Kind of like <statement> || die in perl, something concise that I can put with every critical statement to avoid bothering powershell with the rest of the script if something goes wrong.
Most commands support the -ErrorAction common parameter. Specifying -ErrorAction Stop will generally halt the script on an error. See Get-Help about_CommonParameters.
By default, -ErrorAction is Continue. You can change the default option by changing the value of $ErrorActionPreference. See Get-Help about_Preference_Variables.
If verbosity is really an issue, -ErrorAction is aliased to -ea.
Another way to implement a ...|| die-like construct in PowerShell without the need to add huge try-catch constructs, would be to use the automatic variable $?.
From Get-Help about_Automatic_variables:
$?
Contains the execution status of the last operation. It contains
TRUE if the last operation succeeded and FALSE if it failed.
Simply add the following right after each critical statement:
if(-not $?){
# Call Write-EventLog or write $Error[0] to an xml or txt file if you like
Exit(1)
}
Related
When my PowerShell script tries, for example, to create a SQL Server object for a server that doesn't exist ("bla" in my case), PowerShell displays lots of PowerShell errors in red.
Since my script checks the value of $? after such calls, and displays and logs errors, I'd rather not have the several lines of PowerShell errors displayed as well.
How can I deactivate those being displayed for my script?
You have a couple of options. The easiest involve using the ErrorAction settings.
-Erroraction is a universal parameter for all cmdlets. If there are special commands you want to ignore you can use -erroraction 'silentlycontinue' which will basically ignore all error messages generated by that command. You can also use the Ignore value (in PowerShell 3+):
Unlike SilentlyContinue, Ignore does not add the error message to the $Error automatic variable.
If you want to ignore all errors in a script, you can use the system variable $ErrorActionPreference and do the same thing: $ErrorActionPreference= 'silentlycontinue'
See about_CommonParameters for more info about -ErrorAction.
See about_preference_variables for more info about $ErrorActionPreference.
Windows PowerShell provides two mechanisms for reporting errors: one mechanism for terminating errors and another mechanism for non-terminating errors.
Internal CmdLets code can call a ThrowTerminatingError method when an error occurs that does not or should not allow the cmdlet to continue to process its input objects. The script writter can them use exception to catch these error.
EX :
try
{
Your database code
}
catch
{
Error reporting/logging
}
Internal CmdLets code can call a WriteError method to report non-terminating errors when the cmdlet can continue processing the input objects. The script writer can then use -ErrorAction option to hide the messages, or use the $ErrorActionPreference to setup the entire script behaviour.
You can also append 2>$null to your command.
Example:
$rec = Resolve-DnsName $fqdn -Server $dns 2>$null
You're way off track here. Silencing errors is almost never a good idea, and manually checking $? explicitly after every single command is enormously cumbersome and easy to forget to do (error prone). Don't set yourself up to easily make a mistake. If you're getting lots and lots of red, that means your script kept going when it should have stopped instead. It can no longer do useful work if most of its commands are failing. Continuing a program when it and the system are in an unknown state will have unknown consequences; you could easily leave the system in a corrupt state.
The correct solution is to stop the algorithm on the first error. This principle is called "fail fast," and PowerShell has a built in mechanism to enable that behavior. It is a setting called the error preference, and setting it to the highest level will make your script (and the child scopes if they don't override it) behave this way:
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
This will produce a nice, big error message for your consumption and prevent the following commands from executing the first time something goes wrong, without having to check $? every single time you run a command. This makes the code vastly simpler and more reliable. I put it at the top of every single script I ever write, and you almost certainly should as well.
In the rare cases where you can be absolutely certain that allowing the script to continue makes sense, you can use one of two mechanisms:
catch: This is the better and more flexible mechanism. You can wrap a try/catch block around multiple commands, allowing the first error to stop the sequence and jump into the handler where you can log it and then otherwise recover from it or rethrow it to bubble the error up even further. You can also limit the catch to specific errors, meaning that it will only be invoked in specific situations you anticipated rather than any error. (For example, failing to create a file because it already exists warrants a different response than a security failure.)
The common -ErrorAction parameter: This parameter changes the error handling for one single function call, but you cannot limit it to specific types of errors. You should only use this if you can be certain that the script can continue on any error, not just the ones you can anticipate.
In your case, you probably want one big try/catch block around your entire program. Then your process will stop on the first error and the catch block can log it before exiting. This will remove a lot of duplicate code from your program in addition to cleaning up your log file and terminal output and making your program less likely to cause problems.
Do note that this doesn't handle the case when external executables fail (exit code nonzero, conventionally), so you do still need to check $LASTEXITCODE if you invoke any. Despite this limitation, the setting still saves a lot of code and effort.
