Let's say I have an html object called element that I create using bellow code:
var xmlString = "<div class="parent"><span class="child"></span></div>"
parser = new DOMParser()
var element = parser.parseFromString(xmlString, "text/xml");
// or simply using jquery
var string = "<div class="parent"><span class="child"></span></div>"
var element = $(string);
What I want to do is to select span.child from element using D3, not from the document. Using d3.select('span.child') will try to look for the <span class="child"></span> in the html document.
I checked the documentation and it says:
A selection is an array of elements pulled from the current document.
But I want to select not from the document but from the above element that I just created. Is there any way?
After a bit of debugging I found out that if element is a object, not string, then d3.select(element) will not look for the element in the document instead it will return the element itself.
for detailed info:
d3.select = function(node) {
var group = [ typeof node === "string" ? d3_select(node, d3_document) : node ];
group.parentNode = d3_documentElement;
return d3_selection([ group ]);
};
Related
I have a smart table that shows data from odata service. all properties of the entity type are Edm.String.
now i can set a filter for each column of the resulting table with a lot of filter operators.
My goal is to filter the list of available filter operators depending on the selected column.
e.g.
selected colum 'A' then allow only 'equal to'.
Is that somehow possible? I would like to solve it in front end code.
I didn't find anything like that in ui5 docu...
you need to use equals FilterOperator
here is a link for FilterOperator and another example how to use filter in grid table https://sapui5.hana.ondemand.com/
Here is a quick example of setting more than one filter each with different Filter Operator
filterGlobally : function(oEvent) {
var sQuery = oEvent.getParameter("query");
this._oGlobalFilter = null;
if (sQuery) {
this._oGlobalFilter = new Filter([
new Filter("columA", FilterOperator.EQ, sQuery),
new Filter("columB", FilterOperator.Contains, sQuery)
], false);
}
var oFilter = null;
if (this._oGlobalFilter) {
oFilter = new Filter([this._oGlobalFilter], true);
}
this.byId("idTable").getBinding().filter(oFilter, "Application");
I have the following document in mongo
{"_id":{"$oid":"5e7b6cb9606503483494c63a"},"ProductId":{"$binary":{"base64":"V9+9bOaj8kyWrPwdAm0rBQ==","subType":"03"}},"ProductName":"TestProduct1","ProductItems":[{"_t":"ProductItem","ProductId":{"$binary":{"base64":"V9+9bOaj8kyWrPwdAm0rBQ==","subType":"03"}},"Code":"TP1A"},
{"_t":"ProductItem","ProductId":{"$binary":{"base64":"V9+9bOaj8kyWrPwdAm0rDE==","subType":"03"}},"Code":"TP1B"}]}
What I want to do is return by a query on ProductItem.Code that returns a product with the single matching child item. So preserving the object structure but eliminating all but the single matching child.
I have tried
Product prod = new Product();
IMongoCollection<Product> products = _database.GetCollection<Product>("Products");
var filter = Builders<Product>.Filter.ElemMatch(x=>x.ProductItems, x=>x.Code==code);
prod = products.Find(filter).FirstOrDefault();
return prod;
but this just ends up returning the root document and all of the children instead of just the root document and the single child that I searched for.
You can project the matched document in the array with the positional operator. This is [-1] in C# (https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/operator/projection/positional/)
var filter = Builders<Product>.Filter.ElemMatch(x=>x.ProductItems, x=>x.Code==code);
var projection = Builders< Product >.Projection.Include(x => x.ProjectItems[-1])
var found = await collection.Find(filter, projection).ToListAsync();
var matchedProductItem = found[0].ProductItems.First();
I am trying to construct a MongoDB equivalent of an SQL WHERE IN clause by iterating over a Java Object List and using one field in that list to fill in the IN data. Using generic example, I would like to build the following command in MongoDB syntax:
SELECT title FROM albums WHERE recorded_year IN ('1967','1968','1969','1970');
The SQL command IN data is extracted from the Album object recordedYear value using the following loop:
if (albums.size() <= 1000) {
sb.append("SELECT title FROM albums WHERE recorded_year");
sb.append(" IN (");
for (int i = 0; i < albums.size(); i++) {
sb.append("'");
sb.append(albums.get(i).getRecordedYear());
sb.append("'");
if (i < albums.size() - 1) {
sb.append(",");
} else {
sb.append(")");
}
}
}
Most Mongo/Java sites I visited seem to deal with command structures using hard-coded values which, while helpful, is completely impractical in real world applications. Any help in pointing to a good tutorial, or if someone has the actual code itself would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
But the issue I am having is understanding how to pass a Java Object
list to the to the getAllDocuments...
