I have a 1x100000 struct in MATLAB. It occurs to me that I need to add a field to it, which is easy and fine.. however i can't seem to add the field to the beginning i.e. make the new field the first field.
my struct looks like this
DB(kk).StudyDate
DB(kk).StudyTime
DB(kk).PatientName
i wish to make it
DB(kk).PatientID <---- new field
DB(kk).StudyDate
DB(kk).StudyTime
DB(kk).PatientName
and not
DB(kk).StudyDate
DB(kk).StudyTime
DB(kk).PatientName
DB(kk).PatientID <---- new field
this is more for aesthetics and presentation purposes than anything else as it won't really affect how the struct is used whether the new field is at the beginning or the end.
The orderfields function exists for this purpose:
% Order based on permuting current field ordering
DB = struct('StudyDate','2015/04/27','StudyTime',now(),'PatientName','Baz Bar');
DB.PatientID = dec2hex(randi([1,2^32]));
DB = orderfields(DB,[4,1,2,3]);
% Does the same with explicit fieldnames
DB = struct('StudyDate','2015/04/27','StudyTime',now(),'PatientName','Baz Bar');
DB.PatientID = dec2hex(randi([1,2^32]));
DB = orderfields(DB,{'PatientID','StudyDate','StudyTime','PatientName'});
The only way (AFAIK) to do this is to make a brand new struct and copy all the fields into it in the order you would like them displayed.
Related
I want to build a multipage from.
The first page asks for first name and last name.
I want to greet the user with his first name in the second page.
The best way to do this is to use Live Merge Tags with Populate Anything:
https://gravitywiz.com/documentation/gravity-forms-populate-anything/#live-merge-tags
If you collected the user's first name in a Name field on page 1, you could great him in the field label for a field on page 2 like so:
Hello, #{Name (First):1.3}
(In this example, the field ID for the Name field is 1. The 3 refers to the first name input of a Name field and will always be 3).
If avoiding another plugin (as useful as that one is), you can use either the pre_submission_filter or pre_submission hooks to do this.
If their name was field 1 and lets say the field you'd like to show is field 2...
// THESE FOUR FILTERS WORK TOGETHER TO PRE-POPULATE ALL SORTS OF STUFF, AND YOU CAN ADD TO THIS AS NECESSARY. MINE IS ABOUT 1500 LINES LONG AND IS USED BY SEVERAL FORMS.
add_filter('gform_pre_render', 'populate_forms');
add_filter('gform_pre_validation', 'populate_forms');
add_filter('gform_pre_submission_filter', 'populate_forms', 10);
add_filter('gform_admin_pre_render', 'populate_forms');
function populate_forms($form) {
$form_id = $form['id'];
$current_form = 2; // pretending the form id you are working on is 2.
$future_form = 10; // imaginary form you'll create later for another purpose.
switch($form_id) {
case $current_form:
$first_name = !empty(rgpost('input_1_3')) ? rgpost('input_1_3') : null; // gets the value they entered into the first-name box of field 1.
foreach ($form['fields'] as &$field) {
if ($field->id === '2') { // Make as many of these as necessary.
if ($first_name) { // make sure there's actually a value provided from field 1.
$field->placeholder = $first_name; // not necessary, just habit since sometimes you'd need to have a placeholder to reliably populate some fields.
$field->defaultValue = $first_name; // this is the piece that will actually fill in the value like you'd expect to see in your question.
}
}
}
break;
//case $future_form: do more stuff.
//break;
}
return $form;
}
That should be a decent start for your functionality plugin where you can populate the current and future forms without much hassle. This can also be done with the gform_field_value hook; I've always found the language a bit clumsy with that one, personally.
The plugin mentioned earlier is definitely neat, but I found myself wanting to rely on that stuff less and less.
I need a quick search filter, where user can select what columns are searched. I didn't succeed to implement this behavior.
I tried this:
this.columns.forEach(column=>{
if (this.globalSearchSelectedColumns.indexOf(column.field)>-1) column.getQuickFilterText = (params)=> params.value.name;
else column.getQuickFilterText = ()=> '';
});
this.grid.api.setColumnDefs(this.columns);
this.grid.api.onFilterChanged();
this.grid.api.resetQuickFilter();
where this.columns is columns defs, this.grid is gridOptions, this.globalSearchSelectedColumns is the selected columns to search for, by column.field.
In order to selectively apply quickFilter form ag-Grid you should rewrite the property getQuickFilterText of the columnDef, by setting it to a function which returns an empty string like so:
First of all, you need to retrieve the column by a key through the gridColumnApi
Then you need to access its colDef
Lastly, all you left to do is to rewrite getQuickFilterText property
Assume, that in your class component you have a method disableFilterCol it can look something like this:
disableFilterCol = () => {
var col = this.gridColumnApi.getColumn("athlete");
var colDef = col.getColDef();
colDef.getQuickFilterText = () => "";
console.log("disable Athlete");
};
Once it called, quickFilter will be applied to your data grid excluding athlete column.
