In Swift, is it possible to convert a string to an enum? - swift

If I have an enum with the cases a,b,c,d is it possible for me to cast the string "a" as the enum?

Sure. Enums can have a raw value. To quote the docs:
Raw values can be strings, characters, or any of the integer or
floating-point number types
— Excerpt From: Apple Inc. “The Swift Programming Language.” iBooks. https://itun.es/us/jEUH0.l,
So you can use code like this:
enum StringEnum: String
{
case one = "value one"
case two = "value two"
case three = "value three"
}
let anEnum = StringEnum(rawValue: "value one")!
print("anEnum = \"\(anEnum.rawValue)\"")
Note: You don't need to write = "one" etc. after each case. The default string values are the same as the case names so calling .rawValue will just return a string
EDIT
If you need the string value to contain things like spaces that are not valid as part of a case value then you need to explicitly set the string. So,
enum StringEnum: String
{
case one
case two
case three
}
let anEnum = StringEnum.one
print("anEnum = \"\(anEnum)\"")
gives
anEnum = "one"
But if you want case one to display "value one" you will need to provide the string values:
enum StringEnum: String
{
case one = "value one"
case two = "value two"
case three = "value three"
}

All you need is:
enum Foo: String {
case a, b, c, d
}
let a = Foo(rawValue: "a")
assert(a == Foo.a)
let 💩 = Foo(rawValue: "💩")
assert(💩 == nil)

In Swift 4.2, the CaseIterable protocol can be used for an enum with rawValues, but the string should match against the enum case labels:
enum MyCode : String, CaseIterable {
case one = "uno"
case two = "dos"
case three = "tres"
static func withLabel(_ label: String) -> MyCode? {
return self.allCases.first{ "\($0)" == label }
}
}
usage:
print(MyCode.withLabel("one")) // Optional(MyCode.one)
print(MyCode(rawValue: "uno")) // Optional(MyCode.one)

In case with an enum with Int type you can do it so:
enum MenuItem: Int {
case One = 0, Two, Three, Four, Five //... as much as needs
static func enumFromString(string:String) -> MenuItem? {
var i = 0
while let item = MenuItem(rawValue: i) {
if String(item) == string { return item }
i += 1
}
return nil
}
}
And use:
let string = "Two"
if let item = MenuItem.enumFromString(string) {
//in this case item = 1
//your code
}

Riffing on djruss70's answer to create highly generalized solution:
extension CaseIterable {
static func from(string: String) -> Self? {
return Self.allCases.first { string == "\($0)" }
}
func toString() -> String { "\(self)" }
}
Usage:
enum Chassis: CaseIterable {
case pieridae, oovidae
}
let chassis: Chassis = Chassis.from(string: "oovidae")!
let string: String = chassis.toString()
Note: this will unfortunately not work if the enum is declared #objc. As far as I know as of Swift 5.3 there is no way to get this to work with #objc enum's except brute force solutions (a switch statement).
If someone happens to know of a way to make this work for #objc enums, I'd be very interested in the answer.

Swift 4.2:
public enum PaymentPlatform: String, CaseIterable {
case visa = "Visa card"
case masterCard = "Master card"
case cod = "Cod"
var nameEnum: String {
return Mirror(reflecting: self).children.first?.label ?? String(describing: self)
}
func byName(name: String) -> PaymentPlatform {
return PaymentPlatform.allCases.first(where: {$0.nameEnum.elementsEqual(name)}) ?? .cod
}
}

Extending Duncan C's answer
extension StringEnum: StringLiteralConvertible {
init(stringLiteral value: String){
self.init(rawValue: value)!
}
init(extendedGraphemeClusterLiteral value: String) {
self.init(stringLiteral: value)
}
init(unicodeScalarLiteral value: String) {
self.init(stringLiteral: value)
}
}

For Int enum and their String representation, I declare enum as follows:
enum OrderState: Int16, CustomStringConvertible {
case waiting = 1
case inKitchen = 2
case ready = 3
var description: String {
switch self {
case .waiting:
return "Waiting"
case .inKitchen:
return "InKitchen"
case .ready:
return "Ready"
}
}
static func initialize(stringValue: String)-> OrderState? {
switch stringValue {
case OrderState.waiting.description:
return OrderState.waiting
case OrderState.inKitchen.description:
return OrderState.inKitchen
case OrderState.ready.description:
return OrderState.ready
default:
return nil
}
}
}
Usage:
order.orderState = OrderState.waiting.rawValue
let orderState = OrderState.init(rawValue: order.orderState)
let orderStateStr = orderState?.description ?? ""
print("orderStateStr = \(orderStateStr)")

I used this:
public enum Currency: CaseIterable, Codable {
case AFN = 971 // Afghani (minor=2)
case DZD = 012 // Algerian Dinar (minor=2)
...
private static var cachedLookup: [String: Currency] = [:]
init?(string: String) {
if Self.cachedLookup.isEmpty {
Self.cachedLookup = Dictionary(uniqueKeysWithValues: Self.allCases.map { ("\($0)", $0) })
}
if let currency = Self.cachedLookup[string] {
self = currency
return
} else {
return nil
}
}
}

I found the other answers make this way more complicated then it needs to be. Here is a quick and concise example.
enum Gender: String {
case male, female, unspecified
}
Simple enum, note that I added ": String" to the enum itself to declare the type as string.
Now all you have to do is:
let example: Gender = Gender(rawValue: "male")
And thats it, 'example' is now an enum of type Gender with the value of .male
There is literally nothing else you need to do in Swift 4+.

Related

Accessing decodable enum after parsing in SwiftUI [duplicate]