Make an array of elements which you want to match with the field using the in operator. For example, If you have a someObject.year field, then the array will have the year values; int [] matchYears = { 1989, 2001, 2012 }. Instead of an array you can also use a List collection.
The query:
Bson queryFilter = in("recordedYear", matchYears);
List<Document> result = new ArrayList<>();
collection.find(queryFilter).into(result);
result.forEach(System.out::println);
The queryFilter is built using the com.mongodb.client.model.Filters factory class.
The MongoDB documentation on using the $in operator.
NOTE: The int [] matchYears = { 1989, 2001, 2012 } can be also be created as
int [] matchYears = { javaObject1.recorded_year, javaObject2.recorded_year, ... }.
I didn't quite implement it with BSON, but the logic in the method appears to be working with the code below. Thank you again for your help.
public void getAlbumYears(MongoCollection<Document> collection, List<Album> albums) {
BasicDBObject inQuery = new BasicDBObject();
List<String> year = new ArrayList<>();
for(Album album : albums) {
year.add(album.getYear());
}
inQuery.put("year", new BasicDBObject("$in", year));
for (Document document : collection.find(inQuery)) {
System.out.println(document.toJson());
}
}
I'm developing a sap ui5 application using sap.ui.table.Table.
I need to apply a filter based on multiple strings. For example, if the user input is an array like:
["Stack", "Overflow"]
I need:
Filter all table fields by "Stack";
Filter the result of point 1 by "Overflow";
the result will be all rows that have "Stack" and "Overflow", no matter the field.
Does anyone have a solution?
As per the sap.ui.model.Filter documentation, you can create a filter either based on a filter info object, or from an array of previously created filters. This allows us to do the following:
Create a filter for the first value (eg "Stack")
Create a filter for the second value (eg "Overflow")
Create a filter which contains both of these values, and use it to filter the table.
Let's have a look at some code.
// We will only display rows where ProductName contains
// "Stack" AND CustomerName equals "Overflow"
var oFilterForProductName,
oFilterForCustomerName,
aArrayWhichContainsBothPreviousFilters = [],
oFilterToSetOnTheTable;
var sValueToFilterTheProductNameOn = "Stack",
sValueToFilterTheCustomerNameOn = "Overflow";
var sKeyForProductNameInTheTableModel = "ProductName",
sKeyForCustomerNameInTheTableModel = "CustomerName";
var oTableToFilter = this.byId("myTableId");
// Step 1: create two filters
oFilterForProductName = new sap.ui.model.Filter(
sKeyForProductNameInTheTableModel,
sap.ui.model.FilterOperator.Contains,
sValueToFilterTheProductNameOn);
oFilterForCustomerName = new sap.ui.model.Filter(
sKeyForCustomerNameInTheTableModel,
sap.ui.model.FilterOperator.EQ,
sValueToFilterTheCustomerNameOn);
// Step 2: add these two filters to an array
aArrayWhichContainsBothPreviousFilters.push(oFilterForProductName);
aArrayWhichContainsBothPreviousFilters.push(oFilterForCustomerName);
// Step 3: create a filter based on the array of filters
oFilterToSetOnTheTable = new sap.ui.model.Filter({
filters: aArrayWhichContainsBothPreviousFilters,
and: true
});
oTableToFilter.getBinding("items").filter(oFilterToSetOnTheTable , sap.ui.model.FilterType.Application);
Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions.
Chris
Please pass that array in for loop and pass filters like,
var tableId = this.byId("oTable");
for(var i=0;i < array.length ; i++)
{
oTable.getBinding().filter(new sap.ui.model.Filter("", sap.ui.model.FilterOperator.Contains, array[0]));
}
it may be helpful for you.
I need to select User Name from the collection of Users. I do it in a such way:
MongoCollection<Enums> coll = Db.GetCollection<Enums>("Users");
var query = Query.EQ("_id", id);
var res = coll.FindOne(query);
var name = res.Name;
var url = res.UserUrl; //or some more fields, not just Name
Assuming that User document can contain a lot of data, and there is no need to transfer the whole user document, how to select only a few distinct fields, using official C# driver?
You'll have to use a function that returns a MongoCursor.
In the MongoCursor you can specify the fields you want to return.
var result = Db.GetCollection<Enums>("Users").FindAll();
result.Fields = Fields.Include(new [] {"Name"});;
foreach (var user in result)
{
Console.WriteLine(user.Name);
}