I have the following document and I need to return name who has no votes
user:
{
'user_id': (id),
'name': (name),
'votes': {
(vote_type): (No.of votes of this type)
},
}
I tried with db.user.find({votes: null},{name:true}).pretty(). No results show up. How do I fix this. Appreciate your help!
By default in MongoDB if a field is unpopulated MongoDB won't create the property for that document so you should be able to test if it $exists:
db.user.find({votes: {$exists: false}},{name: true}).pretty()
If you are setting it to null though you should be able to query for it as you described with checking for null:
db.user.find({votes: null},{name: true}).pretty()
If neither works you might be storing an empty object {} by default and will need to check for that:
db.user.find({votes: {}},{name: true}).pretty()
You can iterate over all the elements and add to those some new field f.e. "withNoVotes".
db.user.find().forEach(function(doc) {
if(doc.votes) {
for(var voteType in votes) {
if(votes[voteType] && votes[voteType] > 0) {
db.user.update({_id: doc._id}, {$set: {withNoVotes: true}});
break;
}
}
}
});
Now find them using usual query to find by this new field
db.user.find({withNoVotes: true});
Related
I want to insert to new field and data in existing document, if there is no data in it.
if (repoData.detailViewCounter == undefined) {
console.log('create 0')
Repo.findOneAndUpdate({
'owner.login': userId,
'name': pageId
}, {
detailViewCounter: 0
},
{new: true, upsert: true})
}
So When condition like this, and there is no detailViewCounter field, insert new field with number 0.
{
'owner.login': userId,
'name': pageId
}
But When I run this code and check the MongoDB Compass, there is still no data.
And I also create repo schema detailViewCounter with type:Number
change in option upsert: false
one major problem is field name "owner.login" this is causing the issue, this will search in object owner: { login: userId } but in actual we have string "owner.login", so this is not able to find any matching document, and this will not update record.
you can check after removing condition on field owner.login, it will work
Repo.findOneAndUpdate({
'name': pageId
},
{ detailViewCounter: 0 },
{ new: true, upsert: false }
)
Look at MongoDB restriction on field names, and good question in SO.
I've recently started using MongoDB using Mongoose (from NodeJS), but now I got stuck updating a subdocument in an array.
Let me show you...
I've set up my Restaurant in MongoDB like so:
_id: ObjectId("5edaaed8d8609c2c47fd6582")
name: "Some name"
tables: Array
0: Object
id: ObjectId("5ee277bab0df345e54614b60")
status: "AVAILABLE"
1: Object
id: ObjectId("5ee277bab0df345e54614b61")
status: "AVAILABLE"
As you can see a restaurant can have multiple tables, obviously.
Now I would like to update the status of a table for which I know the _id. I also know the _id of the restaurant that has the table.
But....I only want to update the status if we have the corresponding tableId and this table has the status 'AVAILABLE'.
My update statement:
const result = await Restaurant.updateOne(
{
_id: ObjectId("5edaaed8d8609c2c47fd6582"),
'tables._id': ObjectId("5ee277bab0df345e54614b61"),
'tables.status': 'AVAILABLE'
},
{ $set: { 'tables.$.status': 'CONFIRMED' } }
);
Guess what happens when I run the update-statement above?
It strangely updates the FIRST table (with the wrong table._id)!
However, when I remove the 'tables.status' filter from the query, it does update the right table:
const result = await Restaurant.updateOne(
{
_id: ObjectId("5edaaed8d8609c2c47fd6582"),
'tables._id': ObjectId("5ee277bab0df345e54614b61")
},
{ $set: { 'tables.$.status': 'CONFIRMED' } }
);
Problem here is that I need the status to be 'AVAILABLE', or else it should not update!
Can anybody point me in the wright direction with this?
according to the docs, the positional $ operator acts as a placeholder for the first element that matches the query document
so you are updating only the first array element in the document that matches your query
you should use the filtered positional operator $[identifier]
so your query will be something like that
const result = await Restaurant.updateOne(
{
_id: ObjectId("5edaaed8d8609c2c47fd6582"),
'tables._id': ObjectId("5ee277bab0df345e54614b61"),
'tables.status': 'AVAILABLE'
},
{
$set: { 'tables.$[table].status': 'CONFIRMED' } // update part
},
{
arrayFilters: [{ "table._id": ObjectId("5ee277bab0df345e54614b61"), 'table.status': 'AVAILABLE' }] // options part
}
);
by this way, you're updating the table element that has that tableId and status
hope it helps
In my Movie schema, I have a field "release_date" who can contain nested subdocuments.
These subdocuments contains three fields :
country_code
date
details
I need to guarantee the first two fields are unique (primary key).
I first tried to set a unique index. But I finally realized that MongoDB does not support unique indexes on subdocuments.
Index is created, but validation does not trigger, and I can still add duplicates.
Then, I tried to modify my update function to prevent duplicates, as explained in this article (see Workarounds) : http://joegornick.com/2012/10/25/mongodb-unique-indexes-on-single-embedded-documents/
$ne works well but in my case, I have a combination of two fields, and it's a way more complicated...
$addToSet is nice, but not exactly what I am searching for, because "details" field can be not unique.
I also tried plugin like mongoose-unique-validator, but it does not work with subdocuments ...
