Related
I would like to preface this with saying that english is not my mother tongue, if any of my explanations are vague or don't make sense, please let me know and I will attempt to make them clearer.
I have a document containing some nested data. Currently product and customer are arrays, I would prefer to have them as straight up ObjectIDs.
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5bab713622c97440f287f2bf"),
"created_at" : ISODate("2018-09-26T13:44:54.431Z"),
"prod_line" : ObjectId("5b878e4c22c9745f1090de66"),
"entries" : [
{
"order_number" : "123",
"product" : [
ObjectId("5ba8a0e822c974290b2ea18d")
],
"customer" : [
ObjectId("5b86a20922c9745f1a6408d4")
],
"quantity" : "14"
},
{
"order_number" : "456",
"product" : [
ObjectId("5b878ed322c9745f1090de6c")
],
"customer" : [
ObjectId("5b86a20922c9745f1a6408d5")
],
"quantity" : "12"
}
]
}
I tried using the following query to update it, however that proved unsuccessful as Mongo didn't behave quite as I had expected.
db.Document.find().forEach(function(doc){
doc.entries.forEach(function(entry){
var entry_id = entry.product[0]
db.Document.update({_id: doc._id}, {$set:{'product': entry_id}});
print(entry_id)
})
})
With this query it sets product in the root of the object, not quite what I had hoped for. What I was hoping to do was to iterate through entries and change each individual product and customer to be only their ObjectId and not an array. Is it possible to do this via the mongo shell or do I have to look for another way to accomplish this? Thanks!
In order to accomplish your specified behavior, you just need to modify your query structure a bit. Take a look here for the specific MongoDB documentation on how to accomplish this. I will also propose an update to your code below:
db.Document.find().forEach(function(doc) {
doc.entries.forEach(function(entry, index) {
var productElementKey = 'entries.' + index + '.product';
var productSetObject = {};
productSetObject[productElementKey] = entry.product[0];
db.Document.update({_id: doc._id}, {$set: productSetObject});
print(entry_id)
})
})
The problem that you were having is that you were not updating the specific element within the entries array, but rather adding a new key to the top-level of the document named product. Generally, in order to set the value of an inner document within an array, you need to specify the array key first (entries in this case) and the inner document key second (product in this case). Since you are trying to set specific elements within the entries array, you need to also specify the index in your query object, I have specified above.
In order to update the customer key in the inner documents, simply switch out the product for customer in my above code.
You're trying to add a property 'product' directly into your document with this line
db.Document.update({_id: doc._id}, {$set:{'product': entry_id}});
Try to modify all your entries first, then update your document with this new array of entries.
db.Document.find().forEach(function(doc){
let updatedEntries = [];
doc.entries.forEach(function(entry){
let newEntry = {};
newEntry["order_number"] = entry.order_number;
newEntry["product"] = entry.product[0];
newEntry["customer"] = entry.customer[0];
newEntry["quantity"] = entry.quantity;
updatedEntries.push(newEntry);
})
db.Document.update({_id: doc._id}, {$set:{'entries': updatedEntries}});
})
You'll need to enumerate all the documents and then update the documents one and a time with the value store in the first item of the array for product and customer from each entry:
db.documents.find().snapshot().forEach(function (elem) {
elem.entries.forEach(function(entry){
db.documents.update({
_id: elem._id,
"entries.order_number": entry.order_number
}, {
$set: {
"entries.$.product" : entry.product[0],
"entries.$.customer" : entry.customer[0]
}
}
);
});
});
Instead of doing 2 updates each time you could possibly use the filtered positional operator to do all updates to all arrays items within one update query.
In my MongoDB, I have a student collection with 10 records having fields name and roll. One record of this collection is:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("53d9feff55d6b4dd1171dd9e"),
"name" : "Swati",
"roll" : "80",
}
I want to retrieve the field roll only for all 10 records in the collection as we would do in traditional database by using:
SELECT roll FROM student
I went through many blogs but all are resulting in a query which must have WHERE clause in it, for example:
db.students.find({ "roll": { $gt: 70 })
The query is equivalent to:
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll > 70
My requirement is to find a single key only without any condition. So, what is the query operation for that.