I created live demo for you on ReactJS.
You can improve the way you can select multiple columns that you want to rely on doing filtering.
I suppose that in your case you can try to add set getQuickFilterText = () => "" for either definition of colDef from the very beginning and let the user enabling particular columns, you can set getQuickFilterText property for them to undefined to provide sorting among them.
According to nakhodkiin solution I change my code like this:
this.grid.columnApi.getAllColumns().forEach(column=>{
let def = column.getColDef();
if (this.globalSearchSelectedColumns.indexOf(def.field)>-1) def.getQuickFilterText = undefined;
else def.getQuickFilterText = ()=> '';
});
this.grid.api.onFilterChanged();
And it's working;
I think the problem here lies in setting updated column defs.
Can you try this -
let newColDef= [];
this.columns.forEach(column=>{
if (this.globalSearchSelectedColumns.indexOf(column.field)>-1)
column.getQuickFilterText = (params)=> params.value.name;
else column.getQuickFilterText = ()=> '';
newColDef.push(column);
});
this.grid.api.setColumnDefs(newColDef);
this.grid.api.onFilterChanged();
this.grid.api.resetQuickFilter();
this.grid.api.refreshHeader();
Ag-grid updated its approach of detecting column changes since v19.1
More details here
As per doc -->
When new columns are set, the grid will compare with current columns and work out which > columns are old (to be removed), new (new
columns created) or kept (columns that remain will keep their state
including position, filter and sort).
Comparison of column definitions is done on 1) object reference comparison and 2)
column ID eg colDef.colId. If either the object
reference matches, or the column ID matches, then the grid treats the
columns as the same column.
Ag-grid team is also actively working on fixing this issue for v20.1. You can track it on github
I'm using a date object to keep track of the current date in an application.
In my view I have a one way binding like this:
<h3>{{ currentDate | date }}</h3>
And in the component, I have functions to change this date, like this:
previousMonth(){
this.currentDate.setMonth(this.currentDate.getMonth() - 1);
}
nextMonth(){
this.currentDate.setMonth(this.currentDate.getMonth() + 1);
}
But when these functions are triggered, the currentDate value doesn't update on the view.
I made sure the date object is being updated, just not on the view.
Whenever I remove the date pipe, it works.
Anyone has any idea how to fix this?
Thanks!
The value is not updating in the view because the pipes in angular are so called pure (or, stateless) by default. That means that the input will not be re-evaluated if the input object changes, but only if it's replaced.
From the documentation (see section Pure and Impure pipes):
Angular executes a pure pipe only when it detects a pure change to the
input value. A pure change is either a change to a primitive input
value (String, Number, Boolean, Symbol) or a changed object reference
(Date, Array, Function, Object).
Try the following code instead:
previousMonth(){
this.currentDate.setMonth(this.currentDate.getMonth() - 1);
this.currentDate = new Date(this.currentDate);
}
nextMonth(){
this.currentDate.setMonth(this.currentDate.getMonth() + 1);
this.currentDate = new Date(this.currentDate);
}
I'm getting a response in JSON format, which contains an _id that is stored as an ObjectID in Mongodb on the server side. However, I change it into a String, and it still won't let me add it. Is it because it has numbers? I need the element to be identifiable by the id, so if I can't append this way, is there any other way I can reference the element by the id?
var group = d3.select("#containerthing");
var id = response._id.toString();
console.log(id);
//5802bc044f6313c1097de4a2
var responseNode = group.append(id).attr("fill","black").attr("x", 15).attr("y", 15).attr("width", 190).attr("height", 90);
//InvalidCharacterError: String contains an invalid character
I believe that I understand your problem.
D3's .append():
If the specified type is a string, appends a new element of this type (tag name) as the last child of each selected element, or the next following sibling in the update selection if this is an enter selection. [...] This function should return an element to be appended. (The function typically creates a new element, but it may instead return an existing element.
Why .append() work fine if you pass 'foo'? Because D3 append a custom tag element. If you see in your console I'am sure that you will see <foo>...</foo>
Why .append() work wrong if you pass '5802bc044f6313c1097de4a2'? A custom tag element can't start with a number. You don't use _id, you should try to find another pattern for identify your element.
I hope that helps
The reason was that you can't start elements with numbers. I had to do:
var responseNode = group.append("n"+id).attr("fill","black").attr("x", 15).attr("y", 15).attr("width", 190).attr("height", 90);
to get it to work.
