptors>
<spring:bean class="org.apache.cxf.ws.security.wss4j.WSS4JOutInterceptor">
<spring:property name="properties" ref="wss4jOutConfiguration"/>
</spring:bean>
</cxf:outInterceptors>
</cxf:proxy-client>
Rough Sample Password Callback class:
public class ClientPasswordCallback implements CallbackHandler{
#Override
public void handle(Callback[] callbacks) throws IOException, UnsupportedCallbackException {
WSPasswordCallback callback = (WSPasswordCallback) callbacks[0];
if(callback.getIdentifier().equals("joe")){
callback.setPassword("pass");
}
}
See more here: http://www.mulesoft.org/documentation/display/current/WS-Security+Usability+Improvement
3.3.+ :
There is a new cxf:ws-security element availble in 3.3+ Here is an example flow here: https://svn.codehaus.org/mule/tags/mule-3.4-M2/modules/cxf/src/test/resources/org/mule/module/cxf/wssec/cxf-secure-proxy-flow.xml
<cxf:proxy-client payload="body"
enableMuleSoapHeaders="true" doc:name="SOAP">
<cxf:ws-security>
<cxf:ws-config>
<cxf:property key="action"
value="UsernameToken
Timestamp" />
<cxf:property key="user" value="joe" />
<cxf:property key="passwordCallbackClass"
value="com.mulesoft.mule.example.security.PasswordCallback" />
<cxf:property key="mustUnderstand" value="false" />
</cxf:ws-config>
</cxf:ws-security>
</cxf:proxy-client>
Previously I have also just handled he entire envelope myself when using XSLT. I have then passed the user and pass into the XSLT via context params
<xm:xslt-transformer xsl-file="xslt/ToSomethingSOAPY.xsl">
<xm:context-property key="user" value="${my.user}" />
<xm:context-property key="password" value="${my.pass}" />
</xm:xslt-transformer>
And then reieived them via xsl params like so:
<xsl:param name="user" />
....
<wsse:UsernameToken
xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd"
wsu:Id="UsernameToken-1018444980">
<wsse:Username><xsl:value-of select="$user" /></wsse:Username>
Im working on Open Data Protocol (OData) which is a standardized protocol for creating and consuming data API's.
OData builds on core protocols like HTTP and commonly accepted methodologies like REST .
I have installed, configured and built OData successfully on iOS6
Currently I'm creating a Proxy class to connect to the OData Service using the following commands:
cd /Users/Shamsu/Applications/ODataObjC/ODataSDKV1-1.3/Framework/bin/ODatagenBinary/MacOSX10.7.sdk/Debug
./odatagen /uri=http://35.35.6.4/MyApp.MyApp3D.DataService/MyApp3DDataService.svc/ /out=/Users/Ramshad/Applications/ODataObjC/ODataSDKV1-1.3/Framework/bin/ODatagenBinary/MacOSX10.7.sdk/Debug /u=sa /p=123
However, I'm getting the error: "odatagen: Failed to generate proxy classes. Please verify the metadata"
I can see the "metadata.xml" file is updated as
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<edmx:Edmx Version="1.0" xmlns:edmx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/06/edmx">
<edmx:DataServices m:DataServiceVersion="1.0" m:MaxDataServiceVersion="3.0" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata">
<Schema Namespace="MyAppDBModel" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2009/11/edm">
<EntityType Name="User">
<Key>
<PropertyRef Name="UserID" />
</Key>
<Property Name="UserID" Type="Edm.Guid" Nullable="false" />
<Property Name="UserName" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="10" FixedLength="true" Unicode="true" />
<Property Name="UserDescription" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="50" FixedLength="false" Unicode="true" />
<Property Name="Active" Type="Edm.Int64" />
</EntityType>
</Schema>
<Schema Namespace="MyApp.MyApp3D.DataService" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2009/11/edm">
<EntityContainer Name="MyAppDBEntities" m:IsDefaultEntityContainer="true" p6:LazyLoadingEnabled="true" xmlns:p6="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2009/02/edm/annotation">
<EntitySet Name="User" EntityType="MyAppDBModel.User" />
</EntityContainer>
</Schema>
</edmx:DataServices>
</edmx:Edmx> "
Note: the metadata.xml file is located at out param location (/Users/Ramshad/Applications/ODataObjC/ODataSDKV11.3/Framework/bin/ODatagenBinary/MacOSX10.7.sdk/Debug /metadata.xml)
I'm unable to identify the issue. Any problem with my windows WCF service /ODataService configuration/database configuration ? Permission assigned as * (read,write).
Any help on this issue is appreciated.
Thanks.
I looked a bit closer at the XSLT document I linked to in my original comment, and it seems that the odatagen tool hasn't been updated to work with CSDL v3. The version of CSDL (i.e., the format used to serialize the metadata document) is indicated by the xml namespace of the Schema element. In your metadata, that namespace is http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2009/11/edm, which indicates CSDL v3. You can see in the XSLT document here that this namespace isn't recognized by the odatagen tool.
Since the odatagen tool is open source (see the source on github), you can try to tweak the code and XSLT files to make it work for your situation. You could try to just add the v3 namespace to the recognized schema namespaces, and if your metadata doesn't use any v3 features, I would imagine it would just work. Off the top of my head I'm not sure of the exact differences between v2 and v3, so I can't immediately say whether the metadata you've posted above would be valid in CSDL v2.
Alternatively, you could try to generate the $metadata document so that it's using CSDL v2 instead.
Sorry I don't have a better answer for you. Unfortunately, the odatagen tool has fallen a bit behind. But you're more than welcome to contribute to the project :)