In this code I've written a really useless enum that defines a possible Number with Int or Float.
I can't understand how can I access the value that I set with the association. If I try to print it I get just (Enum Value)
enum Number {
case int (Int)
case float (Float)
}
let integer = Number.int(10)
let float = Number.float(10.5)
println("integer is \(integer)")
println("float is \(float)")
For sake of completeness, enum's association value could be accesed also using if statement with pattern matching. Here is solution for original code:
enum Number {
case int (Int)
case float (Float)
}
let integer = Number.int(10)
let float = Number.float(10.5)
if case let .int(i) = integer {
print("integer is \(i)")
}
if case let .float(f) = float {
print("float is \(f)")
}
This solution is described in detail in: https://appventure.me/2015/10/17/advanced-practical-enum-examples/
The value is associated to an instance of the enumeration. Therefore, to access it without a switch, you need to make a getter and make it available explicitly. Something like below:
enum Number {
case int(Int)
case float(Float)
func get() -> NSNumber {
switch self {
case .int(let num):
return num
case .float(let num):
return num
}
}
}
var vInteger = Number.int(10)
var vFloat = Number.float(10.5)
println(vInteger.get())
println(vFloat.get())
Maybe in the future something like that may be automatically created or a shorter convenience could be added to the language.
It surprises me that Swift 2 (as of beta 2) does not address this. Here's an example of a workaround approach for now:
enum TestAssociatedValue {
case One(Int)
case Two(String)
case Three(AnyObject)
func associatedValue() -> Any {
switch self {
case .One(let value):
return value
case .Two(let value):
return value
case .Three(let value):
return value
}
}
}
let one = TestAssociatedValue.One(1)
let oneValue = one.associatedValue() // 1
let two = TestAssociatedValue.Two("two")
let twoValue = two.associatedValue() // two
class ThreeClass {
let someValue = "Hello world!"
}
let three = TestMixed.Three(ThreeClass())
let threeValue = three. associatedValue() as! ThreeClass
print(threeValue.someValue)
If your enum mixes cases with and without associated values, you'll need to make the return type an optional. You could also return literals for some cases (that do not have associated values), mimicking raw-value typed enums. And you could even return the enum value itself for non-associated, non-raw-type cases. For example:
enum TestMixed {
case One(Int)
case Two(String)
case Three(AnyObject)
case Four
case Five
func value() -> Any? {
switch self {
case .One(let value):
return value
case .Two(let value):
return value
case .Three(let value):
return value
case .Four:
return 4
case .Five:
return TestMixed.Five
}
}
}
let one = TestMixed.One(1)
let oneValue = one.value() // 1
let two = TestMixed.Two("two")
let twoValue = two.value() // two
class ThreeClass {
let someValue = "Hello world!"
}
let three = TestMixed.Three(ThreeClass())
let threeValue = three.value() as! ThreeClass
print(threeValue.someValue)
let four = TestMixed.Four
let fourValue = four.value() // 4
let five = TestMixed.Five
let fiveValue = five.value() as! TestMixed
switch fiveValue {
case TestMixed.Five:
print("It is")
default:
print("It's not")
}
// Prints "It is"
like #iQ. answer, you can use property in enum also
enum Number {
case int (Int)
var value: Int {
switch self {
case .int(let value):
return value
}
}
}
let integer = Number.int(10)
println("integer is \(integer.value)")
I have used something like this:
switch number {
case .int(let n):
println("integer is \(n)")
case .float(let n):
println("float is \(n)")
}
If you're using guard, you can write like below:
enum Action {
case .moveTab(index: Int)
}
guard let case .moveTab(index) = someAction else { return }
You can access enum associated value not only through switch! Mirrors come to our aid
Let's create a protocol
protocol MirrorAssociated {
var associatedValues: [String: Any] { get }
}
extension MirrorAssociated {
var associatedValues: [String: Any] {
var values = [String: Any]()
if let associated = Mirror(reflecting: self).children.first {
let children = Mirror(reflecting: associated.value).children
for case let item in children {
if let label = item.label {
values[label] = item.value
}
}
}
return values
}
}
and use it like this:
enum Test: MirrorAssociated {
case test(value: String, anotherValue: Int)
}
Now we can access any associated value without using switch:
let test: Test = .test(value: "Test String", anotherValue: 1337)
if let value = test.associatedValues["value"] as? String {
print("\(value)") // "Test String"
}
if let intValue = test.associatedValues["anotherValue"] as? Int {
print("\(intValue)") // 1337
}
Swift 5
enum Directory {
case accountImages(URL)
case accountData(URL)
var url: URL {
switch self {
case .accountImages(let url):
return url
case .accountData(let url):
return url
}
}
}
func save(to directory: Directory) {
let dir = directory.url
}
Swift 4,
I have created a simple enum with associated values for handling firebase database reference paths
import Firebase
enum FirebaseDBConstants {
case UserLocation(database : DatabaseReference, userID :String)
case UserRequest(database : DatabaseReference, requestID :String)
func getDBPath() -> DatabaseReference {
switch self {
case .UserLocation(let database,let userID):
return database.root.child(FirebaseDBEnvironmentEnum.getCurrentEnvioronMent()).child("Location").child(userID).child("JSON")
case .UserRequest(let database,let requestID):
return database.root.child(FirebaseDBEnvironmentEnum.getCurrentEnvioronMent()).child("Request").child(requestID)
default:
break
}
}
}
Use it like as shown
//Pass Database refenence root as parameter with your request id
let dbPath = FirebaseDBConstants.UserRequest(database: database, requestID: requestId).getDBPath()

Decode string or int value in structure will return string("1") in Swift 4

I have a structure that some of the values will get Integer or string so I used this structure in my structure to parse JSON in the correct way but the problem is that when I want to print the value it will print string("1") instead of 1.
public struct player1_result_sheet : Decodable {
let ans_1 : QuantumValue?
let ans_2 : QuantumValue?
let ans_3 : QuantumValue?
let ans_4 : QuantumValue?
}
enum QuantumValue: Decodable {
case int(Int), string(String)
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
if let int = try? decoder.singleValueContainer().decode(Int.self) {
self = .int(int)
return
}
if let string = try? decoder.singleValueContainer().decode(String.self) {
self = .string(string)
return
}
throw QuantumError.missingValue
}
enum QuantumError:Error {
case missingValue
}
}
Here is the printing after decode:
(self.res?.response?.detailData?[indexPath.row].player1_result_sheet?.ans_1!)!
If you want to print the value without the enum wrapper, just implement description:
extension QuantumValue: CustomStringConvertible {
public var description: String {
switch self {
case let .string(string):
return string
case let .int(number):
return "\(number)"
}
}
}
Your enum case is string(String) so it prints case(value)
string("1")
You can solve it by creating varible inside enum which returns you a value depends on case of QuantumValue
var value: Any {
switch self {
case .int(let value):
return value
case .string(let value):
return value
}
}
then you can use it like this:
...ans_1!.value)!
1
Also note that type of value is Any so if you want to work with it as String, you have to downcast it
if let string = ...ans_1.value)! as? String {
...
}
QuantumValue is declared as enum, both good cases have associated values.
So printing a value prints both, the case and the associated value.
You could add two properties intValue and stringValue inside QuantumValue
var intValue : Int? {
guard case .int(let num) = self else { return nil }
return num
}
var stringValue : String? {
guard case .string(let string) = self else { return nil }
return string
}
Then you can print
player1_result_sheet?.ans_1?.intValue
By the way the name player1_result_sheet is pretty php-ish.
Please conform to the naming convention.
Structs, classes and enums are UpperCamelCased → Player1ResultSheet
Variables and functions are lowerCamelCased → ans1
And please consolidate your optionals, 6 (six) question and exclamation marks in one line is pretty weird
(self.res?.response?.detailData?[indexPath.row].player1_result_sheet?.ans_1!)!

Can you initialize an Enum value from the name of its case (*not* its RawValue?)