I have a very simple mapping function called "BuildEntity" that does the usual boring "left/right" coding required to dump my reader data into my domain object. (shown below) My question is this - If I don't bring back every column in this mapping as is, I get the "System.IndexOutOfRangeException" exception and wanted to know if ado.net had anything to correct this so I don't need to bring back every column with each call into SQL ...
What I'm really looking for is something like "IsValidColumn" so I can keep this 1 mapping function throughout my DataAccess class with all the left/right mappings defined - and have it work even when a sproc doesn't return every column listed ...
Using reader As SqlDataReader = cmd.ExecuteReader()
Dim product As Product
While reader.Read()
product = New Product()
product.ID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("ProductID"))
product.SupplierID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("SupplierID"))
product.CategoryID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("CategoryID"))
product.ProductName = Convert.ToString(reader("ProductName"))
product.QuantityPerUnit = Convert.ToString(reader("QuantityPerUnit"))
product.UnitPrice = Convert.ToDouble(reader("UnitPrice"))
product.UnitsInStock = Convert.ToInt32(reader("UnitsInStock"))
product.UnitsOnOrder = Convert.ToInt32(reader("UnitsOnOrder"))
product.ReorderLevel = Convert.ToInt32(reader("ReorderLevel"))
productList.Add(product)
End While
Also check out this extension method I wrote for use on data commands:
public static void Fill<T>(this IDbCommand cmd,
IList<T> list, Func<IDataReader, T> rowConverter)
{
using (var rdr = cmd.ExecuteReader())
{
while (rdr.Read())
{
list.Add(rowConverter(rdr));
}
}
}
You can use it like this:
cmd.Fill(products, r => r.GetProduct());
Where "products" is the IList<Product> you want to populate, and "GetProduct" contains the logic to create a Product instance from a data reader. It won't help with this specific problem of not having all the fields present, but if you're doing a lot of old-fashioned ADO.NET like this it can be quite handy.
Although connection.GetSchema("Tables") does return meta data about the tables in your database, it won't return everything in your sproc if you define any custom columns.
For example, if you throw in some random ad-hoc column like *SELECT ProductName,'Testing' As ProductTestName FROM dbo.Products" you won't see 'ProductTestName' as a column because it's not in the Schema of the Products table. To solve this, and ask for every column available in the returned data, leverage a method on the SqlDataReader object "GetSchemaTable()"
If I add this to the existing code sample you listed in your original question, you will notice just after the reader is declared I add a data table to capture the meta data from the reader itself. Next I loop through this meta data and add each column to another table that I use in the left-right code to check if each column exists.
Updated Source Code
Using reader As SqlDataReader = cmd.ExecuteReader()
Dim table As DataTable = reader.GetSchemaTable()
Dim colNames As New DataTable()
For Each row As DataRow In table.Rows
colNames.Columns.Add(row.ItemArray(0))
Next
Dim product As Product While reader.Read()
product = New Product()
If Not colNames.Columns("ProductID") Is Nothing Then
product.ID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("ProductID"))
End If
product.SupplierID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("SupplierID"))
product.CategoryID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("CategoryID"))
product.ProductName = Convert.ToString(reader("ProductName"))
product.QuantityPerUnit = Convert.ToString(reader("QuantityPerUnit"))
product.UnitPrice = Convert.ToDouble(reader("UnitPrice"))
product.UnitsInStock = Convert.ToInt32(reader("UnitsInStock"))
product.UnitsOnOrder = Convert.ToInt32(reader("UnitsOnOrder"))
product.ReorderLevel = Convert.ToInt32(reader("ReorderLevel"))
productList.Add(product)
End While
This is a hack to be honest, as you should return every column to hydrate your object correctly. But I thought to include this reader method as it would actually grab all the columns, even if they are not defined in your table schema.
This approach to mapping your relational data into your domain model might cause some issues when you get into a lazy loading scenario.
Why not just have each sproc return complete column set, using null, -1, or acceptable values where you don't have the data. Avoids having to catch IndexOutOfRangeException or re-writing everything in LinqToSql.
Use the GetSchemaTable() method to retrieve the metadata of the DataReader. The DataTable that is returned can be used to check if a specific column is present or not.
Why don't you use LinqToSql - everything you need is done automatically. For the sake of being general you can use any other ORM tool for .NET
If you don't want to use an ORM you can also use reflection for things like this (though in this case because ProductID is not named the same on both sides, you couldn't do it in the simplistic fashion demonstrated here):
List Provider in C#
I would call reader.GetOrdinal for each field name before starting the while loop. Unfortunately GetOrdinal throws an IndexOutOfRangeException if the field doesn't exist, so it won't be very performant.
You could probably store the results in a Dictionary<string, int> and use its ContainsKey method to determine if the field was supplied.
I ended up writing my own, but this mapper is pretty good (and simple): https://code.google.com/p/dapper-dot-net/