From the MongoDB docs:
A projection can explicitly include several fields. In the following operation, find() method returns all documents that match the query. In the result set, only the item and qty fields and, by default, the _id field return in the matching documents.
db.inventory.find( { type: 'food' }, { item: 1, qty: 1 } )
In this example from the folks at Mongo, the returned documents will contain only the fields of item, qty, and _id.
Thus, you should be able to issue a statement such as:
db.students.find({}, {roll:1, _id:0})
The above statement will select all documents in the students collection, and the returned document will return only the roll field (and exclude the _id).
If we don't mention _id:0 the fields returned will be roll and _id. The '_id' field is always displayed by default. So we need to explicitly mention _id:0 along with roll.
get all data from table
db.student.find({})
SELECT * FROM student
get all data from table without _id
db.student.find({}, {_id:0})
SELECT name, roll FROM student
get all data from one field with _id
db.student.find({}, {roll:1})
SELECT id, roll FROM student
get all data from one field without _id
db.student.find({}, {roll:1, _id:0})
SELECT roll FROM student
find specified data using where clause
db.student.find({roll: 80})
SELECT * FROM students WHERE roll = '80'
find a data using where clause and greater than condition
db.student.find({ "roll": { $gt: 70 }}) // $gt is greater than
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll > '70'
find a data using where clause and greater than or equal to condition
db.student.find({ "roll": { $gte: 70 }}) // $gte is greater than or equal
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll >= '70'
find a data using where clause and less than or equal to condition
db.student.find({ "roll": { $lte: 70 }}) // $lte is less than or equal
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll <= '70'
find a data using where clause and less than to condition
db.student.find({ "roll": { $lt: 70 }}) // $lt is less than
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll < '70'
I think mattingly890 has the correct answer , here is another example along with the pattern/commmand
db.collection.find( {}, {your_key:1, _id:0})
> db.mycollection.find().pretty();
{
"_id": ObjectId("54ffca63cea5644e7cda8e1a"),
"host": "google",
"ip": "1.1.192.1"
}
db.mycollection.find({},{ "_id": 0, "host": 1 }).pretty();
Here you go , 3 ways of doing , Shortest to boring :
db.student.find({}, 'roll _id'); // <--- Just multiple fields name space separated
// OR
db.student.find({}).select('roll _id'); // <--- Just multiple fields name space separated
// OR
db.student.find({}, {'roll' : 1 , '_id' : 1 ); // <---- Old lengthy boring way
To remove specific field use - operator :
db.student.find({}).select('roll -_id') // <--- Will remove id from result
While gowtham's answer is complete, it is worth noting that those commands may differ from on API to another (for those not using mongo's shell).
Please refer to documentation link for detailed info.
Nodejs, for instance, have a method called `projection that you would append to your find function in order to project.
Following the same example set, commands like the following can be used with Node:
db.student.find({}).project({roll:1})
SELECT _id, roll FROM student
Or
db.student.find({}).project({roll:1, _id: 0})
SELECT roll FROM student
and so on.
Again for nodejs users, do not forget (what you should already be familiar with if you used this API before) to use toArray in order to append your .then command.
Try the following query:
db.student.find({}, {roll: 1, _id: 0});
And if you are using console you can add pretty() for making it easy to read.
db.student.find({}, {roll: 1, _id: 0}).pretty();
Hope this helps!!
Just for educational purposes you could also do it with any of the following ways:
1.
var query = {"roll": {$gt: 70};
var cursor = db.student.find(query);
cursor.project({"roll":1, "_id":0});
2.
var query = {"roll": {$gt: 70};
var projection = {"roll":1, "_id":0};
var cursor = db.student.find(query,projection);
`
db.<collection>.find({}, {field1: <value>, field2: <value> ...})
In your example, you can do something like:
db.students.find({}, {"roll":true, "_id":false})
Projection
The projection parameter determines which fields are returned in the
matching documents. The projection parameter takes a document of the
following form:
{ field1: <value>, field2: <value> ... }
The <value> can be any of the following:
1 or true to include the field in the return documents.