Consider this enumeration (note its type is Int)
enum MyTestEnum : Int{
case one = 1
case eight = 8
case unknown = -1
}
You can easily initialize a version of this based on the raw value, like so...
let value = MyTestEnum(rawValue:-1)
I'm trying to find out if it can be initialized with a string representation of the case name itself (again, not the raw value, but the word after 'case') like so...
let value = MyTestEnum(caseName:"eight")
Note: I want this to work with any enum if possible, regardless of its raw value type. For instance, this one...
enum MyOtherEnum{
case xxx
case yyy
case zzz
}
let value = MyOtherEnum(caseName:"xxx")
So can this be done?
Thoughts:
I think Swift has a way to instantiate a class given a string representing the fully-qualified class-name. Perhaps something similar can be used here.
In Swift 4.2, this is quite easy to do now using CaseIterable.
enum MyOtherEnum: CaseIterable {
case xxx
case yyy
case zzz
init?(caseName: String) {
for value in MyOtherEnum.allCases where "\(value)" == caseName {
self = value
return
}
return nil
}
}
enum MyTestEnum: Int, CaseIterable{
case one = 1
case eight = 8
case unknown = -1
init?(caseName: String) {
for value in MyTestEnum.allCases where "\(value)" == caseName {
self = value
return
}
return nil
}
}
What I am doing here is creating a failable initializer which iterates through all potential cases, testing to see if "\(value)" (which returns the name for that potential case) matches the caseName argument passed in to the initializer.
When a match is found, self is set and the loop ends. Otherwise, nil is returned for the call.
Below, are two working and two failing examples:
let myOtherEnum = MyOtherEnum(caseName:"xxx")
print(myOtherEnum) // MyOtherEnum.xxx
let myTestEnum = MyTestEnum(caseName:"eight")
print(myTestEnum?.rawValue) // 8
let myOtherEnumFail = MyOtherEnum(caseName:"aaa")
print(myOtherEnumFail) // nil
let myTestEnumFail = MyTestEnum(caseName:"ten")
print(myTestEnumFail) // nil
Based on CodeBender's solution here is a nice extension for this case
extension CaseIterable {
///Note: case value and name can be different
init?(caseName: String) {
for v in Self.allCases where "\(v)" == caseName {
self = v
return
}
return nil
}
}
You can go with custom initializer
extension MyTestEnum {
public static func allValues() -> [MyTestEnum] {
let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<MyTestEnum> in
var raw = 0
return AnyIterator {
let current = withUnsafePointer(to: &raw) {
$0.withMemoryRebound(to: MyTestEnum.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee }
}
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
return [MyTestEnum](retVal)
}
init?(caseName: String){
for v in MyTestEnum.allValues() {
if "\(v)" == caseName {
self = v
return
}
}
self = MyTestEnum.unknown
}
}
let test = MyTestEnum(caseName: "eight")
or simple manually all your case :)
extension MyTestEnum {
init?(caseName: String){
switch caseName {
case "eight": self.init(rawValue: 8)
case "one": self.init(rawValue: 1)
default: self.init(rawValue: -1)
}
}
}
let test1 = MyTestEnum(caseName: "eight")
let test2 = MyTestEnum(rawValue: 1)
Hope this helps !!
It sounds like your want your enum cases to have raw Int values and raw String values. It's not strictly possible to do this, but perhaps this comes close:
enum MyTestEnum : String {
case one
case eight
case unknown
var intValue: Int {
switch self {
case one: return 1
case eight: return 8
case unknown: return -1
}
}
}
Now you can initialize from case names, but you can also retrieve an intValue when needed. (If needed, you could easily add a failable initializer to allow initialization from integers as well.)

Accessing an Enumeration association value in Swift

In this code I've written a really useless enum that defines a possible Number with Int or Float.
I can't understand how can I access the value that I set with the association. If I try to print it I get just (Enum Value)
enum Number {
case int (Int)
case float (Float)
}
let integer = Number.int(10)
let float = Number.float(10.5)
println("integer is \(integer)")
println("float is \(float)")
For sake of completeness, enum's association value could be accesed also using if statement with pattern matching. Here is solution for original code:
enum Number {
case int (Int)
case float (Float)
}
let integer = Number.int(10)
let float = Number.float(10.5)
if case let .int(i) = integer {
print("integer is \(i)")
}
if case let .float(f) = float {
print("float is \(f)")
}
This solution is described in detail in: https://appventure.me/2015/10/17/advanced-practical-enum-examples/
The value is associated to an instance of the enumeration. Therefore, to access it without a switch, you need to make a getter and make it available explicitly. Something like below:
enum Number {
case int(Int)
case float(Float)
func get() -> NSNumber {
switch self {
case .int(let num):
return num
case .float(let num):
return num
}
}
}
var vInteger = Number.int(10)
var vFloat = Number.float(10.5)
println(vInteger.get())
println(vFloat.get())
Maybe in the future something like that may be automatically created or a shorter convenience could be added to the language.
It surprises me that Swift 2 (as of beta 2) does not address this. Here's an example of a workaround approach for now:
enum TestAssociatedValue {
case One(Int)
case Two(String)
case Three(AnyObject)
func associatedValue() -> Any {
switch self {
case .One(let value):
return value
case .Two(let value):
return value
case .Three(let value):
return value
}
}
}
let one = TestAssociatedValue.One(1)
let oneValue = one.associatedValue() // 1
let two = TestAssociatedValue.Two("two")
let twoValue = two.associatedValue() // two
class ThreeClass {
let someValue = "Hello world!"
}
let three = TestMixed.Three(ThreeClass())
let threeValue = three. associatedValue() as! ThreeClass
print(threeValue.someValue)
If your enum mixes cases with and without associated values, you'll need to make the return type an optional. You could also return literals for some cases (that do not have associated values), mimicking raw-value typed enums. And you could even return the enum value itself for non-associated, non-raw-type cases. For example:
enum TestMixed {
case One(Int)
case Two(String)
case Three(AnyObject)
case Four
case Five
func value() -> Any? {
switch self {
case .One(let value):
return value
case .Two(let value):
return value
case .Three(let value):
return value
case .Four:
return 4
case .Five:
return TestMixed.Five
}
}
}
let one = TestMixed.One(1)
let oneValue = one.value() // 1
let two = TestMixed.Two("two")
let twoValue = two.value() // two
class ThreeClass {
let someValue = "Hello world!"
}
let three = TestMixed.Three(ThreeClass())
let threeValue = three.value() as! ThreeClass
print(threeValue.someValue)
let four = TestMixed.Four
let fourValue = four.value() // 4
let five = TestMixed.Five
let fiveValue = five.value() as! TestMixed
switch fiveValue {
case TestMixed.Five:
print("It is")
default:
print("It's not")
}
// Prints "It is"
like #iQ. answer, you can use property in enum also
enum Number {
case int (Int)
var value: Int {
switch self {
case .int(let value):
return value
}
}
}
let integer = Number.int(10)
println("integer is \(integer.value)")
I have used something like this:
switch number {
case .int(let n):
println("integer is \(n)")
case .float(let n):
println("float is \(n)")
}
If you're using guard, you can write like below:
enum Action {
case .moveTab(index: Int)
}
guard let case .moveTab(index) = someAction else { return }
You can access enum associated value not only through switch! Mirrors come to our aid
Let's create a protocol
protocol MirrorAssociated {
var associatedValues: [String: Any] { get }
}
extension MirrorAssociated {
var associatedValues: [String: Any] {
var values = [String: Any]()
if let associated = Mirror(reflecting: self).children.first {
let children = Mirror(reflecting: associated.value).children
for case let item in children {
if let label = item.label {
values[label] = item.value
}
}
}
return values
}
}
and use it like this:
enum Test: MirrorAssociated {
case test(value: String, anotherValue: Int)
}
Now we can access any associated value without using switch:
let test: Test = .test(value: "Test String", anotherValue: 1337)
if let value = test.associatedValues["value"] as? String {
print("\(value)") // "Test String"
}
if let intValue = test.associatedValues["anotherValue"] as? Int {
print("\(intValue)") // 1337
}
Swift 5
enum Directory {
case accountImages(URL)
case accountData(URL)
var url: URL {
switch self {
case .accountImages(let url):
return url
case .accountData(let url):
return url
}
}
}
func save(to directory: Directory) {
let dir = directory.url
}
Swift 4,
I have created a simple enum with associated values for handling firebase database reference paths
import Firebase
enum FirebaseDBConstants {
case UserLocation(database : DatabaseReference, userID :String)
case UserRequest(database : DatabaseReference, requestID :String)
func getDBPath() -> DatabaseReference {
switch self {
case .UserLocation(let database,let userID):
return database.root.child(FirebaseDBEnvironmentEnum.getCurrentEnvioronMent()).child("Location").child(userID).child("JSON")
case .UserRequest(let database,let requestID):
return database.root.child(FirebaseDBEnvironmentEnum.getCurrentEnvioronMent()).child("Request").child(requestID)
default:
break
}
}
}
Use it like as shown
//Pass Database refenence root as parameter with your request id
let dbPath = FirebaseDBConstants.UserRequest(database: database, requestID: requestId).getDBPath()