Additional reliability
You might also want to consider using strict mode:
Set-StrictMode -Version Latest
This prevents PowerShell from silently proceeding when you use a non-existent variable and in other weird situations. (See the -Version parameter for details about what it restricts.)
Combining these two settings makes PowerShell much more of fail-fast language, which makes programming in it vastly easier.
I had a similar problem when trying to resolve host names using [system.net.dns]. If the IP wasn't resolved .Net threw a terminating error.
To prevent the terminating error and still retain control of the output, I created a function using TRAP.
E.G.
Function Get-IP
{PARAM ([string]$HostName="")
PROCESS {TRAP
{"" ;continue}
[system.net.dns]::gethostaddresses($HostName)
}
}
Add -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue to your script and you'll be good to go.
In some cases you can pipe after the command a Out-Null
command | Out-Null
To extend on Mikkel's answer.
If you still want to capture the error, you can use "-ErrorAction stop" combined with a try - catch.
"-ErrorAction silentlycontinue" will ignore the error.
For instance:
try
{
New-Item -Path "/somepath" -Name "somename" -ErrorAction Stop | Out-Null
}
catch
{
echo "You must run this command in an elevated mode."
}
NOTE: There is no "silentlyStop" action, and I believe Mickel's answer refers to the "stop" action. It is likely a typo.
The idea of using a try-catch combined with the "stop" action is to be able to not just dismiss eventual errors but to show something in case of errors.
If you want the powershell errormessage for a cmdlet suppressed, but still want to catch the error, use "-erroraction 'silentlyStop'"
I am calling an external .ps1 file which contains a break statement in certain error conditions. I would like to somehow catch this scenario, allow any externally printed messages to show as normal, and continue on with subsequent statements in my script. If the external script has a throw, this works fine using try/catch. Even with trap in my file, I cannot stop my script from terminating.
For answering this question, assume that the source code of the external .ps1 file (authored by someone else and pulled in at run time) cannot be changed.
Is what I want possible, or was the author of the script just not thinking about playing nice when called externally?
Edit: providing the following example.
In badscript.ps1:
if((Get-Date).DayOfWeek -ne "Yesterday"){
Write-Warning "Sorry, you can only run this script yesterday."
break
}
In myscript.ps1:
.\badscript.ps1
Write-Host "It is today."
The results I would like to achieve is to see the warning from badscript.ps1 and for it to continue on with my further statements in myscript.ps1. I understand why the break statement causes "It is today." to never be printed, however I wanted to find a way around it, as I am not the author of badscript.ps1.
Edit: Updating title from "powershell try/catch does not catch a break statement" to "how to prevent external script from terminating your script with break statement". The mention of try/catch was really more about one failed solution to the actual question which the new title better reflects.
Running a separate PowerShell process from within my script to invoke the external file has ended up being a solution good enough for my needs:
powershell -File .\badscript.ps1 will execute the contents of badscript.ps1 up until the break statement including any Write-Host or Write-Warning's and let my own script continue afterwards.
I get where you're coming from. Probably the easiest way would be to push the script off as a job, and wait for the results. You can even echo the results out with Receive-Job after it's done if you want.
So considering the bad script you have above, and this script file calling it:
$path = Split-Path -Path $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition -Parent
$start = Start-Job -ScriptBlock { . "$using:Path\badScript.ps1" } -Name "BadScript"
$wait = Wait-Job -Name "BadScript" -Timeout 100
Receive-Job -Name "BadScript"
Get-Command -Name "Get-ChildItem"
This will execute the bad script in a job, wait for the results, echo the results, and then continue executing the script it's in.
This could be wrapped in a function for any scripts you might need to call (just to be on the safe side.
Here's the output:
WARNING: Sorry, you can only run this script yesterday.
CommandType Name Version Source
----------- ---- ------- ------
Cmdlet Get-ChildItem 3.1.0.0 Microsoft.PowerShell.Management
In the about_Break documentation it says
PowerShell does not limit how far labels can resume execution. The
label can even pass control across script and function call
boundaries.
This got me thinking, "How can I trick this stupid language design choice?". And the answer is to create a little switch block that will trap the break on the way out:
.\NaughtyBreak.ps1
Write-Host "NaughtyBreak about to break"
break
.\OuterScript.ps1
switch ('dummy') { default {.\NaughtyBreak.ps1}}
Write-Host "After switch() {NaughtyBreak}"
.\NaughtyBreak.ps1
Write-Host "After plain NaughtyBreak"
Then when we call OuterScript.ps1 we get
NaughtyBreak about to break
After switch() {NaughtyBreak}
NaughtyBreak about to break
Notice that OuterScript.ps1 correctly resumed after the call to NaughtyBreak.ps1 embedded in the switch, but was unceremoniously killed when calling NaughtyBreak.ps1 directly.
