What happens to a transaction if the server crashes - tsql

I know I could just test this but don't want to take down my server.
If a transaction is not yet committed and the SQL server crashes will the transaction be rolled back when the server recovers?

Yes - all transactions that haven't been committed will be rolled back when the server starts up again (thanks to the transaction log that SQL Server keeps)
For more in depth info, see Paul Randal's blog post A SQL Server DBA myth a day: (1/30) in-flight transactions continue after a failover

Related

How to know if a Firebird 2.0 database is being accessed?

I know that using Firebird 2.5+ I can check if there are users accessing my database using SQL, but unfortunately, Firebird 2.0 doesn't have this feature. Yes, I know it's an old version, but it's a legacy software and I'm not allowed to upgrade this in a short time... :(
I need to know if someone is connected to my 2.0 Firebird database, due to a process I'll run:
Block connections to DB (but ONLY if no one is connected)
Run my process
Allow users to reconnect again
I can start my process only when there are no users connected.
My database is part of a client/server system (no Web).
Any hints?
-at[tach] : this parameter prevents any new connections to the database from being made with the exception of the SYSDBA and the database owner. The shutdown will fail if there are any sessions connected after the timeout period has expired. It makes no difference if those connected sessions belong to the SYSDBA, the database owner or any other user. Any connections remaining will terminate the shutdown with the following details:
https://firebirdsql.org/manual/gfix-dbstartstop.html
There is also Services API to do it so your database access library should expose the shutdown function. Specify a short shutdown, and if it failed - then there were some users. If it succeeded - now you can go on with maintenance, having a warranty client applications will not be able to connect.
Alternatively you can upgrade Firebird 2.0 -> 2.1 which is more close to 2.0 than 2.5 but already have Monitoring Tables implemented.
However this your approach has one weak point - race conditions. Using M.T. you envision your work as following:
Keep querying M.T. (which slows down server work significantly) until there are no other connections.
start maintenance work, that would fail if other connections are active
complete maintenance work
Problem is, that even after at step 1 you gained "no other connection" state, it does not mean that between steps 1 and 2, and especially between steps 2 and 3 now new connections would be made.
Even if you made your checks and ensure #1 condition, when you would go on with maintenance there would be some new user connected back and working now. Not every time of course, but as time goes by it will eventually happen one day.
But there is yet one more good thing in FB 2.1 - database-level triggers.
c:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_2_1\doc\sql.extensions\README.db_triggers.txt
You can create a regular "all_current_connections" table, using on connect and on disconnect triggers to keep it up to date.
You perhaps would also have to add some logic to your applications, so they would update that table with your internal application ID, to tell main workflow apps/connections from servicing utilities. However it is also possible that mere CURRENT_USER and CURRENT_CONNECTION pair, which the trigger knows and can store to the table, would be enough for that table, if you can infer kind of application from mere user name.
Then on disconnect trigger might be checking whether all "main workflow" apps disconnected and POST_EVENT to notify servicing utilities. However those utilities would still have to shutdown the database first, anyway.
You can shut down the database using gfix. The gfix tool will try to shutdown the database and if connections still exist after a timeout, the shutdown will fail.
For example, use:
gfix -shut -attach 5 <your-database>
This will:
prevent new connection being created,
wait 5 seconds for the existing connections to end,
if after 5 seconds there are still active connections the shutdown will abort,
otherwise, after 5 seconds the database will be shut down.
After shutdown, only SYSDBA or the database owner can create a connection to the database. This is only a viable option if your application it self doesn't use SYSDBA or the database owner account.
You bring the database back online using:
gfix -online <your-database>
For more information, see also Gfix - Database Housekeeping: Database Startup and Shutdown
Well, not an elegant way, but works...
I try to rename the database file.
If there is someone accessing the database, the rename operation will give me
an exception, saying that the file is in use by some process.
If rename succeeds, new users will not be able to access the database
anymore (the connection string used by my systems is not changed).
I run the exclusive process I have to.
Rename the database file to its original name, allowing new users to
connect again.
I post my solution in the hope that helps someone facing a similar problem.
Our new version of the product will probably a Web application and the database was not choosen yet, but certainly will no be Firebird.
Thanks to all that tried to give me an answer.

