I have two similar (if not identical) node instances that are appearing differently in a deployment diagram (and anywhere else that I use them).
I may have done some odd things in the past while beating EA into submission.
But, now ... by pulling every lever I can imagine, I can't get them to appear the same (or behave the same). The one on the right is consistent with all the other nodes I have.
The colour is off and the "properties" (maybe they're tags?) showing in the body of the one on the left appear but I can't figure out where to edit / remove them.
I've tried:
Element ... Advanced ... Change type (Node --> Device and back to Node just to try and get it to 'forget' anything it's holding onto)
Remove & re-add stereotype to both the Node type (i.e. type from which instance was made) and the instance itself.
Creating a new instance from the same type, just to see what happens. It creates a node instance more like the one on the right.
Early on in developing this model, I created my own MDG technology. My guess is that the node on the left was created from a type in that MDG, which had some attributes available. It's conceivable to me that Sparx is hanging onto those attributes and not providing a way to edit because of the type was changed.
Any guidance on how to manipulate the under lying data (without creating a new node instance and replacing on all diagrams and re-configuring all relationships)?
Those are different elements. You see that the name (FQN) is different on both. Click each and issue Ctrl-G to locate them in the browser.
The green dot on top makes me think that you use your own MDG which puts the dot on <<SUSE>> stereotyped elements. So the MDG is likely what also makes them appear different depending on tagged values.
Regarding the Version and OS shown in the lower compartment of the left class: those are run states. You can edit them via Context/Features../Run State
For the colour of the element, I think what happened is this ... at some point, I selected (Element Context Menu) --> Appearance --> "Default Appearance" and clicked Reset to defaults. Even with a stereotype applied, this reverts to the "unstereotyped" appearance. I grabbed the RGB values from one the element on the right in the image and set the element on the left's values to those numbers and it's all consistent now.
The main question was the Run State variables, which #(Thomas Killian) addresses in another answer.
Related
I'm new to AnyLogic and trying to figure out how Agent-based models should be set there. There is a famous Epidemic model, which I'm trying to reproduce. Most tutorials on classical ABM deal with old GUI settings.
For example, in version 8.5+, which is actual now, the Environment object (that was used for positioning of layouts) has been deprecated.
Now I see that new object Canvas is used to put the layout with agents on the page. But the structure of source code file is a bit unclear for me and I've failed to find relevant description how Canvas can be set for the purpose. (Besides I'm not sure that this is recommended way of doing this task.)
Question: I would love to learn the right way to arbitrary position the area with agents on the page. Below you may see what I get by default.
After some playing around, the 'minimalistic' functionality is as follows.
One should create some population with arbitrary name Person (population name people adds automatically).
The following structure of the Project is to be reproduced (arbitrary names are marked with yellow).
Comment: after adding a Canvas called mapCanvas one adds the function setCanvasCellColor with following body:
mapCanvas.fillCircle(person.getX(), person.getY(), 3, color);
It is clear that former two arguments stand for coordinates of a given point, then its size (i.e. 3) and color. Do not forget to add two arguments used in the body, namely, person as Person and color as Color.
From Entry Action of the statechart named state call the just made function. I've put black color here just for the sake of demonstration; chartreuse constant gets used instead in the Epidemic example.
main.setCanvasCellColor(this, black);
Finally, you may run the model to get the following picture.
Note
If one is reluctant to bother with Canvas, use Main - Presentation - xxx_presentation and click Draw agent with offset to this position checkbox.
I would like to append a Binding node to another Binding node without re-rendering the parent node.
Is there a specific way how Binding.scala would handle this?
Bindings can be nested and composed, so in general it's not something you need to think about. A Binding[T] represents an object that is dynamically bound and will be recomputed when any upstream Binding's value changes.