How to enumerate an enum with String type?

enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
For example, how can I do something like:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
Resulting example:
♠
♥
♦
♣
This post is relevant here https://www.swift-studies.com/blog/2014/6/10/enumerating-enums-in-swift
Essentially the proposed solution is
enum ProductCategory : String {
case Washers = "washers", Dryers = "dryers", Toasters = "toasters"
static let allValues = [Washers, Dryers, Toasters]
}
for category in ProductCategory.allValues{
//Do something
}
Swift 4.2+
Starting with Swift 4.2 (with Xcode 10), just add protocol conformance to CaseIterable to benefit from allCases. To add this protocol conformance, you simply need to write somewhere:
extension Suit: CaseIterable {}
If the enum is your own, you may specify the conformance directly in the declaration:
enum Suit: String, CaseIterable { case spades = "♠"; case hearts = "♥"; case diamonds = "♦"; case clubs = "♣" }
Then the following code will print all possible values:
Suit.allCases.forEach {
print($0.rawValue)
}
Compatibility with earlier Swift versions (3.x and 4.x)
If you need to support Swift 3.x or 4.0, you may mimic the Swift 4.2 implementation by adding the following code:
#if !swift(>=4.2)
public protocol CaseIterable {
associatedtype AllCases: Collection where AllCases.Element == Self
static var allCases: AllCases { get }
}
extension CaseIterable where Self: Hashable {
static var allCases: [Self] {
return [Self](AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<Self> in
var raw = 0
var first: Self?
return AnyIterator {
let current = withUnsafeBytes(of: &raw) { $0.load(as: Self.self) }
if raw == 0 {
first = current
} else if current == first {
return nil
}
raw += 1
return current
}
})
}
}
#endif
I made a utility function iterateEnum() for iterating cases for arbitrary enum types.
Here is the example usage:
enum Suit: String {
case Spades = "♠"
case Hearts = "♥"
case Diamonds = "♦"
case Clubs = "♣"
}
for f in iterateEnum(Suit) {
println(f.rawValue)
}
Which outputs:
♠
♥
♦
♣
But, this is only for debug or test purposes: This relies on several undocumented Swift1.1 compiler behaviors, so, use it at your own risk.
Here is the code:
func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> GeneratorOf<T> {
var cast: (Int -> T)!
switch sizeof(T) {
case 0: return GeneratorOf(GeneratorOfOne(unsafeBitCast((), T.self)))
case 1: cast = { unsafeBitCast(UInt8(truncatingBitPattern: $0), T.self) }
case 2: cast = { unsafeBitCast(UInt16(truncatingBitPattern: $0), T.self) }
case 4: cast = { unsafeBitCast(UInt32(truncatingBitPattern: $0), T.self) }
case 8: cast = { unsafeBitCast(UInt64($0), T.self) }
default: fatalError("cannot be here")
}
var i = 0
return GeneratorOf {
let next = cast(i)
return next.hashValue == i++ ? next : nil
}
}
The underlying idea is:
Memory representation of enum, excluding enums with associated types, is just an index of cases when the count of the cases is 2...256, it's identical to UInt8, when 257...65536, it's UInt16 and so on. So, it can be unsafeBitcast from corresponding unsigned integer types.
.hashValue of enum values is the same as the index of the case.
.hashValue of enum values bitcasted from invalid index is 0.
Revised for Swift2 and implemented casting ideas from #Kametrixom's answer:
func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyGenerator<T> {
var i = 0
return anyGenerator {
let next = withUnsafePointer(&i) { UnsafePointer<T>($0).memory }
return next.hashValue == i++ ? next : nil
}
}
Revised for Swift3:
func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyIterator<T> {
var i = 0
return AnyIterator {
let next = withUnsafePointer(to: &i) {
$0.withMemoryRebound(to: T.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee }
}
if next.hashValue != i { return nil }
i += 1
return next
}
}
Revised for Swift3.0.1:
func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyIterator<T> {
var i = 0
return AnyIterator {
let next = withUnsafeBytes(of: &i) { $0.load(as: T.self) }
if next.hashValue != i { return nil }
i += 1
return next
}
}
The other solutions work but they all make assumptions of for example the number of possible ranks and suits, or what the first and last rank may be. True, the layout of a deck of cards probably isn't going to change much in the foreseeable future. In general, however, it's neater to write code which makes as little assumptions as possible. My solution:
I've added a raw type to the Suit enum, so I can use Suit(rawValue:) to access the Suit cases:
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 1
case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades:
return "spades"
case .Hearts:
return "hearts"
case .Diamonds:
return "diamonds"
case .Clubs:
return "clubs"
}
}
func color() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades:
return "black"
case .Clubs:
return "black"
case .Diamonds:
return "red"
case .Hearts:
return "red"
}
}
}
enum Rank: Int {
case Ace = 1
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Ace:
return "ace"
case .Jack:
return "jack"
case .Queen:
return "queen"
case .King:
return "king"
default:
return String(self.rawValue)
}
}
}
Below the implementation of Card's createDeck() method. init(rawValue:) is a failable initializer and returns an optional. By unwrapping and checking its value in both while statements, there's no need to assume the number of Rank or Suit cases:
struct Card {
var rank: Rank
var suit: Suit
func simpleDescription() -> String {
return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
}
func createDeck() -> [Card] {
var n = 1
var deck = [Card]()
while let rank = Rank(rawValue: n) {
var m = 1
while let suit = Suit(rawValue: m) {
deck.append(Card(rank: rank, suit: suit))
m += 1
}
n += 1
}
return deck
}
}
Here is how to call the createDeck method:
let card = Card(rank: Rank.Ace, suit: Suit.Clubs)
let deck = card.createDeck()
I stumbled around in the bits and bytes and created an extension that I later found out works very similar to #rintaro's answer. It's used like this:
enum E : EnumCollection {
case A, B, C
}
Array(E.cases()) // [A, B, C]
What's remarkable is that it's usable on any enum without associated values. Note that this doesn't work for enums that have no cases.
As with #rintaro's answer, this code uses the underlying representation of an enum. This representation isn't documented and might change in the future, which would break it. I don't recommend the usage of this in production.