0 or false to exclude the field.
NOTE
For the _id field, you do not have to explicitly specify _id: 1 to
return the _id field. The find() method always returns the _id field
unless you specify _id: 0 to suppress the field.
READ MORE
For better understanding I have written similar MySQL query.
Selecting specific fields
MongoDB : db.collection_name.find({},{name:true,email:true,phone:true});
MySQL : SELECT name,email,phone FROM table_name;
Selecting specific fields with where clause
MongoDB : db.collection_name.find({email:'you#email.com'},{name:true,email:true,phone:true});
MySQL : SELECT name,email,phone FROM table_name WHERE email = 'you#email.com';
This works for me,
db.student.find({},{"roll":1})
no condition in where clause i.e., inside first curly braces.
inside next curly braces: list of projection field names to be needed in the result and 1 indicates particular field is the part of the query result
getting name of the student
student-details = db.students.find({{ "roll": {$gt: 70} },{"name": 1, "_id": False})
getting name & roll of the student
student-details = db.students.find({{ "roll": {$gt: 70}},{"name": 1,"roll":1,"_id": False})
I just want to add to the answers that if you want to display a field that is nested in another object, you can use the following syntax
db.collection.find( {}, {{'object.key': true}})
Here key is present inside the object named object
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5d2ef0702385"), "object" : { "key" : "value" } }
var collection = db.collection('appuser');
collection.aggregate(
{ $project : { firstName : 1, lastName : 1 } },function(err, res){
res.toArray(function(err, realRes){
console.log("response roo==>",realRes);
});
});
it's working
Use the Query like this in the shell:
1. Use database_name
e.g: use database_name
2. Which returns only assets particular field information when matched , _id:0 specifies not to display ID in the result
db.collection_name.find( { "Search_Field": "value" },
{ "Field_to_display": 1,_id:0 } )
If u want to retrieve the field "roll" only for all 10 records in the collections.
Then try this.
In MongoDb :
db.students.find( { } , { " roll " : { " $roll " })
In Sql :
select roll from students
The query for MongoDB here fees is collection and description is a field.
db.getCollection('fees').find({},{description:1,_id:0})
Apart from what people have already mentioned I am just introducing indexes to the mix.
So imagine a large collection, with let's say over 1 million documents and you have to run a query like this.
The WiredTiger Internal cache will have to keep all that data in the cache if you have to run this query on it, if not that data will be fed into the WT Internal Cache either from FS Cache or Disk before the retrieval from DB is done (in batches if being called for from a driver connected to database & given that 1 million documents are not returned in 1 go, cursor comes into play)
Covered query can be an alternative. Copying the text from docs directly.
When an index covers a query, MongoDB can both match the query conditions and return the results using only the index keys; i.e. MongoDB does not need to examine documents from the collection to return the results.
When an index covers a query, the explain result has an IXSCAN stage that is not a descendant of a FETCH stage, and in the executionStats, the totalDocsExamined is 0.
Query : db.getCollection('qaa').find({roll_no : {$gte : 0}},{_id : 0, roll_no : 1})
Index : db.getCollection('qaa').createIndex({roll_no : 1})
If the index here is in WT Internal Cache then it would be a straight forward process to get the values. An index has impact on the write performance of the system thus this would make more sense if the reads are a plenty compared to the writes.
If you are using the MongoDB driver in NodeJs then the above-mentioned answers might not work for you. You will have to do something like this to get only selected properties as a response.
import { MongoClient } from "mongodb";
// Replace the uri string with your MongoDB deployment's connection string.
const uri = "<connection string uri>";
const client = new MongoClient(uri);
async function run() {
try {
await client.connect();
const database = client.db("sample_mflix");
const movies = database.collection("movies");
// Query for a movie that has the title 'The Room'
const query = { title: "The Room" };
const options = {
// sort matched documents in descending order by rating
sort: { "imdb.rating": -1 },
// Include only the `title` and `imdb` fields in the returned document
projection: { _id: 0, title: 1, imdb: 1 },
};
const movie = await movies.findOne(query, options);
/** since this method returns the matched document, not a cursor,
* print it directly
*/
console.log(movie);
} finally {
await client.close();
}
}
run().catch(console.dir);
This code is copied from the actual MongoDB doc you can check here.
