Can someone tell me why I am getting different results when using Tuple2[List,List] and List[List] as my Product in the code below? Specifically I would like to know why the second value of the list of lists gets wrapped in another list?
scala> val a = List(1,2,3)
a: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3)
scala> val b = List(4,5,6)
b: List[Int] = List(4, 5, 6)
scala> val c = List(a,b)
c: List[List[Int]] = List(List(1, 2, 3), List(4, 5, 6))
scala> c.productIterator.foreach( println(_) )
List(1, 2, 3)
List(List(4, 5, 6)) // <-- Note this
scala> val d = (a,b)
d: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(1, 2, 3),List(4, 5, 6))
scala> d.productIterator.foreach( println(_) )
List(1, 2, 3)
List(4, 5, 6) // <-- Compared to this
(I have read the (absolutely minimal) description of Scala's Product and the productIterator method on http://www.scala-lang.org/api/current/index.html#scala.Product )
Basically, Tuple means a product between all of its elements, but a non-empty List is a product between its head and tail.
This happens for List, because all case classes extend Product, and represent a product between all their elements similar to tuples. And non-empty List is defined as a case class, containing head and tail: final case class ::[B](override val head: B, private[scala] var tl: List[B]) extends List[B], which inherits the default implementation of Product by case class.
You can observe more of this behaviour with other Lists with 1 or more than 2 elements:
scala> List(a).productIterator.foreach(println)
List(1, 2, 3)
List()
scala> List(a, a).productIterator.foreach(println)
List(1, 2, 3)
List(List(1, 2, 3))
scala> List(a, a, a).productIterator.foreach(println)
List(1, 2, 3)
List(List(1, 2, 3), List(1, 2, 3))
Related
How can I merge two lists / Seqs so it takes 1 element from list 1, then 1 element from list 2, and so on, instead of just appending list 2 at the end of list 1?
E.g
[1,2] + [3,4] = [1,3,2,4]
and not [1,2,3,4]
Any ideas? Most concat methods I've looked at seem to do to the latter and not the former.
Another way:
List(List(1,2), List(3,4)).transpose.flatten
So maybe your collections aren't always the same size. Using zip in that situation would create data loss.
def interleave[A](a :Seq[A], b :Seq[A]) :Seq[A] =
if (a.isEmpty) b else if (b.isEmpty) a
else a.head +: b.head +: interleave(a.tail, b.tail)
interleave(List(1, 2, 17, 27)
,Vector(3, 4)) //res0: Seq[Int] = List(1, 3, 2, 4, 17, 27)
You can do:
val l1 = List(1, 2)
val l2 = List(3, 4)
l1.zip(l2).flatMap { case (a, b) => List(a, b) }
Try
List(1,2)
.zip(List(3,4))
.flatMap(v => List(v._1, v._2))
which outputs
res0: List[Int] = List(1, 3, 2, 4)
Also consider the following implicit class
implicit class ListIntercalate[T](lhs: List[T]) {
def intercalate(rhs: List[T]): List[T] = lhs match {
case head :: tail => head :: (rhs.intercalate(tail))
case _ => rhs
}
}
List(1,2) intercalate List(3,4)
List(1,2,5,6,6,7,8,0) intercalate List(3,4)
which outputs
res2: List[Int] = List(1, 3, 2, 4)
res3: List[Int] = List(1, 3, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7, 8, 0)
For example, if I have a list of List(1,2,1,3,2), and I want to remove only one 1, so the I get List(2,1,3,2). If the other 1 was removed it would be fine.