Your question is a bit ambiguous so you may want to clarify or add a code example, but there is nothing extra you need to do to accomplish your goal. Look at the examples and also this section of the README:
https://github.com/ThoughtWorksInc/Binding.scala/blob/11.0.x/README.md#precise-data-binding
Also, I made a quick example of what I'm talking about here:
https://scalafiddle.io/sf/XZgtwHM/1
If you open up your browser console, you'll see that the method that renders out the parent node is only called the first time, but if you click the button more child elements will be appended without the parent node being affected. Inspect the HTML and pay attention to the id of the parent div, it is set up to increment the ID each time it gets rendered, and the id remains as "parent_1" the whole time.
On object's diagram, I have two different objects inherited from the same class. Unfortunately displayed run states are sorted in a different way. I am trying to sort it but the order of displayed values doesn't change.
Is there any way to sort it? I've tried to set 'Sort Features Alphabetically' but nothing happened.
You need to sort that "manually". t_object.runstate holds
#VAR;Variable=<name>;Value=<val>;Note=<note>;Op=<op>;#ENDVAR
and it will appear in the order right there. So just disassemble the string, re-order as needed and replace it.
EAUI: The sort triangle in the Run State editor has only effect in the editor itself. It does not re-sort the real list. Report a bug (also about a missing "green arrow" which IIRC can be emulated by a strange key shortcut).
I am trying to draw a part decomposition diagram with EA10. It should look like below.
But I couldn't find how. Is this UML diagram ever supported by EA?
Found it. I need to activate the "More tools..." -> "Composite" first. And choose "Port".
BTW, this is really a bad user experience.
You're doing it wrong. Sorry, but there's no kinder way to say it. :)
If the lifeline (:Class) is associated with a classifier (Class) which has properly defined ports (as it should be), then the following applies:
If you create the lifeline by dropping the classifier onto the sequence diagram, you get the option of displaying the ports (aka "structural elements") immediately.
Regardless of how the lifeline was created, you can right-click it and select "Structural Elements" which allows you to select the ports from the classifier (which may have been added since the lifeline was created).
If you want to create ports under a lifeline which has no classifier, you can do that too. Simply right-click and select "Structural Elements". The dialog allows you to create new ports.
The :Class lifeline presumably gets its type information from a Class element, so the first thing you need to do is find the Class element and give it two ports. Once you have done that, you can right-click the lifeline, select the Embedded Elements dialog and include the ports on the lifeline. (The Embedded Elements dialog may have been renamed Structural Elements in recent versions).
I have a custom node type for which I want to have a field that uses a special combobox based on list_text. When one chooses the type list_text it is normally possible to enter a static list of selectable texts, however, I want this list to be dynamic, i.e. based on the results of a db_query. What is the best way to do this using Drupal 7?
A simple example for clarification: A node of this custom type X contains a field that points to another node, so whenever a node of type X is created I want a combobox that contains all other nodes.
(Best solution would be to only display the combobox during node creation, and no longer during edit. But I could also live with it if the combobox was shown during the edit as well.)
I have tried to customize options_select by defining my own data type and implementing hook_options_list accordingly. The combobox was displayed during creation with the correct values, however, I could not save it.. I have no idea what went wrong there, but on the first submit it would change to a different theme, and when I tried again I got an internal server error. Am I on the right track at all with defining a completely new data type for the field? there surely must be a simpler way?
You're right in that you don't need a new datatype. Here's a good tutorial on how to do this. It's not specifically for D7 but I didn't see much that wasn't still applicable. There may be a better way to do it in D7 specifically but I would love to know it too if so :)
The tutorial linked by allegroconmolto sent me on the right way. Thanks for that.
Here's the simpler way of doing it: tutorial
Basically, it is, as I assumed, a common problem and hence a simple solution for it was included in the webform module by now. It provides a hook_webform_select_options_info which can be used to register a callback method. The callback method is then called each time a corresponding option select of a webform is shown, so that you can easily fill it with the results of a dbquery or anything else. Works like a charm and takes next to no time to implement.