https://docs.mongodb.com/drivers/node/current/usage-examples/findOne/
db.student.find({}, {"roll":1, "_id":0})
This is equivalent to -
Select roll from student
db.student.find({}, {"roll":1, "name":1, "_id":0})
This is equivalent to -
Select roll, name from student
In mongodb 3.4 we can use below logic, i am not sure about previous versions
select roll from student ==> db.student.find(!{}, {roll:1})
the above logic helps to define some columns (if they are less)
Using Studio 3T for MongoDB, if I use .find({}, { _id: 0, roll: true }) it still return an array of objects with an empty _id property.
Using JavaScript map helped me to only retrieve the desired roll property as an array of string:
var rolls = db.student
.find({ roll: { $gt: 70 } }) // query where role > 70
.map(x => x.roll); // return an array of role
Not sure this answers the question but I believe it's worth mentioning here.
There is one more way for selecting single field (and not multiple) using db.collection_name.distinct();
e.g.,db.student.distinct('roll',{});
Or, 2nd way: Using db.collection_name.find().forEach(); (multiple fields can be selected here by concatenation)
e.g., db.collection_name.find().forEach(function(c1){print(c1.roll);});
_id = "123321"; _user = await likes.find({liker_id: _id},{liked_id:"$liked_id"}); ;
let suppose you have liker_id and liked_id field in the document so by putting "$liked_id" it will return _id and liked_id only.
For Single Update :
db.collection_name.update({ field_name_1: ("value")}, { $set: { field_name_2 : "new_value" }});
For MultiUpdate :
db.collection_name.updateMany({ field_name_1: ("value")}, { $set: {field_name_2 : "new_value" }});
Make sure indexes are proper.
In my MongoDB, I have a student collection with 10 records having fields name and roll. One record of this collection is:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("53d9feff55d6b4dd1171dd9e"),
"name" : "Swati",
"roll" : "80",
}
I want to retrieve the field roll only for all 10 records in the collection as we would do in traditional database by using:
SELECT roll FROM student
I went through many blogs but all are resulting in a query which must have WHERE clause in it, for example:
db.students.find({ "roll": { $gt: 70 })
The query is equivalent to:
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll > 70
My requirement is to find a single key only without any condition. So, what is the query operation for that.
From the MongoDB docs:
A projection can explicitly include several fields. In the following operation, find() method returns all documents that match the query. In the result set, only the item and qty fields and, by default, the _id field return in the matching documents.
db.inventory.find( { type: 'food' }, { item: 1, qty: 1 } )
In this example from the folks at Mongo, the returned documents will contain only the fields of item, qty, and _id.
Thus, you should be able to issue a statement such as:
db.students.find({}, {roll:1, _id:0})
The above statement will select all documents in the students collection, and the returned document will return only the roll field (and exclude the _id).
If we don't mention _id:0 the fields returned will be roll and _id. The '_id' field is always displayed by default. So we need to explicitly mention _id:0 along with roll.
