I add costum styles to the RTE with a CSS File:
RTE.default.contentCSS = EXT:netjapan/Resources/Public/css/rte.css
For some elements this works. For example for a ulElement:
ul.liststyle1 {
list-style: none;
padding-left: 17px;
}
When I select the ul in the RTE I can chose the Blockstyle liststyle1.
I want to do the same for p:
p.test {
font-size: 80%;
}
And when I select the p I can chose the Blockstyle test and the style is used. But when I save the Blockstyle is gone.
I added this Typoscript:
RTE.default {
removeTags = sdfield, strike
proc.entryHTMLparser_db.removeTags = sdfield, strike
}
So that p is not in the removeTags list. But it had no effect.
Anyone know how it comes that the Blockstyle is removed on the pElement?
I had simillar problem last week. Sometimes RTE is going crazy. I mean that there is no logical sense in it. Check this: marke the text and use the container style it will wrap it in div but there will be also <p> in it so you will have something like <div><p class="bodytext">text</p></div> - you can add style for that. At least this solved my problem
Related
I am using AngularStrap, (TypeAhead), trying to make the substring in the matched items to stand out, like either make them bold (like jquery autocomplete) or change the background of the characters ta different color
California
Technical
I thought this should be possible by changing css (if I know they have a selector for the matched substring) Or use of template/$templatecache
no luck so far
EDIT: In this plnkr I can see the drop down menu items have user input highlighted/bolded but cannot see why and how it happens:
<input type="text" class="span3" ng-model="typeaheadValue" bs-typeahead="typeahead">
plnkr -> http://plnkr.co/edit/Yjff9DiLnGqi2x1E5D2q?p=preview
The typeahead dropdown menu items can be styled through .dropdown-menu a. Matched text is regexed' to <strong>match></strong> i.e style those through .dropdown-menu a strong. Example :
/* style the dropdown items */
.dropdown-menu a {
font-family : 'courier new';
font-size: 110%;
}
/* styling matched text */
.dropdown-menu a strong {
color: white;
background-color: red;
}
forked plnkr -> http://plnkr.co/edit/LpdRiH9DxeRiAib3MOnn?p=preview
does anybody know, how I can show the fileicon in my Downloadlist created with content Type filelinks in Typo3 6.1.5?
In older Typo Versions, I used the extension css_filelinks, but it doesn't work anymore.
My current Typoscript Setup:
tt_content.uploads.20.renderObj = COA
tt_content.uploads.20.renderObj.20.data = file:current:title //file:current:description // file:current:name
First of all, to let TYPO3 display file icons from the filelinks content element, you need to choose any other CE layout (in the Appearance tab) than the default.
Now TYPO3 prepends the files with icons. You might not find them too beautiful. If so, you can configure the file path end type of the icons with TypoScript:
# path to the folder containing the icons
tt_content.uploads.20.renderObj.15.file.import = fileadmin/folder/to/my/icons/
# wrap to indicate the file type of the icons (defaults to |.gif)
tt_content.uploads.20.renderObj.15.file.wrap = |.png
If you want to display icons globally without setting the layout, get rid of the corresponding if statement:
tt_content.uploads.20.renderObj.15.stdWrap.if >
Of course you could also just use CSS selectors to display the right icon:
a[href $='.pdf'] { background: url('icons/pdf.png') no-repeat 1px 2px; padding-left: 20px; }
Is there no CSS-Class you can use?
Like this:
span.csc-uploads-fileName {
background: url("../img/icon.png") no-repeat scroll 0 0 transparent;
height: 40px;
width: 43px;
text-indent: -999em;
}
I was creating a <div> tag in which I wanted to apply two classes for a <div> tag which would be a thumbnail gallery. One class for its position and the other class for its style. This way I could apply the style, I was having some strange results which brought me to a question.
Can two classes be assigned to a <div> tag? If so, which one overrules the other one or which one has priority?
Multiple classes can be assigned to a div. Just separate them in the class name with spaces like this:
<div class="rule1 rule2 rule3">Content</div>
This div will then match any style rules for three different class selectors: .rule1, .rule2 and .rule3.
CSS rules are applied to objects in the page that match their selectors in the order they are encountered in the style sheet and if there is a conflict between two rules (more than one rule trying to set the same attribute), then CSS specificity determines which rule takes precedence.
If the CSS specificity is the same for the conflicting rules, then the later one (the one defined later in the stylesheet or in the later stylesheet) takes precedence. The order of the class names on the object itself does not matter. It is the order of the style rules in the style sheet that matters if the CSS specificity is the same.
So, if you had styles like this:
.rule1 {
background-color: green;
}
.rule2 {
background-color: red;
}
Then, since both rules match the div and have exactly the same CSS specificity, then the second rule comes later so it would have precedence and the background would be red.
If one rule had a higher CSS specificity (div.rule1 scores higher than .rule2):
div.rule1 {
background-color: green;
}
.rule2 {
background-color: red;
}
Then, it would take precedence and the background color here would be green.
If the two rules don't conflict:
.rule1 {
background-color: green;
}
.rule2 {
margin-top: 50px;
}
Then, both rules will be applied.
Actually, the class that defined last in the css - is applied on your div.
check it out:
red last in css
.blue{ color: blue; }
.red { color: red; }
<div class="blue red">blue red</div>
<div class="red blue">red blue</div>
vs
blue last in css
.red { color: red; }
.blue{ color: blue; }
<div class="blue red">blue red</div>
<div class="red blue">red blue</div>
If you asking about they have same property then as per the CSS rule it's take the last statement.