Code (Swift 2.2, Xcode 7.3.1, not working on Xcode 10):
protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
static func cases() -> AnySequence<Self> {
typealias S = Self
return AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyGenerator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
}
}
Code (Swift 3, Xcode 8.1, not working on Xcode 10):
protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
static func cases() -> AnySequence<Self> {
typealias S = Self
return AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyIterator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(to: &raw) { $0.withMemoryRebound(to: S.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee } }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
}
}
I have no idea why I need typealias, but the compiler complains without it.
You could iterate through an enum by implementing the ForwardIndexType protocol.
The ForwardIndexType protocol requires you to define a successor() function to step through the elements.
enum Rank: Int, ForwardIndexType {
case Ace = 1
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
// ... other functions
// Option 1 - Figure it out by hand
func successor() -> Rank {
switch self {
case .Ace:
return .Two
case .Two:
return .Three
// ... etc.
default:
return .King
}
}
// Option 2 - Define an operator!
func successor() -> Rank {
return self + 1
}
}
// NOTE: The operator is defined OUTSIDE the class
func + (left: Rank, right: Int) -> Rank {
// I'm using to/from raw here, but again, you can use a case statement
// or whatever else you can think of
return left == .King ? .King : Rank(rawValue: left.rawValue + right)!
}
Iterating over an open or closed range (..< or ...) will internally call the successor() function which allows you to write this:
// Under the covers, successor(Rank.King) and successor(Rank.Ace) are called to establish limits
for r in Rank.Ace...Rank.King {
// Do something useful
}
This problem is now much easier. Here is my Swift 4.2 Solution:
enum Suit: Int, CaseIterable {
case None
case Spade, Heart, Diamond, Club
static let allNonNullCases = Suit.allCases[Spade.rawValue...]
}
enum Rank: Int, CaseIterable {
case Joker
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight
case Nine, Ten, Jack, Queen, King, Ace
static let allNonNullCases = Rank.allCases[Two.rawValue...]
}
func makeDeck(withJoker: Bool = false) -> [Card] {
var deck = [Card]()
for suit in Suit.allNonNullCases {
for rank in Rank.allNonNullCases {
deck.append(Card(suit: suit, rank: rank))
}
}
if withJoker {
deck.append(Card(suit: .None, rank: .Joker))
}
return deck
}
Pre 4.2:
I like this solution which I put together after finding "List comprehension in Swift".
It uses Int raws instead of Strings but it avoids typing twice, it allows customizing the ranges, and doesn't hard code raw values.
This is a Swift 4 version of my original solution but see the 4.2 improvement above:
enum Suit: Int {
case None
case Spade, Heart, Diamond, Club
static let allRawValues = Suit.Spade.rawValue...Suit.Club.rawValue
static let allCases = Array(allRawValues.map{ Suit(rawValue: $0)! })
}
enum Rank: Int {
case Joker
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six
case Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King, Ace
static let allRawValues = Rank.Two.rawValue...Rank.Ace.rawValue
static let allCases = Array(allRawValues.map{ Rank(rawValue: $0)! })
}
func makeDeck(withJoker: Bool = false) -> [Card] {
var deck = [Card]()
for suit in Suit.allCases {
for rank in Rank.allCases {
deck.append(Card(suit: suit, rank: rank))
}
}
if withJoker {
deck.append(Card(suit: .None, rank: .Joker))
}
return deck
}
In principle it is possible to do it this way assuming that you don't use raw values assignment for enum's cases:
enum RankEnum: Int {
case Ace
case One
case Two
}
class RankEnumGenerator: Generator {
var i = 0
typealias Element = RankEnum
func next() -> Element? {
let r = RankEnum.fromRaw(i)
i += 1
return r
}
}
extension RankEnum {
static func enumerate() -> SequenceOf<RankEnum> {
return SequenceOf<RankEnum>({ RankEnumGenerator() })
}
}
for r in RankEnum.enumerate() {
println("\(r.toRaw())")
}
If you give the enum a raw Int value it will make looping much easier.
For example, you can use anyGenerator to get a generator that can enumerate across your values:
enum Suit: Int, CustomStringConvertible {
case Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
var description: String {
switch self {
case .Spades: return "Spades"
case .Hearts: return "Hearts"
case .Diamonds: return "Diamonds"
case .Clubs: return "Clubs"
}
}
static func enumerate() -> AnyGenerator<Suit> {
var nextIndex = Spades.rawValue
return anyGenerator { Suit(rawValue: nextIndex++) }
}
}
// You can now use it like this:
for suit in Suit.enumerate() {
suit.description
}
// or like this:
let allSuits: [Suit] = Array(Suit.enumerate())
However, this looks like a fairly common pattern, wouldn't it be nice if we could make any enum type enumerable by simply conforming to a protocol? Well with Swift 2.0 and protocol extensions, now we can!
Simply add this to your project:
protocol EnumerableEnum {
init?(rawValue: Int)
static func firstValue() -> Int
}
extension EnumerableEnum {
static func enumerate() -> AnyGenerator<Self> {
var nextIndex = firstRawValue()
return anyGenerator { Self(rawValue: nextIndex++) }
}
static func firstRawValue() -> Int { return 0 }
}
Now any time you create an enum (so long as it has an Int raw value), you can make it enumerable by conforming to the protocol:
enum Rank: Int, EnumerableEnum {
case Ace, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Jack, Queen, King
}
// ...
for rank in Rank.enumerate() { ... }
If your enum values don't start with 0 (the default), override the firstRawValue method:
enum DeckColor: Int, EnumerableEnum {
case Red = 10, Blue, Black
static func firstRawValue() -> Int { return Red.rawValue }
}
// ...
let colors = Array(DeckColor.enumerate())
The final Suit class, including replacing simpleDescription with the more standard CustomStringConvertible protocol, will look like this:
enum Suit: Int, CustomStringConvertible, EnumerableEnum {
case Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
var description: String {
switch self {
case .Spades: return "Spades"
case .Hearts: return "Hearts"
case .Diamonds: return "Diamonds"
case .Clubs: return "Clubs"
}
}
}
// ...
for suit in Suit.enumerate() {
print(suit.description)
}
Swift 3 syntax:
protocol EnumerableEnum {
init?(rawValue: Int)
static func firstRawValue() -> Int
}
extension EnumerableEnum {