get all data from table
db.student.find({})
SELECT * FROM student
get all data from table without _id
db.student.find({}, {_id:0})
SELECT name, roll FROM student
get all data from one field with _id
db.student.find({}, {roll:1})
SELECT id, roll FROM student
get all data from one field without _id
db.student.find({}, {roll:1, _id:0})
SELECT roll FROM student
find specified data using where clause
db.student.find({roll: 80})
SELECT * FROM students WHERE roll = '80'
find a data using where clause and greater than condition
db.student.find({ "roll": { $gt: 70 }}) // $gt is greater than
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll > '70'
find a data using where clause and greater than or equal to condition
db.student.find({ "roll": { $gte: 70 }}) // $gte is greater than or equal
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll >= '70'
find a data using where clause and less than or equal to condition
db.student.find({ "roll": { $lte: 70 }}) // $lte is less than or equal
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll <= '70'
find a data using where clause and less than to condition
db.student.find({ "roll": { $lt: 70 }}) // $lt is less than
SELECT * FROM student WHERE roll < '70'
I think mattingly890 has the correct answer , here is another example along with the pattern/commmand
db.collection.find( {}, {your_key:1, _id:0})
> db.mycollection.find().pretty();
{
"_id": ObjectId("54ffca63cea5644e7cda8e1a"),
"host": "google",
"ip": "1.1.192.1"
}
db.mycollection.find({},{ "_id": 0, "host": 1 }).pretty();
Here you go , 3 ways of doing , Shortest to boring :
db.student.find({}, 'roll _id'); // <--- Just multiple fields name space separated
// OR
db.student.find({}).select('roll _id'); // <--- Just multiple fields name space separated
// OR
db.student.find({}, {'roll' : 1 , '_id' : 1 ); // <---- Old lengthy boring way
To remove specific field use - operator :
db.student.find({}).select('roll -_id') // <--- Will remove id from result
While gowtham's answer is complete, it is worth noting that those commands may differ from on API to another (for those not using mongo's shell).
Please refer to documentation link for detailed info.
Nodejs, for instance, have a method called `projection that you would append to your find function in order to project.
Following the same example set, commands like the following can be used with Node:
db.student.find({}).project({roll:1})
SELECT _id, roll FROM student
Or
db.student.find({}).project({roll:1, _id: 0})
SELECT roll FROM student
and so on.
Again for nodejs users, do not forget (what you should already be familiar with if you used this API before) to use toArray in order to append your .then command.
Try the following query:
db.student.find({}, {roll: 1, _id: 0});
And if you are using console you can add pretty() for making it easy to read.
db.student.find({}, {roll: 1, _id: 0}).pretty();
Hope this helps!!
Just for educational purposes you could also do it with any of the following ways:
1.
var query = {"roll": {$gt: 70};
var cursor = db.student.find(query);
cursor.project({"roll":1, "_id":0});
2.
var query = {"roll": {$gt: 70};
var projection = {"roll":1, "_id":0};
var cursor = db.student.find(query,projection);
`
db.<collection>.find({}, {field1: <value>, field2: <value> ...})
In your example, you can do something like:
db.students.find({}, {"roll":true, "_id":false})
Projection
The projection parameter determines which fields are returned in the
matching documents. The projection parameter takes a document of the
following form:
{ field1: <value>, field2: <value> ... }
The <value> can be any of the following:
1 or true to include the field in the return documents.
0 or false to exclude the field.
NOTE
For the _id field, you do not have to explicitly specify _id: 1 to
return the _id field. The find() method always returns the _id field
unless you specify _id: 0 to suppress the field.
READ MORE
For better understanding I have written similar MySQL query.
Selecting specific fields
MongoDB : db.collection_name.find({},{name:true,email:true,phone:true});
MySQL : SELECT name,email,phone FROM table_name;
Selecting specific fields with where clause
MongoDB : db.collection_name.find({email:'you#email.com'},{name:true,email:true,phone:true});
MySQL : SELECT name,email,phone FROM table_name WHERE email = 'you#email.com';
This works for me,
db.student.find({},{"roll":1})
no condition in where clause i.e., inside first curly braces.
inside next curly braces: list of projection field names to be needed in the result and 1 indicates particular field is the part of the query result
getting name of the student
student-details = db.students.find({{ "roll": {$gt: 70} },{"name": 1, "_id": False})
getting name & roll of the student
student-details = db.students.find({{ "roll": {$gt: 70}},{"name": 1,"roll":1,"_id": False})
I just want to add to the answers that if you want to display a field that is nested in another object, you can use the following syntax
db.collection.find( {}, {{'object.key': true}})
Here key is present inside the object named object
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5d2ef0702385"), "object" : { "key" : "value" } }
var collection = db.collection('appuser');
collection.aggregate(
{ $project : { firstName : 1, lastName : 1 } },function(err, res){
res.toArray(function(err, realRes){
console.log("response roo==>",realRes);
});
});
it's working
Use the Query like this in the shell:
1. Use database_name
e.g: use database_name
2. Which returns only assets particular field information when matched , _id:0 specifies not to display ID in the result
db.collection_name.find( { "Search_Field": "value" },
{ "Field_to_display": 1,_id:0 } )
If u want to retrieve the field "roll" only for all 10 records in the collections.