Putting break back inside a loop (including switch) where it belongs.
foreach($i in 1) { ./badscript.ps1 }
'done'
Or
switch(1) { 1 { ./badscript.ps1 } }
'done'
I'm writing a script that (by necessity) has to call a rather noisy set of other cmdlets. I'd like to the printing from the other cmdlets to not be displayed so I only see the status messages from my own script.
I've tried > $null and | Out-Null, but those only swallow returned values, not text printed via Write-Host. How can I hide/prevent text being printed "down the stack"?
Try to define your dummy function Write-Host before calling noisy cmdlets, e.g.
function Write-Host {}
If they call Write-Host literally then this should help.
If I've read your post correctly, you'd like to silence the Write-Host cmdlet. If we consider command precedence, we know that functions will be run before cmdlets, if they have the same name. Therefore, I'd recommend you create a Write-Host function that doesn't write anything. Here's an example that highlights this possibility.
I have written my own Powershell logging function Log with parameters stream (on which stream to write the message) and message (the message to write).
The idea is that i can write the outputs both to the console and to a log-file. What I do in the function is basically determine on which stream to publish the message (with a switch statement) and then write the message to the stream and the log-file:
switch ($stream) {
Verbose {
Write-Output "$logDate [VERBOSE] $message" | Out-File -FilePath $sgLogFileName -Append
Write-Verbose $message
break
}
}
The question is now, is it possible to check if the -Verbose argument was given?
The goal is to write the message to the log-file only if the -Verbose was given.
I looked already in the following help docs but didn't find anything helpful:
- help about_Parameters
- help about_commonparameters
Also, the -WhatIf parameter does not work with Write-Verbose.
Thanks a lot for your answers!
Inside your script check this:
$PSCmdlet.MyInvocation.BoundParameters["Verbose"].IsPresent
Also available: Check the parameter '$VerbosePreference'. If it is set to 'SilentlyContinue' then $Verbose was not given at the command line. If it is set to '$Continue' then you can assume it was set.
Also applies to the following other common parameters:
Name Value
---- -----
DebugPreference SilentlyContinue
VerbosePreference SilentlyContinue
ProgressPreference Continue
ErrorActionPreference Continue
WhatIfPreference 0
WarningPreference Continue
ConfirmPreference High
Taken from an MSDN blog page from long ago... so it should be relevant with relatively old versions of Powershell. Also see "Get-Help about_CommonParameters" in Powershell v4.
More generally: since one might specify -Verbose:$false on the command line, the following code handles that case. It also works for any other switch parameter:
$Verbose = $false
if ($PSBoundParameters.ContainsKey('Verbose')) { # Command line specifies -Verbose[:$false]
$Verbose = $PsBoundParameters.Get_Item('Verbose')
}
Came across this looking for the same answer and found some good info, also some not so good.
The marked answer seems to be dated and not correct as the comments stated. The PSBoundParameter property object from the MyInvocation object is a Dictionary (PoSH 5.1 up maybe earlier didn't check) which does not contain the IsPresent property. The asker also forgot to consider $VerbosePreference where other answers have presented this option.
Here's a solution that makes it simple and easy:
if ( $PSBoundParameters['Verbose'] -or $VerbosePreference -eq 'Continue' ) {
# do something
}
$PSBoundParameters is a hashtable object, if the value is present and true it will evaluate to true, if it is not present or present and not true it will evaluate to false. VerbosePreference which is set at the session level will display verbose statements when the value is Continue. Put this together in a condition using a logical or and you will get an accurate representation if verbose output is desired.
If you're determining whether or not to print depending on the value of the -Verbose parameter, consider using Write-Verbose instead of Write-Host: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.utility/write-verbose?view=powershell-7.1
When my PowerShell script tries, for example, to create a SQL Server object for a server that doesn't exist ("bla" in my case), PowerShell displays lots of PowerShell errors in red.
Since my script checks the value of $? after such calls, and displays and logs errors, I'd rather not have the several lines of PowerShell errors displayed as well.
How can I deactivate those being displayed for my script?
You have a couple of options. The easiest involve using the ErrorAction settings.
-Erroraction is a universal parameter for all cmdlets. If there are special commands you want to ignore you can use -erroraction 'silentlycontinue' which will basically ignore all error messages generated by that command. You can also use the Ignore value (in PowerShell 3+):
Unlike SilentlyContinue, Ignore does not add the error message to the $Error automatic variable.