static func enumerate() -> AnyIterator<Self> {
var nextIndex = firstRawValue()
let iterator: AnyIterator<Self> = AnyIterator {
defer { nextIndex = nextIndex + 1 }
return Self(rawValue: nextIndex)
}
return iterator
}
static func firstRawValue() -> Int {
return 0
}
}
Updated Code : Swift 4.2/Swift 5
enum Suit: String, CaseIterable {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
To access the Output as per question:
for suitKey in Suit.allCases {
print(suitKey.rawValue)
}
Output :
♠
♥
♦
♣
CaseIterable: provides a collection of all of its values.
Types that conform to the CaseIterable protocol are typically enumerations without associated values. When using a CaseIterable type, you can access a collection of all of the type’s cases by using the type’s allCases property.
For accessing cases we are using .allCases. For more information click https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swift/caseiterable
Updated to Swift 2.2+
func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyGenerator<T> {
var i = 0
return AnyGenerator {
let next = withUnsafePointer(&i) {
UnsafePointer<T>($0).memory
}
if next.hashValue == i {
i += 1
return next
} else {
return nil
}
}
}
It's updated code to Swift 2.2 form #Kametrixom's answer
For Swift 3.0+ (many thanks to #Philip)
func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyIterator<T> {
var i = 0
return AnyIterator {
let next = withUnsafePointer(&i) {
UnsafePointer<T>($0).pointee
}
if next.hashValue == i {
i += 1
return next
} else {
return nil
}
}
}
Swift 5 Solution:
enum Suit: String, CaseIterable {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
// access cases like this:
for suitKey in Suit.allCases {
print(suitKey)
}
Xcode 10 with Swift 4.2
enum Filter: String, CaseIterable {
case salary = "Salary"
case experience = "Experience"
case technology = "Technology"
case unutilized = "Unutilized"
case unutilizedHV = "Unutilized High Value"
static let allValues = Filter.allCases.map { $0.rawValue }
}
Call it
print(Filter.allValues)
Prints:
["Salary", "Experience", "Technology", "Unutilized", "Unutilized High Value"]
Older versions
For enum representing Int
enum Filter: Int {
case salary
case experience
case technology
case unutilized
case unutilizedHV
static let allRawValues = salary.rawValue...unutilizedHV.rawValue // First to last case
static let allValues = allRawValues.map { Filter(rawValue: $0)!.rawValue }
}
Call it like this:
print(Filter.allValues)
Prints:
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
For enum representing String
enum Filter: Int {
case salary
case experience
case technology
case unutilized
case unutilizedHV
static let allRawValues = salary.rawValue...unutilizedHV.rawValue // First to last case
static let allValues = allRawValues.map { Filter(rawValue: $0)!.description }
}
extension Filter: CustomStringConvertible {
var description: String {
switch self {
case .salary: return "Salary"
case .experience: return "Experience"
case .technology: return "Technology"
case .unutilized: return "Unutilized"
case .unutilizedHV: return "Unutilized High Value"
}
}
}
Call it
print(Filter.allValues)
Prints:
["Salary", "Experience", "Technology", "Unutilized", "Unutilized High Value"]
I found myself doing .allValues alot throughout my code. I finally figured out a way to simply conform to an Iteratable protocol and have an rawValues() method.
protocol Iteratable {}
extension RawRepresentable where Self: RawRepresentable {
static func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyIterator<T> {
var i = 0
return AnyIterator {
let next = withUnsafePointer(to: &i) {
$0.withMemoryRebound(to: T.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee }
}
if next.hashValue != i { return nil }
i += 1
return next
}
}
}
extension Iteratable where Self: RawRepresentable, Self: Hashable {
static func hashValues() -> AnyIterator<Self> {
return iterateEnum(self)
}
static func rawValues() -> [Self.RawValue] {
return hashValues().map({$0.rawValue})
}
}
// Example
enum Grocery: String, Iteratable {
case Kroger = "kroger"
case HEB = "h.e.b."
case Randalls = "randalls"
}
let groceryHashes = Grocery.hashValues() // AnyIterator<Grocery>
let groceryRawValues = Grocery.rawValues() // ["kroger", "h.e.b.", "randalls"]
EDIT:
Swift Evolution Proposal SE-0194 Derived Collection of Enum Cases proposes a level headed solution to this problem. We see it in Swift 4.2 and newer. The proposal also points out to some workarounds that are similar to some already mentioned here but it might be interesting to see nevertheless.
I will also keep my original post for completeness' sake.
This is yet another approach based on #Peymmankh's answer, adapted to Swift 3.
public protocol EnumCollection: Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
typealias S = Self
let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyIterator {
let current = withUnsafePointer(to: &raw) {
$0.withMemoryRebound(to: S.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee }
}
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
return [S](retVal)
}
enum Rank: Int {
...
static let ranks = (Rank.Ace.rawValue ... Rank.King.rawValue).map{Rank(rawValue: $0)! }
}
enum Suit {
...
static let suits = [Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs]
}
struct Card {
...
static func fullDesk() -> [Card] {
var desk: [Card] = []
for suit in Suit.suits {
for rank in Rank.ranks {
desk.append(Card(rank: rank,suit: suit))
}
}
return desk
}
}
How about this?
You can try to enumerate like this
enum Planet: String {
case Mercury
case Venus
case Earth
case Mars
static var enumerate: [Planet] {
var a: [Planet] = []
switch Planet.Mercury {
case .Mercury: a.append(.Mercury); fallthrough
case .Venus: a.append(.Venus); fallthrough
case .Earth: a.append(.Earth); fallthrough
case .Mars: a.append(.Mars)
}
return a
}
}
Planet.enumerate // [Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars]
In Swift 3, when the underlying enum has rawValue, you could implement the Strideable protocol. The advantages are that no arrays of values are created like in some other suggestions and that the standard Swift "for in" loop works, which makes a nice syntax.
// "Int" to get rawValue, and Strideable so we can iterate
enum MyColorEnum: Int, Strideable {
case Red
case Green
case Blue
case Black
// required by Strideable
typealias Stride = Int
func advanced(by n:Stride) -> MyColorEnum {
var next = self.rawValue + n
if next > MyColorEnum.Black.rawValue {
next = MyColorEnum.Black.rawValue
}
return MyColorEnum(rawValue: next)!