Then try this.
In MongoDb :
db.students.find( { } , { " roll " : { " $roll " })
In Sql :
select roll from students
The query for MongoDB here fees is collection and description is a field.
db.getCollection('fees').find({},{description:1,_id:0})
Apart from what people have already mentioned I am just introducing indexes to the mix.
So imagine a large collection, with let's say over 1 million documents and you have to run a query like this.
The WiredTiger Internal cache will have to keep all that data in the cache if you have to run this query on it, if not that data will be fed into the WT Internal Cache either from FS Cache or Disk before the retrieval from DB is done (in batches if being called for from a driver connected to database & given that 1 million documents are not returned in 1 go, cursor comes into play)
Covered query can be an alternative. Copying the text from docs directly.
When an index covers a query, MongoDB can both match the query conditions and return the results using only the index keys; i.e. MongoDB does not need to examine documents from the collection to return the results.
When an index covers a query, the explain result has an IXSCAN stage that is not a descendant of a FETCH stage, and in the executionStats, the totalDocsExamined is 0.
Query : db.getCollection('qaa').find({roll_no : {$gte : 0}},{_id : 0, roll_no : 1})
Index : db.getCollection('qaa').createIndex({roll_no : 1})
If the index here is in WT Internal Cache then it would be a straight forward process to get the values. An index has impact on the write performance of the system thus this would make more sense if the reads are a plenty compared to the writes.
If you are using the MongoDB driver in NodeJs then the above-mentioned answers might not work for you. You will have to do something like this to get only selected properties as a response.
import { MongoClient } from "mongodb";
// Replace the uri string with your MongoDB deployment's connection string.
const uri = "<connection string uri>";
const client = new MongoClient(uri);
async function run() {
try {
await client.connect();
const database = client.db("sample_mflix");
const movies = database.collection("movies");
// Query for a movie that has the title 'The Room'
const query = { title: "The Room" };
const options = {
// sort matched documents in descending order by rating
sort: { "imdb.rating": -1 },
// Include only the `title` and `imdb` fields in the returned document
projection: { _id: 0, title: 1, imdb: 1 },
};
const movie = await movies.findOne(query, options);
/** since this method returns the matched document, not a cursor,
* print it directly
*/
console.log(movie);
} finally {
await client.close();
}
}
run().catch(console.dir);
This code is copied from the actual MongoDB doc you can check here.
https://docs.mongodb.com/drivers/node/current/usage-examples/findOne/
db.student.find({}, {"roll":1, "_id":0})
This is equivalent to -
Select roll from student
db.student.find({}, {"roll":1, "name":1, "_id":0})
This is equivalent to -
Select roll, name from student
In mongodb 3.4 we can use below logic, i am not sure about previous versions
select roll from student ==> db.student.find(!{}, {roll:1})
the above logic helps to define some columns (if they are less)
Using Studio 3T for MongoDB, if I use .find({}, { _id: 0, roll: true }) it still return an array of objects with an empty _id property.
Using JavaScript map helped me to only retrieve the desired roll property as an array of string:
var rolls = db.student
.find({ roll: { $gt: 70 } }) // query where role > 70
.map(x => x.roll); // return an array of role
Not sure this answers the question but I believe it's worth mentioning here.
There is one more way for selecting single field (and not multiple) using db.collection_name.distinct();
e.g.,db.student.distinct('roll',{});
Or, 2nd way: Using db.collection_name.find().forEach(); (multiple fields can be selected here by concatenation)
e.g., db.collection_name.find().forEach(function(c1){print(c1.roll);});
_id = "123321"; _user = await likes.find({liker_id: _id},{liked_id:"$liked_id"}); ;
let suppose you have liker_id and liked_id field in the document so by putting "$liked_id" it will return _id and liked_id only.