My solution is:
scala> val myList = List(1,2,1,3,2)
myList: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 1, 3, 2)
scala> myList.patch(myList.indexOf(1), List(), 1)
res7: List[Int] = List(2, 1, 3, 2)
But I feel like I am missing a simpler solution, if so what am I missing?
surely not simpler:
def rm(xs: List[Int], value: Int): List[Int] = xs match {
case `value` :: tail => tail
case x :: tail => x :: rm(tail, value)
case _ => Nil
}
use:
scala> val xs = List(1, 2, 1, 3)
xs: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 1, 3)
scala> rm(xs, 1)
res21: List[Int] = List(2, 1, 3)
scala> rm(rm(xs, 1), 1)
res22: List[Int] = List(2, 3)
scala> rm(xs, 2)
res23: List[Int] = List(1, 1, 3)
scala> rm(xs, 3)
res24: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 1)
you can zipWithIndex and filter out the index you want to drop.
scala> val myList = List(1,2,1,3,2)
myList: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 1, 3, 2)
scala> myList.zipWithIndex.filter(_._2 != 0).map(_._1)
res1: List[Int] = List(2, 1, 3, 2)
The filter + map is collect,
scala> myList.zipWithIndex.collect { case (elem, index) if index != 0 => elem }
res2: List[Int] = List(2, 1, 3, 2)
To remove first occurrence of elem, you can split at first occurance, drop the element and merge back.
list.span(_ != 1) match { case (before, atAndAfter) => before ::: atAndAfter.drop(1) }
Following is expanded answer,
val list = List(1, 2, 1, 3, 2)
//split AT first occurance
val elementToRemove = 1
val (beforeFirstOccurance, atAndAfterFirstOccurance) = list.span(_ != elementToRemove)
beforeFirstOccurance ::: atAndAfterFirstOccurance.drop(1) // shouldBe List(2, 1, 3, 2)
Resource
How to remove an item from a list in Scala having only its index?
How should I remove the first occurrence of an object from a list in Scala?
List is immutable, so you can’t delete elements from it, but you can filter out the elements you don’t want while you assign the result to a new variable:
scala> val originalList = List(5, 1, 4, 3, 2)
originalList: List[Int] = List(5, 1, 4, 3, 2)
scala> val newList = originalList.filter(_ > 2)
newList: List[Int] = List(5, 4, 3)
Rather than continually assigning the result of operations like this to a new variable, you can declare your variable as a var and reassign the result of the operation back to itself:
scala> var x = List(5, 1, 4, 3, 2)
x: List[Int] = List(5, 1, 4, 3, 2)
scala> x = x.filter(_ > 2)
x: List[Int] = List(5, 4, 3)
Working with Lists in Scala I would like a simple way to get all elements but the last element. Is there a complementary method for .last similar to .head/.tail complement?
I'd rather not dirty up code with something like:
val x: List[String] = List("abc", "def", "ghi")
val allButLast: List[String] = x.reverse.tail.reverse
// List(abc, def)
Thanks.
init selects all elements but the last one.
List API for init.
scala> List(1,2,3,4,5)
res0: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
scala> res0.init
res1: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3, 4)
The 4 related methods here are head, tail, init, and last.
head and last get the first and final member, whereas
tail and init exclude the first and final members.
scala> val list = (0 to 10).toList
list: List[Int] = List(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
scala> list.head
res0: Int = 0
scala> list.tail
res1: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
scala> list.init
res2: List[Int] = List(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
scala> list.last
res3: Int = 10
You should also take care, because all 4 of them are unsafe on the empty list and will throw exceptions.
These methods are defined on GenTraversableLike, which List implements.
That's init.
link to Scaladoc: http://www.scala-lang.org/api/2.11.5/index.html#scala.collection.immutable.List#init:Repr
def init: List[A]
Selects all elements except the last.
Also, note that it's defined in GenTraversableLike, so pretty much any Scala collection has this method.
For dropping off any number of items from the end of a list consider dropRight,
val xs = (1 to 5).toList
xs.dropRight(1)
List(1, 2, 3, 4)
xs.dropRight(2)
List(1, 2, 3)
xs.dropRight(10)
List()
What I want to do is sort List objects in Scala, not sort the elements in the list. For example If I have two lists of Ints:
val l1 = List(1, 2, 3, 7)
val l2 = List(1, 2, 3, 4, 10)
I want to be able to put them in order where l1 > l2.
I have created a case class that does what I need it to but the problem is that when I use it none of my other methods work. Do I need to implement all the other methods in the class i.e. flatten, sortWith etc.?