<div class="red green"></div>
CSS
.red{
color:red;
}
.green{
color:green;
}
As per the above example it's take the last statement as per css tree which is .green.
The class that is defined last in the CSS have priority, if nothing else applies.
Read up on CSS priority to see how it works.
Many classes can be assigned to an element, you just separate them with a space
<div class="myClass aSecondClass keepOnClassing stayClassySanDiego"></div>
Because of the cascade in CSS, the overwriting rules closest the to bottom of the document will be applied to the element.
So if you have
.myClass
{
background: white;
color: blue;
}
.keepOnClassing
{
color: red;
}
The red color will be used, but not the background color as it was not overwritten.
You must also take into account CSS specificity, if you have a more specific selector, this one will be used:
.myClass
{
background: white;
color: blue;
}
div.myClass.keepOnClassing
{
background: purple;
color: red;
}
.stayClassySanDiego
{
background: black;
}
The second selector here will be used as it is more specific.
You can take a look at it all here.
I know, there are at least 3 dozen questions like this on stackoverflow and still, I could not make this happen:
A simple table where thead is sticked/fixed at the top, and the tbody is scrolled.
I tried so much in the past days and now I ended up here crying for help.
A solution should work in IE8+ and newest FF, Chrome & Safari.
The difference to other "possible duplicates like this one is that I don't want to use two nested tables or jQuery (plain javascript is fine though).
Demo of what I want:
http://www.imaputz.com/cssStuff/bigFourVersion.html.
Problem is it doesn't work in IE, and I would be fine to use some JS.
Ok i got it:
You need to wrap the table in two DIVs:
<div class="outerDIV">
<div class="innerDIV">
<table></table>
</div>
</div>
The CSS for the DIVs is this:
.outerDIV {
position: relative;
padding-top: 20px; //height of your thead
}
.innerDIV {
overflow-y: auto;
height: 200px; //the actual scrolling container
}
The reason is, that you basically make the inner DIV scrollable, and pull the THEAD out of it by sticking it to the outer DIV.
Now stick the thead to the outerDIV by giving it
table thead {
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
The tbody needs to have display: block as well.
Now you'll notice that the scrolling works, but the widths are completely messep up. That's were Javascript comes in.
You can choose on your own how you want to assign it. I for myself gave the TH's in the table fixed widths and built a simple script which takes the width and assigns them to the first TD-row in the tbody.
Something like this should work:
function scrollingTableSetThWidth(tableId)
{
var table = document.getElementById(tableId);
ths = table.getElementsByTagName('th');
tds = table.getElementsByTagName('td');
if(ths.length > 0) {
for(i=0; i < ths.length; i++) {
tds[i].style.width = getCurrentComputedStyle(ths[i], 'width');
}
}
}
function getCurrentComputedStyle(element, attribute)
{
var attributeValue;
if (window.getComputedStyle)
{ // class A browsers
var styledeclaration = document.defaultView.getComputedStyle(element, null);
attributeValue = styledeclaration.getPropertyValue(attribute);
} else if (element.currentStyle) { // IE
attributeValue = element.currentStyle[vclToCamelCases(attribute)];
}
return attributeValue;
}
With jQuery of course this would be a lot easier but for now i was not allowed to use a third party library for this project.
Maybe we should change a method to archieve this goal.Such as:
<div><ul><li>1</li><li>2</li></ul></div> //make it fixed
<table>
<thead>
<tr><th>1</th><th>2</th></tr>
</thead>
<tfoot></tfoot>
<tbody></tbody>
</table>
Of course, this is not good to sematic.But it is the simplest way without js or jq.
Don't you think so?
I'm creating a MenuBar, and I want to have it display a little icon when there are sub-elements to be displayed. I thought I could achieve this like so:
interface ActionHeroResources extends ClientBundle, MenuBar.Resources
{
#Source("actionhero.css")
public ActionHeroCSS css();
#Override
#Source("agw-dropdown.png")
ImageResource menuBarSubMenuIcon();
}
private static final ActionHeroResources RESOURCES = GWT.create(ActionHeroResources.class);
MenuBar actionMenu = new MenuBar(true, RESOURCES);
public ActionHero()
{
actionMenu.addItem("Select", aSelectMenuFullOfOptions);
}
But the menu appears with the word "Select" an no icon! I'm positive my ImageResource is working correctly because I use menuBarSubMenuIcon().getURL() from the same resource later, and my image shows up just as you'd expect. In the HTML generated by GWT, there is absolutely no distinction between the items with MenuBars as children and the items with Commands. My CSS is working fine.
Any thoughts?
Try overriding the CSS style for .gwt-MenuBar-vertical .subMenuIcon-selected, like this:
.gwt-MenuBar-vertical .subMenuIcon-selected {
background: none;
}
I use this for my own selected items and it works great:
.gwt-MenuBar-vertical .subMenuIcon-selected {
background: url(images/hand_pointer.png) no-repeat 0px 0px;
}
The problem was ultimately that the popup panels that form the submenus take their stylename from the parent, but append a dependent stylename. I don't know of a way to predict what that dependent stylename will be, since the original stylename is obfuscated. I worked around this problem by using the more generic .gwt-MenuBar popup stylename. This only works because I only have one style of popup menu in my program - I'm not sure what I would do if I wanted two popups to look different!
Hopefully, in later gwt releases, the MenuBar styles will come more closely from the resources passed to the menubar and make less use of dependent style names.
You can simply set a css rule for the that appears in the sub menu like this:
.subMenuIcon > img {
/* override gwt sub menu icon */
width: 6px !important;
height: 11px !important;
background: url('your-image-relative-path.png') no-repeat 0px 0px !important;
}