For Single Update :
db.collection_name.update({ field_name_1: ("value")}, { $set: { field_name_2 : "new_value" }});
For MultiUpdate :
db.collection_name.updateMany({ field_name_1: ("value")}, { $set: {field_name_2 : "new_value" }});
Make sure indexes are proper.
I have recently changed one of my fields from object to array of objects.
In my production I have only 14 documents with this field, so I decided to change those fields.
Is there any best practices to do that?
As it is in my production I need to do it in a best way possible?
I got the document Id's of those collections.like ['xxx','yyy','zzz',...........]
my doc structure is like
_id:"xxx",option1:{"op1":"value1","op2":"value2"},option2:"some value"
and I want to change it like(converting object to array of objects)
_id:"xxx",option1:[{"op1":"value1","op2":"value2"},
{"op1":"value1","op2":"value2"}
],option2:"some value"
Can I use upsert? If so How to do it?
Since you need to create the new value of the field based on the old value, you should retrieve each document with a query like
db.collection.find({ "_id" : { "in" : [<array of _id's>] } })
then iterate over the results and $set the value of the field to its new value:
db.collection.find({ "_id" : { "in" : [<array of _id's>] } }).forEach(function(doc) {
oldVal = doc.option1
newVal = compute_newVal_from_oldVal(oldVal)
db.collection.update({ "_id" : doc._id }, { "$set" : { "option" : newVal } })
})
The document structure is rather schematic, so I omitted putting in actual code to create newVal from oldVal.
Since it is an embedded document type you could use push query
db.collectionname.update({_id:"xxx"},{$push:{option1:{"op1":"value1","op2":"value2"}}})
This will create document inside embedded document.Hope it helps
{
"_id" : "user1_20130822",
"metadata" : {
"date" : ISODate("2013-08-22T00:00:00.000Z"),
"username" : "user1"
},
"tags" : {
"abc" : 19,
"123" : 2,
"bca" : 64,
"xyz" : 14,
"zyx" : 12,
"321" : 7
}
}
Given the schema example above, is there a way to query this to retrieve the top "x" tags: E.g., Top 3 "tags" sorted descending?
Is this possible in a single document? e.g., top tags for a user on a given day
What if i have multiple documents that need to be combined together before getting the top? e.g., top tags for a user in a given month
I know this can be done by using a "document per user per tag per day" or by making "tags" an array, but I'd like to be able to do this as above, as it makes in place $inc's easier (many more of these happening than reads).
Or do I need to return back the whole document, and defer to the client on the sorting/limiting?
When you use object-keys as tag-names, you are making this kind of reporting very difficult. The aggreation framework has no $unwind-equivalent for objects. But there is always MapReduce.
Have your map-function emit one document for each key/value pair in the tags-subdocument. It should look something like this;
var mapFunction = function() {
for (var key in this.tags) {
emit(key, this.tags[key]);
}
}
Your reduce-function would then sum up the values emitted for the same key.
var reduceFunction = function(key, values) {
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < values.length; i++) {
sum += values[i];
}
return sum;
}
The complete MapReduce command would look something like this:
db.runCommand(
{
mapReduce: "yourcollection", // the collection where your data is stored
query: { _id : "user1_20130822" }, // or however you want to limit the results
map: mapFunction,
reduce: reduceFunction,
out: "inline", // means that the output is returned directly.
}
)
This will return all tags in unpredictable order. MapReduce has a sort and a limit option, but these only work on a field which has an index in the original collection, so you can't use it on a computed field. To get only the top 3, you would have to sort the results on the application-level. When you insist on doing the sorting and limiting on the database, define an output-collection to store the mapReduce results in (with the out-option set to out: { replace: "temporaryCollectionName" }) and then query that collection with sort and limit afterwards.
Keep in mind that when you use an intermediate collection, you must make sure that no two users run MapReduces with different queries into the same collection. When you have multiple users which want to view your top-3 list, you could let them query the output-collection and do the MapReduce in the background at regular intervales.