My class code looks like this:
class ItemSet(itemSet: List[Int]) extends Ordered[ItemSet] {
val iSet: List[Int] = itemSet
def compare(that: ItemSet) = {
val thisSize = this.iSet.size
val thatSize = that.iSet.size
val hint = List(thisSize, thatSize).min
var result = 0
var loop = 0
val ths = this.iSet.toArray
val tht = that.iSet.toArray
while (loop < hint && result == 0) {
result = ths(loop).compare(tht(loop))
loop += 1
}
if (loop == hint && result == 0 && thisSize != thatSize) {
thisSize.compare(thatSize)
} else
result
}
}
Now if I create an Array of ItemSets I can sort it:
val is1 = new ItemSet(List(1, 2, 5, 8))
val is2 = new ItemSet(List(1, 2, 5, 6))
val is3 = new ItemSet(List(1, 2, 3, 7, 10))
Array(is1, is2, is3).sorted.foreach(i => println(i.iSet))
scala> List(1, 2, 3, 7, 10)
List(1, 2, 5, 6)
List(1, 2, 5, 8)
The two methods that are giving me problems are:
def itemFrequencies(transDB: Array[ItemSet]): Map[Int, Int] = transDB.flatten.groupBy(x => x).mapValues(_.size)
The error I get is:
Expression of type Map[Nothing, Int] doesn't conform to expected type Map[Int, Int]
And for this one:
def sortListAscFreq(transDB: Array[ItemSet], itemFreq: Map[Int, Int]): Array[List[Int]] = {
for (l <- transDB) yield
l.sortWith(itemFreq(_) < itemFreq(_))
}
I get:
Cannot resolve symbol sortWith.
Is there a way I can just extend List[Int] so that I can sort a collection of lists without loosing the functionality of other methods?
The standard library provides a lexicographic ordering for collections of ordered things. You can put it into scope and you're done:
scala> import scala.math.Ordering.Implicits._
import scala.math.Ordering.Implicits._
scala> val is1 = List(1, 2, 5, 8)
is1: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 5, 8)
scala> val is2 = List(1, 2, 5, 6)
is2: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 5, 6)
scala> val is3 = List(1, 2, 3, 7, 10)
is3: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3, 7, 10)
scala> Array(is1, is2, is3).sorted foreach println
List(1, 2, 3, 7, 10)
List(1, 2, 5, 6)
List(1, 2, 5, 8)
The Ordering type class is often more convenient than Ordered in Scala—it allows you to specify how some existing type should be ordered without having to change its code or create a proxy class that extends Ordered[Whatever], which as you've seen can get messy very quickly.
After going through some examples on the web I realize that there is a way to write an anonymous function without the underscore when only a single arg. Also, I'm experimenting with the "span" method on List, which I never knew existed. Anyway, here is my REPL session:
scala> val nums = List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
nums: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
scala> nums span (_ != 3)
res0: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(1, 2),List(3, 4, 5))
scala> nums span (3 !=)
res1: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(1, 2),List(3, 4, 5))
So far so good. But when I try to use the "less than" operator:
scala> nums span (_ < 3)
res2: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(1, 2),List(3, 4, 5))
scala> nums span (3 <)
res3: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(),List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5))
Why is this behaving differently?
scala> nums span (_ < 3)
res0: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(1, 2),List(3, 4, 5))
scala> nums span (3 >)
res1: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(1, 2),List(3, 4, 5))
3 < is a shortcut to 3 < _, which creates a partially applied function from method call.
It's behaving correctly:
scala> nums span (3 < _)
res4: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(),List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5))
The predicate is false for the first element of the list, so the first list returned by span is empty.
scala> nums span (3 < _)
res0: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(),List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5))
// is equivalent to
scala> (nums takeWhile{3 < _}, nums.dropWhile{3 < _})
res1: (List[Int], List[Int]) = (List(),List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5))
where
the predicate is false already for the first element(1) therefore nums.takeWhile{false} results in the empty list List()
For the second part nothing is dropped because the predicate is false already for the first
element(1) and therefore the nums.dropWhile{false} is the whole list List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5).