}
func distance(to other: MyColorEnum) -> Int {
return other.rawValue - self.rawValue
}
// just for printing
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Red: return "Red"
case .Green: return "Green"
case .Blue: return "Blue"
case .Black: return "Black"
}
}
}
// this is how you use it:
for i in MyColorEnum.Red ... MyColorEnum.Black {
print("ENUM: \(i)")
}
This solution strikes the right balance of readability and maintainability.
struct Card {
// ...
static func deck() -> Card[] {
var deck = Card[]()
for rank in Rank.Ace.toRaw()...Rank.King.toRaw() {
for suit in [Suit.Spades, .Hearts, .Clubs, .Diamonds] {
let card = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(rank)!, suit: suit)
deck.append(card)
}
}
return deck
}
}
let deck = Card.deck()
Sorry, my answer was specific to how I used this post in what I needed to do. For those who stumble upon this question, looking for a way to find a case within an enum, this is the way to do it (new in Swift 2):
Edit: lowercase camelCase is now the standard for Swift 3 enum values
// From apple docs: If the raw-value type is specified as String and you don’t assign values to the cases explicitly, each unassigned case is implicitly assigned a string with the same text as the name of that case.
enum Theme: String
{
case white, blue, green, lavender, grey
}
func loadTheme(theme: String)
{
// this checks the string against the raw value of each enum case (note that the check could result in a nil value, since it's an optional, which is why we introduce the if/let block
if let testTheme = Theme(rawValue: theme)
{
// testTheme is guaranteed to have an enum value at this point
self.someOtherFunction(testTheme)
}
}
For those wondering about the enumerating on an enum, the answers given on this page that include a static var/let containing an array of all enum values are correct. The latest Apple example code for tvOS contains this exact same technique.
That being said, they should build a more convenient mechanism into the language (Apple, are you listening?)!
The experiment was:
EXPERIMENT
Add a method to Card that creates a full deck of cards, with one card of each combination of rank and suit.
So without modifying or enhancing the given code other than adding the method (and without using stuff that hasn't been taught yet), I came up with this solution:
struct Card {
var rank: Rank
var suit: Suit
func simpleDescription() -> String {
return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
}
func createDeck() -> [Card] {
var deck: [Card] = []
for rank in Rank.Ace.rawValue...Rank.King.rawValue {
for suit in Suit.Spades.rawValue...Suit.Clubs.rawValue {
let card = Card(rank: Rank(rawValue: rank)!, suit: Suit(rawValue: suit)!)
//println(card.simpleDescription())
deck += [card]
}
}
return deck
}
}
let threeOfSpades = Card(rank: .Three, suit: .Spades)
let threeOfSpadesDescription = threeOfSpades.simpleDescription()
let deck = threeOfSpades.createDeck()
Here is a method I use to both iterate an enum and provide multiple values types from one enum
enum IterateEnum: Int {
case Zero
case One
case Two
case Three
case Four
case Five
case Six
case Seven
//tuple allows multiple values to be derived from the enum case, and
//since it is using a switch with no default, if a new case is added,
//a compiler error will be returned if it doesn't have a value tuple set
var value: (french: String, spanish: String, japanese: String) {
switch self {
case .Zero: return (french: "zéro", spanish: "cero", japanese: "nuru")
case .One: return (french: "un", spanish: "uno", japanese: "ichi")
case .Two: return (french: "deux", spanish: "dos", japanese: "ni")
case .Three: return (french: "trois", spanish: "tres", japanese: "san")
case .Four: return (french: "quatre", spanish: "cuatro", japanese: "shi")
case .Five: return (french: "cinq", spanish: "cinco", japanese: "go")
case .Six: return (french: "six", spanish: "seis", japanese: "roku")
case .Seven: return (french: "sept", spanish: "siete", japanese: "shichi")
}
}
//Used to iterate enum or otherwise access enum case by index order.
//Iterate by looping until it returns nil
static func item(index: Int) -> IterateEnum? {
return IterateEnum.init(rawValue: index)
}
static func numberFromSpanish(number: String) -> IterateEnum? {
return findItem { $0.value.spanish == number }
}
//use block to test value property to retrieve the enum case
static func findItem(predicate: ((_: IterateEnum) -> Bool)) -> IterateEnum? {
var enumIndex: Int = -1
var enumCase: IterateEnum?
//Iterate until item returns nil
repeat {
enumIndex += 1
enumCase = IterateEnum.item(index: enumIndex)
if let eCase = enumCase {
if predicate(eCase) {
return eCase
}
}
} while enumCase != nil
return nil
}
}
var enumIndex: Int = -1
var enumCase: IterateEnum?
// Iterate until item returns nil
repeat {
enumIndex += 1
enumCase = IterateEnum.item(index: enumIndex)
if let eCase = enumCase {
print("The number \(eCase) in french: \(eCase.value.french), spanish: \(eCase.value.spanish), japanese: \(eCase.value.japanese)")
}
} while enumCase != nil
print("Total of \(enumIndex) cases")
let number = IterateEnum.numberFromSpanish(number: "siete")
print("siete in japanese: \((number?.value.japanese ?? "Unknown"))")
This is the output:
The number Zero in french: zéro, spanish: cero, japanese: nuru
The number One in french: un, spanish: uno, japanese: ichi
The number Two in french: deux, spanish: dos, japanese: ni
The number Three in french: trois, spanish: tres, japanese: san
The number Four in french: quatre, spanish: cuatro, japanese: shi
The number Five in french: cinq, spanish: cinco, japanese: go
The number Six in french: six, spanish: seis, japanese: roku
The number Seven in french: sept, spanish: siete, japanese: shichi
Total of 8 cases
siete in japanese: shichi
UPDATE
I recently created a protocol to handle the enumeration. The protocol requires an enum with an Int raw value:
protocol EnumIteration {
//Used to iterate enum or otherwise access enum case by index order. Iterate by looping until it returns nil
static func item(index:Int) -> Self?
static func iterate(item:((index:Int, enumCase:Self)->()), completion:(()->())?) {
static func findItem(predicate:((enumCase:Self)->Bool)) -> Self?
static func count() -> Int
}
extension EnumIteration where Self: RawRepresentable, Self.RawValue == Int {
//Used to iterate enum or otherwise access enum case by index order. Iterate by looping until it returns nil
static func item(index:Int) -> Self? {
return Self.init(rawValue: index)
}