I finally ended up with two queries. One for searching existing subdocument, another to add a subdocument if the previous query returns no document.
insertReleaseDate: async(root, args) => {
const { movieId, fields } = args
// Searching for an existing primary key
const document = await Movie.find(
{
_id: movieId,
release_date: {
$elemMatch: {
country_code: fields.country_code,
date: fields.date
}
}
}
)
if (document.length > 0) {
throw new Error('Duplicate error')
}
// Updating the document
const response = await Movie.updateOne(
{ _id: movieId },
{ $push: { release_date: fields } }
)
return response
}
This code works fine, but I would have preferred to use only one query.
Any idea ? I don't understand why it's so complicated as it should be a common usage.
Thanks RichieK for your answer ! It's working great.
Just take care to put the field name before "$not" like this :
insertReleaseDate: async(root, args) => {
const { movieId, fields } = args
const response = await Movie.updateOne(
{
_id: movieId,
release_date: {
$not: {
$elemMatch: {
country_code: fields.country_code,
date: fields.date
}
}
}
},
{ $push: { release_date: fields } }
)
return formatResponse(response, movieId)
}
Thanks a lot !
I have an array inside a document of a collection called pown.
{
_id: 123..,
name: pupies,
pups:[ {name: pup1, location: somewhere}, {name: pup2, ...}]
}
Now a user using my rest-service sends the entire first entry as put request:
{name: pup1, location: inTown}
After that I want to update this element in my database.
Therefore I tried this:
var updatedPup = req.body;
var searchQuery = {
_id : 123...,
pups : { name : req.body.name }
}
var updateQuery = {
$set: {'pups': updatedPup }
}
db.pown.update(searchQuery, updateQuery, function(err, data){ ... }
Unfortunately it is not updating anythig.
Does anyone know how to update an entire array-element?
As Neil pointed, you need to be acquainted with the dot notation(used to select the fields) and the positional operator $ (used to select a particular element in an array i.e the element matched in the original search query). If you want to replace the whole element in the array
var updateQuery= {
"$set":{"pups.$": updatedPup}
}
If you only need to change the location,
var updateQuery= {
"$set":{"pups.$.location": updatedPup.location}
}
The problem here is that the selection in your query actually wants to update an embedded array element in your document. The first thing is that you want to use "dot notation" instead, and then you also want the positional $ modifier to select the correct element:
db.pown.update(
{ "pups.name": req.body.name },
{ "$set": { "pups.$.locatation": req.body.location }
)
That would be the nice way to do things. Mostly because you really only want to modify the "location" property of the sub-document. So that is how you express that.
I'm using the Mongoose Library for accessing MongoDB with node.js
Is there a way to remove a key from a document? i.e. not just set the value to null, but remove it?
User.findOne({}, function(err, user){
//correctly sets the key to null... but it's still present in the document
user.key_to_delete = null;
// doesn't seem to have any effect
delete user.key_to_delete;
user.save();
});
In early versions, you would have needed to drop down the node-mongodb-native driver. Each model has a collection object that contains all the methods that node-mongodb-native offers. So you can do the action in question by this:
User.collection.update({_id: user._id}, {$unset: {field: 1 }});
Since version 2.0 you can do:
User.update({_id: user._id}, {$unset: {field: 1 }}, callback);
And since version 2.4, if you have an instance of a model already you can do:
doc.field = undefined;
doc.save(callback);
You'll want to do this:
User.findOne({}, function(err, user){
user.key_to_delete = undefined;
user.save();
});
I use mongoose and using any of the above functions did me the requirement. The function compiles error free but the field would still remain.
user.set('key_to_delete', undefined, {strict: false} );
did the trick for me.
At mongo syntax to delete some key you need do following:
{ $unset : { field : 1} }
Seems at Mongoose the same.
Edit
Check this example.
Try:
User.findOne({}, function(err, user){
// user.key_to_delete = null; X
`user.key_to_delete = undefined;`
delete user.key_to_delete;
user.save();
});
if you want to remove a key from collection try this method.
db.getCollection('myDatabaseTestCollectionName').update({"FieldToDelete": {$exists: true}}, {$unset:{"FieldToDelete":1}}, false, true);
Could this be a side problem like using
function (user)
instead of
function(err, user)
for the find's callback ? Just trying to help with this as I already had the case.
Mongoose document is NOT a plain javascript object and that's why you can't use delete operator.(Or unset from 'lodash' library).
Your options are to set doc.path = null || undefined or to use Document.toObject() method to turn mongoose doc to plain object and from there use it as usual.
Read more in mongoose api-ref:
http://mongoosejs.com/docs/api.html#document_Document-toObject
Example would look something like this:
User.findById(id, function(err, user) {
if (err) return next(err);
let userObject = user.toObject();
// userObject is plain object
});
the problem with all of these answers is that they work for one field. for example let's say i want delete all fields from my Document if they were an empty string "".
First you should check if field is empty string put it to $unset :
function unsetEmptyFields(updateData) {
const $unset = {};
Object.keys(updatedData).forEach((key) => {
if (!updatedData[key]) {
$unset[key] = 1;
delete updatedData[key];
}
});
updatedData.$unset = $unset;
if (isEmpty(updatedData.$unset)) { delete updatedData.$unset; }
return updatedData;
}
function updateUserModel(data){
const updatedData = UnsetEmptyFiled(data);
const Id = "";
User.findOneAndUpdate(
{ _id: Id },
updatedData, { new: true },
);
}
I believe that, if you desire remove a specific field into a collection, you should do this:
User.remove ({ key_to_delete: req.params.user.key_to_delete});
you can use
delete user._doc.key