PostgreSQL connection issue - Dropping idle connections

Brief Background:
We have a cloud based Warehouse Management System that uses Glassfish to dish out the java interface. The Warehouse Management System consists of a Dashboard and a mobile application - both of which talk constantly with the Glassfish server (using a web browser).
Issue:
Recently our PostgreSQL database server HDD failed. After restoring from a backup and moving the database to an Amazon Web Service Server, idle connections seem to be dropping out. This causes the entire Warehouse Management System to fail. Restarting the Glassfish server seems to fix the issue until the idle connection causes it to fail again.
It happens around 3-4 times per day after approx 20mins of idle activity i.e. our customer's lunch breaks, after hours etc..
Question:
Is there a setting that I'm missing in the postgresql.conf file? What else could be causing this?
Attachments:
I've attached a screenshot containing the output of running 'select * from pg_stat_activity;' and also the postgresql.conf file.
select * from pg_stat_activity
postgresql.conf
Log:
postgresql-8.4-main.log shows this occasionally, although it doesn't seem to be when it cuts out.
2015-10-19 07:51:41 NZDT [9971-1] postgres#customerName LOG: unexpected EOF on client connection
glassfish server.log is riddled with these lines:
[#|2015-10-19T07:46:49.715+1300|SEVERE|glassfish3.1.1|javax.enterprise.system.container.web.com.sun.enterprise.web|_ThreadID=25;_ThreadName=Thread-2;|WebModule[/pns-CustomerName]Received InterruptedException on request thread
[#|2015-10-20T09:34:42.351+1300|WARNING|glassfish3.1.1|com.sun.grizzly.config.GrizzlyServiceListener|_ThreadID=17;_ThreadName=Thread-2;|GRIZZLY0023: Interrupting idle Thread: http-thread-pool-8080(2).|
[#|2015-10-20T07:33:55.414+1300|WARNING|glassfish3.1.1|javax.enterprise.system.container.web.com.sun.enterprise.web|_ThreadID=14;_ThreadName=Thread-2;|Response Error during finishResponse java.lang.NullPointerException
Thanks in advance

SQL Server 2008 R2 Replication Failing w/ Error 1204

I am working on a SQL Server 2008 R2 server.
On this server are two instances (let's call them A and B).
A replicates one of it's databases to B using a transactional replication.
This replication however became inactive and the snapshot deleted after some maintenance occurred.
I have reinitialized the subscribers and have successfully created a new snapshot but when I start synchronizing, I get the following error:
The SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your statement when there are fewer active users or ask the system administrator to check the SQL Server lock and memory configuration.
(Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 1204)
I have killed the connections to database B that aren't Administrator (login of sa) and that aren't running. This didn't work and I am still getting the error.
I'm not very knowledgeable when it comes to this stuff and I don't have a DBA to talk to so any help is greatly appreciated as I am running out of ideas fast.
Thanks in advance!
Edit: Here is some more info after talking with Razzle Dazzle.
DBCC OPENTRAN - This finds no open transactions on both the provider and the subscriber.
sp_who - This shows that very few (under 40) connections are going for both provider and subscriber. The only connection(s) that are in a status other than either 'Background' or 'Sleeping' is the connection(s) that I have to the server via SSMS.
DBCC MEMORYSTATUS -
Publisher: Publisher Memory Status
Subscriber: Subscriber Memory Status

Orientdb network connection lost during commit

I am using the blueprints graph api for orient against a 2 node cluster running orient 1.7.10. When ingesting simple parent child data I intermittently get the following error on commit -
Warning: caught I/O errors from not connected (local socket=?), trying to reconnect (error: java.io.IOException: Channel is closed)
The connection is then reestablished:
Connection re-acquired transparently after 31ms and 1 retries: no errors will be thrown at application level.
This occurs mid way through the commit (100 vertices and edges) with the result that the server thinks it has sent the response but the client hangs forever.
Is there a way to catch this at the application level and e.g. rollback?
I would be very grateful for any help?
As far as i know a very similar issue was fixed some time ago: https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/2930
one thing to be aware is that autostart transaction of the graph, if is enabled (and it is by default) you don't need to do begin, but just commit, if you do begin the transaction will be committed at shutdown and in that case can create that problem.
another suggestion is migrate to 2.0-* releases that have important improvement also in that side, especially if you are in development phase, the 2.0 final is going to be released very soon and will be the one with major focus in the next months.
bye

ADO.NET Sync Framework - Determining which records synced successfully/failed from PDA to Server

I am using ADO.NET Sync Framework and on the client side (PDA running Windows Mobile 5 and .net cf 3.5 and SQL CE 3.5). Server side is using SQL Server 2005.
On server side manual queries have been written to determine which records are selected for insert/update/delete for each client as well as any conflicting records.
On PDA though, I can't seem to find a way to determine exactly which records were synced successfully and which failed. I can obtain the SyncStatistics but this just gives totals and I need actual row id's so that I can delete the successfully synced records off the PDA.
Any ideas?
Are you not having a event handler for ClientApplyChangeFailed? You can use this for logging the failures.