If you want to ignore all errors in a script, you can use the system variable $ErrorActionPreference and do the same thing: $ErrorActionPreference= 'silentlycontinue'
See about_CommonParameters for more info about -ErrorAction.
See about_preference_variables for more info about $ErrorActionPreference.
Windows PowerShell provides two mechanisms for reporting errors: one mechanism for terminating errors and another mechanism for non-terminating errors.
Internal CmdLets code can call a ThrowTerminatingError method when an error occurs that does not or should not allow the cmdlet to continue to process its input objects. The script writter can them use exception to catch these error.
EX :
try
{
Your database code
}
catch
{
Error reporting/logging
}
Internal CmdLets code can call a WriteError method to report non-terminating errors when the cmdlet can continue processing the input objects. The script writer can then use -ErrorAction option to hide the messages, or use the $ErrorActionPreference to setup the entire script behaviour.
You can also append 2>$null to your command.
Example:
$rec = Resolve-DnsName $fqdn -Server $dns 2>$null
You're way off track here. Silencing errors is almost never a good idea, and manually checking $? explicitly after every single command is enormously cumbersome and easy to forget to do (error prone). Don't set yourself up to easily make a mistake. If you're getting lots and lots of red, that means your script kept going when it should have stopped instead. It can no longer do useful work if most of its commands are failing. Continuing a program when it and the system are in an unknown state will have unknown consequences; you could easily leave the system in a corrupt state.
The correct solution is to stop the algorithm on the first error. This principle is called "fail fast," and PowerShell has a built in mechanism to enable that behavior. It is a setting called the error preference, and setting it to the highest level will make your script (and the child scopes if they don't override it) behave this way:
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
This will produce a nice, big error message for your consumption and prevent the following commands from executing the first time something goes wrong, without having to check $? every single time you run a command. This makes the code vastly simpler and more reliable. I put it at the top of every single script I ever write, and you almost certainly should as well.
In the rare cases where you can be absolutely certain that allowing the script to continue makes sense, you can use one of two mechanisms:
catch: This is the better and more flexible mechanism. You can wrap a try/catch block around multiple commands, allowing the first error to stop the sequence and jump into the handler where you can log it and then otherwise recover from it or rethrow it to bubble the error up even further. You can also limit the catch to specific errors, meaning that it will only be invoked in specific situations you anticipated rather than any error. (For example, failing to create a file because it already exists warrants a different response than a security failure.)
The common -ErrorAction parameter: This parameter changes the error handling for one single function call, but you cannot limit it to specific types of errors. You should only use this if you can be certain that the script can continue on any error, not just the ones you can anticipate.
In your case, you probably want one big try/catch block around your entire program. Then your process will stop on the first error and the catch block can log it before exiting. This will remove a lot of duplicate code from your program in addition to cleaning up your log file and terminal output and making your program less likely to cause problems.
Do note that this doesn't handle the case when external executables fail (exit code nonzero, conventionally), so you do still need to check $LASTEXITCODE if you invoke any. Despite this limitation, the setting still saves a lot of code and effort.
Additional reliability
You might also want to consider using strict mode:
Set-StrictMode -Version Latest
This prevents PowerShell from silently proceeding when you use a non-existent variable and in other weird situations. (See the -Version parameter for details about what it restricts.)
Combining these two settings makes PowerShell much more of fail-fast language, which makes programming in it vastly easier.
I had a similar problem when trying to resolve host names using [system.net.dns]. If the IP wasn't resolved .Net threw a terminating error.
To prevent the terminating error and still retain control of the output, I created a function using TRAP.
E.G.
Function Get-IP
{PARAM ([string]$HostName="")
PROCESS {TRAP
{"" ;continue}
[system.net.dns]::gethostaddresses($HostName)
}
}
Add -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue to your script and you'll be good to go.
In some cases you can pipe after the command a Out-Null
command | Out-Null
To extend on Mikkel's answer.
If you still want to capture the error, you can use "-ErrorAction stop" combined with a try - catch.
"-ErrorAction silentlycontinue" will ignore the error.
For instance:
try
{
New-Item -Path "/somepath" -Name "somename" -ErrorAction Stop | Out-Null
}
catch
{
echo "You must run this command in an elevated mode."
}
NOTE: There is no "silentlyStop" action, and I believe Mickel's answer refers to the "stop" action. It is likely a typo.
The idea of using a try-catch combined with the "stop" action is to be able to not just dismiss eventual errors but to show something in case of errors.
If you want the powershell errormessage for a cmdlet suppressed, but still want to catch the error, use "-erroraction 'silentlyStop'"