static func iterate(item:((index:Int, enumCase:Self)->()), completion:(()->())?) {
var enumIndex:Int = -1
var enumCase:Self?
//Iterate until item returns nil
repeat {
enumIndex += 1
enumCase = Self.item(enumIndex)
if let eCase = enumCase {
item(index: enumIndex, enumCase: eCase)
}
} while enumCase != nil
completion?()
}
static func findItem(predicate:((enumCase:Self)->Bool)) -> Self? {
var enumIndex:Int = -1
var enumCase:Self?
//Iterate until item returns nil
repeat {
enumIndex += 1
enumCase = Self.item(enumIndex)
if let eCase = enumCase {
if predicate(enumCase:eCase) {
return eCase
}
}
} while enumCase != nil
return nil
}
static func count() -> Int {
var enumIndex:Int = -1
var enumCase:Self?
//Iterate until item returns nil
repeat {
enumIndex += 1
enumCase = Self.item(enumIndex)
} while enumCase != nil
//last enumIndex (when enumCase == nil) is equal to the enum count
return enumIndex
}
}
This seems like a hack but if you use raw values you can do something like this
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 0, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
...
}
var suitIndex = 0
while var suit = Suit.fromRaw(suitIndex++) {
...
}
While dealing with Swift 2.0 here is my suggestion:
I have added the raw type to Suit enum
enum Suit: Int {
then:
struct Card {
var rank: Rank
var suit: Suit
func fullDeck()-> [Card] {
var deck = [Card]()
for i in Rank.Ace.rawValue...Rank.King.rawValue {
for j in Suit.Spades.rawValue...Suit.Clubs.rawValue {
deck.append(Card(rank:Rank(rawValue: i)! , suit: Suit(rawValue: j)!))
}
}
return deck
}
}
As with #Kametrixom answer here I believe returning an array would be better than returning AnySequence, since you can have access to all of Array's goodies such as count, etc.
Here's the re-write:
public protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
typealias S = Self
let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyGenerator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
return [S](retVal)
}
}
Another solution:
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
static var count: Int {
return 4
}
init(index: Int) {
switch index {
case 0: self = .spades
case 1: self = .hearts
case 2: self = .diamonds
default: self = .clubs
}
}
}
for i in 0..<Suit.count {
print(Suit(index: i).rawValue)
}
This is a pretty old post, from Swift 2.0. There are now some better solutions here that use newer features of swift 3.0:
Iterating through an Enum in Swift 3.0
And on this question there is a solution that uses a new feature of (the not-yet-released as I write this edit) Swift 4.2:
How do I get the count of a Swift enum?
There are lots of good solutions in this thread and others however some of them are very complicated. I like to simplify as much as possible. Here is a solution which may or may not work for different needs but I think it works well in most cases:
enum Number: String {
case One
case Two
case Three
case Four
case EndIndex
func nextCase () -> Number
{
switch self {
case .One:
return .Two
case .Two:
return .Three
case .Three:
return .Four
case .Four:
return .EndIndex
/*
Add all additional cases above
*/
case .EndIndex:
return .EndIndex
}
}
static var allValues: [String] {
var array: [String] = Array()
var number = Number.One
while number != Number.EndIndex {
array.append(number.rawValue)
number = number.nextCase()
}
return array
}
}
To iterate:
for item in Number.allValues {
print("number is: \(item)")
}
Enums have toRaw() and fromRaw() methods. So if your raw value is an Int, you can iterate from the first to last enum:
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 1
case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades:
return "spades"
case .Hearts:
return "hearts"
case .Diamonds:
return "diamonds"
case .Clubs:
return "clubs"
}
}
}
for i in Suit.Spades.toRaw()...Suit.Clubs.toRaw() {
if let covertedSuit = Suit.fromRaw(i) {
let description = covertedSuit.simpleDescription()
}
}
One gotcha is that you need to test for optional values before running the simpleDescription method, so we set convertedSuit to our value first and then set a constant to convertedSuit.simpleDescription()
Here's my suggested approach. It's not completely satisfactory (I'm very new to Swift and OOP!) but maybe someone can refine it. The idea is to have each enum provide its own range information as .first and .last properties. It adds just two lines of code to each enum: still a bit hard-coded, but at least it's not duplicating the whole set. It does require modifying the Suit enum to be an Int like the Rank enum is, instead of untyped.
Rather than echo the whole solution, here's the code I added to the . enum, somewhere after the case statements (Suit enum is similar):
var first: Int { return Ace.toRaw() }
var last: Int { return King.toRaw() }
and the loop I used to build the deck as an array of String. (The problem definition did not state how the deck was to be structured.)
func createDeck() -> [String] {
var deck: [String] = []
var card: String
for r in Rank.Ace.first...Rank.Ace.last {
for s in Suit.Hearts.first...Suit.Hearts.last {
card = Rank.simpleDescription( Rank.fromRaw(r)!)() + " of " + Suit.simpleDescription( Suit.fromRaw(s)!)()
deck.append( card)
}
}
return deck
}
It's unsatisfactory because the properties are associated to an element rather than to the enum. But it does add clarity to the 'for' loops. I'd like it to say Rank.first instead of Rank.Ace.first. It works (with any element), but it's ugly. Can someone show how to elevate that to the enum level?
And to make it work, I lifted the createDeck method out of the Card struct. I could not figure out how to get a [String] array returned from that struct, and that seems a bad place to put such a method anyway.
I did it using computed property, which returns the array of all values (thanks to this post http://natecook.com/blog/2014/10/loopy-random-enum-ideas/). However, it also uses int raw-values, but I don't need to repeat all members of enumeration in separate property.
UPDATE Xcode 6.1 changed a bit a way how to get enum member using rawValue, so I fixed listing. Also fixed small error with wrong first rawValue.
enum ValidSuits: Int {
case Clubs = 0, Spades, Hearts, Diamonds
func description() -> String {
switch self {
case .Clubs:
return "♣︎"
case .Spades:
return "♠︎"
case .Diamonds:
return "♦︎"
case .Hearts:
return "♥︎"
}
}
static var allSuits: [ValidSuits] {
return Array(
SequenceOf {
() -> GeneratorOf<ValidSuits> in
var i=0
return GeneratorOf<ValidSuits> {
return ValidSuits(rawValue: i++)
}
}
)
}
}